If the middle class is getting "peanuts" in this tax scam......?

[Skull Pilot]

You are holding it up as an example of that tax cut being better than this tax cut and you're major whine about this tax cut is that there is a prediction that over 10 years it will add to the debt.

NO, nitwit........All I was responding to is a post by one of your fellow morons who stated that Obama did NOT give out some "peanuts" to the middle class...

I did NOT side with Obama's give a-ways versus this new tax scam....

Learn to comprehend what you read.

So you did complain about the Obammy tax cuts?

 

[jon_berzerk]

No trump supporter with even a half brain functioning would deny that the lion share of this tax scam is NOT going to the conglomerates (GOP donors) ........while a few dollars are being given to the middle class as tokens to keep the mantra of a "middle class tax cut".......

So, the question is a simple one.......will the few dollars that the middle class will be getting in the next few years be enough to stimulate the economy???

Bear in mind that large companies ONLY expand their goods and services when there is a demand for those goods and services.....and such demands arise from the middle class......

Conversely, if the demand is low, WHAT incentives will there be for companies to hire more people ....or raise salaries???

Most likely, the windfall of tax cuts for these conglomerates (borrowed money, BTW) will be spent in buying back stocks and paying premiums which....to a high percentage are also paid to foreign investors.

So, after the cheering subsides when the average family will get a couple of hundred dollars per month.......what realistic factors will be stimulating the U.S. economy toward more growth?

For 8 years Democrats told us that food stamps and unemployment checks stimulate the economy; Trump and the US economy has made a mockery of Democrat economics

they also pushed the idea that is fun to be unemployed and receiving handouts barely enough to survive from the federal government


they called it

funeployment

 

[nat4900]

For 8 years Democrats told us that food stamps and unemployment checks stimulate the economy

NO, you dumb idiot........Democrats NEVER told you such things.....Unemployment checks and food stamps kept MANY Americans off the streets since the GWB recession (800,000 NEW unemployment claims per MONTH.)

Your fucked up "conclusions" are not only biased, but downright moronic....
Go back to bed.

 

[nat4900]

So you did complain about the Obammy tax cuts?

I sure DID........You can't give tax cuts in the fucking middle of TWO expensive wars and an unfunded Medicare Advantage (sic) program that cost billions.

 

[nat4900]

they also pushed the idea that is fun to be unemployed and receiving handouts barely enough to survive from the federal government


they called it

funeployment

What a waste of cyberspace by yet another clueless, right wing idiot......

yeah, we all called it "funemployment".......what an LOL)

 

[danielpalos]

They literally talk about cutting Social Security and Medicare...

Yes they do, but again, no talk about cutting benefits.

WHAT? Do you think they are going to cut the deficit by increasing Social Security and Medicare?

I didn't say increasing them, I said no cuts to them.

Holy shit. So you expect them to somehow lower the deficit through Social Security and Medicare WITHOUT lowering them?

...and for your next act you are going to pull a rabbit out of your ass.

Do you really think our government programs are run 100% efficiently? Do you really think there are not better and more efficient ways to conduct these programs? Do you really believe that we don't have scammers ripping off these programs?

If you are not on SS or Medicare, it's likely you are related to somebody that is. It may be your parents or grandparents. Do you really think that the Republicans would screw our elderly so badly as to lose every vote in the coming elections? Think they would give the Democrats such fodder for the next presidential election?

Instead of allowing the media to think for you, it's better to wait until the Republicans tell us what their plans are. The media is trying to sell newspapers, get you to tune into their news stations, or get you to go to their web sites.

there is no drug war clause in our Constitution or the republican doctrine. Of course, there are much more efficient ways to operate government.

 

[PoliticalChic]

So is only giving the masses peanuts in tax refunds a scam?

That's like asking if only giving the masses peanuts in entitlements is a scam.

ATTA boy.....and thanks......
Let's all call this tax scam what it really is..a "welfare give away to the middle class."

 

[danielpalos]

No trump supporter with even a half brain functioning would deny that the lion share of this tax scam is NOT going to the conglomerates (GOP donors) ........while a few dollars are being given to the middle class as tokens to keep the mantra of a "middle class tax cut".......

So, the question is a simple one.......will the few dollars that the middle class will be getting in the next few years be enough to stimulate the economy???

Bear in mind that large companies ONLY expand their goods and services when there is a demand for those goods and services.....and such demands arise from the middle class......

Conversely, if the demand is low, WHAT incentives will there be for companies to hire more people ....or raise salaries???

Most likely, the windfall of tax cuts for these conglomerates (borrowed money, BTW) will be spent in buying back stocks and paying premiums which....to a high percentage are also paid to foreign investors.

So, after the cheering subsides when the average family will get a couple of hundred dollars per month.......what realistic factors will be stimulating the U.S. economy toward more growth?

For 8 years Democrats told us that food stamps and unemployment checks stimulate the economy; Trump and the US economy has made a mockery of Democrat economics

Our economy would be much worse, without it.

Where is all the inflation the right likes to harp on for wages, but not quantitative easing.

 

[danielpalos]

No trump supporter with even a half brain functioning would deny that the lion share of this tax scam is NOT going to the conglomerates (GOP donors) ........while a few dollars are being given to the middle class as tokens to keep the mantra of a "middle class tax cut".......

So, the question is a simple one.......will the few dollars that the middle class will be getting in the next few years be enough to stimulate the economy???

Bear in mind that large companies ONLY expand their goods and services when there is a demand for those goods and services.....and such demands arise from the middle class......

Conversely, if the demand is low, WHAT incentives will there be for companies to hire more people ....or raise salaries???

Most likely, the windfall of tax cuts for these conglomerates (borrowed money, BTW) will be spent in buying back stocks and paying premiums which....to a high percentage are also paid to foreign investors.

So, after the cheering subsides when the average family will get a couple of hundred dollars per month.......what realistic factors will be stimulating the U.S. economy toward more growth?

For 8 years Democrats told us that food stamps and unemployment checks stimulate the economy; Trump and the US economy has made a mockery of Democrat economics

they also pushed the idea that is fun to be unemployed and receiving handouts barely enough to survive from the federal government


they called it

funeployment

unlike the rights', "work or die" scheme, to lower costs.

it is for the bottom line, you know.

 

[jon_berzerk]

No trump supporter with even a half brain functioning would deny that the lion share of this tax scam is NOT going to the conglomerates (GOP donors) ........while a few dollars are being given to the middle class as tokens to keep the mantra of a "middle class tax cut".......

So, the question is a simple one.......will the few dollars that the middle class will be getting in the next few years be enough to stimulate the economy???

Bear in mind that large companies ONLY expand their goods and services when there is a demand for those goods and services.....and such demands arise from the middle class......

Conversely, if the demand is low, WHAT incentives will there be for companies to hire more people ....or raise salaries???

Most likely, the windfall of tax cuts for these conglomerates (borrowed money, BTW) will be spent in buying back stocks and paying premiums which....to a high percentage are also paid to foreign investors.

So, after the cheering subsides when the average family will get a couple of hundred dollars per month.......what realistic factors will be stimulating the U.S. economy toward more growth?

For 8 years Democrats told us that food stamps and unemployment checks stimulate the economy; Trump and the US economy has made a mockery of Democrat economics

they also pushed the idea that is fun to be unemployed and receiving handouts barely enough to survive from the federal government


they called it

funeployment

unlike the rights', "work or die" scheme, to lower costs.

it is for the bottom line, you know.

oh yeah welfare and such has been cut off

--LOL

are you fucking nutz or what shit for brains

 

[danielpalos]

No trump supporter with even a half brain functioning would deny that the lion share of this tax scam is NOT going to the conglomerates (GOP donors) ........while a few dollars are being given to the middle class as tokens to keep the mantra of a "middle class tax cut".......

So, the question is a simple one.......will the few dollars that the middle class will be getting in the next few years be enough to stimulate the economy???

Bear in mind that large companies ONLY expand their goods and services when there is a demand for those goods and services.....and such demands arise from the middle class......

Conversely, if the demand is low, WHAT incentives will there be for companies to hire more people ....or raise salaries???

Most likely, the windfall of tax cuts for these conglomerates (borrowed money, BTW) will be spent in buying back stocks and paying premiums which....to a high percentage are also paid to foreign investors.

So, after the cheering subsides when the average family will get a couple of hundred dollars per month.......what realistic factors will be stimulating the U.S. economy toward more growth?

For 8 years Democrats told us that food stamps and unemployment checks stimulate the economy; Trump and the US economy has made a mockery of Democrat economics

they also pushed the idea that is fun to be unemployed and receiving handouts barely enough to survive from the federal government


they called it

funeployment

unlike the rights', "work or die" scheme, to lower costs.

it is for the bottom line, you know.

oh yeah welfare and such has been cut off

--LOL

are you fucking nutz or what shit for brains

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution; providing for the common offense and general warfare is not. It really is that simple, except to the right wing.

 

[jon_berzerk]

No trump supporter with even a half brain functioning would deny that the lion share of this tax scam is NOT going to the conglomerates (GOP donors) ........while a few dollars are being given to the middle class as tokens to keep the mantra of a "middle class tax cut".......

So, the question is a simple one.......will the few dollars that the middle class will be getting in the next few years be enough to stimulate the economy???

Bear in mind that large companies ONLY expand their goods and services when there is a demand for those goods and services.....and such demands arise from the middle class......

Conversely, if the demand is low, WHAT incentives will there be for companies to hire more people ....or raise salaries???

Most likely, the windfall of tax cuts for these conglomerates (borrowed money, BTW) will be spent in buying back stocks and paying premiums which....to a high percentage are also paid to foreign investors.

So, after the cheering subsides when the average family will get a couple of hundred dollars per month.......what realistic factors will be stimulating the U.S. economy toward more growth?

For 8 years Democrats told us that food stamps and unemployment checks stimulate the economy; Trump and the US economy has made a mockery of Democrat economics

they also pushed the idea that is fun to be unemployed and receiving handouts barely enough to survive from the federal government


they called it

funeployment

unlike the rights', "work or die" scheme, to lower costs.

it is for the bottom line, you know.

oh yeah welfare and such has been cut off

--LOL

are you fucking nutz or what shit for brains

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution; providing for the common offense and general warfare is not. It really is that simple, except to the right wing.

again you are absurd lefty

 

[danielpalos]

For 8 years Democrats told us that food stamps and unemployment checks stimulate the economy; Trump and the US economy has made a mockery of Democrat economics

they also pushed the idea that is fun to be unemployed and receiving handouts barely enough to survive from the federal government


they called it

funeployment

unlike the rights', "work or die" scheme, to lower costs.

it is for the bottom line, you know.

oh yeah welfare and such has been cut off

--LOL

are you fucking nutz or what shit for brains

Providing for the general welfare is in our Constitution; providing for the common offense and general warfare is not. It really is that simple, except to the right wing.

again you are absurd lefty

again, you have nothing but fallacy; no wonder it is virtually federal doctrine for some on the left, to not take the right wing seriously, about any Thing serious.

 

[Uncensored2008]

No trump supporter with even a half brain functioning would deny that the lion share of this tax scam is NOT going to the conglomerates (GOP donors) ........while a few dollars are being given to the middle class as tokens to keep the mantra of a "middle class tax cut".......

So, the question is a simple one.......will the few dollars that the middle class will be getting in the next few years be enough to stimulate the economy???

Bear in mind that large companies ONLY expand their goods and services when there is a demand for those goods and services.....and such demands arise from the middle class......

Conversely, if the demand is low, WHAT incentives will there be for companies to hire more people ....or raise salaries???

Most likely, the windfall of tax cuts for these conglomerates (borrowed money, BTW) will be spent in buying back stocks and paying premiums which....to a high percentage are also paid to foreign investors.

So, after the cheering subsides when the average family will get a couple of hundred dollars per month.......what realistic factors will be stimulating the U.S. economy toward more growth?

You know you can't lie your way out of this.

The vast majority of America will see more in their paychecks starting about February.

You Maoists are fucked for the 2018 midterms, no amount of lies by mindless sycophants like you will change it.

Even the "in the bag" corrupt press is starting to cover their ass by reporting small tidbits of truth.

 

[nat4900]

So is only giving the masses peanuts in tax refunds a scam?

That's like asking if only giving the masses peanuts in entitlements is a scam.

ATTA boy.....and thanks......
Let's all call this tax scam what it really is..a "welfare give away to the middle class."

Had that moronic conclusion (in your cartoon) been the case,,,,,,
REAGAN and GWB would have been economic GENIUSES

Instead, Reagan had to RAISE taxes ELEVEN times in his terms, and GWB handed over to Obama a GREAT RECESSION......

 

[danielpalos]

No trump supporter with even a half brain functioning would deny that the lion share of this tax scam is NOT going to the conglomerates (GOP donors) ........while a few dollars are being given to the middle class as tokens to keep the mantra of a "middle class tax cut".......

So, the question is a simple one.......will the few dollars that the middle class will be getting in the next few years be enough to stimulate the economy???

Bear in mind that large companies ONLY expand their goods and services when there is a demand for those goods and services.....and such demands arise from the middle class......

Conversely, if the demand is low, WHAT incentives will there be for companies to hire more people ....or raise salaries???

Most likely, the windfall of tax cuts for these conglomerates (borrowed money, BTW) will be spent in buying back stocks and paying premiums which....to a high percentage are also paid to foreign investors.

So, after the cheering subsides when the average family will get a couple of hundred dollars per month.......what realistic factors will be stimulating the U.S. economy toward more growth?

You know you can't lie your way out of this.

The vast majority of America will see more in their paychecks starting about February.

You Maoists are fucked for the 2018 midterms, no amount of lies by mindless sycophants like you will change it.

Even the "in the bag" corrupt press is starting to cover their ass by reporting small tidbits of truth.

Microeconomics does not solve macroeconomic infrastructure problems.

 

[nat4900]

You know you can't lie your way out of this.

The vast majority of America will see more in their paychecks starting about February.

Moron.....if THAT was the deciding factor (a few more dollars in one's pay check) THEN, GWB AND Obama would have been economic geniuses....
Didn't quite happen....BUT, DO keep listening to hannity.....LOL.

 

[mamooth]

So, with the majority of the USA now having less money to spend, what does it mean?

A tanked economy. After all, economies are demand driven, and there will be less demand. Only the most brainless cultists still profess belief in the total failure of supply-side economics.

Republicans never learn. Or, more correctly, they see that as a feature, one that keeps the working class subservient to their rich GOP masters.

 

[danielpalos]

Healthcare reform and a fifteen dollar an hour minimum wage!

 

[PoliticalChic]

So is only giving the masses peanuts in tax refunds a scam?

That's like asking if only giving the masses peanuts in entitlements is a scam.

ATTA boy.....and thanks......
Let's all call this tax scam what it really is..a "welfare give away to the middle class."

Had that moronic conclusion (in your cartoon) been the case,,,,,,
REAGAN and GWB would have been economic GENIUSES

Instead, Reagan had to RAISE taxes ELEVEN times in his terms, and GWB handed over to Obama a GREAT RECESSION......

Are you serious???

Reagan was a genius for the economy.

1. The benefits from Reaganomics:
   1. The economy grew at a 3.4% average rate…compared with 2.9% for the previous eight years, and 2.7% for the next eight.(Table B-4)
   2. Inflation rate dropped from 12.5% to 4.4%. (Table B-63)
   3. Unemployment fell to 5.5% from 7.1% (Table B-35)
   4. Prime interest rate fell by one-third.(Table B-73)
   5. The S & P 500 jumped 124% (Table B-95) http://www.gpoaccess.gov/eop/tables10.html
   6. Charitable contributions rose 57% faster than inflation. Dinesh D’Souza, “Ronald Reagan: How an Ordinary May Became an Extraordinary Leader,” p. 116

b. and c. Kiva Lending Team: Team REAL Americans | Kiva



2. While the ranks of the wealthy quickly multiplied, middle-class investors also entered the stock market in rapidly growing numbers. The creation by Congress in 1978 of the 401(k) tax-deferred retirement plan provided new incentives for workers to invest their savings in the stock market (often through mutual funds) rather than relying on company-funded pensions for retirement. The 401(k) led to a kind of democratization of Wall Street, as the percentage of American households owning some stake in the stock market—either directly or through mutual funds—shot quickly from 15.9% in 1983 to 29.6% in 1989.23 Thus the great bull market of the 1980s created more wealth, for more American families, than any previous boom in history.

Investment Company Institute, "Equity Ownership in America, 2005," http://www.ici.org/pdf/rpt_05_equity_owners.pdf,

The Reagan Era Learning Guide: Citations



Every time I think you've managed to post the most stupid drivel imaginable.....you manage to go even lower.