I am looking forward to the upcoming election because

[jwoodie]

it will present the clearest choice of alternatives since 1980 (Reagan vs. Carter). As a democrat, I am all in favor of letting the people decide (assuming minimal vote fraud).

For those who are willing to accept the status quo, Hillary should be their choice. For those who believe the federal government has been corrupted, Trump should be their choice.

Let the games begin!

 

[gipper]

To say nothing of the fact that Hillary is an awful Neocon. Rather ironic, but typical of Ds, that they would vote for a Neocon. Vote Hillary for WWIII. Trump is bad, but he isn't as bad as WWIII. This from Paul Craig Roberts today...he is not fan of the R party.

If Hillary becomes US president, the neoconservative threat to Russia will escalate. The Atlanticist Integrationists will be eliminated from the Russian government, and Russia will move to full war standing.

Remember what an unprepared Russia did to the German Wehrmacht, at that time the most powerful army ever assembled. Imagine what a prepared Russia would do to the crazed Hillary and the incompetent neoconservatives.

As I have previously written, pushing Russia to war means the demise of the US and Europe and, considering the destructive power of nuclear weapons, most likely of all life on earth.

The main cause of this danger is the arrogance, hubris, and utter stupidity of the American neoconservatives who are ensconced in positions of power and influence and in Hillary’s presidential campaign. A secondary cause is Europe’s vassal status, which deprives Europe of a sensible foreign policy and forces Europe to enable Washington’s aggression.

What this means is that no matter what you think of Trump, if you vote for Hillary you are definitely voting for the end of the world.

 

[daws101]

it will present the clearest choice of alternatives since 1980 (Reagan vs. Carter). As a democrat, I am all in favor of letting the people decide (assuming minimal vote fraud).

For those who are willing to accept the status quo, Hillary should be their choice. For those who believe the federal government has been corrupted, Trump should be their choice.

Let the games begin!

Bahahahaha!

 

[william the wie]

What the wildcards are is the FBI and the GOP super-PACs. They may strike too hard, too soon. Hillary has too much baggage for any single freighter to carry it. Striking too soon will simply get her replaced with time for the new nominee to turn things around.

 

[daws101]

What the wildcards are is the FBI and the GOP super-PACs. They may strike too hard, too soon. Hillary has too much baggage for any single freighter to carry it. Striking too soon will simply get her replaced with time for the new nominee to turn things around.

Bahahahaha Bahahahaha!

 

[gipper]

What the wildcards are is the FBI and the GOP super-PACs. They may strike too hard, too soon. Hillary has too much baggage for any single freighter to carry it. Striking too soon will simply get her replaced with time for the new nominee to turn things around.

Bahahahaha Bahahahaha!

That is the most intelligent response I have ever seen you post.

 

[daws101]

What the wildcards are is the FBI and the GOP super-PACs. They may strike too hard, too soon. Hillary has too much baggage for any single freighter to carry it. Striking too soon will simply get her replaced with time for the new nominee to turn things around.

Bahahahaha Bahahahaha!

That is the most intelligent response I have ever seen you post.

I dumbed it down just for you!
I'm gonna love seeing you clowns lose.

 

[gipper]

What the wildcards are is the FBI and the GOP super-PACs. They may strike too hard, too soon. Hillary has too much baggage for any single freighter to carry it. Striking too soon will simply get her replaced with time for the new nominee to turn things around.

Bahahahaha Bahahahaha!

That is the most intelligent response I have ever seen you post.

I dumbed it down just for you!
I'm gonna love seeing you clowns lose.

As usual, you don't get it.

No one wins with a president Hillary or Donald. We all lose. However, we lose a lot more if your beloved pantsuit wins.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Uh...no....just no.
The clearest choice of alternatives would be Bernie vs. Hillary. And that has already played out.
And the Democrats chose a corrupt corporatist over someone who FAAAAAAAARRR more aligns with what is supposed to be their beliefs.

 

[daws101]

What the wildcards are is the FBI and the GOP super-PACs. They may strike too hard, too soon. Hillary has too much baggage for any single freighter to carry it. Striking too soon will simply get her replaced with time for the new nominee to turn things around.

Bahahahaha Bahahahaha!

That is the most intelligent response I have ever seen you post.

I dumbed it down just for you!
I'm gonna love seeing you clowns lose.

As usual, you don't get it.

No one wins with a president Hillary or Donald. We all lose. However, we lose a lot more if your beloved pantsuit wins.

Being told by a Crapspiracy theorist that I don't get it is high farce.
Assholes like you are nothing if not entertaining.

 

[gipper]

Uh...no....just no.
The clearest choice of alternatives would be Bernie vs. Hillary. And that has already played out.
And the Democrats chose a corrupt corporatist over someone who FAAAAAAAARRR more aligns with what is supposed to be their beliefs.

Quite right. I wonder if anyone in the lib MSM has said or written anything similar to your insightful post.

D voters choosing Mrs. BJ over The Bern would seem to indicate they are easily controlled by the elites. The elites much prefer a Neocon like Hillary, versus a socialist like Sanders, but this most certainly conflicts with what the D party is suppose to stand for.

 

[william the wie]

CNBC, which uses the same political reporters as all of the other NBC networks is calling the race for maybe Trump already.

 

[Syriusly]

it will present the clearest choice of alternatives since 1980 (Reagan vs. Carter). As a democrat, I am all in favor of letting the people decide (assuming minimal vote fraud).

For those who are willing to accept the status quo, Hillary should be their choice. For those who believe the federal government has been corrupted, Trump should be their choice.

Let the games begin!

I agree- the clearest choice:
The sanity/experience/even temperment of Hillary Clinton, versus the batshit crazy conspiracy enthusiasm/lack of experience/ and think skinned nature of Donald Trump.

For those who believe in a rational government- Clinton should be their choice. For those who believe in every conspiracy theory that the government is coming to get you- well Trump is your clear choice.

 

[gipper]

it will present the clearest choice of alternatives since 1980 (Reagan vs. Carter). As a democrat, I am all in favor of letting the people decide (assuming minimal vote fraud).

For those who are willing to accept the status quo, Hillary should be their choice. For those who believe the federal government has been corrupted, Trump should be their choice.

Let the games begin!

I agree- the clearest choice:
The sanity/experience/even temperment of Hillary Clinton, versus the batshit crazy conspiracy enthusiasm/lack of experience/ and think skinned nature of Donald Trump.

For those who believe in a rational government- Clinton should be their choice. For those who believe in every conspiracy theory that the government is coming to get you- well Trump is your clear choice.

By rational government, you mean one with a POTUS controlled by Neocons, Wall Street, and the 1%....right?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

it will present the clearest choice of alternatives since 1980 (Reagan vs. Carter). As a democrat, I am all in favor of letting the people decide (assuming minimal vote fraud).

For those who are willing to accept the status quo, Hillary should be their choice. For those who believe the federal government has been corrupted, Trump should be their choice.

Let the games begin!

I agree- the clearest choice:
The sanity/experience/even temperment of Hillary Clinton, versus the batshit crazy conspiracy enthusiasm/lack of experience/ and think skinned nature of Donald Trump.

For those who believe in a rational government- Clinton should be their choice. For those who believe in every conspiracy theory that the government is coming to get you- well Trump is your clear choice.

Wow... try again.

 

[daws101]

it will present the clearest choice of alternatives since 1980 (Reagan vs. Carter). As a democrat, I am all in favor of letting the people decide (assuming minimal vote fraud).

For those who are willing to accept the status quo, Hillary should be their choice. For those who believe the federal government has been corrupted, Trump should be their choice.

Let the games begin!

I agree- the clearest choice:
The sanity/experience/even temperment of Hillary Clinton, versus the batshit crazy conspiracy enthusiasm/lack of experience/ and think skinned nature of Donald Trump.

For those who believe in a rational government- Clinton should be their choice. For those who believe in every conspiracy theory that the government is coming to get you- well Trump is your clear choice.

By relational government, you mean one with a POTUS controlled by Neocons, Wall Street, and the 1%....right?

Speaking of batshit!

 

[Syriusly]

it will present the clearest choice of alternatives since 1980 (Reagan vs. Carter). As a democrat, I am all in favor of letting the people decide (assuming minimal vote fraud).

For those who are willing to accept the status quo, Hillary should be their choice. For those who believe the federal government has been corrupted, Trump should be their choice.

Let the games begin!

I agree- the clearest choice:
The sanity/experience/even temperment of Hillary Clinton, versus the batshit crazy conspiracy enthusiasm/lack of experience/ and think skinned nature of Donald Trump.

For those who believe in a rational government- Clinton should be their choice. For those who believe in every conspiracy theory that the government is coming to get you- well Trump is your clear choice.

Wow... try again.

Glad to- I will type slower for you this time- and put it in a bigger font. .

I agree- the clearest choice:

The sanity/experience/even temperment of Hillary Clinton, versus the batshit crazy conspiracy enthusiasm/lack of experience/ and think skinned nature of Donald Trump.

For those who believe in a rational government- Clinton should be their choice. For those who believe in every conspiracy theory that the government is coming to get you- well Trump is your clear choice.

 

[gipper]

it will present the clearest choice of alternatives since 1980 (Reagan vs. Carter). As a democrat, I am all in favor of letting the people decide (assuming minimal vote fraud).

For those who are willing to accept the status quo, Hillary should be their choice. For those who believe the federal government has been corrupted, Trump should be their choice.

Let the games begin!

I agree- the clearest choice:
The sanity/experience/even temperment of Hillary Clinton, versus the batshit crazy conspiracy enthusiasm/lack of experience/ and think skinned nature of Donald Trump.

For those who believe in a rational government- Clinton should be their choice. For those who believe in every conspiracy theory that the government is coming to get you- well Trump is your clear choice.

Wow... try again.

Glad to- I will type slower for you this time- and put it in a bigger font. .

I agree- the clearest choice:

The sanity/experience/even temperment of Hillary Clinton, versus the batshit crazy conspiracy enthusiasm/lack of experience/ and think skinned nature of Donald Trump.

For those who believe in a rational government- Clinton should be their choice. For those who believe in every conspiracy theory that the government is coming to get you- well Trump is your clear choice.

Again...just to be sure....rational means a POTUS controlled by the 1%, Neocons, and Wall Street...right?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

it will present the clearest choice of alternatives since 1980 (Reagan vs. Carter). As a democrat, I am all in favor of letting the people decide (assuming minimal vote fraud).

For those who are willing to accept the status quo, Hillary should be their choice. For those who believe the federal government has been corrupted, Trump should be their choice.

Let the games begin!

I agree- the clearest choice:
The sanity/experience/even temperment of Hillary Clinton, versus the batshit crazy conspiracy enthusiasm/lack of experience/ and think skinned nature of Donald Trump.

For those who believe in a rational government- Clinton should be their choice. For those who believe in every conspiracy theory that the government is coming to get you- well Trump is your clear choice.

Wow... try again.

Glad to- I will type slower for you this time- and put it in a bigger font. .

I agree- the clearest choice:

The sanity/experience/even temperment of Hillary Clinton, versus the batshit crazy conspiracy enthusiasm/lack of experience/ and think skinned nature of Donald Trump.

For those who believe in a rational government- Clinton should be their choice. For those who believe in every conspiracy theory that the government is coming to get you- well Trump is your clear choice.

So, as gipper points out - you consider a plutocratic government rational?

 

[gipper]

it will present the clearest choice of alternatives since 1980 (Reagan vs. Carter). As a democrat, I am all in favor of letting the people decide (assuming minimal vote fraud).

For those who are willing to accept the status quo, Hillary should be their choice. For those who believe the federal government has been corrupted, Trump should be their choice.

Let the games begin!

I agree- the clearest choice:
The sanity/experience/even temperment of Hillary Clinton, versus the batshit crazy conspiracy enthusiasm/lack of experience/ and think skinned nature of Donald Trump.

For those who believe in a rational government- Clinton should be their choice. For those who believe in every conspiracy theory that the government is coming to get you- well Trump is your clear choice.

Wow... try again.

Glad to- I will type slower for you this time- and put it in a bigger font. .

I agree- the clearest choice:

The sanity/experience/even temperment of Hillary Clinton, versus the batshit crazy conspiracy enthusiasm/lack of experience/ and think skinned nature of Donald Trump.

For those who believe in a rational government- Clinton should be their choice. For those who believe in every conspiracy theory that the government is coming to get you- well Trump is your clear choice.

So, as gipper points out - you consider a plutocratic government rational?

I guess he/she/it is incapable of responding. We may have just blown her/his/it's mind.