Trump isn't doing the audits.
Outside of that overlooked little detail, you pretty much nailed it...And most of those scum couldn't be trusted before the 2020 election in the first place.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
HUGE in GA.
- Thread starter Lastamender
- Start date
Outside of that overlooked little detail, you pretty much nailed it...And most of those scum couldn't be trusted before the 2020 election in the first place.
Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 74,288
- 68,470
- 3,615
You people love judges. How about this sweetheart?
WATCH: Bannon's War Room Delivers Huge Audit Update - Georgia Judge Will Start Decertifying Election if It Is Determined Ballots were Counted Twice
Another swing state may blow things wide open.conservativebrief.com
Another fraudit?
So?
- Nov 14, 2011
- 122,988
- 74,097
- 2,635
Nope, it's simply a fact. We all saw this unfold first hand. We all saw Richard Hopkins' affidavit about a postal supervisor instructing others to back date ballots; only to later recant his claims. No charges of perjury. We all saw Mellissa Carone in front of Michigan's state senate tell them she saw as many as 30,000 ballots scanned multiple times; only to accuse the state of cooking the poll books when a Senator pointed out the poll books would have recorded an excess of 30,000 more votes than ballots had that actually occurred. No charges of perjury.So you want it both ways....gotcha.So? To convict someone of perjury, a court has to be shown they lied. A very high bar to meet when there's no cross examination to impeach claims of, I was mistaken.Affidavits are sworn out under pains and penalties of perjury, knucklehead.It is not perjury they knew of that penalty when they did the affidavits. You have no argument and should have respect for these citizens.they will when calledYou can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations.You might remember all of Trump's challenges got laughed out of court because in the end they had nothing at all they could prove. You can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations. You see Trump fucked up telegraphing his intent to challenge the election if he lost. Everyone tightened up and ran better elections than in past years. Even Florida did good. There's precious little for anyone to point to and reasonably cry foul. .What if it was certified by the cheaters?What a bunch of horseshit. There is no legal mechanism to undo an election after the results are certified.
No fewer than four very experienced election observers in Fulton County have sworn out affidavits that they saw highly suspect ballots being counted.
Sorry about your fail, Dudley.
They won't testify in court..
Nope.. They won't commit purjury for Trump.. and his lawyers certainly won't.. So far all have balked at swearing in court.. This is a Trump scam.. .and I don't care if he does 50 audits, but he needs t pay for them instead of screwing you over.
They won't swear to those affidavits in court. Trump is taking ya'll to the cleaners.
- Dec 28, 2011
- 60,043
- 53,299
- 3,600
- Thread starter
- #64
You people love judges. How about this sweetheart?
WATCH: Bannon's War Room Delivers Huge Audit Update - Georgia Judge Will Start Decertifying Election if It Is Determined Ballots were Counted Twice
Another swing state may blow things wide open.
Another fraudit?
So?
Good, glad you feel that way. You will be leaving the thread then. Bye.
- Dec 28, 2011
- 60,043
- 53,299
- 3,600
- Thread starter
- #65
He did not recant his claims the WP had to print a retraction. You fucking liar.Nope, it's simply a fact. We all saw this unfold first hand. We all saw Richard Hopkins' affidavit about a postal supervisor instructing others to back date ballots; only to later recant his claims. No charges of perjury. We all saw Mellissa Carone in front of Michigan's state senate tell them she saw as many as 30,000 ballots scanned multiple times; only to accuse the state of cooking the poll books when a Senator pointed out the poll books would have recorded an excess of 30,000 more votes than ballots had that actually occurred. No charges of perjury.So you want it both ways....gotcha.So? To convict someone of perjury, a court has to be shown they lied. A very high bar to meet when there's no cross examination to impeach claims of, I was mistaken.Affidavits are sworn out under pains and penalties of perjury, knucklehead.It is not perjury they knew of that penalty when they did the affidavits. You have no argument and should have respect for these citizens.they will when calledYou can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations.You might remember all of Trump's challenges got laughed out of court because in the end they had nothing at all they could prove. You can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations. You see Trump fucked up telegraphing his intent to challenge the election if he lost. Everyone tightened up and ran better elections than in past years. Even Florida did good. There's precious little for anyone to point to and reasonably cry foul. .What if it was certified by the cheaters?What a bunch of horseshit. There is no legal mechanism to undo an election after the results are certified.
No fewer than four very experienced election observers in Fulton County have sworn out affidavits that they saw highly suspect ballots being counted.
Sorry about your fail, Dudley.
They won't testify in court..
Nope.. They won't commit purjury for Trump.. and his lawyers certainly won't.. So far all have balked at swearing in court.. This is a Trump scam.. .and I don't care if he does 50 audits, but he needs t pay for them instead of screwing you over.
They won't swear to those affidavits in court. Trump is taking ya'll to the cleaners.
- Nov 14, 2011
- 122,988
- 74,097
- 2,635
You people love judges. How about this sweetheart?
WATCH: Bannon's War Room Delivers Huge Audit Update - Georgia Judge Will Start Decertifying Election if It Is Determined Ballots were Counted Twice
Another swing state may blow things wide open.
Claims of "supposed" fake military ballots have already thrown out of one court. Who knows what you think you'll find with this [3rd] recount of ballots.
Prove it. It happened in more states than GA.
This lawsuit was filed last year and got tossed. They appealed and got tossed again. And relevant to this thread regarding military ballots, the lawsuit contained less than one line about them...
all 900 military ballots in Fulton county that supposedly were 100% for Joe Biden.
LOL
Imagine that? You go into a courtroom and seek judicial relief based on "supposedly," and then get thrown out of court.
All related documents and results can be found here:
Docket for Pearson v. Kemp, 1:20-cv-04809 - CourtListener.com
Docket for Pearson v. Kemp, 1:20-cv-04809 — Brought to you by the RECAP Initiative and Free Law Project, a non-profit dedicated to creating high quality open legal information.www.courtlistener.com
They have the ballots that prove it now. You lose.
LOLOLOL
The ballots were already counted....
And recounted....
And nothing.
You should win at least one out of 100 claims of fraud before you tell others they lose.
You people love judges. How about this sweetheart?
WATCH: Bannon's War Room Delivers Huge Audit Update - Georgia Judge Will Start Decertifying Election if It Is Determined Ballots were Counted Twice
Another swing state may blow things wide open.
Bannon the criminal...Yeah, you should listen to that guy...
- Nov 14, 2011
- 122,988
- 74,097
- 2,635
Oh? Post a link to it...He did not recant his claims the WP had to print a retraction. You fucking liar.Nope, it's simply a fact. We all saw this unfold first hand. We all saw Richard Hopkins' affidavit about a postal supervisor instructing others to back date ballots; only to later recant his claims. No charges of perjury. We all saw Mellissa Carone in front of Michigan's state senate tell them she saw as many as 30,000 ballots scanned multiple times; only to accuse the state of cooking the poll books when a Senator pointed out the poll books would have recorded an excess of 30,000 more votes than ballots had that actually occurred. No charges of perjury.So you want it both ways....gotcha.So? To convict someone of perjury, a court has to be shown they lied. A very high bar to meet when there's no cross examination to impeach claims of, I was mistaken.Affidavits are sworn out under pains and penalties of perjury, knucklehead.It is not perjury they knew of that penalty when they did the affidavits. You have no argument and should have respect for these citizens.they will when calledYou can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations.You might remember all of Trump's challenges got laughed out of court because in the end they had nothing at all they could prove. You can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations. You see Trump fucked up telegraphing his intent to challenge the election if he lost. Everyone tightened up and ran better elections than in past years. Even Florida did good. There's precious little for anyone to point to and reasonably cry foul. .What if it was certified by the cheaters?What a bunch of horseshit. There is no legal mechanism to undo an election after the results are certified.
No fewer than four very experienced election observers in Fulton County have sworn out affidavits that they saw highly suspect ballots being counted.
Sorry about your fail, Dudley.
They won't testify in court..
Nope.. They won't commit purjury for Trump.. and his lawyers certainly won't.. So far all have balked at swearing in court.. This is a Trump scam.. .and I don't care if he does 50 audits, but he needs t pay for them instead of screwing you over.
They won't swear to those affidavits in court. Trump is taking ya'll to the cleaners.
Crepitus
Diamond Member
- Mar 28, 2018
- 74,288
- 68,470
- 3,615
You people love judges. How about this sweetheart?
WATCH: Bannon's War Room Delivers Huge Audit Update - Georgia Judge Will Start Decertifying Election if It Is Determined Ballots were Counted Twice
Another swing state may blow things wide open.
Another fraudit?
So?
Good, glad you feel that way. You will be leaving the thread then. Bye.
Naw, I'll stick around and laugh at you kids.
- Nov 14, 2011
- 122,988
- 74,097
- 2,635
IOW, you want it both ways...I get it.Nope, it's simply a fact. We all saw this unfold first hand. We all saw Richard Hopkins' affidavit about a postal supervisor instructing others to back date ballots; only to later recant his claims. No charges of perjury. We all saw Mellissa Carone in front of Michigan's state senate tell them she saw as many as 30,000 ballots scanned multiple times; only to accuse the state of cooking the poll books when a Senator pointed out the poll books would have recorded an excess of 30,000 more votes than ballots had that actually occurred. No charges of perjury.So you want it both ways....gotcha.So? To convict someone of perjury, a court has to be shown they lied. A very high bar to meet when there's no cross examination to impeach claims of, I was mistaken.Affidavits are sworn out under pains and penalties of perjury, knucklehead.It is not perjury they knew of that penalty when they did the affidavits. You have no argument and should have respect for these citizens.they will when calledYou can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations.You might remember all of Trump's challenges got laughed out of court because in the end they had nothing at all they could prove. You can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations. You see Trump fucked up telegraphing his intent to challenge the election if he lost. Everyone tightened up and ran better elections than in past years. Even Florida did good. There's precious little for anyone to point to and reasonably cry foul. .What if it was certified by the cheaters?What a bunch of horseshit. There is no legal mechanism to undo an election after the results are certified.
No fewer than four very experienced election observers in Fulton County have sworn out affidavits that they saw highly suspect ballots being counted.
Sorry about your fail, Dudley.
They won't testify in court..
Nope.. They won't commit purjury for Trump.. and his lawyers certainly won't.. So far all have balked at swearing in court.. This is a Trump scam.. .and I don't care if he does 50 audits, but he needs t pay for them instead of screwing you over.
They won't swear to those affidavits in court. Trump is taking ya'll to the cleaners.
You did know that Carone wasn't under oath, right?
- Nov 14, 2011
- 122,988
- 74,097
- 2,635
I didn't say she was. Neither was Hopkins. What did you think I meant when I said there was no cross-examination?IOW, you want it both ways...I get it.Nope, it's simply a fact. We all saw this unfold first hand. We all saw Richard Hopkins' affidavit about a postal supervisor instructing others to back date ballots; only to later recant his claims. No charges of perjury. We all saw Mellissa Carone in front of Michigan's state senate tell them she saw as many as 30,000 ballots scanned multiple times; only to accuse the state of cooking the poll books when a Senator pointed out the poll books would have recorded an excess of 30,000 more votes than ballots had that actually occurred. No charges of perjury.So you want it both ways....gotcha.So? To convict someone of perjury, a court has to be shown they lied. A very high bar to meet when there's no cross examination to impeach claims of, I was mistaken.Affidavits are sworn out under pains and penalties of perjury, knucklehead.It is not perjury they knew of that penalty when they did the affidavits. You have no argument and should have respect for these citizens.they will when calledYou can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations.You might remember all of Trump's challenges got laughed out of court because in the end they had nothing at all they could prove. You can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations. You see Trump fucked up telegraphing his intent to challenge the election if he lost. Everyone tightened up and ran better elections than in past years. Even Florida did good. There's precious little for anyone to point to and reasonably cry foul. .What if it was certified by the cheaters?What a bunch of horseshit. There is no legal mechanism to undo an election after the results are certified.
No fewer than four very experienced election observers in Fulton County have sworn out affidavits that they saw highly suspect ballots being counted.
Sorry about your fail, Dudley.
They won't testify in court..
Nope.. They won't commit purjury for Trump.. and his lawyers certainly won't.. So far all have balked at swearing in court.. This is a Trump scam.. .and I don't care if he does 50 audits, but he needs t pay for them instead of screwing you over.
They won't swear to those affidavits in court. Trump is taking ya'll to the cleaners.
You did know that Carone wasn't under oath, right?
It meant there was no lawyer cross-examining them for veracity in a court of law.
- Dec 28, 2011
- 60,043
- 53,299
- 3,600
- Thread starter
- #74
You people love judges. How about this sweetheart?
WATCH: Bannon's War Room Delivers Huge Audit Update - Georgia Judge Will Start Decertifying Election if It Is Determined Ballots were Counted Twice
Another swing state may blow things wide open.
Bannon the criminal...Yeah, you should listen to that guy...
He has no criminal record.
playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 56,003
- 48,760
- 3,645
Irrelevant deflectionSo you want it both ways....gotcha.So? To convict someone of perjury, a court has to be shown they lied. A very high bar to meet when there's no cross examination to impeach claims of, I was mistaken.Affidavits are sworn out under pains and penalties of perjury, knucklehead.It is not perjury they knew of that penalty when they did the affidavits. You have no argument and should have respect for these citizens.they will when calledYou can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations.You might remember all of Trump's challenges got laughed out of court because in the end they had nothing at all they could prove. You can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations. You see Trump fucked up telegraphing his intent to challenge the election if he lost. Everyone tightened up and ran better elections than in past years. Even Florida did good. There's precious little for anyone to point to and reasonably cry foul. .What if it was certified by the cheaters?What a bunch of horseshit. There is no legal mechanism to undo an election after the results are certified.
No fewer than four very experienced election observers in Fulton County have sworn out affidavits that they saw highly suspect ballots being counted.
Sorry about your fail, Dudley.
They won't testify in court..
Nope.. They won't commit purjury for Trump.. and his lawyers certainly won't.. So far all have balked at swearing in court.. This is a Trump scam.. .and I don't care if he does 50 audits, but he needs t pay for them instead of screwing you over.
They won't swear to those affidavits in court. Trump is taking ya'll to the cleaners.
um.... that would be sydney powell's deal.
it's all relevant because it's allllllll about the bigley lie.
playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 56,003
- 48,760
- 3,645
More irrelevancies.You can almost hear the lying democrats ( GULPING) as they type their talking points. They know what's coming , they know what they did. Will they admit their guilt and apologize to President Trump? No chance . But they certainly will be exposed for the lying corrupt pieces of shit they are.
News from Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 9, 2018
Attorney General’s Press Office / 212-416-8060
[email protected]
A.G. SCHNEIDERMAN STATEMENT ON FINAL TRUMP UNIVERSITY SETTLEMENT
New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman released the following statement upon U.S. District Court Judge Gonzalo Curiel’s order finalizing the $25 million Trump University settlement:
“Judge Curiel's order finalizing the $25 million Trump University settlement means that victims of Donald Trump’s fraudulent university will finally receive the relief they deserve. We are particularly pleased that the final settlement we negotiated with class counsel ensures that members of the class will receive an even higher settlement than anyone originally anticipated.
This settlement marked a stunning reversal by President Trump, who for years refused to compensate the victims of his sham university.
My office won’t hesitate to hold those who commit fraud accountable, no matter how rich or powerful they may be.”
A.G. Schneiderman Statement On Final Trump University Settlement | New York State Attorney General
Donald J. Trump Pays Court-Ordered $2 Million For Illegally Using Trump Foundation Funds
Trump Ordered to Pay Eight Separate Charities $250,000 Each
Remaining $1.8 Million in Trump Foundation Bank Account Disbursed Among Charities
Additionally, as part of the settlement, Trump was required to agree to 19 admissions, acknowledging his personal misuse of funds at the Trump Foundation, and agreed to restrictions on future charitable service and ongoing reporting to the Office of the Attorney General, in the event he creates a new charity. The settlement also included mandatory training requirements for Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump, and Eric Trump, which the three children have already undergone. Finally, the settlement required the Trump Foundation to shutter its doors last December and dissolve under court supervision.
Donald J. Trump Pays Court-Ordered $2 Million For Illegally Using Trump Foundation Funds | New York State Attorney General
Can't you clowns stay on topic?
the topic is fraud.
it's alllllllllllllllllll relevant.
playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 56,003
- 48,760
- 3,645
Nothing to do with GA. These people are going to prove fraud."They" are the fraudsters. There are far too many to name. I will stick with "they" and you keep asking stupid questions.Who's "they"? You don't even know do you?The ballots are proof. They have access to the ballots. Fraud will be proven.Fuck them citizens. Anyone participatiing in the Big Lie will have to come up with extraordinary proof to back up their extraordinary claims. That's just how it is.It is not perjury they knew of that penalty when they did the affidavits. You have no argument and should have respect for these citizens.they will when calledYou can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations.You might remember all of Trump's challenges got laughed out of court because in the end they had nothing at all they could prove. You can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations. You see Trump fucked up telegraphing his intent to challenge the election if he lost. Everyone tightened up and ran better elections than in past years. Even Florida did good. There's precious little for anyone to point to and reasonably cry foul. .What if it was certified by the cheaters?What a bunch of horseshit. There is no legal mechanism to undo an election after the results are certified.
No fewer than four very experienced election observers in Fulton County have sworn out affidavits that they saw highly suspect ballots being counted.
Sorry about your fail, Dudley.
They won't testify in court..
Nope.. They won't commit purjury for Trump.. and his lawyers certainly won't.. So far all have balked at swearing in court.. This is a Trump scam.. .and I don't care if he does 50 audits, but he needs t pay for them instead of screwing you over.
donny - who is behind all this was sued & had to have his 'university' shut down for FRAUD, not to mention his 'charitable' foundation disintegrated due to FRAUD & was ordered never to run one again.
Trump is really no better than a common thief, He's going to bilk his followers out of a lot of money to pay his legal fees and foreign loans.
Let's see:
the FBI can't be trusted ... the Department of Justice can't be trusted ...voters can’t be trusted ... the poll workers can’t be trusted ... the voting machines can’t be trusted ... the canvasing boards can't be trusted ... the recounts can't be trusted... the audits can't be trusted ... Democrats can't be trusted ... Republicans can't be trusted ... the media can’t be trusted ... the news can't be trusted ... Sydney Powell can't be trusted ... William Barr can’t be trusted ... Christopher Wray can't be trusted ... the guy who was in charge of election security can’t be trusted ... Georgia's Republican Secretary of State can't be trusted ... Gabriel Sterling, his Republican COO and Trump voter, can't be trusted ... the Republican-led Maricopa board of elections can't be trusted ... Mike Pence can't be trusted ... the lower courts can’t be trusted ... the appellate courts can’t be trusted ... the Supreme Court can’t be trusted ... the United States Congress can't be trusted ...
But Donald Trump can be trusted.
- Nov 14, 2011
- 122,988
- 74,097
- 2,635
I'm guessing while Lastamender is feverishly googling for the WP retraction of Richard Hopkins recanting his affidavit, by now he's realizing that never happened. It was mere Hopkins himself demanding they retract their article-- which they never did.Oh? Post a link to it...He did not recant his claims the WP had to print a retraction. You fucking liar.Nope, it's simply a fact. We all saw this unfold first hand. We all saw Richard Hopkins' affidavit about a postal supervisor instructing others to back date ballots; only to later recant his claims. No charges of perjury. We all saw Mellissa Carone in front of Michigan's state senate tell them she saw as many as 30,000 ballots scanned multiple times; only to accuse the state of cooking the poll books when a Senator pointed out the poll books would have recorded an excess of 30,000 more votes than ballots had that actually occurred. No charges of perjury.So you want it both ways....gotcha.So? To convict someone of perjury, a court has to be shown they lied. A very high bar to meet when there's no cross examination to impeach claims of, I was mistaken.Affidavits are sworn out under pains and penalties of perjury, knucklehead.It is not perjury they knew of that penalty when they did the affidavits. You have no argument and should have respect for these citizens.they will when calledYou can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations.You might remember all of Trump's challenges got laughed out of court because in the end they had nothing at all they could prove. You can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations. You see Trump fucked up telegraphing his intent to challenge the election if he lost. Everyone tightened up and ran better elections than in past years. Even Florida did good. There's precious little for anyone to point to and reasonably cry foul. .What if it was certified by the cheaters?What a bunch of horseshit. There is no legal mechanism to undo an election after the results are certified.
No fewer than four very experienced election observers in Fulton County have sworn out affidavits that they saw highly suspect ballots being counted.
Sorry about your fail, Dudley.
They won't testify in court..
Nope.. They won't commit purjury for Trump.. and his lawyers certainly won't.. So far all have balked at swearing in court.. This is a Trump scam.. .and I don't care if he does 50 audits, but he needs t pay for them instead of screwing you over.
They won't swear to those affidavits in court. Trump is taking ya'll to the cleaners.
So now we'll see if Lastamender admits they didn't retract... or admits he was wrong... or pretends like he didn't bother to look.
- Dec 28, 2011
- 60,043
- 53,299
- 3,600
- Thread starter
- #79
I am not looking for it I have a memory. Hopkins says it was not true if that rag did not retract it they are still lying. No big deal, just exposing more lies.I'm guessing while Lastamender is feverishly googling for the WP retraction of Richard Hopkins recanting his affidavit, by now he's realizing that never happened. It was mere Hopkins himself demanding they retract their article-- which they never did.Oh? Post a link to it...He did not recant his claims the WP had to print a retraction. You fucking liar.Nope, it's simply a fact. We all saw this unfold first hand. We all saw Richard Hopkins' affidavit about a postal supervisor instructing others to back date ballots; only to later recant his claims. No charges of perjury. We all saw Mellissa Carone in front of Michigan's state senate tell them she saw as many as 30,000 ballots scanned multiple times; only to accuse the state of cooking the poll books when a Senator pointed out the poll books would have recorded an excess of 30,000 more votes than ballots had that actually occurred. No charges of perjury.So you want it both ways....gotcha.So? To convict someone of perjury, a court has to be shown they lied. A very high bar to meet when there's no cross examination to impeach claims of, I was mistaken.Affidavits are sworn out under pains and penalties of perjury, knucklehead.It is not perjury they knew of that penalty when they did the affidavits. You have no argument and should have respect for these citizens.they will when calledYou can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations.You might remember all of Trump's challenges got laughed out of court because in the end they had nothing at all they could prove. You can tell all kinds of fables about cheating in your garbage media but when oaths are sworn and perjury can land you in jail it seems your people finally start vetting all these accusations. You see Trump fucked up telegraphing his intent to challenge the election if he lost. Everyone tightened up and ran better elections than in past years. Even Florida did good. There's precious little for anyone to point to and reasonably cry foul. .What if it was certified by the cheaters?What a bunch of horseshit. There is no legal mechanism to undo an election after the results are certified.
No fewer than four very experienced election observers in Fulton County have sworn out affidavits that they saw highly suspect ballots being counted.
Sorry about your fail, Dudley.
They won't testify in court..
Nope.. They won't commit purjury for Trump.. and his lawyers certainly won't.. So far all have balked at swearing in court.. This is a Trump scam.. .and I don't care if he does 50 audits, but he needs t pay for them instead of screwing you over.
They won't swear to those affidavits in court. Trump is taking ya'll to the cleaners.
So now we'll see if Lastamender admits they didn't retract... or admits he was wrong... or pretends like he didn't bother to look.
playtime
Diamond Member
- Aug 18, 2015
- 56,003
- 48,760
- 3,645
You people love judges. How about this sweetheart?
WATCH: Bannon's War Room Delivers Huge Audit Update - Georgia Judge Will Start Decertifying Election if It Is Determined Ballots were Counted Twice
Another swing state may blow things wide open.
Bannon the criminal...Yeah, you should listen to that guy...
He has no criminal record.
yep. for FRAUD.
he was pardoned & one doesn't get a pardon without admitting guilt.
& with that human sausage casing ... he admitted guilt to committing.....
wait for it.....................................
FRAUD.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 40
- Views
- 877
- Replies
- 130
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 2
- Views
- 64
- Replies
- 9
- Views
- 183
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 28
- Views
- 180
- Poll
- Replies
- 231
- Views
- 945
- Replies
- 11
- Views
- 55
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8244
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 476
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-