Steinlight
VIP Member
- Jan 30, 2014
- 4,508
- 289
- 85
Well, it looks like he did. But nothing he did was unconstitutional or infringed on the liberty of the crossdresser.They don't need an official code, school administrations can make whatever rules on dress that they wish.If she doesn't like the dress code, she doesn't have to attend the prom or can create a cross dressing prom of her own. A dress code at a prom in no way violates her individual liberty or constitutional rights."Homosexual whines she can't wear tuxedo to prom."
And here we see the stupidity common to most on the right, the fear of diversity, dissent, and expressions of individual liberty, the unwarranted, unjustified need of conservatives to compel conformity at the expense of individual liberty.
'Love's mother, Geraldine Jackson, said Taylor told her faculty members said they wouldn't supervise the April 24 prom if girls wore tuxes. "That's his exact words. 'Girls wear dresses and boys wear tuxes, and that's the way it is,'" she said.'
Let her wear the tux, who cares, it 'hurts' no one if she does.
Again... the dress code doesn't exist. The principal made it up.
As before, this in no way violates the girl's liberty or constitutional rights. There is no constitutional right to cross dress at school.
The school board said that he CAN'T make up policies.