deltex1
Gold Member
The libtard view is that every Middle East leader/dictator is bad for his country...and must be removed...except for Saddam Hussein. Why is that? Because W removed him. It was Bush's fault.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It is very simple how Obama bears some of the responsibility he ignored all the recommendations of his military commanders on keeping a military force in Iraq as well as their warnings if we didn't. Maliki was not the best person to work with even so a real leader finds a way to deal with people like this the truth is Obama wanted to leave Iraq ASAP and wasn't concerned about the impact which is what he did and is why he shares part of the responsibility.I can't help but notice you hold Obama responsible for nothing and yes Maliki was part of the problem.
Your confession that you accept that Maliki was part of the problem makes it very problematic for you and your cohorts on the right to present a coherent message as to why Obama is responsible for any of the societal and sevurity problems that have befallen Iraq since Obama became president.
Obama was public about what Maliki needed to do but Maliki refused to take our president's advice. Maliki is mostlybresponsible for the current crisis. The other party that is responsible would be the Sunni leaders and the average Sunni that accepted any terrorists among them knowing that attacks agsinst Shiites were coming from the Sunni faction of Iraq.
There is and never has been a US military solution to Sunni attacks that did not begin when Obama was elected and Bush was on his way back to the ranch.
That was left by Bush for the Iraqis to resolve, because ultimately 160,000 US troops on the ground there could not resolve it either.
The libtard view is that every Middle East leader/dictator is bad for his country...and must be removed...except for Saddam Hussein. Why is that? Because W removed him. It was Bush's fault.
Good dodge ,Foo. Answer the question. Why did all the muslim dictators have to go...but Saddam had to stay.DT 9808961The libtard view is that every Middle East leader/dictator is bad for his country...and must be removed...except for Saddam Hussein. Why is that? Because W removed him. It was Bush's fault.
No. Bush was wrong to force the UN inspectors out. The consequences of Bush'd unprecedented ground invasion when there was peaceful verification of Iraq's WMD status is course Bush responsibility. All the consequences from that are Bush's fault.
No US president did what Bush did, when the inspectors were kicked out.
DT 9808961The libtard view is that every Middle East leader/dictator is bad for his country...and must be removed...except for Saddam Hussein. Why is that? Because W removed him. It was Bush's fault.
No. Bush was wrong to force the UN inspectors out. The consequences of Bush'd unprecedented ground invasion when there was peaceful verification of Iraq's WMD status is course Bush responsibility. All the consequences from that are Bush's fault.
No US president did what Bush did, when the inspectors were kicked out.
Foo has his own special version of history, which does not include accepting the facts of history or comments on current failing strategeries.DT 9808961The libtard view is that every Middle East leader/dictator is bad for his country...and must be removed...except for Saddam Hussein. Why is that? Because W removed him. It was Bush's fault.
No. Bush was wrong to force the UN inspectors out. The consequences of Bush'd unprecedented ground invasion when there was peaceful verification of Iraq's WMD status is course Bush responsibility. All the consequences from that are Bush's fault.
No US president did what Bush did, when the inspectors were kicked out.
First of all Bush did not force the inspectors out of Iraq, the UN ordered them out.
U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan on Monday ordered all U.N. inspectors and support staff, humanitarian workers and U.N. observers along the Iraq-Kuwait border to evacuate Iraq after U.S. threats to launch war.
Weapons Inspectors Leave Iraq - CBS News
Second, "unprecedented ground invasion?" Did you ever hear of Korea, Vietnam, Granada, to name a few? While it wasn't a ground invasion per se we did terror bomb Serbia for 72 days killing many ethnic Serbs along with some Chinese nationals, without congressional sanction, THAT was unprecedented.
I can not really understand why the left thinks that bombing the crap out of a country, like we did from behind in Libya or Serbia doesn't destabilize the country. That is the WHOLE purpose of doing so.
You may not agree with the Iraq war and I too would have voted no if given the chance. But a vote was taken and the majority of senior democrats voted for war. Now is not time to revise history.
DT 9808961The libtard view is that every Middle East leader/dictator is bad for his country...and must be removed...except for Saddam Hussein. Why is that? Because W removed him. It was Bush's fault.
No. Bush was wrong to force the UN inspectors out. The consequences of Bush'd unprecedented ground invasion when there was peaceful verification of Iraq's WMD status is course Bush responsibility. All the consequences from that are Bush's fault.
No US president did what Bush did, when the inspectors were kicked out.
First of all Bush did not force the inspectors out of Iraq, the UN ordered them out.
U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan on Monday ordered all U.N. inspectors and support staff, humanitarian workers and U.N. observers along the Iraq-Kuwait border to evacuate Iraq after U.S. threats to launch war.
Weapons Inspectors Leave Iraq - CBS News
Second, "unprecedented ground invasion?" Did you ever hear of Korea, Vietnam, Granada, to name a few? While it wasn't a ground invasion per se we did terror bomb Serbia for 72 days killing many ethnic Serbs along with some Chinese nationals, without congressional sanction, THAT was unprecedented.
I can not really understand why the left thinks that bombing the crap out of a country, like we did from behind in Libya or Serbia doesn't destabilize the country. That is the WHOLE purpose of doing so.
You may not agree with the Iraq war and I too would have voted no if given the chance. But a vote was taken and the majority of senior democrats voted for war. Now is not time to revise history.