Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Unlock unbeatable offers today. Shop here: https://amzn.to/4cEkqYs 🎁
WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT IS WHY she wanted your son on Ritalin. You had the right to say no, probably you were right. But she did not get the idea of putting your son on drugs ONLY because his desk was messy. Jesus, you're thick.Teacher wanted my kid on ritalin and now posters are saying i am lying about.Something to consider, since the Democrats here have all but banned normal male behavior from the public school system, preferring to drug the boys into effeminacy.
Also, take the phones away from anyone under 16, you idiots. Protect them from social media.
To fight K-pop’s influence in China, a club teaches young boys to be alpha males
You were not there, I was there. The claim was that his desk was messy. All the time. The problem here is that some people just cannot accept something they disagree with.WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT IS WHY she wanted your son on Ritalin. You had the right to say no, probably you were right. But she did not get the idea of putting your son on drugs ONLY because his desk was messy. Jesus, you're thick.Teacher wanted my kid on ritalin and now posters are saying i am lying about.Something to consider, since the Democrats here have all but banned normal male behavior from the public school system, preferring to drug the boys into effeminacy.
Also, take the phones away from anyone under 16, you idiots. Protect them from social media.
To fight K-pop’s influence in China, a club teaches young boys to be alpha males
That appears to be true. They wanted us the take him to a doctor and the teacher even said the drug ritalin would help him.Teacher wanted my kid on ritalin and now posters are saying i am lying about.Something to consider, since the Democrats here have all but banned normal male behavior from the public school system, preferring to drug the boys into effeminacy.
Also, take the phones away from anyone under 16, you idiots. Protect them from social media.
To fight K-pop’s influence in China, a club teaches young boys to be alpha males
It's pretty common. Why should teachers have to control their students when they can simply drug them into a stupor?
You were not there, I was there. The claim was that his desk was messy.WHAT YOU ARE LYING ABOUT IS WHY she wanted your son on Ritalin. You had the right to say no, probably you were right. But she did not get the idea of putting your son on drugs ONLY because his desk was messy. Jesus, you're thick.Teacher wanted my kid on ritalin and now posters are saying i am lying about.Something to consider, since the Democrats here have all but banned normal male behavior from the public school system, preferring to drug the boys into effeminacy.
Also, take the phones away from anyone under 16, you idiots. Protect them from social media.
To fight K-pop’s influence in China, a club teaches young boys to be alpha males
So, you haven't got a clue what you're talking about. As I expected.That's not an answer. What particular behaviors that schools are extinguishing in boys have you upset?Tell me what you accept as "normal." Some people take that definition too far.Normal male behavior was acceptable from the beginning of time. What changed in the 1970s?
That which is not aberrant.
Behaviors that are particular to boys. Nothing an administrative diagnosis of ADD and a little Ritalin won't nip in the bud.
Tom Sawyer would have been drugged off his cork by these modern shamans.
Funny, when I was in say, sixth grade, there were 37 students in the class, mostly boys. The class was conducted by one teacher. There were no discipline problems. None.
No drugs were employed.
Speak English and then answer my question.So, you haven't got a clue what you're talking about. As I expected.That's not an answer. What particular behaviors that schools are extinguishing in boys have you upset?Tell me what you accept as "normal." Some people take that definition too far.
That which is not aberrant.
Behaviors that are particular to boys. Nothing an administrative diagnosis of ADD and a little Ritalin won't nip in the bud.
Tom Sawyer would have been drugged off his cork by these modern shamans.
Funny, when I was in say, sixth grade, there were 37 students in the class, mostly boys. The class was conducted by one teacher. There were no discipline problems. None.
No drugs were employed.
Non sequitur.
Speak English and then answer my question.So, you haven't got a clue what you're talking about. As I expected.That's not an answer. What particular behaviors that schools are extinguishing in boys have you upset?That which is not aberrant.
Behaviors that are particular to boys. Nothing an administrative diagnosis of ADD and a little Ritalin won't nip in the bud.
Tom Sawyer would have been drugged off his cork by these modern shamans.
Funny, when I was in say, sixth grade, there were 37 students in the class, mostly boys. The class was conducted by one teacher. There were no discipline problems. None.
No drugs were employed.
Non sequitur.
That's not an answer. What particular behaviors that schools are extinguishing in boys have you upset?Tell me what you accept as "normal." Some people take that definition too far.Democrats here have all but banned normal male behavior from the public school system, preferring to drug the boys into effeminacy.
So you advocate violent, disruptive and controlling behavior for the boys, huh? Nice.
Normal male behavior was acceptable from the beginning of time. What changed in the 1970s?
That which is not aberrant.
Behaviors that are particular to boys. Nothing an administrative diagnosis of ADD and a little Ritalin won't nip in the bud.
Tom Sawyer would have been drugged off his cork by these modern shamans.
Funny, when I was in say, sixth grade, there were 37 students in the class, mostly boys. The class was conducted by one teacher. There were no discipline problems. None.
No drugs were employed.
Teacher wanted my kid on ritalin and now posters are saying i am lying about.Something to consider, since the Democrats here have all but banned normal male behavior from the public school system, preferring to drug the boys into effeminacy.
Also, take the phones away from anyone under 16, you idiots. Protect them from social media.
To fight K-pop’s influence in China, a club teaches young boys to be alpha males
Something to consider, since the Democrats here have all but banned normal male behavior from the public school system, preferring to drug the boys into effeminacy.
Also, take the phones away from anyone under 16, you idiots. Protect them from social media.
To fight K-pop’s influence in China, a club teaches young boys to be alpha males
Democrats here have all but banned normal male behavior from the public school system, preferring to drug the boys into effeminacy.Something to consider, since the Democrats here have all but banned normal male behavior from the public school system, preferring to drug the boys into effeminacy.
Also, take the phones away from anyone under 16, you idiots. Protect them from social media.
To fight K-pop’s influence in China, a club teaches young boys to be alpha males
So you advocate violent, disruptive and controlling behavior for the boys, huh? Nice.
The democrats here, that is a little on the vague side..My 16 year old that attends public school is not effeminate and acts like a male. Why do you lie so much?Something to consider, since the Democrats here have all but banned normal male behavior from the public school system, preferring to drug the boys into effeminacy.
Also, take the phones away from anyone under 16, you idiots. Protect them from social media.
To fight K-pop’s influence in China, a club teaches young boys to be alpha males
That's not an answer. What particular behaviors that schools are extinguishing in boys have you upset?Tell me what you accept as "normal." Some people take that definition too far.Normal male behavior was acceptable from the beginning of time. What changed in the 1970s?
That which is not aberrant.
Behaviors that are particular to boys. Nothing an administrative diagnosis of ADD and a little Ritalin won't nip in the bud.
Tom Sawyer would have been drugged off his cork by these modern shamans.
Funny, when I was in say, sixth grade, there were 37 students in the class, mostly boys. The class was conducted by one teacher. There were no discipline problems. None.
No drugs were employed.
Teachers were allowed to beat students into submission. Is that what you want?
That's not an answer. What particular behaviors that schools are extinguishing in boys have you upset?Tell me what you accept as "normal." Some people take that definition too far.
That which is not aberrant.
Behaviors that are particular to boys. Nothing an administrative diagnosis of ADD and a little Ritalin won't nip in the bud.
Tom Sawyer would have been drugged off his cork by these modern shamans.
Funny, when I was in say, sixth grade, there were 37 students in the class, mostly boys. The class was conducted by one teacher. There were no discipline problems. None.
No drugs were employed.
Teachers were allowed to beat students into submission. Is that what you want?
Actually no. I want disruptive students removed and dealt with separately.
That's not an answer. What particular behaviors that schools are extinguishing in boys have you upset?That which is not aberrant.
Behaviors that are particular to boys. Nothing an administrative diagnosis of ADD and a little Ritalin won't nip in the bud.
Tom Sawyer would have been drugged off his cork by these modern shamans.
Funny, when I was in say, sixth grade, there were 37 students in the class, mostly boys. The class was conducted by one teacher. There were no discipline problems. None.
No drugs were employed.
Teachers were allowed to beat students into submission. Is that what you want?
Actually no. I want disruptive students removed and dealt with separately.
Who is going to do that? You want the number of administrators reduced to almost zero, so are we going to send them to the lunch ladies now?
That's not an answer. What particular behaviors that schools are extinguishing in boys have you upset?
Behaviors that are particular to boys. Nothing an administrative diagnosis of ADD and a little Ritalin won't nip in the bud.
Tom Sawyer would have been drugged off his cork by these modern shamans.
Funny, when I was in say, sixth grade, there were 37 students in the class, mostly boys. The class was conducted by one teacher. There were no discipline problems. None.
No drugs were employed.
Teachers were allowed to beat students into submission. Is that what you want?
Actually no. I want disruptive students removed and dealt with separately.
Who is going to do that? You want the number of administrators reduced to almost zero, so are we going to send them to the lunch ladies now?
Disruptive students were once grouped into separate "dummy" classes, where they would not interfere with kids who wanted to learn. Those who were especially disruptive were expelled.
