uscitizen
Senior Member
- May 6, 2007
- 45,940
- 4,925
Hmmm....let me think about this.....the millionaire who makes all his money turning businesses around...yeah that guy...the millionaire please.
I will take Mary Ann.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hmmm....let me think about this.....the millionaire who makes all his money turning businesses around...yeah that guy...the millionaire please.
The question didn't involve Bush, but the libs seem to still want to bring him into this.
Romney would be a better choice because he's actually made money fixing companies.
All Obama has done is intentionally broke something then claimed to want to fix it.......then leave before he could finish the job leaving everyone pissed off and at each other's throats. Meanwhile everyone is wondering where all the money went.
He's like the Aliens in "Independence Day".
He lays waste to everything he touches, sucks it dry, and moves on to the next target.
The premise that Romney has "fixed" companies is ludicrous. He didn't fix companies, he looted them.
AmPad had 11 million dollars in debt when Bain got into their lives. They closed down plants, fired hundreds of people, racked up 400 million in debt, and their stock was worth pennies when it finally declared bankruptcy.
Or GS Steel- Where they shuttered plants, sold off the assets, and left the pension fund having to go to the federal government for 44 million to stay solvent.
I don't want Romney "fixing" America like he's fixed the companies he's touched.
The question didn't involve Bush, but the libs seem to still want to bring him into this.
Romney would be a better choice because he's actually made money fixing companies.
All Obama has done is intentionally broke something then claimed to want to fix it.......then leave before he could finish the job leaving everyone pissed off and at each other's throats. Meanwhile everyone is wondering where all the money went.
He's like the Aliens in "Independence Day".
He lays waste to everything he touches, sucks it dry, and moves on to the next target.
The premise that Romney has "fixed" companies is ludicrous. He didn't fix companies, he looted them.
AmPad had 11 million dollars in debt when Bain got into their lives. They closed down plants, fired hundreds of people, racked up 400 million in debt, and their stock was worth pennies when it finally declared bankruptcy.
Or GS Steel- Where they shuttered plants, sold off the assets, and left the pension fund having to go to the federal government for 44 million to stay solvent.
I don't want Romney "fixing" America like he's fixed the companies he's touched.
22% either filed for bankruptcy reorganization or closed their doors by the end of the eighth year after Bain first invested
Hmmm....let me think about this.....the millionaire who makes all his money turning businesses around...yeah that guy...the millionaire please.
I will take Mary Ann.
Hmmm....let me think about this.....the millionaire who makes all his money turning businesses around...yeah that guy...the millionaire please.
I will take Mary Ann.
The question didn't involve Bush, but the libs seem to still want to bring him into this.
Romney would be a better choice because he's actually made money fixing companies.
All Obama has done is intentionally broke something then claimed to want to fix it.......then leave before he could finish the job leaving everyone pissed off and at each other's throats. Meanwhile everyone is wondering where all the money went.
He's like the Aliens in "Independence Day".
He lays waste to everything he touches, sucks it dry, and moves on to the next target.
The premise that Romney has "fixed" companies is ludicrous. He didn't fix companies, he looted them.
AmPad had 11 million dollars in debt when Bain got into their lives. They closed down plants, fired hundreds of people, racked up 400 million in debt, and their stock was worth pennies when it finally declared bankruptcy.
Or GS Steel- Where they shuttered plants, sold off the assets, and left the pension fund having to go to the federal government for 44 million to stay solvent.
I don't want Romney "fixing" America like he's fixed the companies he's touched.
Links.
After reading your anti-religious bigotry I tend to question anything you have to say about Romney.
The question didn't involve Bush, but the libs seem to still want to bring him into this.
Romney would be a better choice because he's actually made money fixing companies.
All Obama has done is intentionally broke something then claimed to want to fix it.......then leave before he could finish the job leaving everyone pissed off and at each other's throats. Meanwhile everyone is wondering where all the money went.
He's like the Aliens in "Independence Day".
He lays waste to everything he touches, sucks it dry, and moves on to the next target.
The premise that Romney has "fixed" companies is ludicrous. He didn't fix companies, he looted them.
AmPad had 11 million dollars in debt when Bain got into their lives. They closed down plants, fired hundreds of people, racked up 400 million in debt, and their stock was worth pennies when it finally declared bankruptcy.
Or GS Steel- Where they shuttered plants, sold off the assets, and left the pension fund having to go to the federal government for 44 million to stay solvent.
I don't want Romney "fixing" America like he's fixed the companies he's touched.
What percentage of companies that Bain Capital got involved in actually went out of business?
It was 22% were out of business in an 8 year period after Bain's involvement
Romney at Bain Capital: Big Gains, Some Busts - WSJ.com
22% either filed for bankruptcy reorganization or closed their doors by the end of the eighth year after Bain first invested
So Bain had a 78% success rate in turning businesses around.
Compare that to the number of businesses that start and fail every year and the track record of Bain is very good.
Now please don't take this as an endorsement of Romney. I won't vote for him. I just wanted you to have the actual facts.
Neither one. why do right wingers always seem to limit the options to this or that?
Absolutists....
The premise that Romney has "fixed" companies is ludicrous. He didn't fix companies, he looted them.
AmPad had 11 million dollars in debt when Bain got into their lives. They closed down plants, fired hundreds of people, racked up 400 million in debt, and their stock was worth pennies when it finally declared bankruptcy.
Or GS Steel- Where they shuttered plants, sold off the assets, and left the pension fund having to go to the federal government for 44 million to stay solvent.
I don't want Romney "fixing" America like he's fixed the companies he's touched.
What percentage of companies that Bain Capital got involved in actually went out of business?
It was 22% were out of business in an 8 year period after Bain's involvement
Romney at Bain Capital: Big Gains, Some Busts - WSJ.com
22% either filed for bankruptcy reorganization or closed their doors by the end of the eighth year after Bain first invested
So Bain had a 78% success rate in turning businesses around.
Compare that to the number of businesses that start and fail every year and the track record of Bain is very good.
Now please don't take this as an endorsement of Romney. I won't vote for him. I just wanted you to have the actual facts.
I'm aware of that actual number, and have posted it other times.
Frankly, in most places, a 22% screwup rate would probably still get you fired.
I should also point out that Bain was most active in the 1990's, when the economy was booming. You'd have to be a real fuckup to sink a business in that environment, but Romney still managed.
Neither one. why do right wingers always seem to limit the options to this or that?
Absolutists....
You wouldn't hire Obama to run your business, but you'd hire him to run the entire country? This says a lot about your lack of judgment.
Neither one. why do right wingers always seem to limit the options to this or that?
Absolutists....
You wouldn't hire Obama to run your business, but you'd hire him to run the entire country? This says a lot about your lack of judgment.
The premise that Romney has "fixed" companies is ludicrous. He didn't fix companies, he looted them.
AmPad had 11 million dollars in debt when Bain got into their lives. They closed down plants, fired hundreds of people, racked up 400 million in debt, and their stock was worth pennies when it finally declared bankruptcy.
Or GS Steel- Where they shuttered plants, sold off the assets, and left the pension fund having to go to the federal government for 44 million to stay solvent.
I don't want Romney "fixing" America like he's fixed the companies he's touched.
Links.
After reading your anti-religious bigotry I tend to question anything you have to say about Romney.
I've posted links to these stories dozens of times... and you ignore them.
I don't do links unless I feel like doing them.
Wasn't being a "businessman" touted as a plus for George W. Bush?
Simple question. Simple answer. Simple and obvious point.
Being the first Black was Obama's best qualification.
Only people I've ever seen obsess over Obama's race are the wingnut right.
Links.
After reading your anti-religious bigotry I tend to question anything you have to say about Romney.
If you owned a business, say about 200 employees, with a lot of capital and stock and all that economic shit..........but you became ill, and needed someone to run the thing to keep it going so your kids and grandkids would benefit in the future from it, who would you hire to run that company: Barack Obama or Mitt Romney???
Simple question. Simple answer. Simple and obvious point.
Hmmm....let me think about this.....the millionaire who makes all his money turning businesses around...yeah that guy...the millionaire please.
I will take Mary Ann.
Mary Ann was the hot one.
If you owned a business, say about 200 employees, with a lot of capital and stock and all that economic shit..........but you became ill, and needed someone to run the thing to keep it going so your kids and grandkids would benefit in the future from it, who would you hire to run that company: Barack Obama or Mitt Romney???
Simple question. Simple answer. Simple and obvious point.
Barack Obama. Without a question. It would be a company I could be proud of. The bottom line isn't the only thing to consider for most Americans. You're right, it was a simple question and it had an obvious answer.
"Corporations are people my friend"--Willard Romney.
If you owned a business, say about 200 employees, with a lot of capital and stock and all that economic shit..........but you became ill, and needed someone to run the thing to keep it going so your kids and grandkids would benefit in the future from it, who would you hire to run that company: Barack Obama or Mitt Romney???
Simple question. Simple answer. Simple and obvious point.