Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Deficits went through the roof because the Democrats in Congress increased spending.
Another lo-lo poster chimes in.
Bush didn't have a Democratic Congress you moron.
The Dems didnt retake Congress in 2006? Who knew?
But Reagan did, and that invalidates your argument right there.
Bush didn't have a Democratic Congress you moron.
The Dems didnt retake Congress in 2006? Who knew?
But Reagan did, and that invalidates your argument right there.
Why did Reagan keep raising taxes after his tax cuts?
You're extrapolating from the early Bush years. Agreed the GOP screwed the pooch and tried to act like Democrats. With any luck they learned their lesson although of course it's always tempting to be the good guy giving away free money.Bush didn't have a Democratic Congress you moron.
The Dems didnt retake Congress in 2006? Who knew?
But Reagan did, and that invalidates your argument right there.
The GOP is just as big spenders as Democrats. Anyone who does not realize this is naive in the extreme. The GOP only wants power back so they can be the ones doing all the spending.
Democrats: Tax and spend.
Republicans: Borrow and spend.
The Left didn't write the tax code. It was written by rich lobbyists and approved by rich Senators.
Say what?
You really do just make shit up as you go along, don't you?
Anybody that uses the idiotic terms of "Left' and "right' when referring to politics is suspect anyway.
What is 'left'? What is 'right'?
Was Woodhead Wilson left or was he right? He was a dimocrap but he was a racist.
Was FDR left or right? He was a redistributionist but he stopped the immigration of Jews into America on racial quota grounds. He also interred tens of thousands of Japanese for the sole crime of being Japanese.
So he was a racist, too.
Was Lenin a rightie or a leftie? He was a redistributionist but he was also a murdering thug.
How about Stalin? ANother redistributionist who murdered MILLIONS?
Pol Pot? A redistributionist (BTW, being a redistributionist is a REQUIREMENT for being considered a leftist) and a genocidal mad man.
What about Abraham Lincoln? He was a Republican so he had to be a Right-Winger, right? But yet he fought our costliest War (against dimocrap scum, BTW) to free Black People from Slavery.
What about Castro? Is he left or right?
What about Chavez and his toadie, Maduro? Left or right?
You know what I think?
I think you people are dishonest scumbags.
I think you assign the term 'left' to anything and anybody you like and/or approve of, and assign the term 'right' to those you dont' approve of.
Is Kim Jong Un a leftie or a rightie? He's got your worker's paradise in full operation.
Which is he? left or right.
You people.... You libturds.... You are the most dishonest, deceptive scumbags to ever walk the earth.
Everything you do is dishonest and everything you say is a lie couched in a half-truth.
Everything.
You don't know what you believe.
The Dems didnt retake Congress in 2006? Who knew?
But Reagan did, and that invalidates your argument right there.
Why did Reagan keep raising taxes after his tax cuts?
Deflection noted.
Why did Reagan keep raising taxes after his tax cuts?
Deflection noted.
Now you're running away from your claims? lol
In 1980 revenues were 19% of GDP. By 1988 revenues had fallen to 18.2% of GDP. If the Reagan tax cuts were supposed to increase revenues,
why were they producing LESS revenue relative to GDP??
Deflection noted.
Now you're running away from your claims? lol
In 1980 revenues were 19% of GDP. By 1988 revenues had fallen to 18.2% of GDP. If the Reagan tax cuts were supposed to increase revenues,
why were they producing LESS revenue relative to GDP??
Because GDP increased substantially due to Reagan's policies. In absolute terms the government had more revenue. Your thesis is wrong.
I wasn't born where? Did Reagan help the middle class by selling weapons to terrorists and using the money to fund genocide in Central America?
Was that good for the economy? Did it strengthen the middle class? If it did then let's do it again, because Reagan was the greatest American President in the universe and the 80s were so prosperous for everyone.
Now you're running away from your claims? lol
In 1980 revenues were 19% of GDP. By 1988 revenues had fallen to 18.2% of GDP. If the Reagan tax cuts were supposed to increase revenues,
why were they producing LESS revenue relative to GDP??
Because GDP increased substantially due to Reagan's policies. In absolute terms the government had more revenue. Your thesis is wrong.
In absolute terms the government had more revenue during the Clinton years, after his tax increases. That would prove your theory wrong.
The left don't want the tax code fixed.. as it would bring more of the citizenry into the paying of income taxes.. with more people having a stake in the game, spending would be a much higher concern for them.. if spending is scrutinized and under attack by people who actually pay income taxes (those that don't pay don't care and only see what they can get from government), the liberal way of government takes a hit.. they don't want any hit to come to their power
Now you're running away from your claims? lol
In 1980 revenues were 19% of GDP. By 1988 revenues had fallen to 18.2% of GDP. If the Reagan tax cuts were supposed to increase revenues,
why were they producing LESS revenue relative to GDP??
Because GDP increased substantially due to Reagan's policies. In absolute terms the government had more revenue. Your thesis is wrong.
In absolute terms the government had more revenue during the Clinton years, after his tax increases. That would prove your theory wrong.
OP says Dems want to destroy the rich except....they are "the rich".
Makes sense if you've been dropped on your head a few times
OP says Dems want to destroy the rich except....they are "the rich".
Makes sense if you've been dropped on your head a few times
No no Dems are for poor people. Poor people like Oprah and Hollywood stars and gay athletes.
OP says Dems want to destroy the rich except....they are "the rich".
Makes sense if you've been dropped on your head a few times
No no Dems are for poor people. Poor people like Oprah and Hollywood stars and gay athletes.
Rich Dems want to take away their own wealth and hurt the poor by giving them assistance.
Birds Swim and Fish Fly!
Rich Dems want to take away their own wealth and hurt the poor by giving them assistance.
Birds Swim and Fish Fly!
No, idiot. Do you understand the difference between wealth and income? Probably not. You probably thjnk Michael Jackson was wealthy when he died.
Rich Dems want to take away their own wealth and hurt the poor by giving them assistance.
Birds Swim and Fish Fly!