Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Why did Jesus give men nipples?What's wrong, can't make your case so you try to be funny instead?You're ducking.Oh..I forgotOk, now we're back to "millions of years". You'll say just about anything, won't you?
It has been 2000 years since Jesus invented the world
Jesus invented the world so we could all have Christmas
What was he thinking?
Because men were really bad at metrosexualism those days.Why did Jesus give men nipples?What's wrong, can't make your case so you try to be funny instead?You're ducking.Oh..I forgotOk, now we're back to "millions of years". You'll say just about anything, won't you?
It has been 2000 years since Jesus invented the world
Jesus invented the world so we could all have Christmas
What was he thinking?
Lots of people have said it. They're all nutjobs of course. I mean they believe in creationism for fucks sake. Just google "Satan buried dinosaur fossils" and see for yourself.Don't dodge the question.There's as much evidence for that as there is for creationism.And who here ever said that Satan buried the fossils to trick us?No he didn't. But you don't really care do you.But your friend said there weren't any.
Here's an article from just 2 months ago by a total nutjob claiming Dinosaurs are a hoax:
The Atlantean Conspiracy: Dinosaur Hoax - Dinosaurs Never Existed!
WTF does that have to do with evolution?Lots of people have said it. They're all nutjobs of course. I mean they believe in creationism for fucks sake. Just google "Satan buried dinosaur fossils" and see for yourself.Don't dodge the question.There's as much evidence for that as there is for creationism.And who here ever said that Satan buried the fossils to trick us?No he didn't. But you don't really care do you.
Here's an article from just 2 months ago by a total nutjob claiming Dinosaurs are a hoax:
The Atlantean Conspiracy: Dinosaur Hoax - Dinosaurs Never Existed!
Jeffrey Daumer was an atheist, so therefore all atheists are homosexual cannibals. Great 'logic' there ...
Then how can the fossil record be used as evidence of evolution?That's what he was talking about. It is very rare for bones to fossilize. For example, Dinosaurs ruled the world for 150 million years, but we only know of 300 or so different species. We have incomplete skeletons of about 30 T-Rex's. Do you think that only 30 T-Rex's existed?I was told that it's rare that anything is fossilized. Who specified bones?You can teach yourself the difference between micro and macro, but not where we get fossil fuel?Where do we get all this fossil fuel from, thenHow convenient.The chances of something becoming fossilized are very small.
Tell me, when a scientist discovers a dinosaur bone, do you think that can be turned into gasoline?
No... sorry.Evolution is a fact...it occurs
Almost as little as yours and OS flaming bullshit doesWTF does that have to do with evolution?Lots of people have said it. They're all nutjobs of course. I mean they believe in creationism for fucks sake. Just google "Satan buried dinosaur fossils" and see for yourself.Don't dodge the question.There's as much evidence for that as there is for creationism.And who here ever said that Satan buried the fossils to trick us?
Here's an article from just 2 months ago by a total nutjob claiming Dinosaurs are a hoax:
The Atlantean Conspiracy: Dinosaur Hoax - Dinosaurs Never Existed!
Jeffrey Daumer was an atheist, so therefore all atheists are homosexual cannibals. Great 'logic' there ...
Because we've found a lot of fossils. T-Rex fossils had to survive over 65 million years so there aren't many. We have lots of fossils from the last few hundred thousand years. But it's still very rare for bones and tissue to fossilize.Then how can the fossil record be used as evidence of evolution?That's what he was talking about. It is very rare for bones to fossilize. For example, Dinosaurs ruled the world for 150 million years, but we only know of 300 or so different species. We have incomplete skeletons of about 30 T-Rex's. Do you think that only 30 T-Rex's existed?I was told that it's rare that anything is fossilized. Who specified bones?You can teach yourself the difference between micro and macro, but not where we get fossil fuel?Where do we get all this fossil fuel from, thenHow convenient.
Tell me, when a scientist discovers a dinosaur bone, do you think that can be turned into gasoline?
I'll leave it to the experts, honestlyBecause we've found a lot of fossils. T-Rex fossils had to survive over 65 million years so there aren't many. We have lots of fossils from the last few hundred thousand years. But it's still very rare for bones and tissue to fossilize.Then how can the fossil record be used as evidence of evolution?That's what he was talking about. It is very rare for bones to fossilize. For example, Dinosaurs ruled the world for 150 million years, but we only know of 300 or so different species. We have incomplete skeletons of about 30 T-Rex's. Do you think that only 30 T-Rex's existed?I was told that it's rare that anything is fossilized. Who specified bones?You can teach yourself the difference between micro and macro, but not where we get fossil fuel?Where do we get all this fossil fuel from, then
Tell me, when a scientist discovers a dinosaur bone, do you think that can be turned into gasoline?
r/explainlikeimfive
You're thinking about it wrong. Your wing example for instance; the animals with primitive wings are not little birds running around helpless. They are reptiles or what have you with arms that are the tiniest bit different from their parents. Some of those may have died, but a population of them survived and passed down their genes. And their kids had some limbs the same as their parents, some more wing-like, and some more leg-like like their grandparents. Possibly the ones with legs like their grandparents survived just fine and their offspring's legs became more leg like again. But those offspring with more winglike limbs, for whatever reason, may have also survived. And their offspring over the generations had more wing-like limbs as time passed. Maybe it help them jump further, or lunge at prey more accurately... who knows. And eventually we got to modern birds with hollow bones and feathers. Birds similar to modern ones may have even existed during the time of the dinosaurs. Birds weren't the first things to fly you know.I'll leave it to the experts, honestlyBecause we've found a lot of fossils. T-Rex fossils had to survive over 65 million years so there aren't many. We have lots of fossils from the last few hundred thousand years. But it's still very rare for bones and tissue to fossilize.Then how can the fossil record be used as evidence of evolution?That's what he was talking about. It is very rare for bones to fossilize. For example, Dinosaurs ruled the world for 150 million years, but we only know of 300 or so different species. We have incomplete skeletons of about 30 T-Rex's. Do you think that only 30 T-Rex's existed?I was told that it's rare that anything is fossilized. Who specified bones?You can teach yourself the difference between micro and macro, but not where we get fossil fuel?
Tell me, when a scientist discovers a dinosaur bone, do you think that can be turned into gasoline?
r/explainlikeimfive
It really doesn't make my pillow any cooler at night, one way or the other.
I just don't understand how anything would be able to survive any evolutionary change.
The 'in between' stages would leave them vulnerable.
For instance; birds evolving from reptiles.....It would seem that an animal with poorly developed wings, unable of flight, would be just ground-chum for predators.
And I know how readily I'm dismissed for my "complexity of design" belief as evidence of creation.
But it's because of that complexity that makes the random coincidences of evolution so hard to follow
I'll thank you for the time and effort.You're thinking about it wrong. Your wing example for instance; the animals with primitive wings are not little birds running around helpless. They are reptiles or what have you with arms that are the tiniest bit different from their parents. Some of those may have died, but a population of them survived and passed down their genes. And their kids had some limbs the same as their parents, some more wing-like, and some more leg-like like their grandparents. Possibly the ones with legs like their grandparents survived just fine and their offspring's legs became more leg like again. But those offspring with more winglike limbs, for whatever reason, may have also survived. And their offspring over the generations had more wing-like limbs as time passed. Maybe it help them jump further, or lunge at prey more accurately... who knows. And eventually we got to modern birds with hollow bones and feathers. Birds similar to modern ones may have even existed during the time of the dinosaurs. Birds weren't the first things to fly you know.I'll leave it to the experts, honestlyBecause we've found a lot of fossils. T-Rex fossils had to survive over 65 million years so there aren't many. We have lots of fossils from the last few hundred thousand years. But it's still very rare for bones and tissue to fossilize.Then how can the fossil record be used as evidence of evolution?That's what he was talking about. It is very rare for bones to fossilize. For example, Dinosaurs ruled the world for 150 million years, but we only know of 300 or so different species. We have incomplete skeletons of about 30 T-Rex's. Do you think that only 30 T-Rex's existed?I was told that it's rare that anything is fossilized. Who specified bones?
r/explainlikeimfive
It really doesn't make my pillow any cooler at night, one way or the other.
I just don't understand how anything would be able to survive any evolutionary change.
The 'in between' stages would leave them vulnerable.
For instance; birds evolving from reptiles.....It would seem that an animal with poorly developed wings, unable of flight, would be just ground-chum for predators.
And I know how readily I'm dismissed for my "complexity of design" belief as evidence of creation.
But it's because of that complexity that makes the random coincidences of evolution so hard to follow
I have serious questions on evolution...
1. Why did we shed our fur?
For what reason did humans evolve and shed our fur, Wouldn't it be cold with no fur? Sounds like devolution to me.
2.Why did we become weak?
Monkeys, Apes and chimps are strong as hell creatures, so if that's the case why did we devolve and become weak creatures? It don't make no sense when in the animal kingdom the strongest gets a mate.
On my question number one been reading this book that mentions a theory that was proposed by an Oxford professor Alistar years ago (first I heard of it) His theory goes our ancestors were stranded, probably in east Africa, during a rising of sea levels. One large colony became marooned and had to learn to live on the beach. They started using tools to pry open clams, break open crabs...Spending more time in the ocean they soon lost their furry coat. An aquatic lineage would explain our hairlessness; like dolphins, whales and other aquatic mammals..
That's kind of an interesting theory, I wonder if their are other different ones floating out there? My second question I still have not read any answers that make sense why we became weak?
I would suppose it's possible we lost our hair due to becoming more aquatic.....?Have you ever seen a guy that's about as hairy as an ape? I've seen them, hairy back an all. Did these individuals not cross over in the evolutionary process somehow? Your devolution theory is actually quite simple. The devil made them do it. Here's a brain twister for you. Let's say I park my old pickup out back on my property and leave it there for maybe 100,000 years. I can guarantee you my old pickup will never evolve into a BMW sports coup.
A fact is a fact.
A theory is a theory.
Evolution is a theory, not a fact.
End of story.
Evolution is a fact...it occurs
The only theories involve the mechanism of evolution
God is a theory......a theory unsupported by scientific evidence
...we evolved from Adam(man) and Eve(woman) from when first created in to the larger brained human
I have serious questions on evolution...
1. Why did we shed our fur?
For what reason did humans evolve and shed our fur, Wouldn't it be cold with no fur? Sounds like devolution to me.
2.Why did we become weak?
Monkeys, Apes and chimps are strong as hell creatures, so if that's the case why did we devolve and become weak creatures? It don't make no sense when in the animal kingdom the strongest gets a mate.
On my question number one been reading this book that mentions a theory that was proposed by an Oxford professor Alistar years ago (first I heard of it) His theory goes our ancestors were stranded, probably in east Africa, during a rising of sea levels. One large colony became marooned and had to learn to live on the beach. They started using tools to pry open clams, break open crabs...Spending more time in the ocean they soon lost their furry coat. An aquatic lineage would explain our hairlessness; like dolphins, whales and other aquatic mammals..
That's kind of an interesting theory, I wonder if their are other different ones floating out there? My second question I still have not read any answers that make sense why we became weak?
All species evolved from single cell organisms....we evolved from Adam(man) and Eve(woman) from when first created in to the larger brained human
Aside from the fact that Adam and Eve were not the first humans (if you believe in the Bible), it is impossible for any living organism to mutate into a higher form. Mutation follows the laws of entropy... from order to chaos... from better to worse... This is why our species has less hair now than in prehistoric times. With each generation we make a copy of a copy and information is lost.
If our DNA is so amazing that it can predict the future and change itself in order to make the organism gain attributes it will need in the future to become a better creature... this is more miraculous than any God humans have ever invented. Any change in a species is limited to the scope of what the DNA molecule contains. Something simply cannot become what it is not.
