HOLY CRAP!! IPCC violates all 8 criteria for following scientific method!!

[CrusaderFrank]

And you are clearly not a person who is based in science when you essentially made the same argument he did in your statement " There are not natural explanations......". Lack of another theory or answer is not proof of your theory, science is proof.

Then do some science, hypocrite. So far, you and your side have done absolute zilch for science. By your own standards, that means everything you say is crap.

What's the theory of denialism? How do you explain the current fast warming? And no, waving your hands around and screaming "natural causes" is not a theory, it's a cowardly evasion. "Natural cycles!" isn't a theory, any more than "God did it" is a theory. Natural cycles have to have causes. Name them, and show your evidence that those cycles are now causing fast warming.

Consensus isn't science

 

[jillian]

And get this...........only 1% of science journals articles follow the scientific method.

In other words........."climate science" is a fraud s0ns!!


J Scott Armstrong: Fewer Than 1 Percent Of Papers in Scientific Journals Follow Scientific Method

Fewer than 1 percent of papers published in scientific journals follow the scientific method, according to research by Wharton School professor and forecasting expert J. Scott Armstrong

According to Armstrong, forecasts from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) violate all eight criteria.

“Why is this all happening? Nobody asks them!” said Armstrong, who says that people who submit papers to journals are not required to follow the scientific method. “You send something to a journal and they don’t tell you what you have to do. They don’t say ‘here’s what science is, here’s how to do it.'”


J Scott Armstrong: Fewer Than 1 Percent Of Papers in Scientific Journals Follow Scientific Method - Breitbart




Of course, the alarmist k00ks will kneejerk on the source of the article.........a typical stunt pulled by snowflakes these days. Highly ghey btw..........

But check the link and see the 8 criteria........climate change science doesn't give a shit about them.

breitbart?

lying lunatic rightwingnut failure.

 

[polarbear]

Jesus H. Fucking Christ.

RWNJs never ever look to see who funds these lies.

facts don't matter to progressives s0ns..........never will. Trump is smashing "climate science" because he can......its what the people want!!. The people are sick and tired of the fraud of climate science.

Anyone who ever made a buck in energy production & exploration is a liar and can not be trusted. That`s what the dimwits have been told by the lying scumbags who can`t get a grip on the reality that their lying bitch lost the election because the rest of us were fed up with their lies.

 

[skookerasbil]

And get this...........only 1% of science journals articles follow the scientific method.

In other words........."climate science" is a fraud s0ns!!


J Scott Armstrong: Fewer Than 1 Percent Of Papers in Scientific Journals Follow Scientific Method

Fewer than 1 percent of papers published in scientific journals follow the scientific method, according to research by Wharton School professor and forecasting expert J. Scott Armstrong

According to Armstrong, forecasts from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) violate all eight criteria.

“Why is this all happening? Nobody asks them!” said Armstrong, who says that people who submit papers to journals are not required to follow the scientific method. “You send something to a journal and they don’t tell you what you have to do. They don’t say ‘here’s what science is, here’s how to do it.'”


J Scott Armstrong: Fewer Than 1 Percent Of Papers in Scientific Journals Follow Scientific Method - Breitbart




Of course, the alarmist k00ks will kneejerk on the source of the article.........a typical stunt pulled by snowflakes these days. Highly ghey btw..........

But check the link and see the 8 criteria........climate change science doesn't give a shit about them.

breitbart?

lying lunatic rightwingnut failure.

LOL.....this is about the best progressives can do these days.......just attack the messenger. When your arguments are so absurdly ghey, its all you have left.

So ummm............if the consensus is so irrefutable, why do the AGW alarmists fall all over themselves trying in vain to defend it in here?

 

[polarbear]

And get this...........only 1% of science journals articles follow the scientific method.

In other words........."climate science" is a fraud s0ns!!


J Scott Armstrong: Fewer Than 1 Percent Of Papers in Scientific Journals Follow Scientific Method

Fewer than 1 percent of papers published in scientific journals follow the scientific method, according to research by Wharton School professor and forecasting expert J. Scott Armstrong

According to Armstrong, forecasts from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) violate all eight criteria.

“Why is this all happening? Nobody asks them!” said Armstrong, who says that people who submit papers to journals are not required to follow the scientific method. “You send something to a journal and they don’t tell you what you have to do. They don’t say ‘here’s what science is, here’s how to do it.'”


J Scott Armstrong: Fewer Than 1 Percent Of Papers in Scientific Journals Follow Scientific Method - Breitbart




Of course, the alarmist k00ks will kneejerk on the source of the article.........a typical stunt pulled by snowflakes these days. Highly ghey btw..........

But check the link and see the 8 criteria........climate change science doesn't give a shit about them.

breitbart?

lying lunatic rightwingnut failure.

LOL.....this is about the best progressives can do these days.......just attack the messenger. When your arguments are so absurdly ghey, its all you have left.

So ummm............if the consensus is so irrefutable, why do the AGW alarmists fall all over themselves trying in vain to defend it in here?

All that`s missing now is the race card without it they can`t ever have a full deck of (their) cards.
These 8 criteria you listed are as counterproductive to Dems as the (criminal) laws on the books that prevent them from forcing their agenda down everybody`s throat.