If you're a liberal piling on Milo, you need to explain why you defended the Clintons

[mgh80]

When Democrats finally renounce Bill Clinton as a sexual predator and renounce Hillary for enabling him and attacking his accusers, then I will stop bringing them up in these discussions.

Bill might have done a perverted act...but by the letter of the law was NOT a sexual predator. Also, the "but they also did it" is the worst defense...because you're basically admitting guilt and trying to justify it.

I am admitting that Milo is guilty, and I am denouncing him in multiple threads.

What I'm saying here is that only conservatives have a right to denounce Milo, and exile him from our movement.

Liberals are thorougly discredited as they have always stood by and defended the sexual predators and perverts in their midst, men like Bill Clinton, Ted Kennedy, Barney Frank, Roman Polanski, etc.

So liberals don't get to pile on Milo, because the only reason they are doing so is they disagree with his politics.

The only reason why you're telling them not to pile on is because of their politics-it goes both ways. It is NEVER wrong to out a supporter of pedophilia and pile on them. NEVER. If this was something a little worse (like let's saying lying, stealing, etc)-I'd probably agree with you. But Hell has a special place for pedophiles and those who protect them.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

You know, they were just starting a family. A child at 14 fathering two kids with a 35 year old? And that's just love.

Thank you for that video. I have never liked him, but now I will put him in the same boat as Milo. Both are beyond help and neither will I waste my time on.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

I'm not defending anyone but looking for some consistency. Wasn't Milo 14 in his story? Yes he was. So where are they not equal? Maher on the other hand was basically saying a 13 year old male could never be raped by a 35ish year old female because...I'm not sure why. He just liked it I guess.

-Takei's story was about an 18 year old person taking his virginity (NOT an adult old enough to be a priest)
-Milo admits to STILL being sexually attracted 15 year old girls (as a high school teacher this sickens me)
-Milo is openly protecting pedophiles
-If ANY of my co-workers talked about being sexually attracted to ANY student at my school-I would IMMEDIATELY report them to my principal and make sure that I did all I could get the S.O.B. punished to the fullest extent of the law

I'm not condoning what Takei stated...but give me a break it's nor entirely the same thing. Milo's a piece of crap. Period.

Not everything is left vs right, liberal vs conservative, commie vs capitalist, D vs R...sometimes somebody is just a piece of crap.

18 is an adult. Period. Statutory rape is the charge that should have been leveled. Especially if the kid is only 14.

You are condoning Takei. You're making excuses you would never afford someone you disagree with politically. As long as the person raping or being raped is on your side it's all good. Don't tow the democrat line then not so much leeway then.

My point was that what Milo said was worse than what Takei said (key word: WORSE...you know that word implies that Takei's comments were negative right?).

Pay attention. Go back and read my posts where I make two things VERY clear:

-I referred to Takei's comments as "disgusting" (how the hell is that condoning them?)
-I clearly stated that I am NOT a liberal (unless you consider being pro-life, anti gun-control, pro-capitalism/anti-socialism, pro death penalty, pro defunding planned parenthood, pro deportation of illegals, etc. to be liberal)

Your response is not only ignorant-but it's lazy, and honestly I'm not sure which one is worse.

Listen up cupcake. I don't look for every post you put on here. So far I think you have some very left wing tendencies to make massive charges against one person while making excuses for another. I'll think of you better when you don't call one act "disgusting" and doing nothing while calling for the head of another.

Both acts are disgusting. Are you too stubborn to read that, or too stupid?

Better question:

Do you think it's ok to be a ~30 year old man and be sexually attracted to 15 year old girls-I sure as shit don't.

So we're changing the conversation then?

 

[BlueGin]

I'm not defending anyone but looking for some consistency. Wasn't Milo 14 in his story? Yes he was. So where are they not equal? Maher on the other hand was basically saying a 13 year old male could never be raped by a 35ish year old female because...I'm not sure why. He just liked it I guess.

-Takei's story was about an 18 year old person taking his virginity (NOT an adult old enough to be a priest)
-Milo admits to STILL being sexually attracted 15 year old girls (as a high school teacher this sickens me)
-Milo is openly protecting pedophiles
-If ANY of my co-workers talked about being sexually attracted to ANY student at my school-I would IMMEDIATELY report them to my principal and make sure that I did all I could get the S.O.B. punished to the fullest extent of the law

I'm not condoning what Takei stated...but give me a break it's nor entirely the same thing. Milo's a piece of crap. Period.

Not everything is left vs right, liberal vs conservative, commie vs capitalist, D vs R...sometimes somebody is just a piece of crap.

18 is an adult. Period. Statutory rape is the charge that should have been leveled. Especially if the kid is only 14.

You are condoning Takei. You're making excuses you would never afford someone you disagree with politically. As long as the person raping or being raped is on your side it's all good. Don't tow the democrat line then not so much leeway then.

My point was that what Milo said was worse than what Takei said (key word: WORSE...you know that word implies that Takei's comments were negative right?).

Pay attention. Go back and read my posts where I make two things VERY clear:

-I referred to Takei's comments as "disgusting" (how the hell is that condoning them?)
-I clearly stated that I am NOT a liberal (unless you consider being pro-life, anti gun-control, pro-capitalism/anti-socialism, pro death penalty, pro defunding planned parenthood, pro deportation of illegals, etc. to be liberal)

Your response is not only ignorant-but it's lazy, and honestly I'm not sure which one is worse.

Listen up cupcake. I don't look for every post you put on here. So far I think you have some very left wing tendencies to make massive charges against one person while making excuses for another. I'll think of you better when you don't call one act "disgusting" and doing nothing while calling for the head of another.

Both acts are disgusting. Are you too stubborn to read that, or too stupid?

Better question:

Do you think it's ok to be a ~30 year old man and be sexually attracted to 15 year old girls-I sure as shit don't.

Apparently democrats do since Harvey Milk was 33 and screwing and exploiting 14 year old drug addicted male prostitues ... they even gave the pedophile his own stamp and celebratory day where all school children get to worship him.

 

[mgh80]

-Takei's story was about an 18 year old person taking his virginity (NOT an adult old enough to be a priest)
-Milo admits to STILL being sexually attracted 15 year old girls (as a high school teacher this sickens me)
-Milo is openly protecting pedophiles
-If ANY of my co-workers talked about being sexually attracted to ANY student at my school-I would IMMEDIATELY report them to my principal and make sure that I did all I could get the S.O.B. punished to the fullest extent of the law

I'm not condoning what Takei stated...but give me a break it's nor entirely the same thing. Milo's a piece of crap. Period.

Not everything is left vs right, liberal vs conservative, commie vs capitalist, D vs R...sometimes somebody is just a piece of crap.

18 is an adult. Period. Statutory rape is the charge that should have been leveled. Especially if the kid is only 14.

You are condoning Takei. You're making excuses you would never afford someone you disagree with politically. As long as the person raping or being raped is on your side it's all good. Don't tow the democrat line then not so much leeway then.

My point was that what Milo said was worse than what Takei said (key word: WORSE...you know that word implies that Takei's comments were negative right?).

Pay attention. Go back and read my posts where I make two things VERY clear:

-I referred to Takei's comments as "disgusting" (how the hell is that condoning them?)
-I clearly stated that I am NOT a liberal (unless you consider being pro-life, anti gun-control, pro-capitalism/anti-socialism, pro death penalty, pro defunding planned parenthood, pro deportation of illegals, etc. to be liberal)

Your response is not only ignorant-but it's lazy, and honestly I'm not sure which one is worse.

Listen up cupcake. I don't look for every post you put on here. So far I think you have some very left wing tendencies to make massive charges against one person while making excuses for another. I'll think of you better when you don't call one act "disgusting" and doing nothing while calling for the head of another.

Both acts are disgusting. Are you too stubborn to read that, or too stupid?

Better question:

Do you think it's ok to be a ~30 year old man and be sexually attracted to 15 year old girls-I sure as shit don't.

So we're changing the conversation then?

No we are not...you are either forgetting, not reading, or misunderstanding my previous post(s) in this thread.

I stated that Takei was supporting pedophilia.

I was making two points:

1) Takei also supporting pedophilia does not absolve Milo whatsoever
2) Takei's was not as horrible as Milo's. Does that mean what he said was ok? No.

Seriously work on your reading comprehension skills, or chill out and stop making everything into politics...some issues have no political boundaries and pedophiles/people who support them being p.o.s.'s (ALL of them) isn't a political statement: it's a fact. That's like saying somebody who killed 1 person isn't as bad as somebody who killed 20-you could make that statement...but does that justify in any way, shape or form the person who killed 1 person? No. This shouldn't be a difficult concept to comprehend.

Here's my post from earlier in the thread:

I'm not a liberal...but really? Lewinsky was 21 years old-not a child. Was what he did disgusting and reprehensible? You bet. Was it rape or as bad as pedophilia? Absolutely not.

Agreed but his overall point is valid

The point is not valid as Milo gave tacit approval of sex with 13 year olds as long as they are "sexually mature". Anyone that can defend this man needs to take a long, hard look in the mirror and ask themselves if politics might play too big a role in their life.

So did George Takei and Bill Maher. So let's see what you do with those two. And then we can decide if you're such a hard liner.

I'm unfamiliar with Maher's deal...but the outcry against Takei is his story about him losing his own virginity. Is he still somewhat support pedophilia? In a weird yes, but A) this doesn't absolve Milo whatsoever, and B) at least it was his own virginity and not a stranger's he was referring to.

Seriously people as I stated before I'm not a liberal...but when you resort to defending statements that defend pedophilia-you're an idiot.

 

[mgh80]

-Takei's story was about an 18 year old person taking his virginity (NOT an adult old enough to be a priest)
-Milo admits to STILL being sexually attracted 15 year old girls (as a high school teacher this sickens me)
-Milo is openly protecting pedophiles
-If ANY of my co-workers talked about being sexually attracted to ANY student at my school-I would IMMEDIATELY report them to my principal and make sure that I did all I could get the S.O.B. punished to the fullest extent of the law

I'm not condoning what Takei stated...but give me a break it's nor entirely the same thing. Milo's a piece of crap. Period.

Not everything is left vs right, liberal vs conservative, commie vs capitalist, D vs R...sometimes somebody is just a piece of crap.

18 is an adult. Period. Statutory rape is the charge that should have been leveled. Especially if the kid is only 14.

You are condoning Takei. You're making excuses you would never afford someone you disagree with politically. As long as the person raping or being raped is on your side it's all good. Don't tow the democrat line then not so much leeway then.

My point was that what Milo said was worse than what Takei said (key word: WORSE...you know that word implies that Takei's comments were negative right?).

Pay attention. Go back and read my posts where I make two things VERY clear:

-I referred to Takei's comments as "disgusting" (how the hell is that condoning them?)
-I clearly stated that I am NOT a liberal (unless you consider being pro-life, anti gun-control, pro-capitalism/anti-socialism, pro death penalty, pro defunding planned parenthood, pro deportation of illegals, etc. to be liberal)

Your response is not only ignorant-but it's lazy, and honestly I'm not sure which one is worse.

Listen up cupcake. I don't look for every post you put on here. So far I think you have some very left wing tendencies to make massive charges against one person while making excuses for another. I'll think of you better when you don't call one act "disgusting" and doing nothing while calling for the head of another.

Both acts are disgusting. Are you too stubborn to read that, or too stupid?

Better question:

Do you think it's ok to be a ~30 year old man and be sexually attracted to 15 year old girls-I sure as shit don't.

Apparently democrats do since Harvey Milk was 33 and screwing and exploiting 14 year old drug addicted male prostitues ... they even gave the pedophile his own stamp and celebratory day where all school children get to worship him.

He's also a p.o.s. if he did that..what's your point? That doesn't make this situation any better. Seriously it's like the little kid who gets caught stealing and then says "but Johnny did it too!"...yeah...and?

 

[NYcarbineer]

I have renounced Milo, but liberals don't get to say shit about this issue. They defended Bill Clinton, who committed rape, sexual assault, and seduction of a 21-year-old intern, and they defended Hillary Clinton, who got on national TV and destroyed these womens' reputations by calling them liars.

Again, I say, liberals don't get to say shit about Milo. You are proven sympathizers with perverts and sexual predators.

So Milo is innocent? Pederasty is the latest conservative family value?

 

[BlueGin]

18 is an adult. Period. Statutory rape is the charge that should have been leveled. Especially if the kid is only 14.

You are condoning Takei. You're making excuses you would never afford someone you disagree with politically. As long as the person raping or being raped is on your side it's all good. Don't tow the democrat line then not so much leeway then.

My point was that what Milo said was worse than what Takei said (key word: WORSE...you know that word implies that Takei's comments were negative right?).

Pay attention. Go back and read my posts where I make two things VERY clear:

-I referred to Takei's comments as "disgusting" (how the hell is that condoning them?)
-I clearly stated that I am NOT a liberal (unless you consider being pro-life, anti gun-control, pro-capitalism/anti-socialism, pro death penalty, pro defunding planned parenthood, pro deportation of illegals, etc. to be liberal)

Your response is not only ignorant-but it's lazy, and honestly I'm not sure which one is worse.

Listen up cupcake. I don't look for every post you put on here. So far I think you have some very left wing tendencies to make massive charges against one person while making excuses for another. I'll think of you better when you don't call one act "disgusting" and doing nothing while calling for the head of another.

Both acts are disgusting. Are you too stubborn to read that, or too stupid?

Better question:

Do you think it's ok to be a ~30 year old man and be sexually attracted to 15 year old girls-I sure as shit don't.

Apparently democrats do since Harvey Milk was 33 and screwing and exploiting 14 year old drug addicted male prostitues ... they even gave the pedophile his own stamp and celebratory day where all school children get to worship him.

He's also a p.o.s. if he did that..what's your point? That doesn't make this situation any better. Seriously it's like the little kid who gets caught stealing and then says "but Johnny did it too!"...yeah...and?

Point being I'm tired of the selective outrage.

Obama gives an actual child molester a comemorative stamp and the media and democrats are silent. MIlo talks about his coping mechanism for his sexual abuse and the media and left all of a sudden lose their freaken minds.

I'm not buying this phony outrage.

 

[mgh80]

My point was that what Milo said was worse than what Takei said (key word: WORSE...you know that word implies that Takei's comments were negative right?).

Pay attention. Go back and read my posts where I make two things VERY clear:

-I referred to Takei's comments as "disgusting" (how the hell is that condoning them?)
-I clearly stated that I am NOT a liberal (unless you consider being pro-life, anti gun-control, pro-capitalism/anti-socialism, pro death penalty, pro defunding planned parenthood, pro deportation of illegals, etc. to be liberal)

Your response is not only ignorant-but it's lazy, and honestly I'm not sure which one is worse.

Listen up cupcake. I don't look for every post you put on here. So far I think you have some very left wing tendencies to make massive charges against one person while making excuses for another. I'll think of you better when you don't call one act "disgusting" and doing nothing while calling for the head of another.

Both acts are disgusting. Are you too stubborn to read that, or too stupid?

Better question:

Do you think it's ok to be a ~30 year old man and be sexually attracted to 15 year old girls-I sure as shit don't.

Apparently democrats do since Harvey Milk was 33 and screwing and exploiting 14 year old drug addicted male prostitues ... they even gave the pedophile his own stamp and celebratory day where all school children get to worship him.

He's also a p.o.s. if he did that..what's your point? That doesn't make this situation any better. Seriously it's like the little kid who gets caught stealing and then says "but Johnny did it too!"...yeah...and?

Point being I'm tired of the selective outrage.

Obama gives an actual child molester a comemorative stamp and the media and democrats are silent. MIlo talks about his coping mechanism for his sexual abuse and the media and left all of a sudden lose their freaken minds.

I'm not buying this phony outrage.

I too am tired of selective outrage-but I'm tired of it from the left and the right. Does the left practice selective outrage? Absolutely. However so does the right...if you're not tired of selective outrage from the right then you are ironically being selectively outraged.


PS: He did not just talk about his coping mechanism, if that's all it was he wouldn't be in this crap-storm. Answer these questions honestly:

Is it acceptable for a man in his 30's to be sexually attracted to a 15 year old girl? Is it acceptable for somebody to protect pedophiles?

Milo clearly admits to those two things in the video.

 

[Faun]

I have renounced Milo, but liberals don't get to say shit about this issue. They defended Bill Clinton, who committed rape, sexual assault, and seduction of a 21-year-old intern, and they defended Hillary Clinton, who got on national TV and destroyed these womens' reputations by calling them liars.

Again, I say, liberals don't get to say shit about Milo. You are proven sympathizers with perverts and sexual predators.

Oh, look everyone .... ^^^ this ^^^ is what an idiot, who doesn't know the difference between having sex with a 22 year old from statutory rape of a 13 year old, looks like.

 

[12icer]

When Democrats finally renounce Bill Clinton as a sexual predator and renounce Hillary for enabling him and attacking his accusers, then I will stop bringing them up in these discussions.

Bill might have done a perverted act...but by the letter of the law was NOT a sexual predator. Also, the "but they also did it" is the worst defense...because you're basically admitting guilt and trying to justify it.

Apparently you know nothing about bill clinton and all of the women he raped, while governor of Arkansas, and all of the women he tried to rape and assaulted. You are just like every other liberal coverup talking points puker. Well liberal shit always say all of those women are liars, They wanted billyboy, and were just mad because he stayed with the great shining example that is hillary.
The pile of shitbitch attacked everyone of them, threatened and defamed them as if they were trash. SO your post is an uniformed statement or a LIE.
start at Gennifer Flowers, and go through Paula Jones

 

[mgh80]

When Democrats finally renounce Bill Clinton as a sexual predator and renounce Hillary for enabling him and attacking his accusers, then I will stop bringing them up in these discussions.

Bill might have done a perverted act...but by the letter of the law was NOT a sexual predator. Also, the "but they also did it" is the worst defense...because you're basically admitting guilt and trying to justify it.

Apparently you know nothing about bill clinton and all of the women he raped, while governor of Arkansas, and all of the women he tried to rape and assaulted. You are just like every other liberal coverup talking points puker. Well liberal shit always say all of those women are liars, They wanted billyboy, and were just mad because he stayed with the great shining example that is hillary.
The pile of shitbitch attacked everyone of them, threatened and defamed them as if they were trash. SO your post is an uniformed statement or a LIE.
start at Gennifer Flowers, and go through Paula Jones

If you're resorting to the "you're just a liberal" etc. you're just being lazy. I'm not a liberal...but guess what? I call out jerks from both parties, it's called being consistent.

Is/was Clinton a piece of a crap? You bet.

Does that make Milo any less of a piece of crap? nope.

 

[12icer]

What the fuck are you talking about? Clinton? Never supported his sexual shenanigans (WITH ADULTS btw)

And Mike, you just fucking voted TRUMP, who is ON TAPE talking with almost-stranger about how he, a married man, can't control himself from imposing himself on married women (who reject him).

Don't you think that in light of that maybe it's time for you to STFU about supporting sexual predators?

No because there is a difference in being aggressive, and rape. liberals are okay with anything their damn shit idols do, But let anyone who they disagree with spit on the sidewalk and suddenly it is worse than the murders their beloved messiahs commit. So no we don't accept your ideas, or your assumptions, or your lies, BOO HOO BOOGER EATING HOO, go cry some more because you liberals are searching for something you can never be, decent, intelligent, rational and WINNERS. Even if you win an election you lose some more of your integrity because of what you vote for.