Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
. And the semantics I called you on is about oil. Believe me, not a subject you want to debate me about.
His inaction on an unrelated topic (healthcare)...it clearly gives your position, and bias away.Yes of course, holding Don to what he said is too much to ask. Who do you see me criticizing?Me thinks that nothing Trump would ever do would meet your standard. Why don't you just state that instead of phrasing your statement in a way which engenders some type of possibility?Trump campaigned on getting us out of these centuries old tribal spats. At least he's trying.
No, he's not, and he hasn't done jack shit about healthcare, and he won't. Want to remind us all of Don's wildass healthcare promises?
This really is dishonesty on your part and makes you no better than the people you criticize.
Trump campaigned on getting us out of these centuries old tribal spats. At least he's trying.
No, he's not, and he hasn't done jack shit about healthcare, and he won't. Want to remind us all of Don's wildass healthcare promises?[/So the subject]
Want to stay on subject, petunia.? Stupid fucking libtardos are just tedious idiots.
The subject is partisanshitheadism?
And Obama took Bush's 2 wars to 7, what's your point?Trump campaigned on getting us out of these centuries old tribal spats. At least he's trying.
No, he's not, and he hasn't done jack shit about healthcare, and he won't. Want to remind us all of Don's wildass healthcare promises?
The political mainstream pressured him to invade Syria and remove Assad to save the children™ like two years ago and all they got was the bombing of a couple empty airfields. If Hillary was president we'd be balls deep in yet another regime change war and that's just a fact.
If Don's shtick was he's an outsider little man like you who will stand up on your/our behalf against the "political mainstream", and he can't/doesn't/won't, then he IS the "political mainstream". There is no point in or to him at all, other than he excites the lizardbrains of tribalists.
Sure, got it.His inaction on an unrelated topic (healthcare)...it clearly gives your position, and bias away.Yes of course, holding Don to what he said is too much to ask. Who do you see me criticizing?Me thinks that nothing Trump would ever do would meet your standard. Why don't you just state that instead of phrasing your statement in a way which engenders some type of possibility?Trump campaigned on getting us out of these centuries old tribal spats. At least he's trying.
No, he's not, and he hasn't done jack shit about healthcare, and he won't. Want to remind us all of Don's wildass healthcare promises?
This really is dishonesty on your part and makes you no better than the people you criticize.
It's not about the positive...it's the immediate diffraction away to the negative...it's a tactic. Maybe you are not conscious of it...but it is one.
I personally think Trump is a megalomanical dick bag who never met a Jewish ass he wouldn't kiss...but he is ATTEMPTING to do something right on this issue.
And Obama took Bush's 2 wars to 7, what's your point?Trump campaigned on getting us out of these centuries old tribal spats. At least he's trying.
No, he's not, and he hasn't done jack shit about healthcare, and he won't. Want to remind us all of Don's wildass healthcare promises?
The political mainstream pressured him to invade Syria and remove Assad to save the children™ like two years ago and all they got was the bombing of a couple empty airfields. If Hillary was president we'd be balls deep in yet another regime change war and that's just a fact.
If Don's shtick was he's an outsider little man like you who will stand up on your/our behalf against the "political mainstream", and he can't/doesn't/won't, then he IS the "political mainstream". There is no point in or to him at all, other than he excites the lizardbrains of tribalists.
You said he's not trying even though he's bucking the political establishment by not starting any new wars. The first president in a while to do so. Hopefully he keeps it up.
. And the semantics I called you on is about oil. Believe me, not a subject you want to debate me about.
It is not semantics about the oil, it makes all the difference that the oil produced in this country belongs to the multinational corporations that do the extraction and refining.
It makes a difference that all oil, no matter where it is produced, is sold on the same market.
Here, a good take on the issue...The Myth of U.S. Energy Independence Has Gone Up in Smoke
. And the semantics I called you on is about oil. Believe me, not a subject you want to debate me about.
It is not semantics about the oil, it makes all the difference that the oil produced in this country belongs to the multinational corporations that do the extraction and refining.
It makes a difference that all oil, no matter where it is produced, is sold on the same market.
Here, a good take on the issue...The Myth of U.S. Energy Independence Has Gone Up in Smoke
Total tripe. The entire premise of that lame article is that the price of oil is going up after the attack on Saudi Arabia and guess what petunia, Friday it traded at the same price as the day of the attack.
Now the only leverage middle east oil has on us is refining grade requirements. Which we can convert our refineries to process our own oil.
There was NO crisis until Trump created one. Trumps decisions result in failureWar Hawks or chicken hawks? There's a difference, War hawks have actually served in the military and in many instances saw combat, chicken hawks have never served, never put their lives on the line (actively avoided military service) but are more than willing to let others do the fighting and dying.Trump campaigned on getting us out of these centuries old tribal spats. At least he's trying.
I can't believe the Democrats are railing about NOT putting our troops on the front lines. I can't believe the war hawks are claiming we should stay and fight when they're not the ones doing the fighting. Always someone else's kid has to go fight these stupid Mid-East wars.
We have a vested interest to maintain stability in the Persian Gulf as it has a direct impact on the world's economy. Troops stationed in the region as a deterrent makes perfect sense, but to fight the area's outlier spats is not worth our soldiers lives.
Trump is doing the right things, forcing NATO to pay up, forcing the United Nations to live up to their mandate in the Middle East, and forcing Democrats to put up or shut up. Congress can declare war.
We became energy independent and it's time to reap the dividends now we're not dependent on Middle East oil. Let some other country's kids die for the oil if they want it.
. And the semantics I called you on is about oil. Believe me, not a subject you want to debate me about.
It is not semantics about the oil, it makes all the difference that the oil produced in this country belongs to the multinational corporations that do the extraction and refining.
It makes a difference that all oil, no matter where it is produced, is sold on the same market.
Here, a good take on the issue...The Myth of U.S. Energy Independence Has Gone Up in Smoke
Total tripe. The entire premise of that lame article is that the price of oil is going up after the attack on Saudi Arabia and guess what petunia, Friday it traded at the same price as the day of the attack.
Now the only leverage middle east oil has on us is refining grade requirements. Which we can convert our refineries to process our own oil.
And then we'll leave the ME? Gee, what's the hold up? Seems you admit we're cucked to the ME over oil.
