Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Just curious about your examples. Sure there are some police abuses. but they are small compared with all the damage wrought in riots (around the world no less) just from one FALSE report of police brutality (the George Floyd arrest)and youre still dodging the examples I gave you as you requested,,
why did you ask for them if you were just going to ignore them??
what do riots have to do with this???Just curious about your examples. Sure there are some police abuses. but they are small compared with all the damage wrought in riots (around the world no less) just from one FALSE report of police brutality (the George Floyd arrest)
And speaking of "ignoring", it looks like that's what you're doing, with my examples posted in Post # 440.
I posted several of people being prevented from recording. That's like the very low level illegal. Do I really have to post videos of cops beating people in handcuffs? Or planting drugs? Are those illegal enough for you?So you have no example. Ho hum.
thefreethoughtproject.com
Then they could have just banned being 8 feet away.Because a law was passed and they consider it obstruction, being to close to law enforcement when they are performing their duty and is putting yourself in potential danger zone and if the police tell you to back up and you don’t it is obstruction and you can be arrested. No right is being taken away from you and if you want to challenge it go for it.
You're absolutely correct. If everyone looks at them then there's no damage but perhaps a trespassing charge if he doesn't leave when told. But if everyone leaves then there's lost time, lost value, lost revenue. Even if the theater gives free tickets there's lost revenue and lost time and travel costs to go to the theater again. There's a lawsuit.If you yell "Fire" and the people just stare at you and tell you to go away, what grounds do they have to sue?
Even if they leave the theater and no one gets hurt, other than the price of the ticket perhaps, what do you sue over?
Did I say anything nice about Fauci? Did I mention the Supreme Court EAP ruling? No, I didn't do either. Fauci's behavior wasn't about the Constitution; it's about deep state. The point I was making was that the Deep State do not have any right to rule.Fauci was unable to do anything without the approval of the president. If you agreed with the Supreme Court on the EPA ruling, you would understand this. Nothing Fauci did was done Constitutionally. At any time.
Even news outlets pixelate accused violators. Why is an officers privacy any different.It depends... for example. A minor self harming, a minor in a traffic accident, a minor threatening suicide. Some people like to film this stuff and post it online.
There are privacy concerns for this type of filming.
Did you post any videos of law enforcement officers being beaten by mobs?I posted several of people being prevented from recording. That's like the very low level illegal. Do I really have to post videos of cops beating people in handcuffs? Or planting drugs? Are those illegal enough for you?
VIDEO: Cop Pokes HIMSELF with a Syringe, So 2 Cops Beat a Handcuffed Man for 3 Minutes
Three cops won't be charged for beating an innocent, handcuffed man over a syringe and flagrantly lying, even though the incident was caught on video and proves they lied.
Look how ignorant you are (even after I explained). If the George Floyd arrest had been reported correctly, there would have been no riots. The topic is about police breaking the law. Chauvin was arrested and convicted of doing that, when he did not break the law.what do riots have to do with this???
your examples have nothing to do with the topic,,
Yes he is the press. He's an independent reporter if he says he is. Who gets to say otherwise, unless you, too, support Hillary's call for giving government IDs to the "legitimate" press.Yeah maybe, but a bystander taking video with his cellphone isn't the "press."
But let’s say you’re at 8 or 9 feet and a cop busts you for it if you don’t turn off the camera. That wouldn’t be an easy thing to prove in court. This small dick cop is going to give you the citation.And you will keep on filming and will be able to.
and I said those had nothing to do with this topic,,,Look how ignorant you are (even after I explained). If the George Floyd atrest had been reported correctly, there would have been no riots. The topc s about police breaking the law. Chauvin was arrested and convicted of doing that, when he did not real the law.
My version of the Constitution doesn't mention credentials for the press. I really need to get that new, updated, living version that so many here have. How can I debate the when I'm so far behind, having only the original, first edition, along with those pesky 27 amendments.it is if it's posted on social media. Once a photo/ video is shared, that's press. Whether one has credentials or not.
Especially if they are doing something they don't want on video.But let’s say you’re at 8 or 9 feet and a cop busts you for it if you don’t turn off the camera. That wouldn’t be an easy thing to prove in court. This small dick cop is going to give you the citation.
But as another poster pointed out, they could just move closer to you. Does the law prevent this loophole? I seriously doubt it does.They dont carry tape measures around with them. For safety's sake, stay 15 feet away. It;s still pretty close and cell phone cameras have Zoom. Nobody needs to be close to the police.
OK. I'll acknowledge that, but I still think that when a cop is arrested for breaking the law, but he didnt do that, that should be acknowledged. A lot of people (including in this thread) are not doing that.and I said those had nothing to do with this topic,,,
the topic is how to stop them from breaking the law and the distance you can be to video tape them,,
chavin and the floyd case is well discussed on this forum,,OK. I'll acknowledge that, but I still think that when a cop is arrested for breaking the law, but he didnt do that, that should be acknowledged. A lot of people (including in this thread) are not doing that.
I responded to that other poster. (post # 12)But as another poster pointed out, they could just move closer to you. Does the law prevent this loophole? I seriously doubt it does.
To keep you away.Then they could have just banned being 8 feet away.
But that isn't what they did. They said you are fine 8 feet away, unless you start recording video.
Now why do you think that is?
And how do they know if you are recording video?But as another poster pointed out, they could just move closer to you. Does the law prevent this loophole? I seriously doubt it does.
Oops, wrong. Pay attention this time.To keep you away.
