I have one question: would Ford's testimony convict kavanaugh in a court room?

[Wyatt earp]

If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.

You are missing the point. This is not a court of law.

You also had a logical fallacy or two in your title and first couple sentences.

How is it not? It sure is not any job interview I went to.

And come again saying it's not a court ..??



The Senate Judiciary Committee, established in 1816, considers topics ranging from criminal justice to antitrust and intellectual property law, as well provides advice and consent for judicial nominations. The committee typically conducts confirmation hearings for nominees to the Supreme Court, courts of appeals (circuit courts), and district courts. These judicial officers, known as Article III judges, are appointed for a life term

And thinking about it some more. Why does she needs lawyers for? I never remember needing a lawyer at a job interview.



.

 

[Care4all]

If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.

of course not!
there had not even been a law enforcement investigation....

this was not even close to a trial and was not suppose to be...

if it was a trial, Kavanaugh would have been in contempt of court

as rightwinger said, it's vetting for a job, the highest and most powerful job in the country... that is not an elected position.

Kavanaugh's lack of cool temperament. lack of candor when questioned, and partisan rants and disrespect shown in the hearing, disqualified him, for the SC Justice position.... you don't even need Ford and his incident with her.

pick another conservative nominee worthy to serve the entire nation in an unbiased manner and you could have a Justice seated by December.

 

[Snouter]

Ford's so-called testimony really should put her in a secured mental institution or prison. Ford is nuts. How the f@ck is that nutter on college payrolls?

 

[Care4all]

If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.

You are missing the point. This is not a court of law.

You also had a logical fallacy or two in your title and first couple sentences.

How is it not? It sure is not any job interview I went to.

And come again saying it's not a court ..??



The Senate Judiciary Committee, established in 1816, considers topics ranging from criminal justice to antitrust and intellectual property law, as well provides advice and consent for judicial nominations. The committee typically conducts confirmation hearings for nominees to the Supreme Court, courts of appeals (circuit courts), and district courts. These judicial officers, known as Article III judges, are appointed for a life term

the Senate hearings are not trials? they are fact finding missions!!!

 

[EverCurious]

Ford's so-called testimony really should put her in a secured mental institution or prison. Ford is nuts. How the f@ck is that nutter on college payrolls?

Does explain why college's are failing our kids. #tradeschool

 

[Care4all]

If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.

You are missing the point. This is not a court of law.

You also had a logical fallacy or two in your title and first couple sentences.

How is it not? It sure is not any job interview I went to.

it's a job that lasts a lifetime, so they have to vet them good.

 

[bripat9643]

 

[bripat9643]

 

[bripat9643]

 

[bripat9643]

 

[bripat9643]

 

[bripat9643]

 

[bripat9643]

 

[bripat9643]

 

[bripat9643]

If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.

But this is not a criminal hearing. This is a job interview. The question is Kavanaugh's character, not whether he committed a crime.

What a bullshit fucking excuse. This woman ACCUSED this man of a CRIME. If you want to jettison due process, be a fucking grown up and say so.

If and when he's tried for that crime, he should have all the due process the Constitution affords. But that's not what's going on. Congress is trying to decide if he should be a Supreme Court Justice.

If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.

But this is not a criminal hearing. This is a job interview. The question is Kavanaugh's character, not whether he committed a crime.

What a bullshit fucking excuse. This woman ACCUSED this man of a CRIME. If you want to jettison due process, be a fucking grown up and say so.

If and when he's tried for that crime, he should have all the due process the Constitution affords. But that's not what's going on. Congress is trying to decide if he should be a Supreme Court Justice.

And in the meantime, minus due process, this man is denied confirmation based on the premise that he's guilty until proven innocent. Since the only reason that he would have been denied confirmation was the unfounded charge, he would certainly have to step down from his current position on the appellate court and leave the bench entirely. It sickens me that people like you are fine with destroying a person's life for partisan politics and then try to tell yourselves that that's not really what you're doing. You lowlife cretins can pat yourself on the back but you know every time you look in the mirror that you're at best a horrid American and a wretched excuse for a human.

Skipping over the insults, I never said I was fine with what's going on. It's all political theater from what I can tell. I was merely pointing out that no one's rights are being violated.

The whole thing is clearly and obviously a strategic effort by Democrats to get the MeToo contingent stoked up before the elections. They're also hoping to delay the confirmation of another Justice until after the mid-terms, much like Republicans did near the end of Obama's last term. And Republicans are playing right into their hands. They should have anticipated this. Flake is just trying to minimize the fallout.

Flake is the cause of this train wreck, moron.

 

[eagle1462010]

If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.

You are missing the point. This is not a court of law.

You also had a logical fallacy or two in your title and first couple sentences.

How is it not? It sure is not any job interview I went to.

And come again saying it's not a court ..??



The Senate Judiciary Committee, established in 1816, considers topics ranging from criminal justice to antitrust and intellectual property law, as well provides advice and consent for judicial nominations. The committee typically conducts confirmation hearings for nominees to the Supreme Court, courts of appeals (circuit courts), and district courts. These judicial officers, known as Article III judges, are appointed for a life term

the Senate hearings are not trials? they are fact finding missions!!!

They are political shit throwing machines................let's dig dirt up and accuse the one being nominated from being naked in front of nurses at birth...............oh the shame........

When this is all said and done...........Ford will be a millionaire and no longer SCARED...........retired having the time of her life................well paid for doing her part...........in a complete SCRIPTED PLAY.

Enjoy the BS..............because that is all this is...........

 

[Care4all]

If you say yes you go by feelings and not by the rule of law and the constitution


If you say no then you go by rule of law and the constitution.


Let's see what side these sentators are on ..


Prosecutor tells wavering senators she wouldn't charge Kavanaugh, as vote looms

The sex-crimes prosecutor Republicans hired to question Brett Kavanaugh and accuser Christine Blasey Ford at Thursday's hearing told senators the case would not hold up in a courtroom, sources told Fox News—guidance that could prove critical as wavering lawmakers prepare to vote.

The prosecutor, Rachel Mitchell, spoke at an overnight meeting where all 51 Republican senators were present, two people briefed on the session said.

“Mitchell spelled it out and was clear with senators that she could not take this anywhere near a courtroom,” one source told Fox News. She told them she would not charge the Supreme Court nominee and reportedly said she wouldn't even seek a search warrant.

Mitchell’s opinion could sway fence-sitting senators ahead of a critical Senate Judiciary Committee vote set for Friday afternoon.

You are missing the point. This is not a court of law.

You also had a logical fallacy or two in your title and first couple sentences.

How is it not? It sure is not any job interview I went to.

And come again saying it's not a court ..??



The Senate Judiciary Committee, established in 1816, considers topics ranging from criminal justice to antitrust and intellectual property law, as well provides advice and consent for judicial nominations. The committee typically conducts confirmation hearings for nominees to the Supreme Court, courts of appeals (circuit courts), and district courts. These judicial officers, known as Article III judges, are appointed for a life term

the Senate hearings are not trials? they are fact finding missions!!!

They are political shit throwing machines................let's dig dirt up and accuse the one being nominated from being naked in front of nurses at birth...............oh the shame........

When this is all said and done...........Ford will be a millionaire and no longer SCARED...........retired having the time of her life................well paid for doing her part...........in a complete SCRIPTED PLAY.

Enjoy the BS..............because that is all this is...........

Look, I hate ALL of this coming out and being public, it would have been best to be behind closed doors and Kavanagh asked to withdraw his acceptance of the nomination.

Instead, in this Trumpian era that we are in, and with the Republicans holding all cards with the majority in both houses, they believed these allegations meant nothing and they could plow through the nomination... even in this day and age of women saying, enough is enough... the me too movement.

They were mistaken. And now Kavanaugh is paying the price, for the Trump and Republican's hubris...

They did not read the Tea Leaves correctly...

Kavanaugh's drinking problem has been exposed, not just being a nasty drunk, as a kid... and his "Lack of Candor" when he was questioned, was revealed as well.... he really does NOT have the temperament for being an IMPARTIAL Justice. It would be a disservice to the Supreme Court, to put him on there, now.

He needs to bow out, because this is going to get worse for him and his family.... it is the society we live in now....

Even when the FBI ends their background check in 7 days, the press will look under every leaf if his nomination goes through.

Pick another Gorsuch like conservative, who is not a politico, like Kavanaugh always was, and you could have another Justice by December.

 

[bripat9643]

You are missing the point. This is not a court of law.

You also had a logical fallacy or two in your title and first couple sentences.

How is it not? It sure is not any job interview I went to.

And come again saying it's not a court ..??



The Senate Judiciary Committee, established in 1816, considers topics ranging from criminal justice to antitrust and intellectual property law, as well provides advice and consent for judicial nominations. The committee typically conducts confirmation hearings for nominees to the Supreme Court, courts of appeals (circuit courts), and district courts. These judicial officers, known as Article III judges, are appointed for a life term

the Senate hearings are not trials? they are fact finding missions!!!

They are political shit throwing machines................let's dig dirt up and accuse the one being nominated from being naked in front of nurses at birth...............oh the shame........

When this is all said and done...........Ford will be a millionaire and no longer SCARED...........retired having the time of her life................well paid for doing her part...........in a complete SCRIPTED PLAY.

Enjoy the BS..............because that is all this is...........

Look, I hate ALL of this coming out and being public, it would have been best to be behind closed doors and Kavanagh asked to withdraw his acceptance of the nomination.

Instead, in this Trumpian era that we are in, and with the Republicans holding all cards with the majority in both houses, they believed these allegations meant nothing and they could plow through the nomination... even in this day and age of women saying, enough is enough... the me too movement.

They were mistaken. And now Kavanaugh is paying the price, for the Trump and Republican's hubris...

They did not read the Tea Leaves correctly...

Kavanaugh's drinking problem has been exposed, not just being a nasty drunk, as a kid... and his "Lack of Candor" when he was questioned, was revealed as well.... he really does NOT have the temperament for being an IMPARTIAL Justice. It would be a disservice to the Supreme Court, to put him on there, now.

He needs to bow out, because this is going to get worse for him and his family.... it is the society we live in now....

Even when the FBI ends their background check in 7 days, the press will look under every leaf if his nomination goes through.

Pick another Gorsuch like conservative, who is not a politico, like Kavanaugh always was, and you could have another Justice by December.

Kavanaugh is paying the price for Democrats being utterly shameless douchebags. Do you actually believe anyone with a brain is swallowing the leftwing narrative?

This has nothing to do with Kavanaugh's demeanor. It has to do with the fact that he will be the fifth conservative on the court. That's all it has to do with.

No one is fooled.

 

[eagle1462010]

You are missing the point. This is not a court of law.

You also had a logical fallacy or two in your title and first couple sentences.

How is it not? It sure is not any job interview I went to.

And come again saying it's not a court ..??



The Senate Judiciary Committee, established in 1816, considers topics ranging from criminal justice to antitrust and intellectual property law, as well provides advice and consent for judicial nominations. The committee typically conducts confirmation hearings for nominees to the Supreme Court, courts of appeals (circuit courts), and district courts. These judicial officers, known as Article III judges, are appointed for a life term

the Senate hearings are not trials? they are fact finding missions!!!

They are political shit throwing machines................let's dig dirt up and accuse the one being nominated from being naked in front of nurses at birth...............oh the shame........

When this is all said and done...........Ford will be a millionaire and no longer SCARED...........retired having the time of her life................well paid for doing her part...........in a complete SCRIPTED PLAY.

Enjoy the BS..............because that is all this is...........

Look, I hate ALL of this coming out and being public, it would have been best to be behind closed doors and Kavanagh asked to withdraw his acceptance of the nomination.

Instead, in this Trumpian era that we are in, and with the Republicans holding all cards with the majority in both houses, they believed these allegations meant nothing and they could plow through the nomination... even in this day and age of women saying, enough is enough... the me too movement.

They were mistaken. And now Kavanaugh is paying the price, for the Trump and Republican's hubris...

They did not read the Tea Leaves correctly...

Kavanaugh's drinking problem has been exposed, not just being a nasty drunk, as a kid... and his "Lack of Candor" when he was questioned, was revealed as well.... he really does NOT have the temperament for being an IMPARTIAL Justice. It would be a disservice to the Supreme Court, to put him on there, now.

He needs to bow out, because this is going to get worse for him and his family.... it is the society we live in now....

Even when the FBI ends their background check in 7 days, the press will look under every leaf if his nomination goes through.

Pick another Gorsuch like conservative, who is not a politico, like Kavanaugh always was, and you could have another Justice by December.

Nothing has been proven.............and you can't deny the timing of the so called leak.

Evidence or nothing.......anyone can make accusations............but Ford has been unable to back them up.........Her testimony is all over the dang place.............she can't even say which house it was at.............Give me a break..........she should at least be able to know that.

 

[Care4all]

How is it not? It sure is not any job interview I went to.

And come again saying it's not a court ..??



The Senate Judiciary Committee, established in 1816, considers topics ranging from criminal justice to antitrust and intellectual property law, as well provides advice and consent for judicial nominations. The committee typically conducts confirmation hearings for nominees to the Supreme Court, courts of appeals (circuit courts), and district courts. These judicial officers, known as Article III judges, are appointed for a life term

the Senate hearings are not trials? they are fact finding missions!!!

They are political shit throwing machines................let's dig dirt up and accuse the one being nominated from being naked in front of nurses at birth...............oh the shame........

When this is all said and done...........Ford will be a millionaire and no longer SCARED...........retired having the time of her life................well paid for doing her part...........in a complete SCRIPTED PLAY.

Enjoy the BS..............because that is all this is...........

Look, I hate ALL of this coming out and being public, it would have been best to be behind closed doors and Kavanagh asked to withdraw his acceptance of the nomination.

Instead, in this Trumpian era that we are in, and with the Republicans holding all cards with the majority in both houses, they believed these allegations meant nothing and they could plow through the nomination... even in this day and age of women saying, enough is enough... the me too movement.

They were mistaken. And now Kavanaugh is paying the price, for the Trump and Republican's hubris...

They did not read the Tea Leaves correctly...

Kavanaugh's drinking problem has been exposed, not just being a nasty drunk, as a kid... and his "Lack of Candor" when he was questioned, was revealed as well.... he really does NOT have the temperament for being an IMPARTIAL Justice. It would be a disservice to the Supreme Court, to put him on there, now.

He needs to bow out, because this is going to get worse for him and his family.... it is the society we live in now....

Even when the FBI ends their background check in 7 days, the press will look under every leaf if his nomination goes through.

Pick another Gorsuch like conservative, who is not a politico, like Kavanaugh always was, and you could have another Justice by December.

Nothing has been proven.............and you can't deny the timing of the so called leak.

Evidence or nothing.......anyone can make accusations............but Ford has been unable to back them up.........Her testimony is all over the dang place.............she can't even say which house it was at.............Give me a break..........she should at least be able to know that.

Kavanaugh's calendar just backed up, parts of her claims....

But even if Ford's allegations and the other 3 new women's allegations never existed, Kavanaugh exposed himself in the hearing to being nothing but a hot headed, belligerent Politico, and showed he does not have the impartial temperament to be seated on the Supreme Court....

he really really really failed his interview... I'm sorry, but he did!