I have a right to interfere in the election.

[Luckyone]

Two days ago, Trump said that he had a "right to interfere in the 2020 election"



Do you think he had a right to INTERFERE in the election (key word is "interfere")

and then and what is absolutely incredible is that he stated that when he did interfere, his poll numbers went up. What does that say about our country where we now applaud interfering in the election,.

That brings up another question. If he had a right to interfere in the election but in the same breath he accuses Biden in rigging and interfering in the 2020 election, is that not hypocritical?

As far as having the right to do so, legal experts do not agree with that.

Has Donald Trump Confessed to a Crime in TV Interview? What We Know

It is a crime and this statement of his is just one more nail in the coffin!

 

[Rambunctious]

He was referring to looking into ballot fraud... just what the left will do after Trump wins in November...

 

[Rambunctious]

Lots of new members all of a sudden bringing in dem talking points... but they suck at it... just keep playing wack a mole....

 

[scruffy]

Lots of new members all of a sudden bringing in dem talking points... but they suck at it... just keep playing wack a mole....

Harris is paying these morons

 

[Luckyone]

He was referring to looking into ballot fraud... just what the left will do after Trump wins in November...

No, he used the word "interfere" not "complain, protest, or look into". He said he has a RIGHT to interfere and it has been proven that is what he was trying to do when he asked Pence to reject the legal electoral votes.

You will see what happens if he does not get reelected and has to go to court on this (to respond to Jack Smith's indictment). This statement is going to be a nail in the coffin.

You need to understand that in court, it is not about what you meant but about what you did, and Trump did make this statement 2 days ago,

Debate or argue it all you want but this is pure stupidity on Trump's part

 

[Mac1958]

Two days ago, Trump said that he had a "right to interfere in the 2020 election"

Pretty amazing, even for him.

He just confessed. But will it matter? Something tells me it won't.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Actually democrats interfere in elections, anyone has the right to interfere with nefarious results

 

[excalibur]

Lots of new members all of a sudden bringing in dem talking points... but they suck at it... just keep playing wack a mole....

Paid actors, and/or socks.

 

[Rambunctious]

No, he used the word "interfere" not "complain, protest, or look into". He said he has a RIGHT to interfere and it has been proven that is what he was trying to do when he asked Pence to reject the legal electoral votes.

You will see what happens if he does not get reelected and has to go to court on this (to respond to Jack Smith's indictment). This statement is going to be a nail in the coffin.

You need to understand that in court, it is not about what you meant but about what you did, and Trump did make this statement 2 days ago,

Debate or argue it all you want but this is pure stupidity on Trump's part

Well the charge is interfering and that is what they were talking about... I'm sure he would use a different word if asked again...
However if you are the president of the United States and you know there may have been fraud in the election you must interfere and try and stop the count and check into it...
How else does a president do it?...
Gore interfered when he filed suit... its just a word man... the Dems and the FBI interfered when they made the false charge of Russian collusion... NY courts interfered with two sham trials...

 

[WEATHER53]

He had a right to question the outcome which lib loons have incorrectly labeled as interference.

 

[The Duke]

Lots of new members all of a sudden bringing in dem talking points... but they suck at it... just keep playing wack a mole....

Well OP was "The Banker", so you know what to expect with him.

Although it seems he's changed his M.O.

 

[bendog]

Two days ago, Trump said that he had a "right to interfere in the 2020 election"



Do you think he had a right to INTERFERE in the election (key word is "interfere")

and then and what is absolutely incredible is that he stated that when he did interfere, his poll numbers went up. What does that say about our country where we now applaud interfering in the election,.

That brings up another question. If he had a right to interfere in the election but in the same breath he accuses Biden in rigging and interfering in the 2020 election, is that not hypocritical?

As far as having the right to do so, legal experts do not agree with that.

Has Donald Trump Confessed to a Crime in TV Interview? What We Know

It is a crime and this statement of his is just one more nail in the coffin!

We Republicans ONLY use textul literalism when it reaches the correct conclusion.

And President Trump would have been A GIANT AMONG THE FOUNDERS. Jefferson would have surrendered his quill.

 

[Hellbilly]

He had a right to question the outcome which lib loons have incorrectly labeled as interference.

That’s not what he said. He said he has the right to interfere.

 

[my2¢]

Do you think he had a right to INTERFERE in the election

I believe the calls Trump made to Arizona and Georgia after the 2020 election were inappropriate.

 

[Luckyone]

Well the charge is interfering and that is what they were talking about... I'm sure he would use a different word if asked again...
However if you are the president of the United States and you know there may have been fraud in the election you must interfere and try and stop the count and check into it...
How else does a president do it?...
Gore interfered when he filed suit... its just a word man... the Dems and the FBI interfered when they made the false charge of Russian collusion... NY courts interfered with two sham trials...

No, there is a legal process that he needs to go through when not in agreement.

the word "interfere" means that you are doing something by force (not following the established guidelines/rules).

Here is the definition of the word interfere

,to come into opposition, as one thing with another, especially with the effect of hampering action or procedure

 

[WEATHER53]

That’s not what he said. He said he has the right to interfere.

No. He had a right to question the outcome which you all have falsely labeled as interference

 

[Rambunctious]

No, there is a legal process that he needs to go through when not in agreement.

the word "interfere" means that you are doing something by force (not following the established guidelines/rules).

Here is the definition of the word interfere

,to come into opposition, as one thing with another, especially with the effect of hampering action or procedure

So he interfered in the wrong way?... is that what you are saying?.... why is it there is always a process that must be followed when talking about Trump but never when talking about democrats...
There is also a process for selecting a party's candidate... what happened to the process for that?....

 

[bendog]

No. He had a right to question the outcome which you all have falsely labeled as interference

The Old WEIRD GUY labled it interference you MORON

 

[SassyIrishLass]

No, there is a legal process that he needs to go through when not in agreement.

the word "interfere" means that you are doing something by force (not following the established guidelines/rules).

Here is the definition of the word interfere

,to come into opposition, as one thing with another, especially with the effect of hampering action or procedure

Dude anyone with any sense knows the definition of interfere.

Nobody needs some egghead posting it

 

[Hellbilly]

No. He had a right to question the outcome which you all have falsely labeled as interference

He himself said anyone has a right to interfere.
Watch the video in the OP.