How a lot of folks are feeling

I'm very likely the guy who taught them how to do MOUT. Me or someone very like me.

They'll handle any lunatics just fine. I'm not concerned.
Yeah, I think you are.... the constant shit talking is kind of a giveaway.

Oh I'm not.

Go get'em rambo. Prove me wrong.

Just kidding. We both know you won't DO anything.
And there's the shit talking.....

You're right. We're both shit-TALKING.

Just talking, not doing. Isn't that right, drama queen?
Don't worry about me, I stay plenty busy, lol.

"All politics is local ".
 
In the complete compendium of famous last words, that's number three.

That's nice.

But this is the internet and people are full of shit on here.
Can't argue with that. I know more than one regular on here that is lying our has lied about their military service.

BUT...even if this person isn't what he says he is...others who feel the same are. Dismissing the premise based on the messenger is an error.

Others who feel the same are equally harmless.
 
I know evidence hasn't been presented to any court yet, and that you're trying very hard to avoid that little fact. Which you wouldn't if you really believed that the evidence was worthless.

The courts obviously don't think the evidence is sufficient.

If you weren't a brainwashed retard, you might understand why.
I do know why.
I learned long ago that most people would compromise their integrity to keep their paychecks.

Thanks for confirming.

Again, if you weren't a brainwashed retard, you might understand why.
I don't understand cowardice; I never have.

I don't think it's something to aspire to.
 
I know evidence hasn't been presented to any court yet, and that you're trying very hard to avoid that little fact. Which you wouldn't if you really believed that the evidence was worthless.

The courts obviously don't think the evidence is sufficient.

If you weren't a brainwashed retard, you might understand why.
They haven't heard the evidence, fool.
Every case has been dismissed on procedural grounds.

Are you claiming that you guys aren't competent enough to get the procedural grounds straightened out?
I don't believe the courts want do hear it.

It's a catch 22.

As with every other aspect of human existence...it is far easier to do nothing than do the right thing.
 
I know evidence hasn't been presented to any court yet, and that you're trying very hard to avoid that little fact. Which you wouldn't if you really believed that the evidence was worthless.

The courts obviously don't think the evidence is sufficient.

If you weren't a brainwashed retard, you might understand why.
I do know why.
I learned long ago that most people would compromise their integrity to keep their paychecks.

Thanks for confirming.

Again, if you weren't a brainwashed retard, you might understand why.
I don't understand cowardice; I never have.

I don't think it's something to aspire to.

Sounds to me like you're a pretty big coward.

Clearly you're not going to do anything other than talk.
 
I know evidence hasn't been presented to any court yet, and that you're trying very hard to avoid that little fact. Which you wouldn't if you really believed that the evidence was worthless.

The courts obviously don't think the evidence is sufficient.

If you weren't a brainwashed retard, you might understand why.
They haven't heard the evidence, fool.
Every case has been dismissed on procedural grounds.

Are you claiming that you guys aren't competent enough to get the procedural grounds straightened out?
I don't believe the courts want do hear it.

It's a catch 22.

As with every other aspect of human existence...it is far easier to do nothing than do the right thing.

I believe if you had overwhelming evidence, the courts would listen. You don't, so they treat you like a bunch of tinfoil hat morons, which you are.
 
I know evidence hasn't been presented to any court yet, and that you're trying very hard to avoid that little fact. Which you wouldn't if you really believed that the evidence was worthless.

The courts obviously don't think the evidence is sufficient.

If you weren't a brainwashed retard, you might understand why.
I do know why.
I learned long ago that most people would compromise their integrity to keep their paychecks.

Thanks for confirming.

Again, if you weren't a brainwashed retard, you might understand why.
I don't understand cowardice; I never have.

I don't think it's something to aspire to.

Sounds to me like you're a pretty big coward.

Clearly you're not going to do anything other than talk.
Sounds to me like you enjoy taunting people from behind a keyboard.
I don't believe you would speak that way to me in person.
 
Sounds to me like you enjoy taunting people from behind a keyboard.
I don't believe you would speak that way to me in person.

You wouldn't talk the way you do in person, so I wouldn't need to. That's the point.

People like you say ridiculous things in message boards, but we both know you wouldn't actually DO any of those things. You're all talk, no action. We call you keyboard warriors.
 
Sounds to me like you enjoy taunting people from behind a keyboard.
I don't believe you would speak that way to me in person.

You wouldn't talk the way you do in person, so I wouldn't need to. That's the point.

People like you say ridiculous things in message boards, but we both know you wouldn't actually DO any of those things. You're all talk, no action. We call you keyboard warriors.
Okay.
Sunday afternoon, I'll be at a place called West of the Brazos on 36, near Damon.

Bring your ass.
 
None of that is going to happen.
None of what?

If democrats fail to steal the runoff elections in georgia biden will be facing a republican roadblock to his agenda in the senate

and the prediction is that your president will just rule by executive order instead of passing laws

I think thats a very real possibility

and you will have to think up a lot of excuses to defend it
 
I've been trained on collecting evidence how about you?

Go present it to the courts and let me know how long they last before they laugh at you.
For some reason, the judges are ignoring years of court precedence

What precedence is that?
Bush v Gore
And this one
 

Forum List

Back
Top