Quantum Windbag
Gold Member
- May 9, 2010
- 58,308
- 5,100
- 245
Step one, refuse to engage your imagination.
How Not to Argue Against Libertarianism | Libertarianism.org
Set out like this, the absurdity of these anti-libertarian arguments becomes clear. Libertarians dont dispute (1). In fact, many of us are libertarians because we believe libertarianism (broadly defined as strong respect for liberty, private property, and free markets) will best facilitate the sort of human flourishing (1) describes. Further, we believe the evidence supports this claim.
- Humans are social animals, require deep social connections in order to thrive, and develop much of their sense of self through the social environment theyre raised in. Humans cannot live well in isolation, and live best when working together within a framework of mutual respect and reciprocity.
- Big government is the only political system compatible with (1).
- Libertarians oppose big government.
- Therefore libertarians reject (1).
So instead of rejecting (1), libertarians in fact reject (2). Not only do we reject (2) by claiming that there are other political systems compatible with (1), but we take it a step further by saying that big government isnt just unnecessary for a rich, social environment, but in fact undermines the very sort of flourishing (1) describes.
Whether were right about that is an argument worth having. But its not the argument Corning seems interested in. Instead, like so many other, he believes big governments link to human flourishing is so obvious that the only way one could reject big government is to quite literally reject human flourishing.
How Not to Argue Against Libertarianism | Libertarianism.org