Mac1958
Diamond Member
This country needs more liberalism and less fundamentalism.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The reason that some colleges have turned away some voices has nothing to do with denying free speech and everything to do with maintaining security on campus.
In today’s media on demand cultures, nobody is prevented from being heard.
Next fake controversy.
That's an indictment of the students in college today.
No it isn’t. You should meet some of them.
And show me EXACTLY where in the Constitution it says that Freedom of Speech should be suspended when someone deems that speech 'hate speech'?The reason that some colleges have turned away some voices has nothing to do with denying free speech and everything to do with maintaining security on campus.
In today’s media on demand cultures, nobody is prevented from being heard.
Next fake controversy.
What you are saying then is all people on campus have to do to stop people they don't like from speaking - is to threaten violence.
That's ridiculous. That is giving into violence...accepting it. Allowing bullies to flourish.
I generally despise Trump as POTUS...but he is right here.
All he is saying is: 'if you want federal funding, you better make damn sure that the people whom you invite to speak are allowed to do so you do not allow people to bully/threaten people on your campuses to muzzle other people from exercising their right to Freedom of Speech.'
There is NOTHING wrong with that.
It’s not a problem that requires action. It’s limited in scope and overblown by RW whiners who need something to stir up their base with.
College students and their institutions are not opposed to hearing differing POV. They simply want to keep hate speech where it belongs.
The protests that you have seen when someone like Milo or Spencer books a gig at a college are organic. Nobody is planning to shut down speech.
Feminism did its job. But now it is off the rails. Crazy things are done today. You have shamed women into not getting married and being a homemaker is taboo. Raising a child in this way if possible is the best one by percentages. And I believe a few million women or more that decide to go this route then would be will strengthen our nation. This is not going back 70 years. This is sense. And frankly you have emasculated white males and put them on the bottom of the list. There is a growing amount of poverty with them and they do not get the goodies you get. With the amount of poverty in real sense growing with males in all cultures the game is being set for violence in our future. Over forty years ago we were warned that a generation would be poorer for the first time then the previous and the millenial sare just that. Then about twenty years ago or so we were warned that another part of the world will take over our tech and competiveness and in a couple of decades East Asia will be just that. You will see what 2nd place means. Everything we do with foundation is getting expensive now. We put the massive amounts of fiat currencies into paper investments to keep the real inflation down or into things like housing which should not even be this expensive. Demographics tells you what is going to happen. A stock market collapse will be nasty this time around.You represent the demise of our nation. Its not inclusion you want. It is domination. And our comptiveness is suffering for it.Perhaps all colleges should make the speaker rent a space off campus and hold their speech and the speaker can provide their own security.
U.S. colleges spend millions on security to host controversial speakers
This is a pic of Milo
So Feminism is a cancer, gee Kellyanne Conway's says she is a feminist (or in love with Trump), and Melaina overlooked Trump sexual assaults as locker room talk. Also Democrats have a mental disorder.
Do you agree with his viewpoints and should the college pay to protect this hater and misogynist. He is also a pedophile
He is such a good mentor for students. Well only for conservative students. LOL.
The reason that some colleges have turned away some voices has nothing to do with denying free speech and everything to do with maintaining security on campus.
In today’s media on demand cultures, nobody is prevented from being heard.
Next fake controversy.
That's an indictment of the students in college today.
No it isn’t. You should meet some of them.
If the students resort to physical violence because they don't want other students to hear things, they're a problem.
And show me EXACTLY where in the Constitution it says that Freedom of Speech should be suspended when someone deems that speech 'hate speech'?The reason that some colleges have turned away some voices has nothing to do with denying free speech and everything to do with maintaining security on campus.
In today’s media on demand cultures, nobody is prevented from being heard.
Next fake controversy.
What you are saying then is all people on campus have to do to stop people they don't like from speaking - is to threaten violence.
That's ridiculous. That is giving into violence...accepting it. Allowing bullies to flourish.
I generally despise Trump as POTUS...but he is right here.
All he is saying is: 'if you want federal funding, you better make damn sure that the people whom you invite to speak are allowed to do so you do not allow people to bully/threaten people on your campuses to muzzle other people from exercising their right to Freedom of Speech.'
There is NOTHING wrong with that.
It’s not a problem that requires action. It’s limited in scope and overblown by RW whiners who need something to stir up their base with.
College students and their institutions are not opposed to hearing differing POV. They simply want to keep hate speech where it belongs.
'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.'
The protests that you have seen when someone like Milo or Spencer books a gig at a college are organic. Nobody is planning to shut down speech.
Of course they are...the violence about Ann Coulter's speech was trying to do EXACTLY that.
And it seems Elizabeth Warren disagrees with you.
Elizabeth Warren Speaks Out In Support Of Ann Coulter Like A True Patriot (VIDEO)
And show me EXACTLY where in the Constitution it says that Freedom of Speech should be suspended when someone deems that speech 'hate speech'?The reason that some colleges have turned away some voices has nothing to do with denying free speech and everything to do with maintaining security on campus.
In today’s media on demand cultures, nobody is prevented from being heard.
Next fake controversy.
What you are saying then is all people on campus have to do to stop people they don't like from speaking - is to threaten violence.
That's ridiculous. That is giving into violence...accepting it. Allowing bullies to flourish.
I generally despise Trump as POTUS...but he is right here.
All he is saying is: 'if you want federal funding, you better make damn sure that the people whom you invite to speak are allowed to do so you do not allow people to bully/threaten people on your campuses to muzzle other people from exercising their right to Freedom of Speech.'
There is NOTHING wrong with that.
It’s not a problem that requires action. It’s limited in scope and overblown by RW whiners who need something to stir up their base with.
College students and their institutions are not opposed to hearing differing POV. They simply want to keep hate speech where it belongs.
'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.'
The protests that you have seen when someone like Milo or Spencer books a gig at a college are organic. Nobody is planning to shut down speech.
Of course they are...the violence about Ann Coulter's speech was trying to do EXACTLY that.
And it seems Elizabeth Warren disagrees with you.
Elizabeth Warren Speaks Out In Support Of Ann Coulter Like A True Patriot (VIDEO)
And show me EXACTLY where in the Constitution it says that Freedom of Speech should be suspended when someone deems that speech 'hate speech'?The reason that some colleges have turned away some voices has nothing to do with denying free speech and everything to do with maintaining security on campus.
In today’s media on demand cultures, nobody is prevented from being heard.
Next fake controversy.
What you are saying then is all people on campus have to do to stop people they don't like from speaking - is to threaten violence.
That's ridiculous. That is giving into violence...accepting it. Allowing bullies to flourish.
I generally despise Trump as POTUS...but he is right here.
All he is saying is: 'if you want federal funding, you better make damn sure that the people whom you invite to speak are allowed to do so you do not allow people to bully/threaten people on your campuses to muzzle other people from exercising their right to Freedom of Speech.'
There is NOTHING wrong with that.
It’s not a problem that requires action. It’s limited in scope and overblown by RW whiners who need something to stir up their base with.
College students and their institutions are not opposed to hearing differing POV. They simply want to keep hate speech where it belongs.
'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.'
The protests that you have seen when someone like Milo or Spencer books a gig at a college are organic. Nobody is planning to shut down speech.
Of course they are...the violence about Ann Coulter's speech was trying to do EXACTLY that.
And it seems Elizabeth Warren disagrees with you.
Elizabeth Warren Speaks Out In Support Of Ann Coulter Like A True Patriot (VIDEO)
Freedom of speech has not been suspended.
That’s you being a pants on fire weirdo.
Have you ever looked to see how many colleges and universities that Ann Coulter has spoken at in the last 5 years?
Is it zero?
And show me EXACTLY where in the Constitution it says that Freedom of Speech should be suspended when someone deems that speech 'hate speech'?The reason that some colleges have turned away some voices has nothing to do with denying free speech and everything to do with maintaining security on campus.
In today’s media on demand cultures, nobody is prevented from being heard.
Next fake controversy.
What you are saying then is all people on campus have to do to stop people they don't like from speaking - is to threaten violence.
That's ridiculous. That is giving into violence...accepting it. Allowing bullies to flourish.
I generally despise Trump as POTUS...but he is right here.
All he is saying is: 'if you want federal funding, you better make damn sure that the people whom you invite to speak are allowed to do so you do not allow people to bully/threaten people on your campuses to muzzle other people from exercising their right to Freedom of Speech.'
There is NOTHING wrong with that.
It’s not a problem that requires action. It’s limited in scope and overblown by RW whiners who need something to stir up their base with.
College students and their institutions are not opposed to hearing differing POV. They simply want to keep hate speech where it belongs.
'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.'
The protests that you have seen when someone like Milo or Spencer books a gig at a college are organic. Nobody is planning to shut down speech.
Of course they are...the violence about Ann Coulter's speech was trying to do EXACTLY that.
And it seems Elizabeth Warren disagrees with you.
Elizabeth Warren Speaks Out In Support Of Ann Coulter Like A True Patriot (VIDEO)
Once again. This is a rare occurrence and the objection that students have is not about hearing differing POV. It’s about their institutions being used to promote hate speech.
Ann Coulter is heard. Believe me.
They wouldn't need security if they didn't do their level best to constantly slander conservatives and their ideals. Colleges brought the trouble on themselvesPerhaps all colleges should make the speaker rent a space off campus and hold their speech and the speaker can provide their own security.
U.S. colleges spend millions on security to host controversial speakers
This is a pic of Milo
You represent the demise of our nation. Its not inclusion you want. It is domination. And our comptiveness is suffering for it.Perhaps all colleges should make the speaker rent a space off campus and hold their speech and the speaker can provide their own security.
U.S. colleges spend millions on security to host controversial speakers
This is a pic of Milo
So Feminism is a cancer, gee Kellyanne Conway's says she is a feminist (or in love with Trump), and Melaina overlooked Trump sexual assaults as locker room talk. Also Democrats have a mental disorder.
Do you agree with his viewpoints and should the college pay to protect this hater and misogynist. He is also a pedophile
He is such a good mentor for students. Well only for conservative students. LOL.
And show me EXACTLY where in the Constitution it says that Freedom of Speech should be suspended when someone deems that speech 'hate speech'?The reason that some colleges have turned away some voices has nothing to do with denying free speech and everything to do with maintaining security on campus.
In today’s media on demand cultures, nobody is prevented from being heard.
Next fake controversy.
What you are saying then is all people on campus have to do to stop people they don't like from speaking - is to threaten violence.
That's ridiculous. That is giving into violence...accepting it. Allowing bullies to flourish.
I generally despise Trump as POTUS...but he is right here.
All he is saying is: 'if you want federal funding, you better make damn sure that the people whom you invite to speak are allowed to do so you do not allow people to bully/threaten people on your campuses to muzzle other people from exercising their right to Freedom of Speech.'
There is NOTHING wrong with that.
It’s not a problem that requires action. It’s limited in scope and overblown by RW whiners who need something to stir up their base with.
College students and their institutions are not opposed to hearing differing POV. They simply want to keep hate speech where it belongs.
'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.'
The protests that you have seen when someone like Milo or Spencer books a gig at a college are organic. Nobody is planning to shut down speech.
Of course they are...the violence about Ann Coulter's speech was trying to do EXACTLY that.
And it seems Elizabeth Warren disagrees with you.
Elizabeth Warren Speaks Out In Support Of Ann Coulter Like A True Patriot (VIDEO)
Freedom of speech has not been suspended.
That’s you being a pants on fire weirdo.
Have you ever looked to see how many colleges and universities that Ann Coulter has spoken at in the last 5 years?
Is it zero?
Is 'hate speech' protected under the 'Free Speech' First Amendment in the Constitution?
Yes or no?
And show me EXACTLY where in the Constitution it says that Freedom of Speech should be suspended when someone deems that speech 'hate speech'?What you are saying then is all people on campus have to do to stop people they don't like from speaking - is to threaten violence.
That's ridiculous. That is giving into violence...accepting it. Allowing bullies to flourish.
I generally despise Trump as POTUS...but he is right here.
All he is saying is: 'if you want federal funding, you better make damn sure that the people whom you invite to speak are allowed to do so you do not allow people to bully/threaten people on your campuses to muzzle other people from exercising their right to Freedom of Speech.'
There is NOTHING wrong with that.
It’s not a problem that requires action. It’s limited in scope and overblown by RW whiners who need something to stir up their base with.
College students and their institutions are not opposed to hearing differing POV. They simply want to keep hate speech where it belongs.
'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.'
The protests that you have seen when someone like Milo or Spencer books a gig at a college are organic. Nobody is planning to shut down speech.
Of course they are...the violence about Ann Coulter's speech was trying to do EXACTLY that.
And it seems Elizabeth Warren disagrees with you.
Elizabeth Warren Speaks Out In Support Of Ann Coulter Like A True Patriot (VIDEO)
Freedom of speech has not been suspended.
That’s you being a pants on fire weirdo.
Have you ever looked to see how many colleges and universities that Ann Coulter has spoken at in the last 5 years?
Is it zero?
Is 'hate speech' protected under the 'Free Speech' First Amendment in the Constitution?
Yes or no?
Sure is.
Next dumb question.
There are many in this country who claim to be liberal, but are clearly not.Refusing to allow differing opinions and ideas to be expressed is NOT JUST 'Intolerance' - it is a sign of FEAR.
And show me EXACTLY where in the Constitution it says that Freedom of Speech should be suspended when someone deems that speech 'hate speech'?The reason that some colleges have turned away some voices has nothing to do with denying free speech and everything to do with maintaining security on campus.
In today’s media on demand cultures, nobody is prevented from being heard.
Next fake controversy.
What you are saying then is all people on campus have to do to stop people they don't like from speaking - is to threaten violence.
That's ridiculous. That is giving into violence...accepting it. Allowing bullies to flourish.
I generally despise Trump as POTUS...but he is right here.
All he is saying is: 'if you want federal funding, you better make damn sure that the people whom you invite to speak are allowed to do so you do not allow people to bully/threaten people on your campuses to muzzle other people from exercising their right to Freedom of Speech.'
There is NOTHING wrong with that.
It’s not a problem that requires action. It’s limited in scope and overblown by RW whiners who need something to stir up their base with.
College students and their institutions are not opposed to hearing differing POV. They simply want to keep hate speech where it belongs.
'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.'
The protests that you have seen when someone like Milo or Spencer books a gig at a college are organic. Nobody is planning to shut down speech.
Of course they are...the violence about Ann Coulter's speech was trying to do EXACTLY that.
And it seems Elizabeth Warren disagrees with you.
Elizabeth Warren Speaks Out In Support Of Ann Coulter Like A True Patriot (VIDEO)
Once again. This is a rare occurrence and the objection that students have is not about hearing differing POV. It’s about their institutions being used to promote hate speech.
Ann Coulter is heard. Believe me.
The reason that some colleges have turned away some voices has nothing to do with denying free speech and everything to do with maintaining security on campus.
In today’s media on demand cultures, nobody is prevented from being heard.
Next fake controversy.
That's an indictment of the students in college today.
No it isn’t. You should meet some of them.
If the students resort to physical violence because they don't want other students to hear things, they're a problem.
Hardly ever happened. Isn’t a major issue.
This EO will have zero impact.
It’s a piece of meaningless red meat to the base who largely despises higher education.
And show me EXACTLY where in the Constitution it says that Freedom of Speech should be suspended when someone deems that speech 'hate speech'?The reason that some colleges have turned away some voices has nothing to do with denying free speech and everything to do with maintaining security on campus.
In today’s media on demand cultures, nobody is prevented from being heard.
Next fake controversy.
What you are saying then is all people on campus have to do to stop people they don't like from speaking - is to threaten violence.
That's ridiculous. That is giving into violence...accepting it. Allowing bullies to flourish.
I generally despise Trump as POTUS...but he is right here.
All he is saying is: 'if you want federal funding, you better make damn sure that the people whom you invite to speak are allowed to do so you do not allow people to bully/threaten people on your campuses to muzzle other people from exercising their right to Freedom of Speech.'
There is NOTHING wrong with that.
It’s not a problem that requires action. It’s limited in scope and overblown by RW whiners who need something to stir up their base with.
College students and their institutions are not opposed to hearing differing POV. They simply want to keep hate speech where it belongs.
'Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.'
The protests that you have seen when someone like Milo or Spencer books a gig at a college are organic. Nobody is planning to shut down speech.
Of course they are...the violence about Ann Coulter's speech was trying to do EXACTLY that.
And it seems Elizabeth Warren disagrees with you.
Elizabeth Warren Speaks Out In Support Of Ann Coulter Like A True Patriot (VIDEO)
Once again. This is a rare occurrence and the objection that students have is not about hearing differing POV. It’s about their institutions being used to promote hate speech.
Ann Coulter is heard. Believe me.
Talk about having things backwards...There are many in this country who claim to be liberal, but are clearly not.Refusing to allow differing opinions and ideas to be expressed is NOT JUST 'Intolerance' - it is a sign of FEAR.
There is nothing more liberal than the protection and advocacy of freedom of expression.
Instead of looking for every reason to promote it, these people look for any excuse to shut it down.
That is not liberal.
.