- Mar 3, 2013
- 83,022
- 44,735
- 2,605
will Trump get?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Trump instructed you all not to care about that anymore.If EC respects the US Constitution and the voters will, then yes.
Besides prison has been waiting for Hillary way too long.
View attachment 102543
But he wont.he could get more, as u know
i am hearing that two from Oregon may vote for TrumpHe'll get 306.
I heard the same thing.i am hearing that two from Oregon may vote for TrumpHe'll get 306.
if Trump gets closer to 320 votes, Obama will open up an investigation on China. they hacked it !!!!I heard the same thing.i am hearing that two from Oregon may vote for TrumpHe'll get 306.
i am hearing that two from Oregon may vote for TrumpHe'll get 306.
awe,,,shucks!!!,,,but d list celebrities sure seem to think that anyone can change their mindsi am hearing that two from Oregon may vote for TrumpHe'll get 306.
According to the supreme court they don't have that option.
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
That is not entirely correct.i am hearing that two from Oregon may vote for TrumpHe'll get 306.
According to the supreme court they don't have that option. Electors are acting as agents of the States via the winning party in that State, it is not a discretionary position.
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
Whatever they may think is not relevant - most electors CAN change their minds. That is how the system works.awe,,,shucks!!!,,,but d list celebrities sure seem to think that anyone can change their mindsi am hearing that two from Oregon may vote for TrumpHe'll get 306.
According to the supreme court they don't have that option.
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
The Oregon electors are pledged to hilly.That is not entirely correct.i am hearing that two from Oregon may vote for TrumpHe'll get 306.
According to the supreme court they don't have that option. Electors are acting as agents of the States via the winning party in that State, it is not a discretionary position.
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
Faithless elector - Wikipedia
According to the Blair case a state can hole electors accountable and/or replace them should they fail to pledge for a specific candidate. Not all states have laws that bind electors. In this case, Oregon does have a faithless elector law:
ORS 248.355 - Selection of presidential electors - 2015 Oregon Revised Statutes
That law, however, does not seem to have any enforcement options to it. If the electors pledge to Trump and then vote otherwise I do not see any repercussions to that action.
He'll get 306 but damn I would laugh my ass off if after all this whining and crying the dems had to actually go to court to get two electors back that defied them.i am hearing that two from Oregon may vote for TrumpHe'll get 306.
That is not entirely correct.i am hearing that two from Oregon may vote for TrumpHe'll get 306.
According to the supreme court they don't have that option. Electors are acting as agents of the States via the winning party in that State, it is not a discretionary position.
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
Faithless elector - Wikipedia
According to the Blair case a state can hole electors accountable and/or replace them should they fail to pledge for a specific candidate. Not all states have laws that bind electors. In this case, Oregon does have a faithless elector law:
ORS 248.355 - Selection of presidential electors - 2015 Oregon Revised Statutes
That law, however, does not seem to have any enforcement options to it. If the electors pledge to Trump and then vote otherwise I do not see any repercussions to that action.
Excuse the misstatement.The Oregon electors are pledged to hilly.That is not entirely correct.i am hearing that two from Oregon may vote for TrumpHe'll get 306.
According to the supreme court they don't have that option. Electors are acting as agents of the States via the winning party in that State, it is not a discretionary position.
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
Faithless elector - Wikipedia
According to the Blair case a state can hole electors accountable and/or replace them should they fail to pledge for a specific candidate. Not all states have laws that bind electors. In this case, Oregon does have a faithless elector law:
ORS 248.355 - Selection of presidential electors - 2015 Oregon Revised Statutes
That law, however, does not seem to have any enforcement options to it. If the electors pledge to Trump and then vote otherwise I do not see any repercussions to that action.
The Electoral College will vote on Monday.will Trump get?
They could be.That is not entirely correct.i am hearing that two from Oregon may vote for TrumpHe'll get 306.
According to the supreme court they don't have that option. Electors are acting as agents of the States via the winning party in that State, it is not a discretionary position.
FindLaw's United States Supreme Court case and opinions.
Faithless elector - Wikipedia
According to the Blair case a state can hole electors accountable and/or replace them should they fail to pledge for a specific candidate. Not all states have laws that bind electors. In this case, Oregon does have a faithless elector law:
ORS 248.355 - Selection of presidential electors - 2015 Oregon Revised Statutes
That law, however, does not seem to have any enforcement options to it. If the electors pledge to Trump and then vote otherwise I do not see any repercussions to that action.
They could be subject to any State maleficence or betrayal of public trust laws. Electors voluntarily agree to the party rules to support the nominee of the party when they enter their names to become electors and if their party wins, they are bound by those rules. They would have no defense for not following the rules.