Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This just in....Completely unsurprised that you have no answer...because only in climate science do people argue that consensus is evidence...
but we are told that year after year, man keeps increasing the CO2 in the atmosphere and the temperature is going up and in 11 and 1/2 years now, we are all doomed. So if the temperature keeps going up year after year, how can you have "HISTORIC" blizzard....Liberals are and always will be the most stupid people on the planet.Up to 2 feet of snow is expected to impact many western states as winds strengthen.
It is the same reason why "cancer" will never have a cure.. Too much money is given for the research, the scientists dont want to kill the golden goose.That's why it's a "theory". When you factor in evidence that some universities are involved in bribery and corruption scandals at this time it isn't hard to conclude that universities are willing to fudge and skew data to keep lucrative global warming grant money flowing.
That is total crap. You obviously know nothing about cancer research.It is the same reason why "cancer" will never have a cure.. Too much money is given for the research, the scientists dont want to kill the golden goose.That's why it's a "theory". When you factor in evidence that some universities are involved in bribery and corruption scandals at this time it isn't hard to conclude that universities are willing to fudge and skew data to keep lucrative global warming grant money flowing.
CouldMy favorite word for Climate Change is "IF".. that right there is the game changer..
May
- Might
You need to put some meat on your posts.CouldMy favorite word for Climate Change is "IF".. that right there is the game changer..
May
- Might
STFU, warmer.
Yea but the changes weren't as drastic as now.They won't believe the data. They don't trust scientists. They trust oil companies and lobbyists.
View attachment 252864
Fossil fuels — like oil, natural gas, and coal — “contain carbon that’s been locked away from the natural cycle for eons.” When we burn these fossil fuels, the carbon combines with oxygen to make carbon dioxide. This extra carbon dioxide (and other GHGs like methane) traps more and more heat in our atmosphere.
Humans started harnessing fossil fuels on a massive scale during the Industrial Revolution. The Industrial Revolution began about 1760 and most historians mark its end sometime before the middle of the next century.
Basically, it was a time of profound transformation. Before the Industrial Revolution, about 80 percent of the world’s population were rural farmers. But the Industrial Revolution changed how the world lived and worked, bringing millions to urban centers to work in factories.
Now add China, India, Mexico, Middle East, Africa to us industrialized nations. Now we are putting way too much up in the air. It was ok when it was just Europe and the USA but now it's the entire world that is industrialized.
The first bullet point is fine.
The second bullet point, change the word pollution to dioxide.
The third bullet point, not even close.
Why conservatives keep gaslighting the nation about climate change
Republican climate rhetoric shifts (again), but the goal remains the same.
In recent years, leaders of the Republican Party have become aware that denying the existence of global warming makes them look like idiots. Changes in climate have become obvious, not just to scientists, but to ordinary people — they can be directly measured, with such exotic instruments as a “thermometer.” Majorities of every group except the most conservative Republicans (who will trust their media over their lying eyes) believe it is happening.
Denying visible, tangible reality is a dicey business, even for the modern US right. It makes the party look like a death cult. So Republican climate-communication strategy has undergone something of an adjustment.
Not a large adjustment, mind you. The GOP remains dead set against doing anything about climate change, against any policy that would threaten the profits of fossil fuel companies. That is the non-negotiable baseline, despite a few fringe figures who signal otherwise (until the time comes for votes).
But front-line, hardcore denialism of the “it’s a hoax” variety has largely receded to the base. Republican leaders and spokespeople have moved back to the next line of defense: Yes, the climate is changing, but we don’t know to what extent humans are responsible.
Professional double-talker Marco Rubio, senator from the climate-battered state of Florida, ran a version of this on CNN’s Jake Tapper show earlier this month.
Why conservatives keep gaslighting the nation about climate change
Changes in climate have become obvious, not just to scientists, but to ordinary people
Do you have a 100 year period in history when "the climate did not change"?
How about a 20 year period?
Yea but the changes weren't as drastic as now. In fact we were going into an ice age but somehow we are warming.
I'm not going to argue with you. I'm just putting you down as a denier. Not even a good one. Republicans have gotten good at denying GW without actually denying it. They say we are contributing but now the question is, how much.
For 10 years they said we weren't contributing, now we are but the question how much.
This reminds me of the Corporations and Republicans who denied cigarettes caused cancer or that lead was bad for us.
You simply suck.
Excellent point!
What were the changes over this most recent 50 year period?
What about the 50 year period before that?
What about the eighteen 50 year periods before that?
Before we waste...err...invest trillions in windmills, we need to know more.
In fact we were going into an ice age but somehow we are warming.
Thank goodness. A bit of warming is much better than an ice age.
An ice age would kill billions.
I'm not going to argue with you.
That's good. I wouldn't want to make you cry.
Yea but the changes weren't as drastic as now.
The first bullet point is fine.
The second bullet point, change the word pollution to dioxide.
The third bullet point, not even close.
Why conservatives keep gaslighting the nation about climate change
Republican climate rhetoric shifts (again), but the goal remains the same.
In recent years, leaders of the Republican Party have become aware that denying the existence of global warming makes them look like idiots. Changes in climate have become obvious, not just to scientists, but to ordinary people — they can be directly measured, with such exotic instruments as a “thermometer.” Majorities of every group except the most conservative Republicans (who will trust their media over their lying eyes) believe it is happening.
Denying visible, tangible reality is a dicey business, even for the modern US right. It makes the party look like a death cult. So Republican climate-communication strategy has undergone something of an adjustment.
Not a large adjustment, mind you. The GOP remains dead set against doing anything about climate change, against any policy that would threaten the profits of fossil fuel companies. That is the non-negotiable baseline, despite a few fringe figures who signal otherwise (until the time comes for votes).
But front-line, hardcore denialism of the “it’s a hoax” variety has largely receded to the base. Republican leaders and spokespeople have moved back to the next line of defense: Yes, the climate is changing, but we don’t know to what extent humans are responsible.
Professional double-talker Marco Rubio, senator from the climate-battered state of Florida, ran a version of this on CNN’s Jake Tapper show earlier this month.
Why conservatives keep gaslighting the nation about climate change
Changes in climate have become obvious, not just to scientists, but to ordinary people
Do you have a 100 year period in history when "the climate did not change"?
How about a 20 year period?
Yea but the changes weren't as drastic as now. In fact we were going into an ice age but somehow we are warming.
I'm not going to argue with you. I'm just putting you down as a denier. Not even a good one. Republicans have gotten good at denying GW without actually denying it. They say we are contributing but now the question is, how much.
For 10 years they said we weren't contributing, now we are but the question how much.
This reminds me of the Corporations and Republicans who denied cigarettes caused cancer or that lead was bad for us.
You simply suck.
Excellent point!
What were the changes over this most recent 50 year period?
What about the 50 year period before that?
What about the eighteen 50 year periods before that?
Before we waste...err...invest trillions in windmills, we need to know more.
In fact we were going into an ice age but somehow we are warming.
Thank goodness. A bit of warming is much better than an ice age.
An ice age would kill billions.
I'm not going to argue with you.
That's good. I wouldn't want to make you cry.
Here are 197 bad arguments global warming deniers make and the scientific response to the stupid shit you say
https://skepticalscience.com/argument.php
Your bad arguments on on this list so stop making flawed arguments. Seriously.
Energy Secretary Rick Perry contradicts Trump, says humans do play a role in causing climate change
PUBLISHED 2 HOURS AGO UPDATED 27 MIN AGO
Matthew J. Belvedere@MATT_BELVEDERE
KEY POINTS
[......]
- “The climate is changing. Are we part of the reason? Yeah, it is,” says Energy Secretary Rick Perry.
- Veering off the Trump administration message, Perry adds, “I’ll let people debate on who’s the bigger problem here.”
- Perry says that it’s worth developing Zero-Emissions technology and that the Trump administration has made great strides. (abu afak: LOL on that last point. He's gone backwards)
That is an odd switch for the Trump administration.Energy Secretary Rick Perry contradicts Trump, says humans do play a role in causing climate change
PUBLISHED 2 HOURS AGO UPDATED 27 MIN AGO
Matthew J. Belvedere@MATT_BELVEDERE
KEY POINTS
[......]
- “The climate is changing. Are we part of the reason? Yeah, it is,” says Energy Secretary Rick Perry.
- Veering off the Trump administration message, Perry adds, “I’ll let people debate on who’s the bigger problem here.”
- Perry says that it’s worth developing Zero-Emissions technology and that the Trump administration has made great strides. (abu afak: LOL on that last point. He's gone backwards)
No, you didn't think.That is an odd switch for the Trump administration.Energy Secretary Rick Perry contradicts Trump, says humans do play a role in causing climate change
PUBLISHED 2 HOURS AGO UPDATED 27 MIN AGO
Matthew J. Belvedere@MATT_BELVEDERE
KEY POINTS
[......]
- “The climate is changing. Are we part of the reason? Yeah, it is,” says Energy Secretary Rick Perry.
- Veering off the Trump administration message, Perry adds, “I’ll let people debate on who’s the bigger problem here.”
- Perry says that it’s worth developing Zero-Emissions technology and that the Trump administration has made great strides. (abu afak: LOL on that last point. He's gone backwards)
I thought Trump was supposed to choose administrators who agree with him and disagree with science and common sense.
.
Do you think these two did think?No, you didn't think.
they think alot.Do you think these two did think?No, you didn't think.
Giuliani: "Truth isn't truth."
Kellyanne Conway's "alternative facts"
Is that the best you can do? I'm sure they think a lot. But not with any logic or wisdom.they think alot.Do you think these two did think?No, you didn't think.
Giuliani: "Truth isn't truth."
Kellyanne Conway's "alternative facts"
If you could stop hating, you could think.
I'm doing fine. You're the one chirping emotional posts.Is that the best you can do? I'm sure they think a lot. But not with any logic or wisdom.
.
