If God Doesn’t Exist

As sentient beings we know what's right and wrong, and it can differ based on religion, culture, etc. No God is required to acknowledge that hurting another human being is wrong.

Atheists are usually wrong and this is totally so wrong.

Being a sentient human being means you don't know what is right and wrong. God through the Bible is required for humans to repent and be sorry for their wrongful actions and thoughts, i.e. sin.
 
People thought murder was wrong long before most of them started believing in Jehovah, who was only a regional tribal god before 1700 years ago.

Not according to the Bible. People were killing innocent people for no reason and that's why we had the global flood.

Anyway, Kyle Rittenhouse killed in self defense; It wasn't murder.
 
As sentient beings we know what's right and wrong, and it can differ based on religion, culture, etc. No God is required to acknowledge that hurting another human being is wrong.

Atheists are usually wrong and this is totally so wrong.

Being a sentient human being means you don't know what is right and wrong. God through the Bible is required for humans to repent and be sorry for their wrongful actions and thoughts, i.e. sin.
.
christians are always wrong they rely on a book of forgeries and fallacies, learning not to be sinners would first require correcting the wrongs they wrote in their 4th century - bible.

beginning with all beings are sentient and are reflective of the same metaphysical image they have evolved from and will continue to evolve by means of the prescribed religion of antiquity or eventually will become extinct by the same means so abandoned as christianity, the desert religions.
 
As sentient beings we know what's right and wrong, and it can differ based on religion, culture, etc. No God is required to acknowledge that hurting another human being is wrong.

Atheists are usually wrong and this is totally so wrong.

Being a sentient human being means you don't know what is right and wrong. God through the Bible is required for humans to repent and be sorry for their wrongful actions and thoughts, i.e. sin.
.
christians are always wrong they rely on a book of forgeries and fallacies, learning not to be sinners would first require correcting the wrongs they wrote in their 4th century - bible.

beginning with all beings are sentient and are reflective of the same metaphysical image they have evolved from and will continue to evolve by means of the prescribed religion of antiquity or eventually will become extinct by the same means so abandoned as christianity, the desert religions.

We can't be wrong if science backs up the Bible and creation science's findings. We have the scientific method with how life only begets life. Not primordial soup or weird and unbelievable abiogenesis (formerly spontaneous generation which has been debunked).
 
If God doesn’t exist, the universe came into existence by chance, the first living cell developed from non-living matter by chance, and all living things are the eventual product of the blind, undirected process of evolution. In such a case, human life is no more valuable than dust, and there is no basis for saying that any life matters. Only if there is an author of life who creates and imbues us with a meaning greater than our physical parts can lives actually matter, and in an equal way.

If God doesn’t exist, there’s also no objective standard for labeling an action—such as murder—wrong. If we’re all just the product of blind, purposeless forces, morality is just an opinion. Unless there is a higher-than-human moral authority, no one has a basis for claiming that murder is objectively wrong.

And finally, if God doesn’t exist, the concept of justice is meaningless because there can be no right or wrong in the first place to require justice. As C.S. Lewis famously said about his conversion to Christianity, “My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust. But how had I got this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line. What was I comparing this universe with when I called it unjust?” Justice requires a standard, and there is no objective standard in a purposeless universe.

Do you believe in psychology, symbolism, balance and/or wisdom? How about mercy? Do you want to be loved? Why wouldnt you?
 
If God doesn’t exist, the universe came into existence by chance, the first living cell developed from non-living matter by chance, and all living things are the eventual product of the blind, undirected process of evolution. In such a case, human life is no more valuable than dust, and there is no basis for saying that any life matters. Only if there is an author of life who creates and imbues us with a meaning greater than our physical parts can lives actually matter, and in an equal way.

If God doesn’t exist, there’s also no objective standard for labeling an action—such as murder—wrong. If we’re all just the product of blind, purposeless forces, morality is just an opinion. Unless there is a higher-than-human moral authority, no one has a basis for claiming that murder is objectively wrong.

And finally, if God doesn’t exist, the concept of justice is meaningless because there can be no right or wrong in the first place to require justice. As C.S. Lewis famously said about his conversion to Christianity, “My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust. But how had I got this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line. What was I comparing this universe with when I called it unjust?” Justice requires a standard, and there is no objective standard in a purposeless universe.

Do you believe in psychology, symbolism, balance and/or wisdom? How about mercy? Do you want to be loved? Why wouldnt you?
Why should atomic matter care about such things?
 
We can't be wrong if science backs up the Bible and creation science's findings. We have the scientific method with how life only begets life. Not primordial soup or weird and unbelievable abiogenesis (formerly spontaneous generation which has been debunked).

"Prove all things. Hold fast that which is true." - The Holy Bible
Is there a more concise definition of science than this?
 
As sentient beings we know what's right and wrong, and it can differ based on religion, culture, etc. No God is required to acknowledge that hurting another human being is wrong.

Atheists are usually wrong and this is totally so wrong.

Being a sentient human being means you don't know what is right and wrong. God through the Bible is required for humans to repent and be sorry for their wrongful actions and thoughts, i.e. sin.
.
christians are always wrong they rely on a book of forgeries and fallacies, learning not to be sinners would first require correcting the wrongs they wrote in their 4th century - bible.

beginning with all beings are sentient and are reflective of the same metaphysical image they have evolved from and will continue to evolve by means of the prescribed religion of antiquity or eventually will become extinct by the same means so abandoned as christianity, the desert religions.

We can't be wrong if science backs up the Bible and creation science's findings. We have the scientific method with how life only begets life. Not primordial soup or weird and unbelievable abiogenesis (formerly spontaneous generation which has been debunked).
Science doesn't ''back up'' the bibles.

So-called creation science is not science at all but hyper-religious quackery.
 
Science doesn't ''back up'' the bibles.

So-called creation science is not science at all but hyper-religious quackery.

Only one Bible that is true, i.e. the one with God's words. It isn't Satan's Antibible of Evolution. That is full of lies which the atheists and their science of atheism believe in like you.

Creation science isn't quackery because we show that it is backed by the scientific method and has the mountain of evidence. It is the best theory.

We can see the troubling part of the science of atheism today as people do not believe in God anymore and have taken to the streets to cause rioting, looting, vandalism, fire bombing, killings, and other forms of violence. These people have no morals or scruples:

Honor thy Father and Mother
Thou shalt not murder (Antifa/BLM)
Thou shalt not commit adultery
Thou shalt not steal (Antifa/BLM)
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor (liberal news)
Thou shalt not covet (looters)
 
Science doesn't ''back up'' the bibles.

So-called creation science is not science at all but hyper-religious quackery.

Only one Bible that is true, i.e. the one with God's words. It isn't Satan's Antibible of Evolution. That is full of lies which the atheists and their science of atheism believe in like you.

Creation science isn't quackery because we show that it is backed by the scientific method and has the mountain of evidence. It is the best theory.

We can see the troubling part of the science of atheism today as people do not believe in God anymore and have taken to the streets to cause rioting, looting, vandalism, fire bombing, killings, and other forms of violence. These people have no morals or scruples:

Honor thy Father and Mother
Thou shalt not murder (Antifa/BLM)
Thou shalt not commit adultery
Thou shalt not steal (Antifa/BLM)
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor (liberal news)
Thou shalt not covet (looters)
The bible is not the word of any gods. The bible is the words of many, mostly unknown men.

Why would you think that religious people are any more or less violent than non-religious people?
 
Science doesn't ''back up'' the bibles.

So-called creation science is not science at all but hyper-religious quackery.

Only one Bible that is true, i.e. the one with God's words. It isn't Satan's Antibible of Evolution. That is full of lies which the atheists and their science of atheism believe in like you.

Creation science isn't quackery because we show that it is backed by the scientific method and has the mountain of evidence. It is the best theory.

We can see the troubling part of the science of atheism today as people do not believe in God anymore and have taken to the streets to cause rioting, looting, vandalism, fire bombing, killings, and other forms of violence. These people have no morals or scruples:

Honor thy Father and Mother
Thou shalt not murder (Antifa/BLM)
Thou shalt not commit adultery
Thou shalt not steal (Antifa/BLM)
Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor (liberal news)
Thou shalt not covet (looters)
The bible is not the word of any gods. The bible is the words of many, mostly unknown men.

Why would you think that religious people are any more or less violent than non-religious people?
"The divinely revealed realities, which are contained and presented in the text of Sacred Scripture, have been written down under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit. For Holy Mother Church, relying on the faith of the apostolic age, accepts as sacred and canonical the books of the Old and the New Testaments, whole and entire, with all their parts, on the grounds that, written under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, they have God as their author, and have been handed on as such to the Church herself.

God inspired the human authors of the sacred books. To compose the sacred books, God chose certain men who, all the while he employed them in this task, made full use of their own faculties and powers so that, though he acted in them and by them, it was as true authors that they consigned to writing whatever he wanted written, and no more. The inspired books teach the truth. Since therefore all that the inspired authors or sacred writers affirm should be regarded as affirmed by the Holy Spirit, we must acknowledge that the books of Scripture firmly, faithfully, and without error teach that truth which God, for the sake of our salvation, wished to see confided to the Sacred Scriptures.

Still, the Christian faith is not a "religion of the book." Christianity is the religion of the "Word" of God, a word which is not a written and mute word, but the Word is incarnate and living. If the Scriptures are not to remain a dead letter, Christ, the eternal Word of the living God, must, through the Holy Spirit, open our minds to understand the Scriptures.
 
The bible is not the word of any gods. The bible is the words of many, mostly unknown men.

Why would you think that religious people are any more or less violent than non-religious people?

The Bible is the word of God and science backs up God's word with natural selection, Cambrian explosion, global flood evidence, Tower of Babel evidence, 7,000 different languages, only life begets life, creation scientists' accomplishments, laws, theories, and more. OTOH, the Antibible of Evolution is the word of Satan and not backed up by science. The science behind it are lies. Why do you believe in lies such as big bang, abiogenesis, aliens, dinosaurs going extinct before humans, long time universe and Earth and long timelines, plants and animals evolving, Earth's geology taking a long time, and more evolution weirdness?

Christians have the objective morality of the Ten Commandments and the Bible which states what happens after death and that all would experience final judgement. Other religions have something similar based on how one lived their life. Atheists have nothing basically but trusting what humans will do when they are alive knowing what is right and wrong. It cannot be trusted because it is based on secularism.
 
The bible is not the word of any gods. The bible is the words of many, mostly unknown men.

Why would you think that religious people are any more or less violent than non-religious people?

The Bible is the word of God and science backs up God's word with natural selection, Cambrian explosion, global flood evidence, Tower of Babel evidence, 7,000 different languages, only life begets life, creation scientists' accomplishments, laws, theories, and more. OTOH, the Antibible of Evolution is the word of Satan and not backed up by science. The science behind it are lies. Why do you believe in lies such as big bang, abiogenesis, aliens, dinosaurs going extinct before humans, long time universe and Earth and long timelines, plants and animals evolving, Earth's geology taking a long time, and more evolution weirdness?

Christians have the objective morality of the Ten Commandments and the Bible which states what happens after death and that all would experience final judgement. Other religions have something similar based on how one lived their life. Atheists have nothing basically but trusting what humans will do when they are alive knowing what is right and wrong. It cannot be trusted because it is based on secularism.
.
Christians have the objective morality of the Ten Commandments and the Bible
.
no bond, moses lied, there never were tablets etched by the Almighty and given to him they made up the tail to enhance their own standing and was never able to produce the documents to prove otherwise.

the same forgeries and fallacies can be found on nearly every page of your 4th century christian bible - you worship nothing more than a madeup religion dedicated to the roman empire.
 
As sentient beings we know what's right and wrong, and it can differ based on religion, culture, etc. No God is required to acknowledge that hurting another human being is wrong.

Atheists are usually wrong and this is totally so wrong.

Being a sentient human being means you don't know what is right and wrong. God through the Bible is required for humans to repent and be sorry for their wrongful actions and thoughts, i.e. sin.
.
christians are always wrong they rely on a book of forgeries and fallacies, learning not to be sinners would first require correcting the wrongs they wrote in their 4th century - bible.

beginning with all beings are sentient and are reflective of the same metaphysical image they have evolved from and will continue to evolve by means of the prescribed religion of antiquity or eventually will become extinct by the same means so abandoned as christianity, the desert religions.
THE HEBREW OLD TESTAMENT IS FAR OLDER THAN THE 4th CENTURY BC. The New Testament is but the fulfillment of the OLD TESTAMENT.
 
no bond, moses lied, there never were tablets etched by the Almighty and given to him they made up the tail to enhance their own standing and was never able to produce the documents to prove otherwise.

the same forgeries and fallacies can be found on nearly every page of your 4th century christian bible - you worship nothing more than a madeup religion dedicated to the roman empire.

You are delusional and getting all worked up because we are all going to die and face final judgement. One can read the Ten Commandments as a child and understand the words. Then later, come to understand the depth and meaning of each commandment as they grow into adulthood. The story of the tablets being handed to Moses is just the beginning.

What's happened to you is you have been misled and now have become overwrougth and mentally ill when confronted with the truth and evidence. You keep repeating the same thing over and over in your end paragraph.
 
If God doesn’t exist, the universe came into existence by chance, the first living cell developed from non-living matter by chance, and all living things are the eventual product of the blind, undirected process of evolution. In such a case, human life is no more valuable than dust, and there is no basis for saying that any life matters. Only if there is an author of life who creates and imbues us with a meaning greater than our physical parts can lives actually matter, and in an equal way.

If God doesn’t exist, there’s also no objective standard for labeling an action—such as murder—wrong. If we’re all just the product of blind, purposeless forces, morality is just an opinion. Unless there is a higher-than-human moral authority, no one has a basis for claiming that murder is objectively wrong.

And finally, if God doesn’t exist, the concept of justice is meaningless because there can be no right or wrong in the first place to require justice. As C.S. Lewis famously said about his conversion to Christianity, “My argument against God was that the universe seemed so cruel and unjust. But how had I got this idea of just and unjust? A man does not call a line crooked unless he has some idea of a straight line. What was I comparing this universe with when I called it unjust?” Justice requires a standard, and there is no objective standard in a purposeless universe.

Do you prefer lock in contracts? If so what kind?
 
no bond, moses lied, there never were tablets etched by the Almighty and given to him they made up the tail to enhance their own standing and was never able to produce the documents to prove otherwise.

the same forgeries and fallacies can be found on nearly every page of your 4th century christian bible - you worship nothing more than a madeup religion dedicated to the roman empire.

You are delusional and getting all worked up because we are all going to die and face final judgement. One can read the Ten Commandments as a child and understand the words. Then later, come to understand the depth and meaning of each commandment as they grow into adulthood. The story of the tablets being handed to Moses is just the beginning.

What's happened to you is you have been misled and now have become overwrougth and mentally ill when confronted with the truth and evidence. You keep repeating the same thing over and over in your end paragraph.
Is Jesus the lake of fire?
 
If God doesn’t exist, the universe came into existence by chance
Even if the universe came into being by probability wave, there is still a God. God is the original cause behind everything. If that cause was a probability wave, then that is God. Something caused that probability wave to exist, something created that there was a probability, and something created waves. That's God.

There is no escaping God only denying the personal aspect of Him. Athiests who deny the personal aspect and claim personality, love and intelligence came out of chance are merely accepting the Impersonal nature of God, even if they don't realize, accept or wish to say so.
So you believe in a prime mover. Whats your take on John 1?
 

Forum List

Back
Top