Missouri_Mike
Diamond Member
- Nov 5, 2012
- 24,123
- 15,661
I'm not defending anyone but looking for some consistency. Wasn't Milo 14 in his story? Yes he was. So where are they not equal? Maher on the other hand was basically saying a 13 year old male could never be raped by a 35ish year old female because...I'm not sure why. He just liked it I guess.So did George Takei and Bill Maher. So let's see what you do with those two. And then we can decide if you're such a hard liner.Agreed but his overall point is validI'm not a liberal...but really? Lewinsky was 21 years old-not a child. Was what he did disgusting and reprehensible? You bet. Was it rape or as bad as pedophilia? Absolutely not.
The point is not valid as Milo gave tacit approval of sex with 13 year olds as long as they are "sexually mature". Anyone that can defend this man needs to take a long, hard look in the mirror and ask themselves if politics might play too big a role in their life.
I'm unfamiliar with Maher's deal...but the outcry against Takei is his story about him losing his own virginity. Is he still somewhat support pedophilia? In a weird yes, but A) this doesn't absolve Milo whatsoever, and B) at least it was his own virginity and not a stranger's he was referring to.
Seriously people as I stated before I'm not a liberal...but when you resort to defending statements that defend pedophilia-you're an idiot.