Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
They also believed in slavery and the inferior status of womenIf God doesn't exist...
... then maybe Gods do
... or maybe not.
Maybe we will never know because we don't even know what it means to be a "god".
You must be a government school grad, huh?
Bet they never told you that our memorializing documents are based on the Bible.
Or this:
“52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh
Maybe they said it like this:
Believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known today, “an extremist Fundementalist hate group.”
Or, maybe they told you the truth and you're simply as dumb as asphalt.
Could be?
Wadda dope.
The anti-Americanism didn't work for Bill's wife, but you'll keep riding that horse, huh?
I kinda like this quote:
"There is no king who has not had a slave among his ancestors, and no slave who has not had a king among his."
Helen Keller
Notice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution?
"Notice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution"
Of course they did.
You really are a dunce.....one would have thought you'd read the Constitution before you stat what is or isn't in it.
Second paragraph of Article VII.
Post it, please.
And never make that mistake again.
Oh......and Merry Christmas
So where was your omnipotent and benevolent God, during the times of human crisis?
And if he just lets us do our own thing without intervention, and roots for those that believe in him, then that means he doesn't care.
Or he doesn't have the power to care.
Or maybe, He likes seeing the evil and destruction he can cause in his video game of our universe, before he has to go to dinner.
Or... maybe... he just doesn't exist?
They also believed in slavery and the inferior status of womenYou must be a government school grad, huh?
Bet they never told you that our memorializing documents are based on the Bible.
Or this:
“52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh
Maybe they said it like this:
Believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known today, “an extremist Fundementalist hate group.”
Or, maybe they told you the truth and you're simply as dumb as asphalt.
Could be?
Wadda dope.
The anti-Americanism didn't work for Bill's wife, but you'll keep riding that horse, huh?
I kinda like this quote:
"There is no king who has not had a slave among his ancestors, and no slave who has not had a king among his."
Helen Keller
Notice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution?
"Notice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution"
Of course they did.
You really are a dunce.....one would have thought you'd read the Constitution before you stat what is or isn't in it.
Second paragraph of Article VII.
Post it, please.
And never make that mistake again.
Oh......and Merry Christmas
Article VII
The ratification of the conventions of nine states, shall be sufficient for the establishment of this Constitution between the states so ratifying the same.
Where is the reference to Jesus?
I know a guy like Dillon. He's not a racist but he has other crazy conspiracy theories about other things similar to how Dillon believed that blacks are killing and raping all our white women. I kept trying to find a way to get him to stop calling and coming over but he kept coming and calling. One day he did something, can't even remember what it was now, but I told him to lose my number and didn't pick up the phone. I figure if that pissed him off there's nothing I can do about that but had I told him I think he's a loser whos crazy I think that would have put me on his dillan roof list. Lol..The lady who survived the black church shooting said if dillan roof doesn't get the death penalty then he will be visited every night by 9 angels talking about Jesus. Oh brother. And she looked so sure if herself. I suppose that lie provides her comfort.I'm pretty sure I have forgotten more science then you will ever know. So your I don't believe in science argument rings a little hollow. I've been a practicing engineer for over 30 years. What exactly have you done which makes you an expert on science?And yet the 2nd law of thermodynamics still precludes an infinite universe with usable energy.
Do you believe 100% in thermodynamic science? Why is it you doubt all other sciences but you put all your eggs in the thermodynamic basket?
"The state of entropy of the entire universe, as an isolated system, will always increase over time." Who says? Who says it won't slow down or stop eventually? Is that a fact or scientific consensus?
Are you serious? If you're a practicing engineer, basing your measurements on stuff you hope is true based on what your parents told you upon birth, then I do not want to ride in your car...
Whatever gives her peace is good. I never question a person's faith. In the case that you mention, I personally hope there is a Hell, with eternal damnation, and that he forever rots there! Squeeking out silently into blackness is not a proper penalty for him. I can just hope he suffers so bad in his final days, that people like him learn something. But we all know that they won't...
Because racism such as his, is as much a religion as the others. It is fueled by people seeking money, and promoting lies and hatred of others. And innocently passed along by parents to their children.
Political chick doesn't have a problem with Mormons but doesn't like Muslims. And eventually when she realizes the Mormon story is offensive to Christians shell want to ban that too. If any religion gets too popular shell shut it down.Per Wiki, there are approximately 4,200 religions in the world.
Now, using that as a number going forward, and based on the meaning of being devoted to a religion, and that each one believes that their's is infallibly correct, that means that 4,199 of them are flat-out wrong!!!
Wow...
And given enough prodding, they're willing to kill the other 4,199 religions, and all the people that believe in them, just to prove they're right!
They also believed in slavery and the inferior status of women
Wadda dope.
The anti-Americanism didn't work for Bill's wife, but you'll keep riding that horse, huh?
I kinda like this quote:
"There is no king who has not had a slave among his ancestors, and no slave who has not had a king among his."
Helen Keller
Notice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution?
"Notice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution"
Of course they did.
You really are a dunce.....one would have thought you'd read the Constitution before you stat what is or isn't in it.
Second paragraph of Article VII.
Post it, please.
And never make that mistake again.
Oh......and Merry Christmas
Article VII
The ratification of the conventions of nine states, shall be sufficient for the establishment of this Constitution between the states so ratifying the same.
Where is the reference to Jesus?
Are you this stupid, or a congenital liar?
Oh...you answered that already with you avi.
This was the request:
Second paragraph of Article VII.
Post it, please.
And never make that mistake again.
Second paragraph.
Post it, please.
And never make that mistake again.
They also believed in slavery and the inferior status of womenYou must be a government school grad, huh?
Bet they never told you that our memorializing documents are based on the Bible.
Or this:
“52 of the 56 signers of the declaration and 50 to 52 of the 55 signers of the Constitution were orthodox Trinitarian Christians.” David Limbaugh
Maybe they said it like this:
Believers in the Father, Son, and Holy Ghost, or, as they would be known today, “an extremist Fundementalist hate group.”
Or, maybe they told you the truth and you're simply as dumb as asphalt.
Could be?
Wadda dope.
The anti-Americanism didn't work for Bill's wife, but you'll keep riding that horse, huh?
I kinda like this quote:
"There is no king who has not had a slave among his ancestors, and no slave who has not had a king among his."
Helen Keller
Notice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution?
"Notice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution"
Of course they did.
You really are a dunce.....one would have thought you'd read the Constitution before you stat what is or isn't in it.
Second paragraph of Article VII.
Post it, please.
And never make that mistake again.
Oh......and Merry Christmas
Article VII
The ratification of the conventions of nine states, shall be sufficient for the establishment of this Constitution between the states so ratifying the same.
Where is the reference to Jesus?
That is an idiotic statement. The external locus of control is strong in this one.So He doesn't exist, doesn't care, is unaware, likes the savagery, or is just a really bad Player in the Universal God Game.
We should be travelling to other star systems by now. Except that religion keeps erasing our knowledge for the benefit of the ruler.
We have to start over every 1000 years or so.... Why?
You support the omnipotent benevolent God, do you not?
And being an engineer, you know the mass reboots we have undertaken as a species based on religious genocide and wiping out of prior knowledge, right?
And where we could possibly be at this point in terms of medicine and science, if those religious reboots never happened?
So where was your omnipotent and benevolent God, during the times of human crisis?
And if he just lets us do our own thing without intervention, and roots for those that believe in him, then that means he doesn't care.
Or he doesn't have the power to care.
Or maybe, He likes seeing the evil and destruction he can cause in his video game of our universe, before he has to go to dinner.
Or... maybe... he just doesn't exist? And we made Him up to explain stuff we haven't yet explained?
Why is the idea of "God" being real, important to you?
Still no mention of JesusThey also believed in slavery and the inferior status of women
Wadda dope.
The anti-Americanism didn't work for Bill's wife, but you'll keep riding that horse, huh?
I kinda like this quote:
"There is no king who has not had a slave among his ancestors, and no slave who has not had a king among his."
Helen Keller
Notice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution?
"Notice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution"
Of course they did.
You really are a dunce.....one would have thought you'd read the Constitution before you stat what is or isn't in it.
Second paragraph of Article VII.
Post it, please.
And never make that mistake again.
Oh......and Merry Christmas
Article VII
The ratification of the conventions of nine states, shall be sufficient for the establishment of this Constitution between the states so ratifying the same.
Where is the reference to Jesus?
This was the request:
Second paragraph of Article VII.
Post it, please.
And never make that mistake again.
I'll take your refusal to post the second paragraph a proof that you know that....as usual....I'm correct again.
You're dismissed.
Still no mention of JesusWadda dope.
The anti-Americanism didn't work for Bill's wife, but you'll keep riding that horse, huh?
I kinda like this quote:
"There is no king who has not had a slave among his ancestors, and no slave who has not had a king among his."
Helen Keller
Notice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution?
"Notice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution"
Of course they did.
You really are a dunce.....one would have thought you'd read the Constitution before you stat what is or isn't in it.
Second paragraph of Article VII.
Post it, please.
And never make that mistake again.
Oh......and Merry Christmas
Article VII
The ratification of the conventions of nine states, shall be sufficient for the establishment of this Constitution between the states so ratifying the same.
Where is the reference to Jesus?
This was the request:
Second paragraph of Article VII.
Post it, please.
And never make that mistake again.
I'll take your refusal to post the second paragraph a proof that you know that....as usual....I'm correct again.
You're dismissed.
Article VII
The ratification of the conventions of nine states, shall be sufficient for the establishment of this Constitution between the states so ratifying the same.
Im noticing a lot of usmb Republicans claim to be engineers. I'm calling bullshit here and nowThat's good because I don't build cars.I'm pretty sure I have forgotten more science then you will ever know. So your I don't believe in science argument rings a little hollow. I've been a practicing engineer for over 30 years. What exactly have you done which makes you an expert on science?And yet the 2nd law of thermodynamics still precludes an infinite universe with usable energy.
Do you believe 100% in thermodynamic science? Why is it you doubt all other sciences but you put all your eggs in the thermodynamic basket?
"The state of entropy of the entire universe, as an isolated system, will always increase over time." Who says? Who says it won't slow down or stop eventually? Is that a fact or scientific consensus?
Are you serious? If you're a practicing engineer, basing your measurements on stuff you hope is true based on what your parents told you upon birth, then I do not want to ride in your car...
happinessbeyondthought: How "consciousness" creates matter...the God particle?
Are you still serious? You know the "God particle" has nothing to do with "god", right? It was just an unfortunate term in a book?
The Higgs Boson and the Nobel: Why We Call It the 'God Particle'
It took off because religious people thought that there could actually be a particle that proved "god"!
But it has nothing to do with "god" or anything else supernatural!!! It has to do with the way a particle interacts with space-time to create mass!
It's good that you're not engineering cars, or any other moving thing (i hope). What exactly are you engineering?
Still no mention of JesusNotice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution?
"Notice how the founders never mention Christ in the Constitution"
Of course they did.
You really are a dunce.....one would have thought you'd read the Constitution before you stat what is or isn't in it.
Second paragraph of Article VII.
Post it, please.
And never make that mistake again.
Oh......and Merry Christmas
Article VII
The ratification of the conventions of nine states, shall be sufficient for the establishment of this Constitution between the states so ratifying the same.
Where is the reference to Jesus?
This was the request:
Second paragraph of Article VII.
Post it, please.
And never make that mistake again.
I'll take your refusal to post the second paragraph a proof that you know that....as usual....I'm correct again.
You're dismissed.
Article VII
The ratification of the conventions of nine states, shall be sufficient for the establishment of this Constitution between the states so ratifying the same.
Still no second paragraph
They supported slavery. That is what we are talking about, right? Even in the 60's the northern Democrats were in cahoots with the southern Democrats. If you don't believe me, listen to Malcolm X with your own ears.Odd...show where northern Democrats supported the Confederacy
In defense of our founders....they were crippled by the slave rapers in the south who insisted on protecting their "peculiar institution"
Complete nonsense
Show where southern Republicans opposed civil rights and we can start to talk
Republicans didn't oppose civil rights. Republicans championed civil rights.
In 1957, and then again in 1960, Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower made bold civil rights proposals to increase black voting rights and protections. [133] Since Congress was solidly in the hands of the Democrats, they cut the heart out of his bills before passing weak, watered-down versions of his proposals. [134]Nevertheless, to focus national attention upon the plight of blacks, Eisenhower started a civil rights commission and was the first President to appoint a black to an executive position in the White House. [135]
[133] The Civil Rights Act of 1964: The Passage of the Low that Ended Racial Segregation, Robert D. Loevy, editor (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997), pp. 26, 27, 33; see also Civil Rights — 1957: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate Eighty-Fifth Congress First Session (Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1960), pp. 125-131; Civil Rights Act of 1960: Hearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate Eighty Sixth Congress Second Session on H.R. 8601 (Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1960), pp. 2-7.
[134] The Civil Rights Act of 1964, pp. 26, 27, 28, 30, 31.
[135] The White House Historical Association online, “African Americans and the White House: the 1950s”
Republican Senator Everett Dirksen – The Key To Modern-era Civil Rights Legislation
It was Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Democrat President Lyndon Johnson, who pushed through the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act. In fact, Dirksen was instrumental in the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964, 1965 and 1968. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. hailed Senator Dirksen’s “able and courageous Leadership”, and "The Chicago Defender”, the largest black-owned daily at that time, praised Senator Dirksen “for the grand manner of his generalship behind the passage of the best civil rights measures that have ever been enacted into law since Reconstruction”.
The chief opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act were Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd, a former official in the Ku Klux Klan. None of these racist Democrats became Republicans.
FAIL
I asked you to show where SOUTHERN Republicans supported Civil rights
Try again
Your logic eludes me. The 13th Amendment emancipating the slaves was passed with 100 percent of Republicans (88 of 88 in the House, 30 of 30 in the Senate) voting for it. Only 23 percent of Democrats (16 of 66 in the House, 3 of 8 in the Senate) voted for it. You do realize that at this time only northern Democrats were in the House and Senate, right?
38th United States Congress - Wikipedia
They supported slavery. That is what we are talking about, right? Even in the 60's the northern Democrats were in cahoots with the southern Democrats. If you don't believe me, listen to Malcolm X with your own ears.
Complete nonsense
Show where southern Republicans opposed civil rights and we can start to talk
Republicans didn't oppose civil rights. Republicans championed civil rights.
In 1957, and then again in 1960, Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower made bold civil rights proposals to increase black voting rights and protections. [133] Since Congress was solidly in the hands of the Democrats, they cut the heart out of his bills before passing weak, watered-down versions of his proposals. [134]Nevertheless, to focus national attention upon the plight of blacks, Eisenhower started a civil rights commission and was the first President to appoint a black to an executive position in the White House. [135]
[133] The Civil Rights Act of 1964: The Passage of the Low that Ended Racial Segregation, Robert D. Loevy, editor (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997), pp. 26, 27, 33; see also Civil Rights — 1957: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate Eighty-Fifth Congress First Session (Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1960), pp. 125-131; Civil Rights Act of 1960: Hearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate Eighty Sixth Congress Second Session on H.R. 8601 (Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1960), pp. 2-7.
[134] The Civil Rights Act of 1964, pp. 26, 27, 28, 30, 31.
[135] The White House Historical Association online, “African Americans and the White House: the 1950s”
Republican Senator Everett Dirksen – The Key To Modern-era Civil Rights Legislation
It was Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Democrat President Lyndon Johnson, who pushed through the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act. In fact, Dirksen was instrumental in the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964, 1965 and 1968. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. hailed Senator Dirksen’s “able and courageous Leadership”, and "The Chicago Defender”, the largest black-owned daily at that time, praised Senator Dirksen “for the grand manner of his generalship behind the passage of the best civil rights measures that have ever been enacted into law since Reconstruction”.
The chief opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act were Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd, a former official in the Ku Klux Klan. None of these racist Democrats became Republicans.
FAIL
I asked you to show where SOUTHERN Republicans supported Civil rights
Try again
Your logic eludes me. The 13th Amendment emancipating the slaves was passed with 100 percent of Republicans (88 of 88 in the House, 30 of 30 in the Senate) voting for it. Only 23 percent of Democrats (16 of 66 in the House, 3 of 8 in the Senate) voted for it. You do realize that at this time only northern Democrats were in the House and Senate, right?
38th United States Congress - Wikipedia
Then why do blacks today, even the successful ones, think the GOP is racist?
Republicans now have a chance to win blacks over. Remember "what have you got to lose"? This goes for the poorly educated blue collar whites. Time for Republicans to show us what they got.
Please don't fuck us like bush Tom delay and Dennis hastert did
You ever watch blackish? But you make a good point. Us libs can't have it both ways. We say southern Democrats were racist but now southern Republicans are. So it's possible for parties to change. You claim the GOP is not racist and it's the best party for working class people. Moving forward let's see.Who says they do?Then why do blacks today, even the successful ones, think the GOP is racist?Your logic eludes me. The 13th Amendment emancipating the slaves was passed with 100 percent of Republicans (88 of 88 in the House, 30 of 30 in the Senate) voting for it. Only 23 percent of Democrats (16 of 66 in the House, 3 of 8 in the Senate) voted for it. You do realize that at this time only northern Democrats were in the House and Senate, right?FAILRepublicans didn't oppose civil rights. Republicans championed civil rights.Complete nonsense
Show where southern Republicans opposed civil rights and we can start to talk
In 1957, and then again in 1960, Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower made bold civil rights proposals to increase black voting rights and protections. [133] Since Congress was solidly in the hands of the Democrats, they cut the heart out of his bills before passing weak, watered-down versions of his proposals. [134]Nevertheless, to focus national attention upon the plight of blacks, Eisenhower started a civil rights commission and was the first President to appoint a black to an executive position in the White House. [135]
[133] The Civil Rights Act of 1964: The Passage of the Low that Ended Racial Segregation, Robert D. Loevy, editor (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997), pp. 26, 27, 33; see also Civil Rights — 1957: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate Eighty-Fifth Congress First Session (Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1960), pp. 125-131; Civil Rights Act of 1960: Hearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate Eighty Sixth Congress Second Session on H.R. 8601 (Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1960), pp. 2-7.
[134] The Civil Rights Act of 1964, pp. 26, 27, 28, 30, 31.
[135] The White House Historical Association online, “African Americans and the White House: the 1950s”
Republican Senator Everett Dirksen – The Key To Modern-era Civil Rights Legislation
It was Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Democrat President Lyndon Johnson, who pushed through the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act. In fact, Dirksen was instrumental in the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964, 1965 and 1968. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. hailed Senator Dirksen’s “able and courageous Leadership”, and "The Chicago Defender”, the largest black-owned daily at that time, praised Senator Dirksen “for the grand manner of his generalship behind the passage of the best civil rights measures that have ever been enacted into law since Reconstruction”.
The chief opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act were Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd, a former official in the Ku Klux Klan. None of these racist Democrats became Republicans.
I asked you to show where SOUTHERN Republicans supported Civil rights
Try again
38th United States Congress - Wikipedia
Republicans now have a chance to win blacks over. Remember "what have you got to lose"? This goes for the poorly educated blue collar whites. Time for Republicans to show us what they got.
Please don't fuck us like bush Tom delay and Dennis hastert did
No. I am more of a deist. I believe the laws of nature or such that people like yourself will eventually suffer the predictable surprises of normalizing their deviance.That is an idiotic statement. The external locus of control is strong in this one.So He doesn't exist, doesn't care, is unaware, likes the savagery, or is just a really bad Player in the Universal God Game.
We should be travelling to other star systems by now. Except that religion keeps erasing our knowledge for the benefit of the ruler.
We have to start over every 1000 years or so.... Why?
You support the omnipotent benevolent God, do you not?
And being an engineer, you know the mass reboots we have undertaken as a species based on religious genocide and wiping out of prior knowledge, right?
And where we could possibly be at this point in terms of medicine and science, if those religious reboots never happened?
So where was your omnipotent and benevolent God, during the times of human crisis?
And if he just lets us do our own thing without intervention, and roots for those that believe in him, then that means he doesn't care.
Or he doesn't have the power to care.
Or maybe, He likes seeing the evil and destruction he can cause in his video game of our universe, before he has to go to dinner.
Or... maybe... he just doesn't exist? And we made Him up to explain stuff we haven't yet explained?
Why is the idea of "God" being real, important to you?
The more Republican the south became the less racist it became. All of the bad things that happened in the south happened when Democrats were in charge of the south. There is your sign. Do you need another one? What good has voting for Democrats as a block done for blacks?You ever watch blackish? But you make a good point. Us libs can't have it both ways. We say southern Democrats were racist but now southern Republicans are. So it's possible for parties to change. You claim the GOP is not racist and it's the best party for working class people. Moving forward let's see.Who says they do?Then why do blacks today, even the successful ones, think the GOP is racist?Your logic eludes me. The 13th Amendment emancipating the slaves was passed with 100 percent of Republicans (88 of 88 in the House, 30 of 30 in the Senate) voting for it. Only 23 percent of Democrats (16 of 66 in the House, 3 of 8 in the Senate) voted for it. You do realize that at this time only northern Democrats were in the House and Senate, right?FAILRepublicans didn't oppose civil rights. Republicans championed civil rights.
In 1957, and then again in 1960, Republican President Dwight D. Eisenhower made bold civil rights proposals to increase black voting rights and protections. [133] Since Congress was solidly in the hands of the Democrats, they cut the heart out of his bills before passing weak, watered-down versions of his proposals. [134]Nevertheless, to focus national attention upon the plight of blacks, Eisenhower started a civil rights commission and was the first President to appoint a black to an executive position in the White House. [135]
[133] The Civil Rights Act of 1964: The Passage of the Low that Ended Racial Segregation, Robert D. Loevy, editor (Albany: State University of New York Press, 1997), pp. 26, 27, 33; see also Civil Rights — 1957: Hearings Before the Subcommittee on Constitutional Rights of the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate Eighty-Fifth Congress First Session (Washington, DC: United States Government Printing Office, 1960), pp. 125-131; Civil Rights Act of 1960: Hearings Before the Committee on the Judiciary United States Senate Eighty Sixth Congress Second Session on H.R. 8601 (Washington: United States Government Printing Office, 1960), pp. 2-7.
[134] The Civil Rights Act of 1964, pp. 26, 27, 28, 30, 31.
[135] The White House Historical Association online, “African Americans and the White House: the 1950s”
Republican Senator Everett Dirksen – The Key To Modern-era Civil Rights Legislation
It was Republican Senator Everett Dirksen from Illinois, not Democrat President Lyndon Johnson, who pushed through the landmark 1964 Civil Rights Act. In fact, Dirksen was instrumental in the passage of civil rights legislation in 1957, 1960, 1964, 1965 and 1968. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. hailed Senator Dirksen’s “able and courageous Leadership”, and "The Chicago Defender”, the largest black-owned daily at that time, praised Senator Dirksen “for the grand manner of his generalship behind the passage of the best civil rights measures that have ever been enacted into law since Reconstruction”.
The chief opponents of the 1964 Civil Rights Act were Democrat Senators Sam Ervin, Albert Gore, Sr. and Robert Byrd, a former official in the Ku Klux Klan. None of these racist Democrats became Republicans.
I asked you to show where SOUTHERN Republicans supported Civil rights
Try again
38th United States Congress - Wikipedia
Republicans now have a chance to win blacks over. Remember "what have you got to lose"? This goes for the poorly educated blue collar whites. Time for Republicans to show us what they got.
Please don't fuck us like bush Tom delay and Dennis hastert did
I will forgive all past sins. Let's forget the past. I have an open mind. God if you're out there give me a sign
They all have common elements because there are natural laws. You seem more than ready to blame religion for the bad but very reluctant to give religion any credit for the good.Per Wiki, there are approximately 4,200 religions in the world.
Now, using that as a number going forward, and based on the meaning of being devoted to a religion, and that each one believes that their's is infallibly correct, that means that 4,199 of them are flat-out wrong!!!
Wow...
And given enough prodding, they're willing to kill the other 4,199 religions, and all the people that believe in them, just to prove they're right!
Give us the 3-5 pieces of evidence you have for God's existence.No. I am more of a deist. I believe the laws of nature or such that people like yourself will eventually suffer the predictable surprises of normalizing their deviance.That is an idiotic statement. The external locus of control is strong in this one.So He doesn't exist, doesn't care, is unaware, likes the savagery, or is just a really bad Player in the Universal God Game.
We should be travelling to other star systems by now. Except that religion keeps erasing our knowledge for the benefit of the ruler.
We have to start over every 1000 years or so.... Why?
You support the omnipotent benevolent God, do you not?
And being an engineer, you know the mass reboots we have undertaken as a species based on religious genocide and wiping out of prior knowledge, right?
And where we could possibly be at this point in terms of medicine and science, if those religious reboots never happened?
So where was your omnipotent and benevolent God, during the times of human crisis?
And if he just lets us do our own thing without intervention, and roots for those that believe in him, then that means he doesn't care.
Or he doesn't have the power to care.
Or maybe, He likes seeing the evil and destruction he can cause in his video game of our universe, before he has to go to dinner.
Or... maybe... he just doesn't exist? And we made Him up to explain stuff we haven't yet explained?
Why is the idea of "God" being real, important to you?
As an engineer I see the natural cycles that have occurred throughout man's history and the role that violating the moral law plays in it. As an engineer I see how you use critical theory to criticize everything that you don't believe to justify what you do believe and convince yourself that you are using critical thinking. You're not. Critical thinking is challenging what you do believe to test its validity. You don't have a positive argument for your beliefs. You have negative arguments for what you don't believe such as your path not taken argument you are making now.
No, that doesn't mean He doesn't care. It means that it is not virtuous if we are made to be virtuous. Don't worry, the laws of compensation are such that virtue is increasing. It just isn't in a straight line. It is cyclical. It is Darwinian.
The reality is that there is plenty of evidence for His existence. You just don't accept any of it, but regardless, you are being pruned by Him through the natural laws of right and wrong, even if you don't recognize it or accept it.
Well I think the KKK in the 80s, 90's, 2000 and 2010s vote GOP, no?The more Republican the south became the less racist it became. All of the bad things that happened in the south happened when Democrats were in charge of the south.You ever watch blackish? But you make a good point. Us libs can't have it both ways. We say southern Democrats were racist but now southern Republicans are. So it's possible for parties to change. You claim the GOP is not racist and it's the best party for working class people. Moving forward let's see.Who says they do?Then why do blacks today, even the successful ones, think the GOP is racist?Your logic eludes me. The 13th Amendment emancipating the slaves was passed with 100 percent of Republicans (88 of 88 in the House, 30 of 30 in the Senate) voting for it. Only 23 percent of Democrats (16 of 66 in the House, 3 of 8 in the Senate) voted for it. You do realize that at this time only northern Democrats were in the House and Senate, right?FAIL
I asked you to show where SOUTHERN Republicans supported Civil rights
Try again
38th United States Congress - Wikipedia
Republicans now have a chance to win blacks over. Remember "what have you got to lose"? This goes for the poorly educated blue collar whites. Time for Republicans to show us what they got.
Please don't fuck us like bush Tom delay and Dennis hastert did
I will forgive all past sins. Let's forget the past. I have an open mind. God if you're out there give me a sign
