How to make Gun Grabbers Cry:

[The2ndAmendment]

Federalist 46:

Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it. Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion, that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession, than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors. Let us rather no longer insult them with the supposition that they can ever reduce themselves to the necessity of making the experiment, by a blind and tame submission to the long train of insidious measures which must precede and produce it.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Get mad

 

[M14 Shooter]

They are far more upset with the nerve of the court to rule that the 2nd protects an individual right not connected with service in the militia.

This forces them to make up all kinds of arguents as to how lisencing, registration, regulatory taxation, prior restraint and any host of other arbitray restrictions on the ecercise of the right not inherent to same do not qualify as infringements.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

They are far more upset with the nerve of the court to rule that the 2nd protects an individual right not connected with service in the militia.

This forces them to make up all kinds of arguents as to how lisencing, registration, regulatory taxation, prior restraint and any host of other arbitray restrictions on the ecercise of the right not inherent to same do not qualify as infringements.

They should realize that their ideas are so shitty and tyrannical in nature, that only a unarmed populace could be coerced to follow them.

 

[Old Rocks]

32,000 deaths a year from guns in the US. All too many of those deaths being children. The unregulated sale of guns here will shortly take a larger toll of American lives than the automobile.

Another Sandy, you gun nuts are going to see blowback that you cannot yet imagine. And that will happen because you idiots are arming the crazies.

 

[JoeB131]

How to make gun-grabbers cry?

Show us a bunch of children who were slaughtered by a crazy person who was able to get a gun.

That would make most sensible people cry.


Hey, I'll admit, that I don't go to the theatre as often as I used to. But I did to see the new Trek movie, and lo and behold, there we had the "friendly message" of what to do if someone starts shooting the place up.

Seriously, this is the kind of country you want to live in.

Oh, right. Because some drunks shot up a jail in 1946, and that's almost like being able to overthrow the government.

 

[skookerasbil]

People on the far left live in a perpetual tragic state.........its a connect the dots thing........





Clearly, if tomorrow all guns were gone, suicides would cease and tragedies and crime would disappear!!!


Happy now!!!!

 

[JoeB131]

People on the far left live in a perpetual tragic state.........its a connect the dots thing........


Clearly, if tomorrow all guns were gone, suicides would cease and tragedies and crime would disappear!!!

No, I don't think that suicides and crime would stop if we got rid of privately owned guns.

I think they'd both be a lot harder to do, though. And the fact most industrialized countries that restrict private gun ownership have less crime is proof of that.

 

[skookerasbil]

How to make gun-grabbers cry?

Show us a bunch of children who were slaughtered by a crazy person who was able to get a gun.

That would make most sensible people cry.


Hey, I'll admit, that I don't go to the theatre as often as I used to. But I did to see the new Trek movie, and lo and behold, there we had the "friendly message" of what to do if someone starts shooting the place up.

Seriously, this is the kind of country you want to live in.

Oh, right. Because some drunks shot up a jail in 1946, and that's almost like being able to overthrow the government.

^^^........this is a pronounced thinking issue here!!! Has nothing to do with intelligence......but rather thought processing. Psychiatrists refer to it as an inability to think on the margin. Ironically, it is most evident in "crazy" people.

People like this really think that mass shootings would not happen if gun laws were more sweeping......"crazy person who was able to get a gun". These people really do think that government can solve ALL of societies problems.......that more gun laws are a zero sum game for all people in society. It really is fascinating that people can actually navigate the real world thinking this way.

Thankfully for the masses, this kind of thinking is fringe stuff. People who can think on the margin recognize that there are necessary tradeoffs in life and the benefits of the simple deterrent value of gun ownership. They also recognize that there are many,many, many different ways to conduct mass killings.......but the connect the dots challenged people in our society dont have the thinking processes to effectively weigh this in their minds. But they are fringe so they lose.........

 

[skookerasbil]

People on the far left live in a perpetual tragic state.........its a connect the dots thing........


Clearly, if tomorrow all guns were gone, suicides would cease and tragedies and crime would disappear!!!

No, I don't think that suicides and crime would stop if we got rid of privately owned guns.

I think they'd both be a lot harder to do, though. And the fact most industrialized countries that restrict private gun ownership have less crime is proof of that.

HOLY MOTHER OF GOD


Thankyou for putting an exclamation point on my last post.


Crime skyrockets when you take away guns s0n......... http://voices.yahoo.com/the-uk-gun-ban-3819560.html?cat=17. People with the abilty to think on the margin immediately can conclude as to why that would be.

 

[jknowgood]

Yeah ban all guns, it worked so well when alcohol was banned.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

32,000 deaths a year from guns in the US. All too many of those deaths being children. The unregulated sale of guns here will shortly take a larger toll of American lives than the automobile.

Another Sandy, you gun nuts are going to see blowback that you cannot yet imagine. And that will happen because you idiots are arming the crazies.

32,00 death per YEAR from guns; meanwhile:

550 rapes and 1300 murders prevented each DAY by guns in the US. This comes from the US Department of Justice.

550x365 = 200,750 rapes prevented each YEAR
1300x365 = 474,500 murders prevented each YEAR

Not to mention the other three million crimes that are prevented each YEAR by guns.

U MAD BRO?

 

[hunarcy]

32,000 deaths a year from guns in the US. All too many of those deaths being children. The unregulated sale of guns here will shortly take a larger toll of American lives than the automobile.

Another Sandy, you gun nuts are going to see blowback that you cannot yet imagine. And that will happen because you idiots are arming the crazies.

Actually, WE want to regulate the crazies and removed them from society, where they are a danger to those around them and themselves as well. YOU folks are the ones that believe that's wrong.

 

[Luddly Neddite]

Federalist 46:

Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it. Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion, that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession, than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors. Let us rather no longer insult them with the supposition that they can ever reduce themselves to the necessity of making the experiment, by a blind and tame submission to the long train of insidious measures which must precede and produce it.

Why do the nutters try to take credit (blame!) for things they obviously did not write?

More important - Why don't they cry for the thousands of innocent dead people? Why don't they care about the massacred children?

Why do they keep telling the same lie, over and over? No one is trying to take their tiny little penises away from them. Oops I meant to say guns.

So, OP, where did you plagiarize your op from?

 

[Luddly Neddite]

 

[ba1614]

How to make a gun grabber cry? Just invite them into my den.

 

[M14 Shooter]

The unregulated sale of guns here will shortly take a larger toll of American lives than the automobile.

Show this to be true.
First, you have to define and then prove the existence of "unregulated sales"
You then have to show that these sales will lead to what you claim.
Since this is something you know you cannot do, you will do everything you can to avoid doing so.

Another Sandy, you gun nuts are going to see blowback that you cannot yet imagine.

Something you pray for each and every night.

 

[The2ndAmendment]

Another Sandy, you gun nuts are going to see blowback that you cannot yet imagine.

Something you pray for each and every night.

That's why they don't' want to put armed guards in schools, then they wouldn't have any more massacres involving children to take advantage of.

 

[skookerasbil]

Federalist 46:

Besides the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation, the existence of subordinate governments, to which the people are attached, and by which the militia officers are appointed, forms a barrier against the enterprises of ambition, more insurmountable than any which a simple government of any form can admit of. Notwithstanding the military establishments in the several kingdoms of Europe, which are carried as far as the public resources will bear, the governments are afraid to trust the people with arms. And it is not certain, that with this aid alone they would not be able to shake off their yokes. But were the people to possess the additional advantages of local governments chosen by themselves, who could collect the national will and direct the national force, and of officers appointed out of the militia, by these governments, and attached both to them and to the militia, it may be affirmed with the greatest assurance, that the throne of every tyranny in Europe would be speedily overturned in spite of the legions which surround it. Let us not insult the free and gallant citizens of America with the suspicion, that they would be less able to defend the rights of which they would be in actual possession, than the debased subjects of arbitrary power would be to rescue theirs from the hands of their oppressors. Let us rather no longer insult them with the supposition that they can ever reduce themselves to the necessity of making the experiment, by a blind and tame submission to the long train of insidious measures which must precede and produce it.

Why do the nutters try to take credit (blame!) for things they obviously did not write?

More important - Why don't they cry for the thousands of innocent dead people? Why don't they care about the massacred children?

Why do they keep telling the same lie, over and over? No one is trying to take their tiny little penises away from them. Oops I meant to say guns.

So, OP, where did you plagiarize your op from?

What would we do around this forum without the k00ky and incoherant rants of miserable feminist bulldogs??

 

[JoeB131]

[


^^^........this is a pronounced thinking issue here!!! Has nothing to do with intelligence......but rather thought processing. Psychiatrists refer to it as an inability to think on the margin. Ironically, it is most evident in "crazy" people.

People like this really think that mass shootings would not happen if gun laws were more sweeping......"crazy person who was able to get a gun". These people really do think that government can solve ALL of societies problems.......that more gun laws are a zero sum game for all people in society. It really is fascinating that people can actually navigate the real world thinking this way.

Thankfully for the masses, this kind of thinking is fringe stuff. People who can think on the margin recognize that there are necessary tradeoffs in life and the benefits of the simple deterrent value of gun ownership. They also recognize that there are many,many, many different ways to conduct mass killings.......but the connect the dots challenged people in our society dont have the thinking processes to effectively weigh this in their minds. But they are fringe so they lose.........

Hey, guy, when was the last time you heard about a mass school shooting or a mass theatre shooting in Japan.

Oh, that's right. That shit don't happen in Japan. Because Japan has banned private gun ownership. Now, yeah, you did have that guy who released poison gas in the subway once, but that was 20 years ago and it took a whole cult to do it.

So, yeah, government CAN reduce these sorts of events from happening. Other government have tried it. Other government have done it.

Frankly, there is no value to you compensating for your small penis that involves letting crazy people own guns.