Victims don't get due process. That's why the act that made them victims is a crime.It's isn't.So you believe in the concept of guilty until proven innocent, I thought that was antithetical to our justice system. But you also want to disadvantage the law abiding because the legal system fails, that makes a lot of sense, NOT!
not quite sure how keeping guns away from criminals and the mentally ill is finding them guilty until proven innocent.
No one is advocating due process rights be abridged or abandoned – only those afforded their comprehensive right to due process are placed in the FBI's NICS database, only those who have been adjudicated a felon or mentally ill are designated a prohibited person, and those denied pursuant to a NICS background check have the right to appeal.
It is when you advocate that everyone taking a particular pill is denied their rights as she has, without due process.
What about people who get shot? Where's their due process?
You could ask the same if someone is beaten to death, doesn't alter the fact that the criminal is entitled to due process before their rights are restricted, same applies to the law abiding people whether they take a pill or not.
What a fucking dunce he is.