Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, it's not. The global temps plateaued at least 15 years ago. The Arctic ice cover is at "normal" levels (whatever those really are) unlike the alarmist crap spewed out by the likes of olfraud and his ilk. Furthermore when it was WARMER, during the Holocene Thermal Maximum, none of the catastrophes that the revisionists warn us about ever happened.
Adapt always, but don't worry about global warming. That's a good thing. When it's cold it's bad. Read some history some time and really understand what is happening. The revisionist BS is just that... BS.
There is no plateau for any time period, 10 15, 20 years ago. Temperature goes up some years and down some years. 2012 recorded the lowest extent of artic ice since they began recording artic ice melts. A warmer world has been a boon for the human race in the last couple hundred years. I don't know what the consequences of a warmer world will be (nobody else does either) but unless we have a major cooling event, I think the human race will find out.
Actually it wasn't. When they actually looked they were able to determine that wind had blown the sea ice into smaller rafts which is why the refreeze happened so fast. The ice was there it was just in different places than normal. That's the problem with sea ice as a metric. Just remember they havn't been able to surface a sub at the north pole for decades in this supposed warmest time ever...
And yes, there most certainly IS a plateau. In fact there is a considerable amount of evidence that shows we are heading into a period of cooling that will last for between 50 and 200 years so you will find that out soon enough, and, if history is any guide, the cooler world will be very hard for all life on this planet.
You know the inmates have thrown in the towel when they start blaming the media for the reason things aren't going their way.
The media is the propaganda arm of the Democrat party, so what's absurd about blaming it?
Why wasn't Bush prosecuted for the crimes committed at Abu Ghraib?
Oh yes!
It's so much worse to put underpants on a terrorist's head than it is to kill a terrorist and a bunch of innocent people with a drone strike!
Any evidence that Bush personally ordered a hit?
Cuz Obama brags about how he reviews and selects all of the drone targets.