Hunter Biden Not Guilty!

IsHunter Biden Guilty as charged?


  • Total voters
    26
  • Poll closed .
Yep.... and legally, being presumed innocent by the courts is what is most important. That said, we all have a right to our own opinions.


Also,,, there is objective reality. If a dude robes a bank, then he is guilty of robbing the bank in reality even if he is never convicted by the courts and even if no one knows that he is the one who robbed the bank.
"...If a dude robes a bank..." Red Velour?
I couldn't resist. Carry on. 😎
 
1. Sending and receiving classified emails on a non-gov't server.
2. Mishandling of classified information
3. Destruction of evidence
4. Perjury

Your link says there was no sufficient evidence to show that she "INTENDED" to violate the law, not that she didn't violate it. Yes of course she intended to violate it. You dont accidentally erase 30,000 emails under federal subpoena. You don't accidentally beat a blackberry with a hammer. It's fucking ridiculous the two tier justice system we have in America.
Yes of course she intended to violate it. You dont accidentally erase 30,000 emails under federal subpoena.
Sure, you do. If you are a public figure and receive so many e-mails it required a staff to go through it all. In this case that staff had an outside firm periodically purge the e-mails. That firm forgot. Did so when they realized their mistake. Not realizing those documents where under subpoena.

This is not my explanation. But the explanation of the guy who did the purge when being deposed.
You don't accidentally beat a blackberry with a hammer.
You are right you don't. That doesn't mean you did it with the purpose of destroying evidence. That happened as a security precaution when they updated their medium. This was before any subpoena was issued.

Again, the statements given in the report.

You undoubtably are highly dubious about those explanations. Maybe the FBI is too, I don't know. The point is that in order to convict, the government has to show beyond a reasonable doubt those statements are lies. My guess is that they can't do that, and so didn't indict.
 
Everyone has the presumption of innocence in a court of law in the court of public opinion you are free to believe what you wish in regards to guilt or innocence.
 
Let’s talk a second about an analogy.

Let’s say some dickbag decides to rob a local pharmacy. He gets a gun. He gets a mask. He goes to the pharmacy. He points the gun at the pharmacist behind the counter and demands the contents of the cash register. The pharmacist complies.

Maybe sometime down the road the cops make an arrest of the dickbag. BUT between the time of the robbery and the time of the arrest, common sense will tell us all that the dickbag is guilty of the crime of robbery.

And dickbag refuses a plea offer and goes to trial. Between the moment of the robbery and the moment he is convicted, he is still guilty of that felony.

What he is not (until the conviction) is “presumed” to be guilty in the eyes of the law.

Whether Hunter is guilty of his fucking tax crimes (as alleged) is not yet established via a trial. So, in the eyes of the law, he is presumed innocent. But he might very well (in reality) be as guilty as fuck.
 
Hunter Biden is not guilty of any criminal acts, unless and until it can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt, in a court of law, that he committed any criminal acts.

This is how the justice system in America works. Disagreeing with the statement above would make somebody appear to be un-American. There, I've said it. I've aid it all out for the world to see. Hunter Biden is not guilty. And he has even pleaded so.

Hunter Biden has not even had his day(s) in court and some people demand he be sentenced. We all know that's not how it works.

View attachment 886938

You don't have to be found legally guilty to be guilty of something. We all know that.
 
We can only hope they treat him just like Trump.
We can only hope Trump will be treated like Hunter Biden, and have to stand trial for his alleged crimes, with a jury of 12 coming to the verdict of guilty or not guilty.

An actual trial like Hunter.

Trump pardoning himself, or having his DOJ drop the federal cases before trial would be an injustice and abuse of power.

You would think an innocent man would want the trial asap, instead of stalling and delaying it, hoping he becomes president so he could make it go away, without trial of being guilty or not guilty....
 
so what's new......as usual the Bidens along with all the DemonicRats


giving America the middle finger.



1705096647110.png
 
Not a crime in any way. Nice lane change. Not really.

AM radio has really done a number on you. Literally every word out of your mouth about this is wrong.
When those emails are under subpoena it certainly is a crime dumbfuck. Continuing your desperate attempt to run away from the fact that Crackhead Hunter and his whole corrupt family are guilty as hell. Hence why Crackhead Hunter is running from testifying. He doesn’t get to set any conditions,
 

Forum List

Back
Top