emilynghiem
Constitutionalist / Universalist
I have a longstanding issue with people/groups either framing homosexuality as "always unnatural" or "not a choice but the person's born nature." Only one or the other, either/or, and pushing one position while denouncing the other as false.
What is WRONG with acknowledging that people may fall under either type?
Some may be born with such tendency, some may or may not develop or act on it, others may be naturally heterosexual, but after abuse were conditioned toward homosexuality (where some people have reported being healed of these conditions and attractions AFTER the abuse was healed that caused it!) Why can't all these be possible?
Are you one of those people who believes that
if people change their orientation and are no longer homosexual
then they weren't homosexual to begin with?
Doesn't that imply that homosexuality is a choice for such people?
Which way is it? Or does it depend on the person which is going on?
Thanks, just tired of hearing people argue one side over the other,
when many different experiences and situations exist for different people!
If Diabetes can have two types
Type I that is genetic and
Type II that can develop from other factors
and people can be
born with Cancer
or develop it later from certain circumstantial factors
and yet people can be treated and cured of either
type of cancer even if they were born with it
Why not acknowledge different situations going on
with homosexuality? Why does it have to be framed all one way or the other?
What is WRONG with acknowledging that people may fall under either type?
Some may be born with such tendency, some may or may not develop or act on it, others may be naturally heterosexual, but after abuse were conditioned toward homosexuality (where some people have reported being healed of these conditions and attractions AFTER the abuse was healed that caused it!) Why can't all these be possible?
Are you one of those people who believes that
if people change their orientation and are no longer homosexual
then they weren't homosexual to begin with?
Doesn't that imply that homosexuality is a choice for such people?
Which way is it? Or does it depend on the person which is going on?
Thanks, just tired of hearing people argue one side over the other,
when many different experiences and situations exist for different people!
If Diabetes can have two types
Type I that is genetic and
Type II that can develop from other factors
and people can be
born with Cancer
or develop it later from certain circumstantial factors
and yet people can be treated and cured of either
type of cancer even if they were born with it
Why not acknowledge different situations going on
with homosexuality? Why does it have to be framed all one way or the other?