pknopp
Diamond Member
- Jul 22, 2019
- 71,606
- 27,716
- 2,210
guns for defense are an investment not a useless debt,,
Defense is supposed to be paid for also. If you think so highly of it, you should have no problem paying for it.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
guns for defense are an investment not a useless debt,,
I pay for it every yr,, the least they coukld do is give me a gun to defend the country,,Defense is supposed to be paid for also. If you think so highly of it, you should have no problem paying for it.
Doesn't matter. Does it shoot straight, have bullets, and has a cleaning kit? If yes, let them have them. They love their country and believe in freedom and Democracy.The question was not about some random rifles.
Doesn't matter. Does it shoot straight, have bullets, and has a cleaning kit? If yes, let them have them. They love their country and believe in freedom and Democracy.
Do you think they want to be part of that same Russian population of fifty cities protesting this war and a murdering dictator? No! They want to be free.
who ever said that would happen??Do I support giving people random guns where we have no idea the condition? No.
Not your kind. You people don't know the meaning of the word.Why not? They support Democracy and they love their country. Do you support Democracy?
disagreeing doesnt tell me who said that would happen,,Do I support giving people random guns where we have no idea the condition? No.
As the patriarch I'm responsible for the arming of my family.Wow, you fighting against Trump and Putin? Damn son, I'm impressed.
democracy is a horrible thing that needs to be eradicated from the planet,,Why not? They support Democracy and they love their country. Do you support Democracy?
I have always been pro-gun. But your attempt to draw some sort of parallel between Ukrainians being handed weapons of war and Democratic gun control is pathetic.So you oppose government restricting your right to own a gun and the silly laws pushed by the Demonazi Party
reagan or congress doesnt have legal authority to make them illegal,,I have always been pro-gun. But your attempt to draw some sort of parallel between Ukrainians being handed weapons of war and Democratic gun control is pathetic.
In fact, the very Democratic argument is that large capacity magazines and "assault weapons" are weapons of war.
So you are defeating whatever point you think you are making.
What's more, the AKs the Ukrainian population is being handed are fully automatic weapons, which have been illegal in the US since Reagan outlawed them.
'
They did, they do, and they are.reagan or congress doesnt have legal authority to make them illegal,,
yeah and congress and SCOTUS get it right every time,,They did, they do, and they are.
![]()
Supreme Court Lets Stand Ban on Machine Gun Ownership
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to recognize a constitutional right to own machine guns sought by the National Rifle Assn., which had described a lower court's ruling in the matter as "the first ban on firearms possession by law-abiding citizens in American history."www.latimes.com
reagan or congress doesnt have legal authority to make them illegal,,
shall not be infringedThey did, they do, and they are.
![]()
Supreme Court Lets Stand Ban on Machine Gun Ownership
The Supreme Court on Monday declined to recognize a constitutional right to own machine guns sought by the National Rifle Assn., which had described a lower court's ruling in the matter as "the first ban on firearms possession by law-abiding citizens in American history."www.latimes.com
So we are entitled to own nukes?shall not be infrined
doesnt make it legal,, its not the only unconstitutional law on the books,,True but they passed the law anyway.
I don't do red herringsSo we are entitled to own nukes?
sure why not??So we are entitled to own nukes?
doesnt make it legal,, its not the only unconstitutional law on the books,,