Asclepias
Diamond Member
The facts are that he was fired for having the same wrong opinion you do.Yes all the time and the vast majority of them dont wind up dead especially if they are white criminals.All the time? Maybe that’s the problem. Resisting arrest, assault and battery on a police officer, taking a weapon from a police officer? This death was 100% preventable. Don’t commit crimes. Jeezus! Just don’t commit crimes and if you do then don’t resist arrest!I didnt do the autopsy and really it doesnt matter. The back is the back. People resist all the time. It shouldnt end up with him getting shot in the back.Where in the back? I bet they are closer to the side. Again if he doesn’t resist none of this happens.I could tell because I can see and I can read. Two shots to his back and the other almost killed someone in a car.How could you tell the video is flawed at best. To me it looked like it was bang bang. If he cooperated and didn’t resist arrest then he would still be alive.Read my comment again.There were three shots. Not two. I watched it and it looked like the shots rang as he was firing his tazer.Nope. Youre wrong again. Both shots hit him in the back the other shot almost killed someone in a car.Did you watch the video? It was bang bang. First shot hit him in the side the next two in the back. Not sure why it escalated so fast. Cops could not let him go after he resisted arrest either. Very messy. Why did he resist?Sure if he had any replacement cartridges.Malfunctioning not non working. It could have worked. So you may play what if games and I may not? Got it...He was he going to kill a kid or an elderly person with a non working dropped taser? For that matter what makes you think he would mess with anyone?And if he kills a kid or an elderly person with the tazer then the cop is vilified. Why did he resist arrest?Of course it was.My bad. Not what I meant. Meant to type another sentence and hit the reply by accident.He was shot in the back and you just claimed he wasnt loser. Back to the bench you go.He was drunk and you got lambasted yesterday. Relax, snowflake.Now youre 0-465Eh? He was drunk?Yes he was stupid.He was not shot in the back
" "His cause of death: gunshot wounds of the back," an investigator from the medical examiner’s office told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. "![]()
He was not shot in the back. Well he was literally but that was not the intent.
What I wanted to post.
When you shoot at a man running away from you the intent is to shoot him in the back.
But he didn't.
And once again he dropped the Taser at the scene BEFORE he ran so who could he have used it on?
Cool opinion. The facts dont support it.