Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Because she didn’t actually say that, asshole. She said make it a “non paper” which she claims means take out the classified information.
Devices were destroyed when they were end of life. The emails were all on the server. Destorying devices when you’re done with them is best for data security. Clinton had her lawyer go through her emails to sort out work emails. There’s no evidence she didn’t know everything was returned.
It is telling that not one single Trumper is saying he did not do the things he is accused of. Just that he should not be held accountable because others were not.
Yet you keep insisting that you think 'both sides are the same'.
Because she didn’t actually say that, asshole. She said make it a “non paper” which she claims means take out the classified information.
Devices were destroyed when they were end of life. The emails were all on the server. Destorying devices when you’re done with them is best for data security. Clinton had her lawyer go through her emails to sort out work emails. There’s no evidence she didn’t know everything was returned.
Corruption of Trump’s own lawyers?Obama did the weaponizing for 8 years. Not much of the corruption was cleaned out during the Trump years.
With actual facts based in reality.So exactly how are we to go about pointing out inequities in the system?
.
Just as it is telling that not one single Potatohead is saying that the potato did not do the things he's accused of.
A “non-paper” is a technical term used in government. It doesn’t mean “not made of paper”.Exactly how does a fax qualify as non paper?
Yea, her lawyer didn’t look at every email. She used filters to sort out emails. She described her process at length to the government. They didn’t lie about it. There’s nothing sinister here.Also they used bleachbit on the server and the lawyers didn't review the content of every email. They had no idea if they contained work related info or not.
Simple issue with interpretation of a question. Clinton used one device at a time but several devices over the years. Not a lie, just a question that wasn’t specific enough.BTW don't think your failure to address her lying to congress about only using ONE DEVICE went unnoticed.
And I bet you believe Trump declassified all the documents he took to Mar a Lago.I just shake my head at you morons... that you can type this and believe it is just hilarious... what a dupe!
One of these days, someone like you is going to actually say something useful.I just shake my head at you morons... that you can type this and believe it is just hilarious... what a dupe!
With actual facts based in reality.
So, we've got numerous people, with Hillary Clinton being the very worst offender, who have not been charged with any crimes related to the mishandling of classified documents. Joe Biden was found to have classified documents against law and they kept it hush, hush because the election was right around the corner and, he continued having classified documents against the law months after that. He knowingly had classified documents in violation of the law and he and his lawyers and others purposely obstructed justice by keeping it quiet instead of returning them to the National Archives. They kept it all quiet until they knew it was coming out in the media and then decided to come clean.
Hillary had set up an illegal server in her basement where numerous classified documents were funneled through and could be hacked (some by Wikileaks), with some of them winding up on Anthony Wiener's laptop and Huma Abedin (a person with ties to radical Islam) had access to many classified documents. Did she or Anthony Weiner have clearance to see those classified documents? After receiving a subpoena to keep records for an investigation, Hillary obstructed justice and had 30,000 emails deleted.
And yet the DOJ is trying to claim that these people didn't intend on breaking the law so were not charged while claiming that Trump intended to break the law by not returning "classified" documents when ordered to do so. Apparently just the fact of having classified documents illegally was OK with the DOJ just as long as you returned them when asked or ordered to do so. If not, then, all of a sudden, having classified documents is not OK, even though it was OK beforehand.
Hillary certainly wasn't ignorant of the law (hell, she's a lawyer) at least when she had 30,000 emails deleted against a subpoena (and probably other aspects of her case as well). Why should Trump be held accountable for merely having documents in his possession that were OK to have before as well as numerous other people, including Biden, and why should Trump be held accountable for obstruction of justice when others weren't? Why can Huma Abedin and Anthony Weiner and Wikileaks have access to classified documents and everyone who came in and out of Biden's garage and other places but Trump must be held accountable for others seeing classified documents? So, what happened to ignorance of the law is no excuse? The others should be charged even if the DOJ claims they were ignorant of the laws. Otherwise, it looks like weaponized law enforcement doing a political hit job.
Anyone who broke the law should be prosecuted. So why aren't the Republicans going after all the law breakers instead of just defending Trump saying whatabout?Trump did things he is accused of. So did Hillary, Biden, and others. One gets indicted while the other ones don't.
A “non-paper” is a technical term used in government. It doesn’t mean “not made of paper”.
Yea, her lawyer didn’t look at every email. She used filters to sort out emails. She described her process at length to the government. They didn’t lie about it. There’s nothing sinister here.
Simple issue with interpretation of a question. Clinton used one device at a time but several devices over the years. Not a lie, just a question that wasn’t specific enough.
You’re really desperate to find something here.
Anyone who broke the law should be prosecuted. So why aren't the Republicans going after all the law breakers instead of just defending Trump saying whatabout?
What charge that Trump is indicted for do you believe Hillary, Biden, or Pence should be charged with?
I actually went back and looked at the testimony. You don’t know what you’re talking about.I worked in the government for 21.5 years and never heard the term. Also she answered the question AFTER those years had elapsed, spin on commie, spin on.
her lying to congress about only using ONE DEVICE went unnoticed.
What I am “admitting “ (actually noting) is the right hypocrisy and dishonesty.Thanks for admitting that they should also be indicted. That wasn't so hard, was it? Where are those indictments, or does the DOJ work for just Democrats?
You didn’t though. You left out the based in reality part.I pointed to three, is that not enough?
.
xiden stole documents from a Scif while he was a senator and retained them for decades, are you going to claim he didn't know what he was doing?
.
Hillary deleted 30,000 emails against a subpoena and every one of them had classified documents.What charge that Trump is indicted for do you believe Hillary, Biden, or Pence should be charged with?
