If Harris somehow wins, will this mean the end of Primary voting for the Democratic Party?

[busybee01]

In 2016 they anointed Hillary because Bernie didn't have the donor power that the Establishment Hillary had. He was deemed "dangerous". Of course we all know the outcome and he is now largely irrelevant after he endorsed Hillary.

After her loss, the MSM and Democrat operatives kept repeating "we can't repeat this facade again, we need a competent candidate who is challenged in a Primary and wins in a democratic process. After all, we are the Democratic Party damn it!"

Now we observe history repeating itself as Harris is anointed. Not once, but twice if one is objective. First as V.P with 2% of the delegate vote in the 2020 Primary and now 0% votes in the 2024 Primary.

Clearly Dem voters are not happy. Some don't care about democracy they will obediently put on their pom poms and accept their Rulers decisions on their behalf, similar to what a pleb in China or N Korea does today. Others have become a little bit too uppity on youtube (one Asian guy in particular) and they have declared that they will punish the Dems for their tactics and name calling of Trump as Hitler etc and thus vote for Trump to spite the Dems.

Therefore, if Harris wins in 2024, will this affirm the Democrat Parties position that they know what is best for their subjects and going forward they will refer to their Chamber of donors, mainstream media, Party Seniors (Obama, Pelosi etc) and Super Delegates to produce the greatest politician possible.

Is this a fair assessment? If not, what leads you to believe that after the last two cycles of them anointed a leader that somehow they will change going forward?

You are a stupid asshole. The dutifully elected delegates could choose anyone they want once Biden released them. That is the democratic process. The Republican Party is the party that is against democracy.

 

[Polishprince]

You are a stupid asshole. The dutifully elected delegates could choose anyone they want once Biden released them. That is the democratic process. The Republican Party is the party that is against democracy.

Sure. But if Biden is going to withdraw from the campaign at such a late date, he owes an explanation to the Democrat voters as to why he is leaving and what has changed.

Its unfair to the Democrat voters as well as potential Democrat candidates who might have entered the race if they knew Sleepy Joe wasn't going to follow through with his candidacy.

 

[Lesh]

Sure. But if Biden is going to withdraw from the campaign at such a late date, he owes an explanation to the Democrat voters as to why he is leaving and what has changed.

Its unfair to the Democrat voters as well as potential Democrat candidates who might have entered the race if they knew Sleepy Joe wasn't going to follow through with his candidacy.

A Republican telling Dems that Biden owes Dems… something?

Shaddup

 

[Polishprince]

A Republican telling Dems that Biden owes Dems… something?

Shaddup

Why wouldn't he owe them? Don't Dems have a right to have a proper opportunity to actually vet their candidate before nominating them?

 

[Lesh]

Why wouldn't he owe them? Don't Dems have a right to have a proper opportunity to actually vet their candidate before nominating them?

What the fuck do you care? You’re a partisan Trumper

 

[rightwinger]

Sure. But if Biden is going to withdraw from the campaign at such a late date, he owes an explanation to the Democrat voters as to why he is leaving and what has changed.

Its unfair to the Democrat voters as well as potential Democrat candidates who might have entered the race if they knew Sleepy Joe wasn't going to follow through with his candidacy.

I didn’t hear any Democrats asking for an explanation