HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant’s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Bad argument.
If heteros adopt then the kid was already deprived of the chance to be raised by his actual parents. Or at least the realization is that the adoption was a better alternative to begin with. Not to mention that heteros are providing the mother-and-father circumstance which is what has been empirically demonstrated as the ideal for child rearing as illustrated by the social problems created by alternatives since the 1960's.
Homos contrive those adoption circumstances with no regard for the kid's rights.
It's circumstance vs contrivance and intent. Big difference.

It's the exact same argument.

If a different-sex couple uses sperm donation or adoption to have a child or bring one into their lives. They are denying that child the right to be raised by the "actual parents".

And you comparison of dual parent families to single parent families with your "social problems" of the poor is still a fail.


>>>>

You conveniently left out the part where that kid will still be raised by a mother and a father.
You need only to look at every mostly black jurisdiction on the country to see prime empirical examples of the failures generated by unstructured families. You argue like monty pyons's black knight.

Spare us the horseshit and logical fallacies

 

[RoshawnMarkwees]

You conveniently left out the part where that kid will still be raised by a mother and a father.
You need only to look at every mostly black jurisdiction on the country to see prime empirical examples of the failures generated by unstructured families. You argue like monty pyons's black knight.

Actually I pointed out the fail part of your logic. You attempt to compare two parent to single parent homes as the root of the problem in the communities you point to.

Didn't "conveniently left" anything out.


>>>>

Single parent homes missing a gender parent is the root of the problem in those failing locales.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

You conveniently left out the part where that kid will still be raised by a mother and a father.
You need only to look at every mostly black jurisdiction on the country to see prime empirical examples of the failures generated by unstructured families. You argue like monty pyons's black knight.

Actually I pointed out the fail part of your logic. You attempt to compare two parent to single parent homes as the root of the problem in the communities you point to.

Didn't "conveniently left" anything out.


>>>>

Single parent homes missing a gender parent is the root of the problem in those failing locales.

Moronic bigots are the problem.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Single parent homes missing a gender parent is the root of the problem in those failing locales.

Here fixed it for you: "Single parent homes is the root of the problem in those failing locales."


>>>>

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Yet another adoption case headed for SCOTUS. These heartless and moronic bastards won't stop but they will get smacked down sooner or later.......

Lesbian Parent Petitions U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Adoption Rights Case
November 17, 2015 by HRC staff Lesbian Parent Petitions U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Adoption Rights Case
lesbian parent in Alabama has petitioned the Supreme Court to hear her case challenging an Alabama Supreme Court decision nullifying a Georgia adoption order that provided her legal recognition as a parent. On September 18, the Alabama Supreme Court nullified a lesbian couple’s adoption order issued by a Georgia state court. The court held the Georgia state court violated its own state law when it issued the adoption order to the couple.

Update! Supreme Court reverses Alabama court that denied lesbian woman's adoption Supreme Court reverses Alabama court that denied lesbian woman's adoption

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday unanimously reversed an Alabama court's refusal to recognize a same-sex adoption.

The justices upheld a challenge brought by an Alabama woman after her state's highest court refused to recognize the adoption she and her former lesbian partner were granted in Georgia.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yet another adoption case headed for SCOTUS. These heartless and moronic bastards won't stop but they will get smacked down sooner or later.......

Lesbian Parent Petitions U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Adoption Rights Case
November 17, 2015 by HRC staff Lesbian Parent Petitions U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Adoption Rights Case
lesbian parent in Alabama has petitioned the Supreme Court to hear her case challenging an Alabama Supreme Court decision nullifying a Georgia adoption order that provided her legal recognition as a parent. On September 18, the Alabama Supreme Court nullified a lesbian couple’s adoption order issued by a Georgia state court. The court held the Georgia state court violated its own state law when it issued the adoption order to the couple.

Update! Supreme Court reverses Alabama court that denied lesbian woman's adoption Supreme Court reverses Alabama court that denied lesbian woman's adoption

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday unanimously reversed an Alabama court's refusal to recognize a same-sex adoption.

The justices upheld a challenge brought by an Alabama woman after her state's highest court refused to recognize the adoption she and her former lesbian partner were granted in Georgia.

Excellent news.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

Yet another adoption case headed for SCOTUS. These heartless and moronic bastards won't stop but they will get smacked down sooner or later.......

Lesbian Parent Petitions U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Adoption Rights Case
November 17, 2015 by HRC staff Lesbian Parent Petitions U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Adoption Rights Case
lesbian parent in Alabama has petitioned the Supreme Court to hear her case challenging an Alabama Supreme Court decision nullifying a Georgia adoption order that provided her legal recognition as a parent. On September 18, the Alabama Supreme Court nullified a lesbian couple’s adoption order issued by a Georgia state court. The court held the Georgia state court violated its own state law when it issued the adoption order to the couple.

Update! Supreme Court reverses Alabama court that denied lesbian woman's adoption Supreme Court reverses Alabama court that denied lesbian woman's adoption

WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court on Monday unanimously reversed an Alabama court's refusal to recognize a same-sex adoption.

The justices upheld a challenge brought by an Alabama woman after her state's highest court refused to recognize the adoption she and her former lesbian partner were granted in Georgia.

Excellent news.

Yes ! And unanimous too. It bodes well for the Mississippi case when it gets there.

 

[Conservative65]

I found this story out of backwards Mississippi particularly disturbing in light of the enormous gains made by LGBT people in recent years and culminating in the SCOTUS ruling in Obergefell that bans on same sex marriage are unconstitutional. This stance on adoption not only goes against the tide of the evolving standards of human decency by perpetuating discrimination, but also harms children who are in need of a loving home as well as those who are currently in the care of gay people and who could benefit by a second parent adoption by the legal parent’s partner.

This policy is especially irrational and hateful in view of the fact that Mississippi is the only state in the country with such a ban in place. Moreover, many states have been allowing adoption by gay people long before marriage was even on the radar. In my state of New Jersey, joint adoption by same sex couples has been allowed since 1997, the first state to officially do so. It was not much of an issue then and it certainly is not one now. How is it possible that two states in the United States are existing is such a disparate moral, logical and legal reality?

Gov. Bryant’s support of a state law that enshrines discrimination is shameful, especially coming at a time when it is imperative that we find permanent families and safe, loving homes for every child - including many in Mississippi currently in foster care,” said Rob Hill, HRC Mississippi State Director. “We call on Attorney General Jim Hood to come down on the right side of history -- don’t defend the ban, allow it to become another discarded artifact of discrimination.”
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

The case presents challenges to the ban from the perspective of a parent who is unable to receive legal recognition of her parental status because her spouse is the child’s legal parent and also a woman; it also challenges the prohibition of a same-sex couple to adopt a child through the foster care system. Despite the discriminatory ban, which has been in place since 2000, Mississippi has the highest number of LGBT people raising children.

“With one-third of Mississippi’s 3,484 same-sex couples already raising children and 100 Mississippi youth in foster care waiting for loving adoptive homes, shame on the governor for trying to keep Mississippi tethered to a discriminatory past.” Hill said.
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

August 12, 2015 by HRC staff

All you had to say is you live in New Jersey and I knew you were fucked up. That you support freaks of nature proves it.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I found this story out of backwards Mississippi particularly disturbing in light of the enormous gains made by LGBT people in recent years and culminating in the SCOTUS ruling in Obergefell that bans on same sex marriage are unconstitutional. This stance on adoption not only goes against the tide of the evolving standards of human decency by perpetuating discrimination, but also harms children who are in need of a loving home as well as those who are currently in the care of gay people and who could benefit by a second parent adoption by the legal parent’s partner.

This policy is especially irrational and hateful in view of the fact that Mississippi is the only state in the country with such a ban in place. Moreover, many states have been allowing adoption by gay people long before marriage was even on the radar. In my state of New Jersey, joint adoption by same sex couples has been allowed since 1997, the first state to officially do so. It was not much of an issue then and it certainly is not one now. How is it possible that two states in the United States are existing is such a disparate moral, logical and legal reality?

Gov. Bryant’s support of a state law that enshrines discrimination is shameful, especially coming at a time when it is imperative that we find permanent families and safe, loving homes for every child - including many in Mississippi currently in foster care,” said Rob Hill, HRC Mississippi State Director. “We call on Attorney General Jim Hood to come down on the right side of history -- don’t defend the ban, allow it to become another discarded artifact of discrimination.”
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

The case presents challenges to the ban from the perspective of a parent who is unable to receive legal recognition of her parental status because her spouse is the child’s legal parent and also a woman; it also challenges the prohibition of a same-sex couple to adopt a child through the foster care system. Despite the discriminatory ban, which has been in place since 2000, Mississippi has the highest number of LGBT people raising children.

“With one-third of Mississippi’s 3,484 same-sex couples already raising children and 100 Mississippi youth in foster care waiting for loving adoptive homes, shame on the governor for trying to keep Mississippi tethered to a discriminatory past.” Hill said.
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

August 12, 2015 by HRC staff

All you had to say is you live in New Jersey and I knew you were fucked up. That you support freaks of nature proves it.

Thank you for that thoughtful and cogent commentary on an important and sensitive topic. As a contributor here, you add a valuable dimension to the discussion. Keep up the good work!

 

[Conservative65]

I found this story out of backwards Mississippi particularly disturbing in light of the enormous gains made by LGBT people in recent years and culminating in the SCOTUS ruling in Obergefell that bans on same sex marriage are unconstitutional. This stance on adoption not only goes against the tide of the evolving standards of human decency by perpetuating discrimination, but also harms children who are in need of a loving home as well as those who are currently in the care of gay people and who could benefit by a second parent adoption by the legal parent’s partner.

This policy is especially irrational and hateful in view of the fact that Mississippi is the only state in the country with such a ban in place. Moreover, many states have been allowing adoption by gay people long before marriage was even on the radar. In my state of New Jersey, joint adoption by same sex couples has been allowed since 1997, the first state to officially do so. It was not much of an issue then and it certainly is not one now. How is it possible that two states in the United States are existing is such a disparate moral, logical and legal reality?

Gov. Bryant’s support of a state law that enshrines discrimination is shameful, especially coming at a time when it is imperative that we find permanent families and safe, loving homes for every child - including many in Mississippi currently in foster care,” said Rob Hill, HRC Mississippi State Director. “We call on Attorney General Jim Hood to come down on the right side of history -- don’t defend the ban, allow it to become another discarded artifact of discrimination.”
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

The case presents challenges to the ban from the perspective of a parent who is unable to receive legal recognition of her parental status because her spouse is the child’s legal parent and also a woman; it also challenges the prohibition of a same-sex couple to adopt a child through the foster care system. Despite the discriminatory ban, which has been in place since 2000, Mississippi has the highest number of LGBT people raising children.

“With one-third of Mississippi’s 3,484 same-sex couples already raising children and 100 Mississippi youth in foster care waiting for loving adoptive homes, shame on the governor for trying to keep Mississippi tethered to a discriminatory past.” Hill said.
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

August 12, 2015 by HRC staff

All you had to say is you live in New Jersey and I knew you were fucked up. That you support freaks of nature proves it.

Thank you for that thoughtful and cogent commentary on an important and sensitive topic. As a contributor here, you add a valuable dimension to the discussion. Keep up the good work!

As a progressive that wastes oxygen when you breathe, you contribute nothing to society.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I found this story out of backwards Mississippi particularly disturbing in light of the enormous gains made by LGBT people in recent years and culminating in the SCOTUS ruling in Obergefell that bans on same sex marriage are unconstitutional. This stance on adoption not only goes against the tide of the evolving standards of human decency by perpetuating discrimination, but also harms children who are in need of a loving home as well as those who are currently in the care of gay people and who could benefit by a second parent adoption by the legal parent’s partner.

This policy is especially irrational and hateful in view of the fact that Mississippi is the only state in the country with such a ban in place. Moreover, many states have been allowing adoption by gay people long before marriage was even on the radar. In my state of New Jersey, joint adoption by same sex couples has been allowed since 1997, the first state to officially do so. It was not much of an issue then and it certainly is not one now. How is it possible that two states in the United States are existing is such a disparate moral, logical and legal reality?

Gov. Bryant’s support of a state law that enshrines discrimination is shameful, especially coming at a time when it is imperative that we find permanent families and safe, loving homes for every child - including many in Mississippi currently in foster care,” said Rob Hill, HRC Mississippi State Director. “We call on Attorney General Jim Hood to come down on the right side of history -- don’t defend the ban, allow it to become another discarded artifact of discrimination.”
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

The case presents challenges to the ban from the perspective of a parent who is unable to receive legal recognition of her parental status because her spouse is the child’s legal parent and also a woman; it also challenges the prohibition of a same-sex couple to adopt a child through the foster care system. Despite the discriminatory ban, which has been in place since 2000, Mississippi has the highest number of LGBT people raising children.

“With one-third of Mississippi’s 3,484 same-sex couples already raising children and 100 Mississippi youth in foster care waiting for loving adoptive homes, shame on the governor for trying to keep Mississippi tethered to a discriminatory past.” Hill said.
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

August 12, 2015 by HRC staff

All you had to say is you live in New Jersey and I knew you were fucked up. That you support freaks of nature proves it.

Thank you for that thoughtful and cogent commentary on an important and sensitive topic. As a contributor here, you add a valuable dimension to the discussion. Keep up the good work!

As a progressive that wastes oxygen when you breathe, you contribute nothing to society.

 

[Conservative65]

I found this story out of backwards Mississippi particularly disturbing in light of the enormous gains made by LGBT people in recent years and culminating in the SCOTUS ruling in Obergefell that bans on same sex marriage are unconstitutional. This stance on adoption not only goes against the tide of the evolving standards of human decency by perpetuating discrimination, but also harms children who are in need of a loving home as well as those who are currently in the care of gay people and who could benefit by a second parent adoption by the legal parent’s partner.

This policy is especially irrational and hateful in view of the fact that Mississippi is the only state in the country with such a ban in place. Moreover, many states have been allowing adoption by gay people long before marriage was even on the radar. In my state of New Jersey, joint adoption by same sex couples has been allowed since 1997, the first state to officially do so. It was not much of an issue then and it certainly is not one now. How is it possible that two states in the United States are existing is such a disparate moral, logical and legal reality?

Gov. Bryant’s support of a state law that enshrines discrimination is shameful, especially coming at a time when it is imperative that we find permanent families and safe, loving homes for every child - including many in Mississippi currently in foster care,” said Rob Hill, HRC Mississippi State Director. “We call on Attorney General Jim Hood to come down on the right side of history -- don’t defend the ban, allow it to become another discarded artifact of discrimination.”
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

The case presents challenges to the ban from the perspective of a parent who is unable to receive legal recognition of her parental status because her spouse is the child’s legal parent and also a woman; it also challenges the prohibition of a same-sex couple to adopt a child through the foster care system. Despite the discriminatory ban, which has been in place since 2000, Mississippi has the highest number of LGBT people raising children.

“With one-third of Mississippi’s 3,484 same-sex couples already raising children and 100 Mississippi youth in foster care waiting for loving adoptive homes, shame on the governor for trying to keep Mississippi tethered to a discriminatory past.” Hill said.
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

August 12, 2015 by HRC staff

All you had to say is you live in New Jersey and I knew you were fucked up. That you support freaks of nature proves it.

Thank you for that thoughtful and cogent commentary on an important and sensitive topic. As a contributor here, you add a valuable dimension to the discussion. Keep up the good work!

As a progressive that wastes oxygen when you breathe, you contribute nothing to society.

Yeah, you're a Republican. Bullshit you fucking lying asshole.

 

[TheProgressivePatriot]

I found this story out of backwards Mississippi particularly disturbing in light of the enormous gains made by LGBT people in recent years and culminating in the SCOTUS ruling in Obergefell that bans on same sex marriage are unconstitutional. This stance on adoption not only goes against the tide of the evolving standards of human decency by perpetuating discrimination, but also harms children who are in need of a loving home as well as those who are currently in the care of gay people and who could benefit by a second parent adoption by the legal parent’s partner.

This policy is especially irrational and hateful in view of the fact that Mississippi is the only state in the country with such a ban in place. Moreover, many states have been allowing adoption by gay people long before marriage was even on the radar. In my state of New Jersey, joint adoption by same sex couples has been allowed since 1997, the first state to officially do so. It was not much of an issue then and it certainly is not one now. How is it possible that two states in the United States are existing is such a disparate moral, logical and legal reality?

Gov. Bryant’s support of a state law that enshrines discrimination is shameful, especially coming at a time when it is imperative that we find permanent families and safe, loving homes for every child - including many in Mississippi currently in foster care,” said Rob Hill, HRC Mississippi State Director. “We call on Attorney General Jim Hood to come down on the right side of history -- don’t defend the ban, allow it to become another discarded artifact of discrimination.”
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

The case presents challenges to the ban from the perspective of a parent who is unable to receive legal recognition of her parental status because her spouse is the child’s legal parent and also a woman; it also challenges the prohibition of a same-sex couple to adopt a child through the foster care system. Despite the discriminatory ban, which has been in place since 2000, Mississippi has the highest number of LGBT people raising children.

“With one-third of Mississippi’s 3,484 same-sex couples already raising children and 100 Mississippi youth in foster care waiting for loving adoptive homes, shame on the governor for trying to keep Mississippi tethered to a discriminatory past.” Hill said.
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

August 12, 2015 by HRC staff

All you had to say is you live in New Jersey and I knew you were fucked up. That you support freaks of nature proves it.

Thank you for that thoughtful and cogent commentary on an important and sensitive topic. As a contributor here, you add a valuable dimension to the discussion. Keep up the good work!

As a progressive that wastes oxygen when you breathe, you contribute nothing to society.

Listen moron. I have better things to do than to get into a juvenile pissing match with you. Fuck off bubba

 

[Conservative65]

I found this story out of backwards Mississippi particularly disturbing in light of the enormous gains made by LGBT people in recent years and culminating in the SCOTUS ruling in Obergefell that bans on same sex marriage are unconstitutional. This stance on adoption not only goes against the tide of the evolving standards of human decency by perpetuating discrimination, but also harms children who are in need of a loving home as well as those who are currently in the care of gay people and who could benefit by a second parent adoption by the legal parent’s partner.

This policy is especially irrational and hateful in view of the fact that Mississippi is the only state in the country with such a ban in place. Moreover, many states have been allowing adoption by gay people long before marriage was even on the radar. In my state of New Jersey, joint adoption by same sex couples has been allowed since 1997, the first state to officially do so. It was not much of an issue then and it certainly is not one now. How is it possible that two states in the United States are existing is such a disparate moral, logical and legal reality?

Gov. Bryant’s support of a state law that enshrines discrimination is shameful, especially coming at a time when it is imperative that we find permanent families and safe, loving homes for every child - including many in Mississippi currently in foster care,” said Rob Hill, HRC Mississippi State Director. “We call on Attorney General Jim Hood to come down on the right side of history -- don’t defend the ban, allow it to become another discarded artifact of discrimination.”
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

The case presents challenges to the ban from the perspective of a parent who is unable to receive legal recognition of her parental status because her spouse is the child’s legal parent and also a woman; it also challenges the prohibition of a same-sex couple to adopt a child through the foster care system. Despite the discriminatory ban, which has been in place since 2000, Mississippi has the highest number of LGBT people raising children.

“With one-third of Mississippi’s 3,484 same-sex couples already raising children and 100 Mississippi youth in foster care waiting for loving adoptive homes, shame on the governor for trying to keep Mississippi tethered to a discriminatory past.” Hill said.
HRC Condemns Mississippi Gov. Phil Bryant s Statement of Support for LGBT Adoption Ban Human Rights Campaign

August 12, 2015 by HRC staff

All you had to say is you live in New Jersey and I knew you were fucked up. That you support freaks of nature proves it.

Thank you for that thoughtful and cogent commentary on an important and sensitive topic. As a contributor here, you add a valuable dimension to the discussion. Keep up the good work!

As a progressive that wastes oxygen when you breathe, you contribute nothing to society.

Listen moron. I have better things to do than to get into a juvenile pissing match with you. Fuck off bubba

Tell you what. When you can enforce your demands pussy, go for it. Since you're nothing more than a big mouth that licks the President's ass, I doubt you can.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I found this story out of backwards Mississippi particularly disturbing in light of the enormous gains made by LGBT people in recent years and culminating in the SCOTUS ruling in Obergefell that bans on same sex marriage are unconstitutional. This stance on adoption not only goes against the tide of the evolving standards of human decency by perpetuating discrimination, but also harms children who are in need of a loving home as well as those who are currently in the care of gay people and who could benefit by a second parent adoption by the legal parent’s partner.

This policy is especially irrational and hateful in view of the fact that Mississippi is the only state in the country with such a ban in place. Moreover, many states have been allowing adoption by gay people long before marriage was even on the radar. In my state of New Jersey, joint adoption by same sex couples has been allowed since 1997, the first state to officially do so. It was not much of an issue then and it certainly is not one now. How is it possible that two states in the United States are existing is such a disparate moral, logical and legal reality?

All you had to say is you live in New Jersey and I knew you were fucked up. That you support freaks of nature proves it.

Thank you for that thoughtful and cogent commentary on an important and sensitive topic. As a contributor here, you add a valuable dimension to the discussion. Keep up the good work!

As a progressive that wastes oxygen when you breathe, you contribute nothing to society.

Yeah, you're a Republican. Bullshit you fucking lying asshole.

You don't belong in our GOP. You are weaseling far right reactionary who offers nothing worthwhile to our country. Don't be threatening anyone.

 

[Conservative65]

All you had to say is you live in New Jersey and I knew you were fucked up. That you support freaks of nature proves it.

Thank you for that thoughtful and cogent commentary on an important and sensitive topic. As a contributor here, you add a valuable dimension to the discussion. Keep up the good work!

As a progressive that wastes oxygen when you breathe, you contribute nothing to society.

Yeah, you're a Republican. Bullshit you fucking lying asshole.

You don't belong in our GOP. You are weaseling far right reactionary who offers nothing worthwhile to our country. Don't be threatening anyone.

Your GOP? You haven't been a part of it in years. Run along boy.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Thank you for that thoughtful and cogent commentary on an important and sensitive topic. As a contributor here, you add a valuable dimension to the discussion. Keep up the good work!

As a progressive that wastes oxygen when you breathe, you contribute nothing to society.

Yeah, you're a Republican. Bullshit you fucking lying asshole.

You don't belong in our GOP. You are weaseling far right reactionary who offers nothing worthwhile to our country. Don't be threatening anyone.

Your GOP? You haven't been a part of it in years. Run along boy.

My GOP. Just voted in the primary, for Kasich.

 

[Pete7469]

Yeah, you're a Republican. Bullshit you fucking lying asshole.

Jerkoff Fakey is a republicrat, in fact he is the epitome of a republicrat. He shares nothing with the GOP base as far as principles go, but how many republicrats do? In fact what "principles" do republicrats have?

"Smaller government"?

Government ballooned under Bush43 and bed wetters like Fakey called his supporters "reactionaries" as if they knew what the word meant.

"Fiscal restraint"?

The republicrats pledged to roll back the insane levels of spending that the meat puppet queer demanded and barely put a dent in it, while regressive pukes like Jerkoff Fakey and the rest of the libturd parasites pretend their moonbat messiah never promised to cut the debt in half.

"My GOP"

Voted for Ted Cruz, who would leave it up to the states to decide if perverts can adopt children or get "married", if abortion can be a form of government funded birth control, if people can smoke pot wherever they like, and if sloths can drain a state treasury through welfare entitlements.

These queer issues irritate me because they are so fucking insignificant to the real problems we face today, and regressive pinheads like the turd who calls himself a "progressive patriot" (as if a soviet apparatchik could actually be a patriot) pretend that America didn't become an economic behemoth when government was restrained by the Constitution and our culture was regulated by a moral standard. The looser the morals became, and the more the government has grown, the less prosperity and freedom we have.

Fuck Jerkoff Fakey. and Fuck RegressiveTroglodyte.

 

[Conservative65]

Yeah, you're a Republican. Bullshit you fucking lying asshole.

Jerkoff Fakey is a republicrat, in fact he is the epitome of a republicrat. He shares nothing with the GOP base as far as principles go, but how many republicrats do? In fact what "principles" do republicrats have?

"Smaller government"?

Government ballooned under Bush43 and bed wetters like Fakey called his supporters "reactionaries" as if they knew what the word meant.

"Fiscal restraint"?

The republicrats pledged to roll back the insane levels of spending that the meat puppet queer demanded and barely put a dent in it, while regressive pukes like Jerkoff Fakey and the rest of the libturd parasites pretend their moonbat messiah never promised to cut the debt in half.

"My GOP"

Voted for Ted Cruz, who would leave it up to the states to decide if perverts can adopt children or get "married", if abortion can be a form of government funded birth control, if people can smoke pot wherever they like, and if sloths can drain a state treasury through welfare entitlements.

These queer issues irritate me because they are so fucking insignificant to the real problems we face today, and regressive pinheads like the turd who calls himself a "progressive patriot" (as if a soviet apparatchik could actually be a patriot) pretend that America didn't become an economic behemoth when government was restrained by the Constitution and our culture was regulated by a moral standard. The looser the morals became, and the more the government has grown, the less prosperity and freedom we have.

Fuck Jerkoff Fakey. and Fuck RegressiveTroglodyte.

From what I read, he espouses many Democrat ideas.

 

[JakeStarkey]

I am a mainstream Republican and petey and con65 are far right reactionary hard cons.

That far right groups is not the 'base' of the GOP, despite what they say or wan

They hope wishfully for a Cruz and will get a Trump or a Rubio or a convention pick.