progressive hunter
Diamond Member
- Dec 11, 2018
- 62,664
- 38,433
- 2,615
I posted dozens in this threadIf, among those "thousands", you showed us ONE, that would be a start.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I posted dozens in this threadIf, among those "thousands", you showed us ONE, that would be a start.
everybody is the press,,Yeah maybe, but a bystander taking video with his cellphone isn't the "press."
I almost missed the meaning in your post. whew.I posted dozens in this thread
I posted dozens of them in this thread,,here is the cookie cutter response from Demofks. I have thousands of examples!!!!!! And then at the end of the day ain't got a one. so fking typical of you fking losers.
sorry but the 1st A applies to everyone so that makes us all the press,,Yeah maybe, but a bystander taking video with his cellphone isn't the "press."
sorry but the 1st A applies to everyone so that makes us all the press,,
how is it not true??Why do you say that?
how is it not true??
and no post numbers will be provided once he replies.I posted dozens of them in this thread,,
why does he need to??and no post numbers will be provided once he replies.
Too, IMO, you are falling into the demofk ditch here. No where does it say that Press is a licensed group. I believe it means the people are the press no matter what. news is news no matter who is providing a story. It's anyone's freedom to release information regarding anything. Again, just my opinion of the wording.Because the 1st Amendment only applies to Congress not making any laws abridging freedom of the Press and they haven't, Arizona is not the Congress, and has only asked street citizens which are NOT the Press to stand back a little and let the cops work while they play with their cellphones.
ok, so maybe now there's confusion. I thought at first you were being smart. It's on whom to look?why does he need to??
its on him to look at them when they are given,,
I was confused,, I thought you were him asking again,,ok, so maybe now there's confusion. I thought at first you were being smart. It's on whom to look?
we're always good my man.I was confused,, I thought you were him asking again,,
I hope I corrected it,,
You can't assume that because they didn't define a limit that the press then is anyone. When written, the Press referred to that body of reporters and journalists which as a living, professionally gathered news on the government and informed the public via printed media.No where does it say that Press is a licensed group.
I just gave another example, are you going to take time to watch it??You can't assume that because they didn't define a limit that the press then is anyone. When written, the Press referred to that body of reporters and journalists which as a living, professionally gathered news on the government and informed the public via printed media.
This has nothing to do with you taking cellphone video of a cop. Police are not the government proper, you are not the press, and no freedom has been abridged regardless.
but they arent to close, the cops werent hindered in any way,,looks like 20 feet? and their too close. Just as I said.
I just gave another example, are you going to take time to watch it??
and these guys do do this for a living even thought no where in the 1st A it says they have to,,