https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/01/18/this-is-where-90-percent-of-glo

[francoHFW]

This is where 90 percent of global warming is going

As scientists and NO GOPers have known for ever...

 

[Missourian]

Best Thread Title Evah!

​

 

[TNHarley]

Best Thread Title Evah!

View attachment 60260

​

you are digging the screenshots, ey? lol

 

[francoHFW]

TY, TYVM. lol

 

[francoHFW]

from link:
Gleckler is the lead author of a new study in the journal Nature Climate Change finding that, in the past two decades, ocean heat content has been rising rapidly and that, much more than before, heat is also mixing into the deeper layers of the ocean, rather than remaining near the surface.
“As the upper oceans have been warming over time, more and more of this heat is finding its way down into the deeper ocean, and our results indicate that the fractional amount of heat that is trapped in the deeper ocean is increasing as well,” Gleckler said.
“We find that the heat uptake of the global oceans has doubled since about 1997, compared to what took place prior to that over the industrial era. And that was a surprising result to us,” he added.
The research was conducted with scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Pennsylvania State University.
We tend to think of global warming as an overall upward trend in air temperature — but that’s simply the most immediate way in which we experience it. From a scientific perspective, it is perhaps best understood as anenergy imbalance between the Earth and space, with less heat escaping and more being retained within the planet’s system.
In this sense, the new study represents a strong confirmation of this overall energy-balance shift. If large volumes of heat are trapped on Earth because of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, then inevitably, the majority of that heat must be stored in the oceans, simply because of their greater ability to retain such energy.

Plus every year is the hottest yet, but no worries, dupes. Rush has proved it's a hoax since a couple professors at a third rate college in E. Anglia muffed an experiment...

 

[BluesLegend]

Franco quick turn off your computer its consuming fossil fuels and heating the planet.

 

[westwall]

This is where 90 percent of global warming is going

As scientists and NO GOPers have known for ever...

That's funny. They have no mechanism to show how that would work. You see dear unscientific fruitloop, UV radiation CAN penetrate deep enough into the oceans to warm them. That is well documented. UV light will penetrate as much as 500 meters deep. Long Wave IR on the other hand (the supposed culprit) is not even capable of penetrating 1 millimeter. Yes, you read that correctly. And as any 5th grader will tell you heat rises so their whole tale about global warming is false.

Demonstrably so. But facts have never bothered anti science doofi like franco here.

 

[westwall]

from link:
Gleckler is the lead author of a new study in the journal Nature Climate Change finding that, in the past two decades, ocean heat content has been rising rapidly and that, much more than before, heat is also mixing into the deeper layers of the ocean, rather than remaining near the surface.
“As the upper oceans have been warming over time, more and more of this heat is finding its way down into the deeper ocean, and our results indicate that the fractional amount of heat that is trapped in the deeper ocean is increasing as well,” Gleckler said.
“We find that the heat uptake of the global oceans has doubled since about 1997, compared to what took place prior to that over the industrial era. And that was a surprising result to us,” he added.
The research was conducted with scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Pennsylvania State University.
We tend to think of global warming as an overall upward trend in air temperature — but that’s simply the most immediate way in which we experience it. From a scientific perspective, it is perhaps best understood as anenergy imbalance between the Earth and space, with less heat escaping and more being retained within the planet’s system.
In this sense, the new study represents a strong confirmation of this overall energy-balance shift. If large volumes of heat are trapped on Earth because of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, then inevitably, the majority of that heat must be stored in the oceans, simply because of their greater ability to retain such energy.

Plus every year is the hottest yet, but no worries, dupes. Rush has proved it's a hoax since a couple professors at a third rate college in E. Anglia muffed an experiment...

You twits are all alike. Here is the death knell of your silly "study"...
"identified in observational5, 6, 7, modelling8, 9 and data re-analysis10, 11 studies."


And, dear franco here can't tell the difference between fact and science fiction....

 

[francoHFW]

I'll go with NOAA and Penn St., thanks.

 

[francoHFW]

At any rate, I'm against pollution and for AEnergy.

 

[francoHFW]

from link:
Gleckler is the lead author of a new study in the journal Nature Climate Change finding that, in the past two decades, ocean heat content has been rising rapidly and that, much more than before, heat is also mixing into the deeper layers of the ocean, rather than remaining near the surface.
“As the upper oceans have been warming over time, more and more of this heat is finding its way down into the deeper ocean, and our results indicate that the fractional amount of heat that is trapped in the deeper ocean is increasing as well,” Gleckler said.
“We find that the heat uptake of the global oceans has doubled since about 1997, compared to what took place prior to that over the industrial era. And that was a surprising result to us,” he added.
The research was conducted with scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Pennsylvania State University.
We tend to think of global warming as an overall upward trend in air temperature — but that’s simply the most immediate way in which we experience it. From a scientific perspective, it is perhaps best understood as anenergy imbalance between the Earth and space, with less heat escaping and more being retained within the planet’s system.
In this sense, the new study represents a strong confirmation of this overall energy-balance shift. If large volumes of heat are trapped on Earth because of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, then inevitably, the majority of that heat must be stored in the oceans, simply because of their greater ability to retain such energy.

Plus every year is the hottest yet, but no worries, dupes. Rush has proved it's a hoax since a couple professors at a third rate college in E. Anglia muffed an experiment...

You twits are all alike. Here is the death knell of your silly "study"...
"identified in observational5, 6, 7, modelling8, 9 and data re-analysis10, 11 studies."


And, dear franco here can't tell the difference between fact and science fiction....

All your links go to this study, so I can't see any "death knell" lol...


''detection and attribution studies have used observations and climate models to identify an anthropogenic warming signature in the upper (0–700 m) ocean1, 2, 3, 4. Recently, as a result of the so-called surface warming hiatus, there has been considerable interest in global ocean heat content (OHC) changes in the deeper ocean, including natural and anthropogenically forced changes identified in observational5, 6, 7, modelling8, 9 and data re-analysis10, 11 studies. Here, we examine OHC changes in the context of the Earth’s global energy budget since early in the industrial era (circa 1865–2015) for a range of depths. We rely on OHC change estimates from a diverse collection of measurement systems including data from the nineteenth-century Challengerexpedition12, a multi-decadal record of ship-based in situ mostly upper-ocean measurements, the more recent near-global Argo floats profiling to intermediate (2,000 m) depths13, and full-depth repeated transoceanic sections5. We show that the multi-model mean constructed from the current generation of historically forced climate models is consistent with the OHC changes from this diverse collection of observational systems. Our model-based analysis suggests that nearly half of the industrial-era increases in global OHC have occurred in recent decades, with over a third of the accumulated heat occurring below 700 m and steadily rising."

Explanation?

 

[westwall]

from link:
Gleckler is the lead author of a new study in the journal Nature Climate Change finding that, in the past two decades, ocean heat content has been rising rapidly and that, much more than before, heat is also mixing into the deeper layers of the ocean, rather than remaining near the surface.
“As the upper oceans have been warming over time, more and more of this heat is finding its way down into the deeper ocean, and our results indicate that the fractional amount of heat that is trapped in the deeper ocean is increasing as well,” Gleckler said.
“We find that the heat uptake of the global oceans has doubled since about 1997, compared to what took place prior to that over the industrial era. And that was a surprising result to us,” he added.
The research was conducted with scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Pennsylvania State University.
We tend to think of global warming as an overall upward trend in air temperature — but that’s simply the most immediate way in which we experience it. From a scientific perspective, it is perhaps best understood as anenergy imbalance between the Earth and space, with less heat escaping and more being retained within the planet’s system.
In this sense, the new study represents a strong confirmation of this overall energy-balance shift. If large volumes of heat are trapped on Earth because of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, then inevitably, the majority of that heat must be stored in the oceans, simply because of their greater ability to retain such energy.

Plus every year is the hottest yet, but no worries, dupes. Rush has proved it's a hoax since a couple professors at a third rate college in E. Anglia muffed an experiment...

You twits are all alike. Here is the death knell of your silly "study"...
"identified in observational5, 6, 7, modelling8, 9 and data re-analysis10, 11 studies."


And, dear franco here can't tell the difference between fact and science fiction....

All your links go to this study, so I can't see any "death knell" lol...


''detection and attribution studies have used observations and climate models to identify an anthropogenic warming signature in the upper (0–700 m) ocean1, 2, 3, 4. Recently, as a result of the so-called surface warming hiatus, there has been considerable interest in global ocean heat content (OHC) changes in the deeper ocean, including natural and anthropogenically forced changes identified in observational5, 6, 7, modelling8, 9 and data re-analysis10, 11 studies. Here, we examine OHC changes in the context of the Earth’s global energy budget since early in the industrial era (circa 1865–2015) for a range of depths. We rely on OHC change estimates from a diverse collection of measurement systems including data from the nineteenth-century Challengerexpedition12, a multi-decadal record of ship-based in situ mostly upper-ocean measurements, the more recent near-global Argo floats profiling to intermediate (2,000 m) depths13, and full-depth repeated transoceanic sections5. We show that the multi-model mean constructed from the current generation of historically forced climate models is consistent with the OHC changes from this diverse collection of observational systems. Our model-based analysis suggests that nearly half of the industrial-era increases in global OHC have occurred in recent decades, with over a third of the accumulated heat occurring below 700 m and steadily rising."

Explanation?

Yes, you really are that stupid. How much of his work is based on models and how much on something real? I would hazard a guess that it is over 90% modelling. Nope, based on the number of times that models are mentioned in the abstract i am now quite confident that 99% of his "study" is based on computer derived fiction.

You see that's the problem with climatology studies is they are mainly fiction.

 

[9aces]

Water's getting warmer? Good, I hate cold water.

 

[Old Rocks]

Dear Mr. Westwall, the scientists all predicted, and predict, increasing warming. You have predicted cooling for the last six years. In that period, we have had 2010 and 2014, both years with the about the same warming as 1998. Last year, 2015 went well above 1998. And 2016 will most likely do the same. So, by results, your whole spiel looks pretty sad.

Now add to that most of the scientists in the world completely disagree with what you state. And the melting of the glaciers, warming of the oceans, acidification of the oceans, and melting of the permafrost are all measured phenomena, and your position looks pretty damned silly.

 

[francoHFW]

from link:
Gleckler is the lead author of a new study in the journal Nature Climate Change finding that, in the past two decades, ocean heat content has been rising rapidly and that, much more than before, heat is also mixing into the deeper layers of the ocean, rather than remaining near the surface.
“As the upper oceans have been warming over time, more and more of this heat is finding its way down into the deeper ocean, and our results indicate that the fractional amount of heat that is trapped in the deeper ocean is increasing as well,” Gleckler said.
“We find that the heat uptake of the global oceans has doubled since about 1997, compared to what took place prior to that over the industrial era. And that was a surprising result to us,” he added.
The research was conducted with scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Pennsylvania State University.
We tend to think of global warming as an overall upward trend in air temperature — but that’s simply the most immediate way in which we experience it. From a scientific perspective, it is perhaps best understood as anenergy imbalance between the Earth and space, with less heat escaping and more being retained within the planet’s system.
In this sense, the new study represents a strong confirmation of this overall energy-balance shift. If large volumes of heat are trapped on Earth because of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, then inevitably, the majority of that heat must be stored in the oceans, simply because of their greater ability to retain such energy.

Plus every year is the hottest yet, but no worries, dupes. Rush has proved it's a hoax since a couple professors at a third rate college in E. Anglia muffed an experiment...

You twits are all alike. Here is the death knell of your silly "study"...
"identified in observational5, 6, 7, modelling8, 9 and data re-analysis10, 11 studies."


And, dear franco here can't tell the difference between fact and science fiction....

All your links go to this study, so I can't see any "death knell" lol...


''detection and attribution studies have used observations and climate models to identify an anthropogenic warming signature in the upper (0–700 m) ocean1, 2, 3, 4. Recently, as a result of the so-called surface warming hiatus, there has been considerable interest in global ocean heat content (OHC) changes in the deeper ocean, including natural and anthropogenically forced changes identified in observational5, 6, 7, modelling8, 9 and data re-analysis10, 11 studies. Here, we examine OHC changes in the context of the Earth’s global energy budget since early in the industrial era (circa 1865–2015) for a range of depths. We rely on OHC change estimates from a diverse collection of measurement systems including data from the nineteenth-century Challengerexpedition12, a multi-decadal record of ship-based in situ mostly upper-ocean measurements, the more recent near-global Argo floats profiling to intermediate (2,000 m) depths13, and full-depth repeated transoceanic sections5. We show that the multi-model mean constructed from the current generation of historically forced climate models is consistent with the OHC changes from this diverse collection of observational systems. Our model-based analysis suggests that nearly half of the industrial-era increases in global OHC have occurred in recent decades, with over a third of the accumulated heat occurring below 700 m and steadily rising."

Explanation?

Yes, you really are that stupid. How much of his work is based on models and how much on something real? I would hazard a guess that it is over 90% modelling. Nope, based on the number of times that models are mentioned in the abstract i am now quite confident that 99% of his "study" is based on computer derived fiction.

You see that's the problem with climatology studies is they are mainly fiction.

Sure. lol. Also.ACTUAL READINGS from THOUSANDS of devices. Your "guess" is idiocy. You may be thinking of 1950's car models lol...

 

[westwall]

Dear Mr. Westwall, the scientists all predicted, and predict, increasing warming. You have predicted cooling for the last six years. In that period, we have had 2010 and 2014, both years with the about the same warming as 1998. Last year, 2015 went well above 1998. And 2016 will most likely do the same. So, by results, your whole spiel looks pretty sad.

Now add to that most of the scientists in the world completely disagree with what you state. And the melting of the glaciers, warming of the oceans, acidification of the oceans, and melting of the permafrost are all measured phenomena, and your position looks pretty damned silly.

And it isn't getting warmer. The facts run counter to your hero's predictions so they have had to go back and falsify the historical records to prop up their lies. Furthermore the instruments that are used can't measure as finely as the supposed "record temperature" was. It is all smoke and mirrors and anti-science brainless twits like you lap it up like the little puppies you are.

 

[westwall]

from link:
Gleckler is the lead author of a new study in the journal Nature Climate Change finding that, in the past two decades, ocean heat content has been rising rapidly and that, much more than before, heat is also mixing into the deeper layers of the ocean, rather than remaining near the surface.
“As the upper oceans have been warming over time, more and more of this heat is finding its way down into the deeper ocean, and our results indicate that the fractional amount of heat that is trapped in the deeper ocean is increasing as well,” Gleckler said.
“We find that the heat uptake of the global oceans has doubled since about 1997, compared to what took place prior to that over the industrial era. And that was a surprising result to us,” he added.
The research was conducted with scientists from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and Pennsylvania State University.
We tend to think of global warming as an overall upward trend in air temperature — but that’s simply the most immediate way in which we experience it. From a scientific perspective, it is perhaps best understood as anenergy imbalance between the Earth and space, with less heat escaping and more being retained within the planet’s system.
In this sense, the new study represents a strong confirmation of this overall energy-balance shift. If large volumes of heat are trapped on Earth because of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, then inevitably, the majority of that heat must be stored in the oceans, simply because of their greater ability to retain such energy.

Plus every year is the hottest yet, but no worries, dupes. Rush has proved it's a hoax since a couple professors at a third rate college in E. Anglia muffed an experiment...

You twits are all alike. Here is the death knell of your silly "study"...
"identified in observational5, 6, 7, modelling8, 9 and data re-analysis10, 11 studies."


And, dear franco here can't tell the difference between fact and science fiction....

All your links go to this study, so I can't see any "death knell" lol...


''detection and attribution studies have used observations and climate models to identify an anthropogenic warming signature in the upper (0–700 m) ocean1, 2, 3, 4. Recently, as a result of the so-called surface warming hiatus, there has been considerable interest in global ocean heat content (OHC) changes in the deeper ocean, including natural and anthropogenically forced changes identified in observational5, 6, 7, modelling8, 9 and data re-analysis10, 11 studies. Here, we examine OHC changes in the context of the Earth’s global energy budget since early in the industrial era (circa 1865–2015) for a range of depths. We rely on OHC change estimates from a diverse collection of measurement systems including data from the nineteenth-century Challengerexpedition12, a multi-decadal record of ship-based in situ mostly upper-ocean measurements, the more recent near-global Argo floats profiling to intermediate (2,000 m) depths13, and full-depth repeated transoceanic sections5. We show that the multi-model mean constructed from the current generation of historically forced climate models is consistent with the OHC changes from this diverse collection of observational systems. Our model-based analysis suggests that nearly half of the industrial-era increases in global OHC have occurred in recent decades, with over a third of the accumulated heat occurring below 700 m and steadily rising."

Explanation?

Yes, you really are that stupid. How much of his work is based on models and how much on something real? I would hazard a guess that it is over 90% modelling. Nope, based on the number of times that models are mentioned in the abstract i am now quite confident that 99% of his "study" is based on computer derived fiction.

You see that's the problem with climatology studies is they are mainly fiction.

Sure. lol. Also.ACTUAL READINGS from THOUSANDS of devices. Your "guess" is idiocy. You may be thinking of 1950's car models lol...

Yes, actual readings which are then "re-analysed" to conform to what they want them to say. Like I said brainless anti science halfwits like you lap it up because you are so stupid and ignorant you have no idea what they are feeding you. You're a good little mushroom.

 

[skookerasbil]

This is where 90 percent of global warming is going

As scientists and NO GOPers have known for ever...

nobody cares s0n............


Americans Show Low Levels of Concern on Global Warming


Only on the radar of the craZies............


Show me please where the science is mattering in 2015.?Links please btw...........

 

[Old Rocks]

Oh my, it is not getting warmer. So all the meteorological agencies of nations all over the world are lying. My, it is a grand conspiracy to fool the whole of the world. And only a chosen few know the truth. People like Mr. Westwall.

Do you need more aluminum foil for your little hats, Mr. Westwall?

 

[francoHFW]

Evidence of that? Oh right, Rush proved GW was a hoax, RW idiocy.