If Life Was Only Fair

DriftingSand

Cast Iron Member
Feb 16, 2014
10,193
2,218
255
State of Disgust!
We often hear from the Liberal left that it's "not fair" that some folks "have" while other folks "have not." The rich should "give what they have" to the poor. It's just so unfair. Why can't we have what they have? Boo hoo.

Well, if life was truly FAIR then everyone (including every, single Liberal) would suffer with Cancer, Emphysema, Down Syndrome, Blindness, Deafness, Hammer Toe, Schizophrenia, Homosexuality, Eczema, Psoriasis, Hepatitis, AIDS, Tuberculosis, and a plethora of other ills and ailments. We would all "share" in the very bad in conjunction with all that cash. So quit whining and count your blessings.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: Ava
We often hear from the Liberal left that it's "not fair" that some folks "have" while other folks "have not." The rich should "give what they have" to the poor. It's just so unfair. Why can't we have what they have? Boo hoo.

Well, if life was truly FAIR then everyone (including every, single Liberal) would suffer with Cancer, Emphysema, Down Syndrome, Blindness, Deafness, Hammer Toe, Schizophrenia, Homosexuality, Eczema, Psoriasis, Hepatitis, AIDS, Tuberculosis, and a plethora of other ills and ailments. We would all "share" in the very bad in conjunction with all that cash. So quit whining and count your blessings.

Good point

And the question is, if some people "have" while other people "have not"....Why do we continue policies that exclusively help the "haves" ?
 
We often hear from the Liberal left that it's "not fair" that some folks "have" while other folks "have not." The rich should "give what they have" to the poor. It's just so unfair. Why can't we have what they have? Boo hoo.

Well, if life was truly FAIR then everyone (including every, single Liberal) would suffer with Cancer, Emphysema, Down Syndrome, Blindness, Deafness, Hammer Toe, Schizophrenia, Homosexuality, Eczema, Psoriasis, Hepatitis, AIDS, Tuberculosis, and a plethora of other ills and ailments. We would all "share" in the very bad in conjunction with all that cash. So quit whining and count your blessings.

Good point

And the question is, if some people "have" while other people "have not"....Why do we continue policies that exclusively help the "haves" ?
Why do we have to have policies that help either.

Laws should have no regard for individual differences and should be applied equally to all.
 
We often hear from the Liberal left that it's "not fair" that some folks "have" while other folks "have not." The rich should "give what they have" to the poor. It's just so unfair. Why can't we have what they have? Boo hoo.

Well, if life was truly FAIR then everyone (including every, single Liberal) would suffer with Cancer, Emphysema, Down Syndrome, Blindness, Deafness, Hammer Toe, Schizophrenia, Homosexuality, Eczema, Psoriasis, Hepatitis, AIDS, Tuberculosis, and a plethora of other ills and ailments. We would all "share" in the very bad in conjunction with all that cash. So quit whining and count your blessings.

Good point

And the question is, if some people "have" while other people "have not"....Why do we continue policies that exclusively help the "haves" ?
Why do we have to have policies that help either.

Laws should have no regard for individual differences and should be applied equally to all.

The Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules
 
We often hear from the Liberal left that it's "not fair" that some folks "have" while other folks "have not." The rich should "give what they have" to the poor. It's just so unfair. Why can't we have what they have? Boo hoo.

Well, if life was truly FAIR then everyone (including every, single Liberal) would suffer with Cancer, Emphysema, Down Syndrome, Blindness, Deafness, Hammer Toe, Schizophrenia, Homosexuality, Eczema, Psoriasis, Hepatitis, AIDS, Tuberculosis, and a plethora of other ills and ailments. We would all "share" in the very bad in conjunction with all that cash. So quit whining and count your blessings.

Good point

And the question is, if some people "have" while other people "have not"....Why do we continue policies that exclusively help the "haves" ?

The underlying "policy" that we can all take advantage of is this: Educate yourself while working hard and being the best you can be: thrive and prosper. Otherwise, do the bare minimum, play video games, drop out of school in the 9th grade, and remain poor but don't complain when you get out of life what you put in to it.
 
We often hear from the Liberal left that it's "not fair" that some folks "have" while other folks "have not." The rich should "give what they have" to the poor. It's just so unfair. Why can't we have what they have? Boo hoo.

Well, if life was truly FAIR then everyone (including every, single Liberal) would suffer with Cancer, Emphysema, Down Syndrome, Blindness, Deafness, Hammer Toe, Schizophrenia, Homosexuality, Eczema, Psoriasis, Hepatitis, AIDS, Tuberculosis, and a plethora of other ills and ailments. We would all "share" in the very bad in conjunction with all that cash. So quit whining and count your blessings.

Good point

And the question is, if some people "have" while other people "have not"....Why do we continue policies that exclusively help the "haves" ?
Why do we have to have policies that help either.

Laws should have no regard for individual differences and should be applied equally to all.

The Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules
Not an answer to the question

as usual.
 
"Fair" is where you take the kids to eat cotton candy and ride the ride the bumper cars.

Life isn't fair. Deal with it.
 
We often hear from the Liberal left that it's "not fair" that some folks "have" while other folks "have not." The rich should "give what they have" to the poor. It's just so unfair. Why can't we have what they have? Boo hoo.

Well, if life was truly FAIR then everyone (including every, single Liberal) would suffer with Cancer, Emphysema, Down Syndrome, Blindness, Deafness, Hammer Toe, Schizophrenia, Homosexuality, Eczema, Psoriasis, Hepatitis, AIDS, Tuberculosis, and a plethora of other ills and ailments. We would all "share" in the very bad in conjunction with all that cash. So quit whining and count your blessings.

Good point

And the question is, if some people "have" while other people "have not"....Why do we continue policies that exclusively help the "haves" ?

The underlying "policy" that we can all take advantage of is this: Educate yourself while working hard and being the best you can be: thrive and prosper. Otherwise, do the bare minimum, play video games, drop out of school in the 9th grade, and remain poor but don't complain when you get out of life what you put in to it.

Buckle down and work harder....Got it

Problem is that American workers do work hard. We put in more hours, receive less vacation and are more productive than any workers on earth. What has happened though is that corporate profits and executive compensation are at record levels, none is trickling down to the workers. What is happening to those young people who have educated themselves? They see low paying jobs with no benefits and no prospects of advancement
 
We often hear from the Liberal left that it's "not fair" that some folks "have" while other folks "have not." The rich should "give what they have" to the poor. It's just so unfair. Why can't we have what they have? Boo hoo.

Well, if life was truly FAIR then everyone (including every, single Liberal) would suffer with Cancer, Emphysema, Down Syndrome, Blindness, Deafness, Hammer Toe, Schizophrenia, Homosexuality, Eczema, Psoriasis, Hepatitis, AIDS, Tuberculosis, and a plethora of other ills and ailments. We would all "share" in the very bad in conjunction with all that cash. So quit whining and count your blessings.

Good point

And the question is, if some people "have" while other people "have not"....Why do we continue policies that exclusively help the "haves" ?
Why do we have to have policies that help either.

Laws should have no regard for individual differences and should be applied equally to all.

The Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules
Not an answer to the question

as usual.

You got your answer....you just don't like it

The "laws" are being constructed by those with the most power and influence. They are constructed to ensure that those with the most wealth are able to continue gathering it and maintain it
 
We often hear from the Liberal left that it's "not fair" that some folks "have" while other folks "have not." The rich should "give what they have" to the poor. It's just so unfair. Why can't we have what they have? Boo hoo.

Well, if life was truly FAIR then everyone (including every, single Liberal) would suffer with Cancer, Emphysema, Down Syndrome, Blindness, Deafness, Hammer Toe, Schizophrenia, Homosexuality, Eczema, Psoriasis, Hepatitis, AIDS, Tuberculosis, and a plethora of other ills and ailments. We would all "share" in the very bad in conjunction with all that cash. So quit whining and count your blessings.

Hey, don't blame liberals.

Its your god who chooses who to smite.
 
We often hear from the Liberal left that it's "not fair" that some folks "have" while other folks "have not." The rich should "give what they have" to the poor. It's just so unfair. Why can't we have what they have? Boo hoo.

Well, if life was truly FAIR then everyone (including every, single Liberal) would suffer with Cancer, Emphysema, Down Syndrome, Blindness, Deafness, Hammer Toe, Schizophrenia, Homosexuality, Eczema, Psoriasis, Hepatitis, AIDS, Tuberculosis, and a plethora of other ills and ailments. We would all "share" in the very bad in conjunction with all that cash. So quit whining and count your blessings.

Hey, don't blame liberals.

Its your god who chooses who to smite.
A good, ol' Luddly deflection!! But regardless, I guess your response means that you'll stop begging for "equality" when it doesn't exist.
 
We often hear from the Liberal left that it's "not fair" that some folks "have" while other folks "have not." The rich should "give what they have" to the poor. It's just so unfair. Why can't we have what they have? Boo hoo.

Well, if life was truly FAIR then everyone (including every, single Liberal) would suffer with Cancer, Emphysema, Down Syndrome, Blindness, Deafness, Hammer Toe, Schizophrenia, Homosexuality, Eczema, Psoriasis, Hepatitis, AIDS, Tuberculosis, and a plethora of other ills and ailments. We would all "share" in the very bad in conjunction with all that cash. So quit whining and count your blessings.

Good point

And the question is, if some people "have" while other people "have not"....Why do we continue policies that exclusively help the "haves" ?
Why do we have to have policies that help either.

Laws should have no regard for individual differences and should be applied equally to all.

The Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules
Not an answer to the question

as usual.

You got your answer....you just don't like it

The "laws" are being constructed by those with the most power and influence. They are constructed to ensure that those with the most wealth are able to continue gathering it and maintain it

I'm willing to bet that if YOU were able to make all the laws then you would "benefit" from them in some way, shape, or form. Nevertheless, the Constitution is a set standard for all the people of the USA -- equally.
 
Good point

And the question is, if some people "have" while other people "have not"....Why do we continue policies that exclusively help the "haves" ?
Why do we have to have policies that help either.

Laws should have no regard for individual differences and should be applied equally to all.

The Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules
Not an answer to the question

as usual.

You got your answer....you just don't like it

The "laws" are being constructed by those with the most power and influence. They are constructed to ensure that those with the most wealth are able to continue gathering it and maintain it

I'm willing to bet that if YOU were able to make all the laws then you would "benefit" from them in some way, shape, or form. Nevertheless, the Constitution is a set standard for all the people of the USA -- equally.

Actually, if I were making the laws I would ensure that they were more inclusive and look out for the rights of all Americans, not just myself

That is what being an American used to be about
 
We often hear from the Liberal left that it's "not fair" that some folks "have" while other folks "have not." The rich should "give what they have" to the poor. It's just so unfair. Why can't we have what they have? Boo hoo.

Well, if life was truly FAIR then everyone (including every, single Liberal) would suffer with Cancer, Emphysema, Down Syndrome, Blindness, Deafness, Hammer Toe, Schizophrenia, Homosexuality, Eczema, Psoriasis, Hepatitis, AIDS, Tuberculosis, and a plethora of other ills and ailments. We would all "share" in the very bad in conjunction with all that cash. So quit whining and count your blessings.

Good point

And the question is, if some people "have" while other people "have not"....Why do we continue policies that exclusively help the "haves" ?

The underlying "policy" that we can all take advantage of is this: Educate yourself while working hard and being the best you can be: thrive and prosper. Otherwise, do the bare minimum, play video games, drop out of school in the 9th grade, and remain poor but don't complain when you get out of life what you put in to it.

Buckle down and work harder....Got it

Problem is that American workers do work hard. We put in more hours, receive less vacation and are more productive than any workers on earth. What has happened though is that corporate profits and executive compensation are at record levels, none is trickling down to the workers. What is happening to those young people who have educated themselves? They see low paying jobs with no benefits and no prospects of advancement

The ones that are picking better majors are not seeing those issues.
 
Why do we have to have policies that help either.

Laws should have no regard for individual differences and should be applied equally to all.

The Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules
Not an answer to the question

as usual.

You got your answer....you just don't like it

The "laws" are being constructed by those with the most power and influence. They are constructed to ensure that those with the most wealth are able to continue gathering it and maintain it

I'm willing to bet that if YOU were able to make all the laws then you would "benefit" from them in some way, shape, or form. Nevertheless, the Constitution is a set standard for all the people of the USA -- equally.

Actually, if I were making the laws I would ensure that they were more inclusive and look out for the rights of all Americans, not just myself

That is what being an American used to be about

Not through government fiat, but by choice.
 
Why do we have to have policies that help either.

Laws should have no regard for individual differences and should be applied equally to all.

The Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules
Not an answer to the question

as usual.

You got your answer....you just don't like it

The "laws" are being constructed by those with the most power and influence. They are constructed to ensure that those with the most wealth are able to continue gathering it and maintain it

I'm willing to bet that if YOU were able to make all the laws then you would "benefit" from them in some way, shape, or form. Nevertheless, the Constitution is a set standard for all the people of the USA -- equally.

Actually, if I were making the laws I would ensure that they were more inclusive and look out for the rights of all Americans, not just myself

That is what being an American used to be about

So if you happened to become successful there would be a law guaranteeing ME the right to take what YOU worked for?
 
We often hear from the Liberal left that it's "not fair" that some folks "have" while other folks "have not." The rich should "give what they have" to the poor. It's just so unfair. Why can't we have what they have? Boo hoo.

Well, if life was truly FAIR then everyone (including every, single Liberal) would suffer with Cancer, Emphysema, Down Syndrome, Blindness, Deafness, Hammer Toe, Schizophrenia, Homosexuality, Eczema, Psoriasis, Hepatitis, AIDS, Tuberculosis, and a plethora of other ills and ailments. We would all "share" in the very bad in conjunction with all that cash. So quit whining and count your blessings.

Good point

And the question is, if some people "have" while other people "have not"....Why do we continue policies that exclusively help the "haves" ?

The underlying "policy" that we can all take advantage of is this: Educate yourself while working hard and being the best you can be: thrive and prosper. Otherwise, do the bare minimum, play video games, drop out of school in the 9th grade, and remain poor but don't complain when you get out of life what you put in to it.

Buckle down and work harder....Got it

Problem is that American workers do work hard. We put in more hours, receive less vacation and are more productive than any workers on earth. What has happened though is that corporate profits and executive compensation are at record levels, none is trickling down to the workers. What is happening to those young people who have educated themselves? They see low paying jobs with no benefits and no prospects of advancement

The ones that are picking better majors are not seeing those issues.

No matter the major, like American medicine, the cost of education is out of reach for many.

THAT is not "equality", its not "American" and its not good for the future of our country.
 
The Golden Rule: He who has the gold makes the rules
Not an answer to the question

as usual.

You got your answer....you just don't like it

The "laws" are being constructed by those with the most power and influence. They are constructed to ensure that those with the most wealth are able to continue gathering it and maintain it

I'm willing to bet that if YOU were able to make all the laws then you would "benefit" from them in some way, shape, or form. Nevertheless, the Constitution is a set standard for all the people of the USA -- equally.

Actually, if I were making the laws I would ensure that they were more inclusive and look out for the rights of all Americans, not just myself

That is what being an American used to be about

Not through government fiat, but by choice.

The wealthy have benefitted from supply side policies for the last 30 years. That is government fiat and it resulted in a stagnation of the middle class while showering wealth on the upper one percent

If it takes government fiat to reverse that trend....so be it
 
Not an answer to the question

as usual.

You got your answer....you just don't like it

The "laws" are being constructed by those with the most power and influence. They are constructed to ensure that those with the most wealth are able to continue gathering it and maintain it

I'm willing to bet that if YOU were able to make all the laws then you would "benefit" from them in some way, shape, or form. Nevertheless, the Constitution is a set standard for all the people of the USA -- equally.

Actually, if I were making the laws I would ensure that they were more inclusive and look out for the rights of all Americans, not just myself

That is what being an American used to be about

Not through government fiat, but by choice.

The wealthy have benefitted from supply side policies for the last 30 years. That is government fiat and it resulted in a stagnation of the middle class while showering wealth on the upper one percent

If it takes government fiat to reverse that trend....so be it

Seig Heil, Herr Winger.

and shove your jackboot up your own ass.
 

Forum List

Back
Top