thereisnospoon
Gold Member
Good? Who's good?.....Of the little guy?...Please spare me the "little guy" bullshit.Then they would be working for good not greedMuch worse? Ok, let's try it this way....What's the difference between the two?...God I wish I had a penny for every time you fools bring that guy up. It's laughable. Koch brothers are much worse. Imagine how bad their bosses are.I just heard 4 out of every $5 donated to GOP candidates come from superpacs. Billionaires and millionaires. Way worse in the GOP.
Clearly the GOP is more corrupt.
Hey, is it their fault George Soros is a miserly bastard and won't distribute his money EQUALLY?
If the Koch bros were a couple of flaming libs but did business the same way they do it now, what say you?
This ought to be good.
All wealthy people act in their own self interest. The ones that contribute to liberal causes are doing so to make themselves feel better. They do not do so out of altruism. They do it because they as well as people like you have this deep seated self loathing that brings out this extreme guilt.
Greed? As far as that is concerned, we are ALL greedy. After all what is the prime motivation of success? Money. Wealth. Security.
Please tell me you do not work as a volunteer....
My definition of adverse greed is the the Borough official/employee who makes a very good living, committing some sort of scam or theft because that despite the very good salary and benefits, it's never enough. Or the real rich guy ( Bernie Madoff for example) who had more money than he could ever know what to do with, it was never enough.
But to refer to someone as greedy who earns their way and tries to keep as much as possible, because they earned it, is ludicrous and smacks of evil class envy.
Now, there is no counter argument to that. Any such argument would be illogical.