I have one question: would Ford's testimony convict kavanaugh in a court room?

^LOCK HER UP crew still whining
She has 700 k in the gofundme accounts already...........plenty of money to go after for a civil case and slander............

She is being rewarded by the left and will be a millionaire now..............:CryingCow:
Maybe she is making merka great again.
Maybe she is looking for an early retirement on the beach.......I think years down the road we'll see her living it up in early retirement.............

They reward the tools of the party on the left.............hurry up and donate to her........she's only 300k from being a millionaire.
 
If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.


In a courtroom a prosecutor would bring tons more evidence before going to trial.

In a courtroom, Brett doesn't get to mouth off to the judge and prosecutor... it's called contempt of court.
Show us the tons more evidence.........LOL
 
^LOCK HER UP crew still whining
She has 700 k in the gofundme accounts already...........plenty of money to go after for a civil case and slander............

She is being rewarded by the left and will be a millionaire now..............:CryingCow:
Maybe she is making merka great again.
Maybe she is looking for an early retirement on the beach.......I think years down the road we'll see her living it up in early retirement.............

They reward the tools of the party on the left.............hurry up and donate to her........she's only 300k from being a millionaire.
This is the america you choose. Live with it.
 
^LOCK HER UP crew still whining
She has 700 k in the gofundme accounts already...........plenty of money to go after for a civil case and slander............

She is being rewarded by the left and will be a millionaire now..............:CryingCow:
Maybe she is making merka great again.
Maybe she is looking for an early retirement on the beach.......I think years down the road we'll see her living it up in early retirement.............

They reward the tools of the party on the left.............hurry up and donate to her........she's only 300k from being a millionaire.
This is the america you choose. Live with it.
Who the fuck said we chose this path..........I'm against your BS agenda........and the lies and political BS your side does all the time.........they do it every election cycle...........

What was done under Obama and those elections..........your side opinion is TAINTED...........I don't believe a thing your side says anymore.......bunch of Liars................

Used gov't agencies as weapons against the people ........and nothing is done about it..........pay protesters to cause violence.....nothing .......but a few needing bail after starting crap............and now another BORK ATTACK..............
 
If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.




Nooooooope.
 
Nope
But this is not a court room

It is a job interview to see if this guy deserves a promotion
Clinton - I did not have sex with that woman
Obama - There is no serious person out there who would suggest somehow that you could even rig America’s elections, in part because they’re so decentralized and the numbers of votes involved.

WTF are you babbling about Fingerboy
Stay on topic
I'm talking about your signature, shit for brains.
 
I have one question: would Ford's testimony convict Kavanaugh in a court room?

The sex crimes prosecutor who questioned Ford said she wouldn't take this anywhere near a courtroom, she wouldn't even pursue a search warrant.
 
If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.


In a courtroom a prosecutor would bring tons more evidence before going to trial.

In a courtroom, Brett doesn't get to mouth off to the judge and prosecutor... it's called contempt of court.
There is no evidence against Kavanaugh, you thermonuclear dumbass. None.
 
Seeing pictures of Kavenaugh with his family, it's heartbreaking to see how the Dims have destroyed all of them.
Their lives will never be the same.
 
^LOCK HER UP crew still whining
She has 700 k in the gofundme accounts already...........plenty of money to go after for a civil case and slander............

She is being rewarded by the left and will be a millionaire now..............:CryingCow:
Yeah, but she had nothing to gain by testifying!
LOL

That was probably a requirement for getting paid.

LOL
We're not even counting the $750,000 that Soros paid her.
 
Seeing pictures of Kavenaugh with his family, it's heartbreaking to see how the Dims have destroyed all of them.
Their lives will never be the same.
The left doesn't care........they didn't care when the IRS, FBI, ATF, OSHA crawled up people's life costing them millions defending themselves because they dared try and start a 501C group.

They destroy people for their power.............they don't care.
 
^LOCK HER UP crew still whining
She has 700 k in the gofundme accounts already...........plenty of money to go after for a civil case and slander............

She is being rewarded by the left and will be a millionaire now..............:CryingCow:
Yeah, but she had nothing to gain by testifying!
LOL

That was probably a requirement for getting paid.

LOL
We're not even counting the $750,000 that Soros paid her.
She's a millionaire now........................she'll be laughing all the way to the bank shortly..........she just has to play the timid scared one for a bit and then the skies the limit................

Afraid to fly...........yadda yadda yadda...........don't know which house........yadda yadda yadda..........

It's a bunch of garbage and a set up...........and she will be well paid for it.
 
If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.


In a courtroom a prosecutor would bring tons more evidence before going to trial.

In a courtroom, Brett doesn't get to mouth off to the judge and prosecutor... it's called contempt of court.
In a courtroom someone would actually cross examine the "victim".
 
If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.


In a courtroom a prosecutor would bring tons more evidence before going to trial.

In a courtroom, Brett doesn't get to mouth off to the judge and prosecutor... it's called contempt of court.
In a courtroom someone would actually cross examine the "victim".
Also, she would be prosecuted for filing a false police report and then sued for defamation.
 
If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.
Nope. She may have opened herself up for purgery in a court. There is a reason she never filed a report with Maryland.
 

Forum List

Back
Top