If Harris somehow wins, will this mean the end of Primary voting for the Democratic Party?

I guess Sleepy Joe and the D's can do as they please.

But having Joe run , just to withdraw for no logical reason being stated after winning all of the primary votes is just telling lib voters to go fuck themselves. Your choice doesn't matter.
 
It will go to the convention and delegates can vote for who they want

Love watching a Conservative whine about protecting Democratic voters
Wha it really is about is you do not have the integrity to accept the punishment you deserve for your actions. You want to win so much you have changed the constitution and threaten to change it more and change long standing rules inside the Congress. you call it Democracy. It is not anymore. We were a Repulic, became a Democracy and are moving onto something else. You are even past using the votes and calling it Democracy and then becoming dictatorial once empowered to not even caring about who got the votes and becoming dictatorial.
 
In 2016 they anointed Hillary because Bernie didn't have the donor power that the Establishment Hillary had. He was deemed "dangerous". Of course we all know the outcome and he is now largely irrelevant after he endorsed Hillary.

After her loss, the MSM and Democrat operatives kept repeating "we can't repeat this facade again, we need a competent candidate who is challenged in a Primary and wins in a democratic process. After all, we are the Democratic Party damn it!"

Now we observe history repeating itself as Harris is anointed. Not once, but twice if one is objective. First as V.P with 2% of the delegate vote in the 2020 Primary and now 0% votes in the 2024 Primary.

Clearly Dem voters are not happy. Some don't care about democracy they will obediently put on their pom poms and accept their Rulers decisions on their behalf, similar to what a pleb in China or N Korea does today. Others have become a little bit too uppity on youtube (one Asian guy in particular) and they have declared that they will punish the Dems for their tactics and name calling of Trump as Hitler etc and thus vote for Trump to spite the Dems.

Therefore, if Harris wins in 2024, will this affirm the Democrat Parties position that they know what is best for their subjects and going forward they will refer to their Chamber of donors, mainstream media, Party Seniors (Obama, Pelosi etc) and Super Delegates to produce the greatest politician possible.

Is this a fair assessment? If not, what leads you to believe that after the last two cycles of them anointed a leader that somehow they will change going forward?
Don't forget how Biden's 2020 campaign was all but over, then they rearranged the Primary state order to put South Carolina early so his buddy Jim Clyburn could hand SC primary votes to him. Then they forced the other leading candidates to drop out and VOILA! Biden was the nominee.
 
I guess Sleepy Joe and the D's can do as they please.

But having Joe run , just to withdraw for no logical reason being stated after winning all of the primary votes is just telling lib voters to go fuck themselves. Your choice doesn't matter.
Actually, it is their party and they make the rules

As of now, rules are being followed

Delegates are pledged to vote for Biden, Biden has withdrawn and delegates are released to vote for who they want
 
Don't forget how Biden's 2020 campaign was all but over, then they rearranged the Primary state order to put South Carolina early so his buddy Jim Clyburn could hand SC primary votes to him. Then they forced the other leading candidates to drop out and VOILA! Biden was the nominee.
South Carolina was always early before Super Tuesday
Jim Clyburns support turned the tide for Biden
 
In 2016 they anointed Hillary because Bernie didn't have the donor power that the Establishment Hillary had. He was deemed "dangerous". Of course we all know the outcome and he is now largely irrelevant after he endorsed Hillary.

In 2020 Trump was anointed because (at least in my state like many others) primaries were canceled and Trump just became the nominee without a vote of the people in my state. The GOP power brokers installed him.

The GOP and DNC are private organizations, not government entities, meaning they get to select their candidate for the general election however they want.

P.S. - As a loyal GOP voter from 1978-2016, was royally pissed that I never got a chance to vote in a primary in 2020 for the GOP candidate.

WW
 
It will go to the convention and delegates can vote for who they want

Love watching a Conservative whine about protecting Democratic voters
Hilarious.

90% of Dems are happy that things are turning out this way and Harris has enormous support… and funding
 
I guess Sleepy Joe and the D's can do as they please.

But having Joe run , just to withdraw for no logical reason being stated after winning all of the primary votes is just telling lib voters to go fuck themselves. Your choice doesn't matter.
Nope
 
Hilarious.

90% of Dems are happy that things are turning out this way and Harris has enormous support… and funding
Democrats did not want the convention turning into a Cat Fight right before the convention.
No other Democrat has stepped up to oppose Kamala
 
Actually, it is their party and they make the rules

As of now, rules are being followed

Delegates are pledged to vote for Biden, Biden has withdrawn and delegates are released to vote for who they want

Doesn't Sleepy Joe have an obligation to his supporters to explain WHY he is giving up the race? His "age" isn't a logical reason, he knew how old he was going to be in 2024 a long time ago, before he threw his hat into the ring.

If he just discovered he was daft and senile, and he was on the precipice of being Amendment 25'ed out, doesn't he have an obligation to admit it?
 
Doesn't Sleepy Joe have an obligation to his supporters to explain WHY he is giving up the race? His "age" isn't a logical reason, he knew how old he was going to be in 2024 a long time ago, before he threw his hat into the ring.

If he just discovered he was daft and senile, and he was on the precipice of being Amendment 25'ed out, doesn't he have an obligation to admit it?
Biden has served this country for 50 years
He owes nobody an explanation
 
Kamala lives in fairytale La La land. Literally overnight, she became the "star" the baby of the Democrat party. Too bad she is a horrible person and MANY voters would not touch her with a 10 foot pole. :auiqs.jpg::auiqs.jpg:
 
In 2016 they anointed Hillary because Bernie didn't have the donor power that the Establishment Hillary had. He was deemed "dangerous". Of course we all know the outcome and he is now largely irrelevant after he endorsed Hillary.

After her loss, the MSM and Democrat operatives kept repeating "we can't repeat this facade again, we need a competent candidate who is challenged in a Primary and wins in a democratic process. After all, we are the Democratic Party damn it!"

Now we observe history repeating itself as Harris is anointed. Not once, but twice if one is objective. First as V.P with 2% of the delegate vote in the 2020 Primary and now 0% votes in the 2024 Primary.

Clearly Dem voters are not happy. Some don't care about democracy they will obediently put on their pom poms and accept their Rulers decisions on their behalf, similar to what a pleb in China or N Korea does today. Others have become a little bit too uppity on youtube (one Asian guy in particular) and they have declared that they will punish the Dems for their tactics and name calling of Trump as Hitler etc and thus vote for Trump to spite the Dems.

Therefore, if Harris wins in 2024, will this affirm the Democrat Parties position that they know what is best for their subjects and going forward they will refer to their Chamber of donors, mainstream media, Party Seniors (Obama, Pelosi etc) and Super Delegates to produce the greatest politician possible.

Is this a fair assessment? If not, what leads you to believe that after the last two cycles of them anointed a leader that somehow they will change going forward?
Blm doesn’t want her
 

Forum List

Back
Top