Hunter will be indicted by the end of the month according to the DOJ

Exactly, this will be some type of plea deal and if any jail time is served it'll be more like rehab since we all know Hunter is still using.

Comer needs to make it clear indicting Hunter changes nothing regarding the investigation into the Biden Family crimes.

But lets be honest we all know the house investigation is nothing but another grandstanding show, and a weak one at that. If parties were switched and dems were running the show they would have had any and all family members who received money give testimony in both public and closed door hearings.
I disagree. The House cannot prosecute. But it can investigate. Hunter himself is of little interest. But Hunter in connection with his pappy is very much of interest and the House is actually doing the right thing.

The investigation is very likely to bring to full light the connection between Hunter’s foreign business activities and the former President’s assistance to his dopey son in that business. It all reeks of corruption and it might lead to impeachment proceedings.

While the already corrupted Brandon Administration’s DOJ is going after Trump on criminal charges for purely partisan political reasons — it would be great to air the criminality of President Potato at the same fucking time.
 
I disagree. The House cannot prosecute. But it can investigate. Hunter himself is of little interest. But Hunter in connection with his pappy is very much of interest and the House is actually doing the right thing.

The investigation is very likely to bring to full light the connection between Hunter’s foreign business activities and the former President’s assistance to his dopey son in that business. It all reeks of corruption and it might lead to impeachment proceedings.

While the already corrupted Brandon Administration’s DOJ is going after Trump on criminal charges for purely partisan political reasons — it would be great to air the criminality of President Potato at the same fucking time.
Exactly. Prosecute Trump illegally over nothing, don't prosecute the Bidens over several felonies. Even the Dimmest of voters can see the truth.
 
So Hunter like Mr Trump, is in real legal trouble. But Joe is not?

325867604_738478480713428_2092643009947266021_n.jpg
 
Donald Trump is also a private citizen.
You still spouting your nonsense?

cribbed from a legal site:

In the context of defamation, a public figure is generally defined as an individual who has assumed a role of prominence in society or voluntarily or involuntarily thrust themselves into the public spotlight, like a government official, a celebrity, or even a person at the heart of a controversy. Public figures have a higher burden of proof when bringing a defamation claim; they must show that the defendant acted with actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth when publishing a false statement.

A private figure, on the other hand, is generally defined as anyone who does not qualify as a public figure and is not in the public spotlight. Private figures must only prove that the defendant acted with ordinary negligence when publishing a false statement.
 
Millions of people have been in or run for office. Are you saying none of them are private citizens?
p1fasnxo2qmb1.jpg

Its the actual provable crime of someone planning to run for office (or has been in office), vs someone never been in office and/or not running for office.
 
You still spouting your nonsense?

cribbed from a legal site:

In the context of defamation, a public figure is generally defined as an individual who has assumed a role of prominence in society or voluntarily or involuntarily thrust themselves into the public spotlight, like a government official, a celebrity, or even a person at the heart of a controversy. Public figures have a higher burden of proof when bringing a defamation claim; they must show that the defendant acted with actual malice or reckless disregard for the truth when publishing a false statement.

A private figure, on the other hand, is generally defined as anyone who does not qualify as a public figure and is not in the public spotlight. Private figures must only prove that the defendant acted with ordinary negligence when publishing a false statement.

Exactly, so a famous "artist" like Hunter Biden, who's work commands six-figure prices on the international art market, is most definitely not a private citizen.

Thank you!
 
If this was a conservative. They would be yelling about how this was a badge of honor, and the gun charge was nothing.
BS......just like J6.......break the law, go to jail.
 
That might be a fair guess.

I am wondering if it’s a head fake.

If the legal validity of the federal gun charge against Hunter is now open to debate, here’s some pure speculation. I wonder if the only charges will be the tax case crap. Drag that shit out a bit (if any felony charge is included) and then, whenever they feel the time is right, let him cop to the tax misdemeanors.
Only issue if they go the FARA route, is what country is he lobbying for and what individual?
 
Why the fuck is it taking so long? It's a simple gun charge, one paragraph. Why the fuck is it taking years to prosecute this shit?
 
Last edited:
That might be a fair guess.

I am wondering if it’s a head fake.

If the legal validity of the federal gun charge against Hunter is now open to debate, here’s some pure speculation. I wonder if the only charges will be the tax case crap. Drag that shit out a bit (if any felony charge is included) and then, whenever they feel the time is right, let him cop to the tax misdemeanors.
The smartest play just to set up a failed case and charge them with something that they know won't stick so he can turn around and hide behind double jeopardy later.
 
Its the actual provable crime of someone planning to run for office (or has been in office), vs someone never been in office and/or not running for office.
Does that make it any less wrong?
 
If this was a conservative. They would be yelling about how this was a badge of honor, and the gun charge was nothing.

In this case it is, because a federal district judge has already ruled it is a violation of the second, denying firearms rights, based upon the fact someone was a former addict.

But I digress. Lets take the charge on face value.

This now opens the door to every right wing fuckwit in the country, that has ever had a drug or alcohol problem, and bought a gun at any time.

Be careful what you wish for rightards. This one is going to come back to bite somebody in the ass hard.

See you down the road.

The important point here is that your former position on gun control has changed. As we now see, enforcement of federal firearms laws is no longer something you support.
 

Forum List

Back
Top