Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That's not what you said earlier!
But I'm glad you finally came around to my side on that.
Thank You!
Why didn't you quote what I said earlier?
I didn't "finally come around" to your side. I stated correctly, if you could travel the speed of light, you could stop time. I gave a hypothetical about twins, one on earth and one traveling near the speed of light. This is a popular hypothetical taught in most quantum physics classes. It demonstrates how we DO "travel in time" because time is relative. I never said a damn thing about traveling BACK in time. In my hypothetical, the twin travels into the future, not the past.
What you are doing is what most of the morons at this site do, you are morphing things I say into some absurd and ridiculous thing that I never said, then trying to strong arm your fucking way to an argumentative win. It's sad and pathetic. Go fuck yourself!
Because I knew you would deny saying it if I didn't quote you, I know pompous know-it-alls like you like the back of my hand. That's why I'm glad we are on a messageboard rather than arguing in person where you can simply deny what you said and get away with it. Of course you will deny what you said even after I post it and play word games that you didn't mean what you said, but at least it will be there for everyone to see.
Now we can't presently time travel because we can't go faster than the speed of light. In fact, up until recently, it was thought that nothing could go faster than the speed of light. It contradicts classical physics or Newtonian physics. It even challenges Einsteinian physics. But theoretical physicists who are pioneering quantum physics say that it IS a possibility.
How did the Universe (i.e. everything that exists) get here?
And if you believe there are multiple universes, then how did the Multiverse get here?
We know the Universe wasn't always here, and will end sometime in the future.
How did everything begin, and what happens after the end?
I'm looking for an answer from those of you who say God definitely does not exist.
We don't know. Time, for instance, appears to have begun with the Big Bang, so there might not have been any cause for the Universe to be an effect of since there was probably no time for a cause to exist in. Applying concepts like time and causality to the Big Bang might be comparable to asking What is north of the North Pole? ultimately nonsensical and incoherent.
In fact, something can come from nothing and we are able to observe it in the form of virtual particles and quantum vacuum fluctuations. They explain why the early universe lacked uniformity and provided the seeds for the emergence of structure. These quantum phenomena are also causeless in the sense that they are objectively and irreducibly random, a fact confirmed by tests of non-local realism and Bells Theorem.
Can I ask you something? The hack pseudo-science website you are copying and pasting this incoherent babble from... are they paying you? Because all you seem to be doing is free advertising for them. I seriously doubt you have the intellectual competence to even understand half the shit you post about. I've seen these same paragraphs posted by you numerous times in numerous threads. You're simply flooding the board with this stuff like some kind of fucking autobot. I really do hope you are smart enough to have worked out a payment arrangement for your work. I would hate to think you're doing this for free.
since there was probably no time for a cause to exist in.
Where is the evidence that "cause" requires time to exist in?
In fact, something can come from nothing and we are able to observe it in the form of virtual particles and quantum vacuum fluctuations.
Not true. We've NEVER observed something coming from nothing.
Applying concepts like time and causality to the Big Bang might be comparable to asking What is north of the North Pole?
Nonsense. The North Pole is a geographic location, there is nothing north of it. Time is not a concept. It is a dimension in space-time continuum, one of four dimensions that comprise reality. In theory, time and space does not exist until the Singularity which is the beginning of the Big Bang... but this is a THEORY!
Causation is logic, and while there is no requirement for logic to apply when dealing with origin of the universe, it certainly applies to Newton's Laws of Motion. If the universe is in motion, something set it into motion. Now you are saying we don't need to explain this, but in order to explain it, we logically DO need to explain it. We can't claim it is unexplained yet explained... that defies logic.
since there was probably no time for a cause to exist in.
Where is the evidence that "cause" requires time to exist in?
In fact, something can come from nothing and we are able to observe it in the form of virtual particles and quantum vacuum fluctuations.
Not true. We've NEVER observed something coming from nothing.
Applying concepts like time and causality to the Big Bang might be comparable to asking What is north of the North Pole?
Nonsense. The North Pole is a geographic location, there is nothing north of it. Time is not a concept. It is a dimension in space-time continuum, one of four dimensions that comprise reality. In theory, time and space does not exist until the Singularity which is the beginning of the Big Bang... but this is a THEORY!
Causation is logic, and while there is no requirement for logic to apply when dealing with origin of the universe, it certainly applies to Newton's Laws of Motion. If the universe is in motion, something set it into motion. Now you are saying we don't need to explain this, but in order to explain it, we logically DO need to explain it. We can't claim it is unexplained yet explained... that defies logic.
Tell Einstein, Hawking and Kaku... I'm just the messenger!
Einstein just turned over in his grave!!!
Uhm.. Einstein is who discovered time is relative. If he turned over it's because some idiot called 'bullshit' on that 109 years later.
Why didn't you quote what I said earlier?
I didn't "finally come around" to your side. I stated correctly, if you could travel the speed of light, you could stop time. I gave a hypothetical about twins, one on earth and one traveling near the speed of light. This is a popular hypothetical taught in most quantum physics classes. It demonstrates how we DO "travel in time" because time is relative. I never said a damn thing about traveling BACK in time. In my hypothetical, the twin travels into the future, not the past.
What you are doing is what most of the morons at this site do, you are morphing things I say into some absurd and ridiculous thing that I never said, then trying to strong arm your fucking way to an argumentative win. It's sad and pathetic. Go fuck yourself!
Because I knew you would deny saying it if I didn't quote you, I know pompous know-it-alls like you like the back of my hand. That's why I'm glad we are on a messageboard rather than arguing in person where you can simply deny what you said and get away with it. Of course you will deny what you said even after I post it and play word games that you didn't mean what you said, but at least it will be there for everyone to see.
Now we can't presently time travel because we can't go faster than the speed of light. In fact, up until recently, it was thought that nothing could go faster than the speed of light. It contradicts classical physics or Newtonian physics. It even challenges Einsteinian physics. But theoretical physicists who are pioneering quantum physics say that it IS a possibility.
Now we can't presently time travel because we can't go faster than the speed of light.
As anyone with a fucking brain in their head can see... NOT A DAMN WORD ABOUT GOING BACK IN TIME!
As I said, you seek to morph my words into absurdities you can then attack and puff your chest out, as IF you have won an argument. It's sad and pathetic.
or what!
For those readers who are more interested in the subject of time and time travel, as opposed to following eddy's pathetic and sad attempts to "win" an argument with me, here are a couple of short video clips:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bf2B7DN3tqc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MO_Q_f1WgQI
How did the Universe (i.e. everything that exists) get here?
And if you believe there are multiple universes, then how did the Multiverse get here?
We know the Universe wasn't always here, and will end sometime in the future.
How did everything begin, and what happens after the end?
I'm looking for an answer from those of you who say God definitely does not exist.
You can call it whatever you like, if you dilate something, you've gone from point A to point B...orOK, the top video is time DILATION, not really time travel, though you will never admit it.
Without time there is no "before" for a creator to have created the universe.
Without time there is no "before" for a creator to have created the universe.
It is correct there is no "before" in a physical sense.
In a spiritual sense, there is no such thing as time.
Without time there is no "before" for a creator to have created the universe.
It is correct there is no "before" in a physical sense.
In a spiritual sense, there is no such thing as time.
Spirituality like religion and god is a human construct. It exists -- in the mind
One took damage equivalent to 2 years worth of age and perhaps even experienced time at a different rate, but only perceived time is factored in. The actual time that passed is the same.The fact that perceived time was different for each individual doesn't change the amount of actual time that has passed.
Time IS perception. There is no such thing as "actual" time, this is what Einstein proved with Theory of Relativity. Time is relative to the observer of it. We can only experience time as "present" or "now" ...there is no way for anyone to experience "past" or "future" time. If you time-traveled to the past or future, you would experience it as "present" and the people around you would also be experiencing it as "present" ...there would be no way to tell that you were experiencing "past" or "future" other than the circumstantial conditions around you. Your perception would still be "present" and their perception would still be "present" ...they would not know they were in your past or future.
In my example, the returning twin is experiencing the same "present" time, but he is in the future by a couple of years, proven by the fact his twin is two years older than he. If the time-traveling twin has kept track of time and his calendar, he will know that he is two years into the future from the date/time on his calendar. His time slowed down, the twin on earth's time stayed the same. They will both have equal perception of "present" time, but one is two years into the future.
In fact, something can come from nothing and we are able to observe it in the form of virtual particles and quantum vacuum fluctuations.
