Hunter is 100% the victim of deep state right wing lawfare

[postman]

And were you present when the Justices overturned Roe? No, you were not, so you have no idea whether they reviewed previous bad decisions using new arguments, old arguments, or both. Stare Decisis is not a law that ties the hands of Justices, who need to be free to hear each case on its own merits, not be required to check with a democrat before ruling.

This is where you're wrong. Stare Decisis is a long standing principle in common law. It's what keeps the system from becoming uncontrollable chaos.

What if in January they decide a states death penalty law is constitutional. And the state starts to executes the prisoners it had on death row.
They part way though the backlog, when a prison files an emergency appeal in March, and by June they change their mind and say the states death penalty law is unconstitutional.

When a law is ruled unconstitutional, it's treated as if the law never existed. Which means those put to death based on their January ruling, were illegally executed. And the state liable for wrongful death lawsuits.

That's no way to run a state.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

This is where you're wrong. Stare Decisis is a long standing principle in common law. It's what keeps the system from becoming uncontrollable chaos.

What if in January they decide a states death penalty law is constitutional. And the state starts to executes the prisoners it had on death row.
They part way though the backlog, when a prison files an emergency appeal in March, and by June they change their mind and say the states death penalty law is unconstitutional.

When a law is ruled unconstitutional, it's treated as if the law never existed. Which means those put to death based on their January ruling, were illegally executed. And the state liable for wrongful death lawsuits.

That's no way to run a state.

When the law becomes a means of attacking innocent people they become invalid and death to the tyrants that tried to enforce those corrupt laws.

 

[hadit]

This is where you're wrong. Stare Decisis is a long standing principle in common law. It's what keeps the system from becoming uncontrollable chaos.

What if in January they decide a states death penalty law is constitutional. And the state starts to executes the prisoners it had on death row.
They part way though the backlog, when a prison files an emergency appeal in March, and by June they change their mind and say the states death penalty law is unconstitutional.

When a law is ruled unconstitutional, it's treated as if the law never existed. Which means those put to death based on their January ruling, were illegally executed. And the state liable for wrongful death lawsuits.

That's no way to run a state.

Which is why the court suddenly deciding that states don't have the right to control abortion within their own borders was a travesty that needed to be undone. It was a bad decision.

 

[Delldude]

Which is why the court suddenly deciding that states don't have the right to control abortion within their own borders was a travesty that needed to be undone. It was a bad decision.

Think you mean Fed. The states do by vote.

 

[postman]

When the law becomes a means of attacking innocent people they become invalid and death to the tyrants that tried to enforce those corrupt laws.

How can you say the laws are corrupt, if one court say they are, but the court changes it mind and says they aren't. And then with the same frivolity changes back again.

Because they can. And don't feel bound by any previous decisions.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How can you say the laws are corrupt, if one court say they are, but the court changes it mind and says they aren't. And then with the same frivolity changes back again.

Because they can. And don't feel bound by any previous decisions.

I can say it because the New York laws were tweaked to get one specific person.

 

[hadit]

Think you mean Fed. The states do by vote.

Roe was the decision that removed the freedom from the states.

 

[Delldude]

Roe was the decision that removed the freedom from the states.

Roe was the freedom from the feds.

 

[postman]

Which is why the court suddenly deciding that states don't have the right to control abortion within their own borders was a travesty that needed to be undone. It was a bad decision.

What happened to equal protection. Privileges and immunities. You can't have a system where the laws are radically different from state to state. How could commerce even function if one state had a long list of requirements for say, a commercial drivers license., And the state next to it only requires you have a regular drivers license, and one hours training, with no road test.

And especially the Texas abortion law, which means the doctor licensed in another state, has to follow a law from a state he doesn't even practice in.

 

[postman]

I can say it because the New York laws were tweaked to get one specific person.

The New York laws were on the books for decades, with over 50 cases prosecuted under them. They did a court record search.

 

[postman]

But I wanted to talk about the OP. Where the Hunter Biden case is one of selective prosecution, because in many ways, thousands upon thousands of people are also guilty of 18 USC 1001 for their answer on the ATF form.

Q: Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance? {Y/N]

Nearly everybody that smokes a pack a day or more, is addicted to the stimulant Nicotine.

Yet smokers aren't routinely prosecuted.

 

[hadit]

What happened to equal protection. Privileges and immunities. You can't have a system where the laws are radically different from state to state. How could commerce even function if one state had a long list of requirements for say, a commercial drivers license., And the state next to it only requires you have a regular drivers license, and one hours training, with no road test.

The federal government controls interstate commerce, which means it prevents states from imposing tariffs and restrictions on the free flow of goods across state borders. It does not, however, control the individual states' driving license requirements. Think, we already have states such as California imposing greater restrictions and regulations on drivers than other states do. Some vehicles are not legal in all 50 states.

And especially the Texas abortion law, which means the doctor licensed in another state, has to follow a law from a state he doesn't even practice in.

Texas can't force a doctor in another state to follow a Texas law. It can try, but without the federal government enforcing laws, it can't enforce its laws on another state.

 

[postman]

The federal government controls interstate commerce, which means it prevents states from imposing tariffs and restrictions on the free flow of goods across state borders. It does not, however, control the individual states' driving license requirements.

Try again.

CDL Federal Requirements - Driving-Tests.org

Find out what is required to obtain your Commercial Learner's Permit (CLP) or Commercial Driver's License (CDL).

driving-tests.org

. It all starts with knowing about the rules and requirements set by the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA). Each state has their own application process, fees, and forms, but they all adhere to the federal requirements of the FMCSA. (Source: CDL Federal Requirements - Driving-Tests.org)

If you wish to obtain a Class A or Class B CDL, you must successfully complete driver training from FMCSA-approved training providers. Be at least 18 years old to drive intrastate (within the state). Be at least 21 years old to drive interstate (out-of-state) or to transport hazardous materials.
Must be able to speak and read English at a sufficient level (Section 391.11). Provide a DOT medical card, which requires a DOT physical.
(Source: CDL Federal Requirements - Driving-Tests.org)

federal requirements

 

[postman]

Texas can't force a doctor in another state to follow a Texas law. It can try, but without the federal government enforcing laws, it can't enforce its laws on another state.

Texas enforces their law by a unique model of enabling civil litigation, which crosses state lines.

 

[whitehall]

Lawfare? What's that? Hunter almost had a sweetheart plea deal when about 50 intelligence "experts" called the laptop "Russian disinformation" but it wasn't. The media and the administration pulled out all the stops but it wasn't good enough to get the junkie tax evader off the hook.

 

[Delldude]

But I wanted to talk about the OP. Where the Hunter Biden case is one of selective prosecution, because in many ways, thousands upon thousands of people are also guilty of 18 USC 1001 for their answer on the ATF form.

Q: Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance? {Y/N]

Nearly everybody that smokes a pack a day or more, is addicted to the stimulant Nicotine.

Yet smokers aren't routinely prosecuted.

"Any other controlled substance"

 

[postman]

Lawfare? What's that? Hunter almost had a sweetheart plea deal when about 50 intelligence "experts" called the laptop "Russian disinformation" but it wasn't. The media and the administration pulled out all the stops but it wasn't good enough to get the junkie tax evader off the hook.

Yet as I pointed out. Anyone who smokes more than a pack a day, has to answer "yes" to the question on the form, or face prosecution under 18 USC 1001.

Q: Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance? [y/n]

 

[postman]

"Any other controlled substance"

Read it again. It says or not and

If any of the categories apply, you have to answer yes, or be prosecuted for violation of 18 USC 1001.

But how many people (except Hunter Biden) are prosecuted, without another predicate crime?

Virtually no-one.

 

[whitehall]

Yet as I pointed out. Anyone who smokes more than a pack a day, has to answer "yes" to the question on the form, or face prosecution under 18 USC 1001.

Q: Are you an unlawful user of, or addicted to, marijuana or any depressant, stimulant, narcotic drug, or any other controlled substance? [y/n]

Yeah right. Hunter was a smoker and that's why he pleaded guilty to falsifying a federal form. Get in line with the 50 "intelligence experts" hacks who swore that Hunter's laptop was "Russian disinformation" when they knew it wasn't.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

This is where you're wrong. Stare Decisis is a long standing principle in common law. It's what keeps the system from becoming uncontrollable chaos.

What if in January they decide a states death penalty law is constitutional. And the state starts to executes the prisoners it had on death row.
They part way though the backlog, when a prison files an emergency appeal in March, and by June they change their mind and say the states death penalty law is unconstitutional.

When a law is ruled unconstitutional, it's treated as if the law never existed. Which means those put to death based on their January ruling, were illegally executed. And the state liable for wrongful death lawsuits.

That's no way to run a state.

Another important principle of stare decisis:

Without it, all the courts would be booked for 10 years. And all of them would just be trying the same case over and over.