Imagine if London was occupied by Israel

[theliq]

Where LOGIC is the "principles of correct reasoning",
ROUDY LOGIC is..........well............not that!

The best way to describe ROUDY LOGIC,
is with a demonstration...​

Loinboy: You take their land.
Roudy: the land wasn't the Muslims,

Loinboy: You take their identity.
Roudy: there were no Palestinian people,

Loinboy: You take their history.
Roudy: nor was there a history.

Roudy: Nice try at deflecting the fact
Loinboy: Huh?

Bipolar disease hit your brain again? We were talking about Musim inability to coexist. which is what is happening all over Europe.

Do you:

A- deny
B - agree
C- change subject!

And none of those statements are false. I repeat, the land did not belong to the Palestinians, it was owned and run by the British and before that for 600 years it was the Ottoman Turks. The Arabs did not call themselves Palestinians up until 1967, there has never been an Arab Palestinian nation, with rulers, capitals, currencies, etc. the Palestinians are invading Arab squatters from neighboring countries.

I understand these are inconvenient facts for terrorist ass kissers like yourself. Deal with it, MOHOMMOD!

Mandates did not own anything. Their job was to assist other countries.

Correct again Tinnie,but you know Roudy is as THICK AS TWO BRICKS.

"WHAT'S A BRICK ON THE SIDE OF ROUDYS HEAD CALLED....answer AN EXTENTION " No More Need Be Said On That Cretin.

 

[theliq]

a lot in the us funded ira terrorism.
And there was i thinking the us was against terrorists.

one man's terrorist, is another man's freedom fighter. Ask the jews, they had many that became the leaders in their early govt.
But to the british the same could be said of americans after the war for independance.

that’s a horrible analogy.

What freedoms is hamas fighting for? When they were elected to political office in gaza, what freedoms were instituted? How did they advance the cause of the syrian, lebanese and jordanian arabs collectively calling themselves “palestinians”?

while hamas turns gaza into an islamist state, the western media praise it for keeping 'law and order'

while hamas turns gaza into an islamist state, the western media praise it for keeping 'law and order' – telegraph blogs

hamas has not only created the conditions in gaza that breed schismatic ultras but also has long record of encouraging salafi-jihadis. An early group was jaysh al-islam (“army of islam”). Jaysh became famous in 2007 when it kidnapped bbc correspondent alan johnston and held him captive for nearly four months. Hamas was newly in control of a de facto government and reckoned that johnston’s detention was too high a pr price to pay for ownership of gaza. It issued an ultimatum to jaysh to release johnston. Jaysh’s response was to threaten to go public with details of its collaboration with hamas, including plots to assassinate palestinian authority officials.

Jaysh also played a role in hamas’s cross-border raid in 2006 that culminated in the death of two israeli soldiers and the capture of a third, gilad shalit, who has been denied access to humanitarian monitors for the five years of his captivity. Khalid abu hilal, a member of al-ahrar, an islamist faction close to hamas, boasted of the ruling party’s big-tent approach to snatching him: “hamas wanted the shalit operation to be a national undertaking, not purely hamas. They had just formed a government it was a political calculation.” last sunday, just as the news broke of arrigoni’s kidnapping, a senior hamas lawmaker called on palestinians to kidnap more israelis.

in the us, kidnapping is a felony. In most societies, it's considered... You know... in bad form. except, that is, in the surreal world of islamic terrorists where the islamic terrorist lawmakers encourage kidnapping.

you are off the original subject.........control your anti-hatred spew here dickhead

 

[Billo_Really]

Israel has little violence compared to the shitte vs sunni murders.
not to mention acid attachs
"honor" killings, many generations old
vast executions of women
muslims going after christians



krist

after to god damn long you'd think the Pals would have tried, sincerely tried to live in peace one damn time.

but no, the like seeing their women and children die in front of them as they try to kill people.

as insane as that is, it's the only logical conclusion.

Did you see the video? Or are your two thumbs up your ass? You can't occupy land that isn't yours for over 45 years in violation of all international laws and not be the cause of all the violence.

Israel talking about Palestinian violence, is like Charles Manson lecturing someone to be pro-life.

 

[Billo_Really]

We were talking about Musim inability to coexist.

No we were'nt. That's what you were trying to hijack the thread to, so you didn't have to talk about the fuckin' shit the Israeli's were doing on land that isn't theirs.

 

[Two Thumbs]

Israel has little violence compared to the shitte vs sunni murders.
not to mention acid attachs
"honor" killings, many generations old
vast executions of women
muslims going after christians



krist

after to god damn long you'd think the Pals would have tried, sincerely tried to live in peace one damn time.

but no, the like seeing their women and children die in front of them as they try to kill people.

as insane as that is, it's the only logical conclusion.

Did you see the video? Or are your two thumbs up your ass? You can't occupy land that isn't yours for over 45 years in violation of all international laws and not be the cause of all the violence.

Israel talking about Palestinian violence, is like Charles Manson lecturing someone to be pro-life.

Since they are not violating any international laws, since it was an international decision to put them there, the bases of your is moot.

Just how much does it suck to prove yourself wrong?

 

[theliq]

Israel has little violence compared to the shitte vs sunni murders.
not to mention acid attachs
"honor" killings, many generations old
vast executions of women
muslims going after christians



krist

after to god damn long you'd think the Pals would have tried, sincerely tried to live in peace one damn time.

but no, the like seeing their women and children die in front of them as they try to kill people.

as insane as that is, it's the only logical conclusion.

Did you see the video? Or are your two thumbs up your ass? You can't occupy land that isn't yours for over 45 years in violation of all international laws and not be the cause of all the violence.

Israel talking about Palestinian violence, is like Charles Manson lecturing someone to be pro-life.

Since they are not violating any international laws, since it was an international decision to put them there, the bases of your is moot.

Just how much does it suck to prove yourself wrong?

Dopey IDIOT

 

[Indofred]

Not really acceptance. There are areas in and around London that nobody steps in, because the Muslims have turned it into a little copy of the shithole they come from. They're even imposing their own barbaric Islamic Shariah laws. It's like that all over Europe. Comes from Muslim inability to co exist, assimilate, and respect and accept the culture and traditions of the countries they have invaded. Even the extremely progressive and liberal Europeans are fed up with them.

The bolded bits are the funniest.

Please link to reliable evidence showing Shariah law in any part of the UK.
The nearest you'll find is a couple of divorce courts run on the same lines as the Jewish courts that have been in the UK for a very long time.
The Jewish, as with the Muslim courts, are open to their respective groups but no one is forced to use them. The standard court system is open to all as the Jewish and Islamic courts are open to anyone who wishes to use that system.

Muslim's inability to co-exist.
Yep. Your post shows other groups seem to experience the very problem you're complaining of.

Now to invasions. The last Muslim invasion of a European country was Spain and that was a very long time ago.
Perhaps you could let me know when the western countries last invaded/attacked Muslim countries.

Afghanistan and Iraq are just two of many.

 

[Billo_Really]

Since they are not violating any international laws, since it was an international decision to put them there, the bases of your is moot.

Just how much does it suck to prove yourself wrong?

You just get dumb and dumber, doncha?

Israeli Violations of International Law - (6) The current Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal. Military actions and occupations are considered legal only if they are based on self-defense (as Israel claims), but it is now clear that Israel's occupation is illegal because Israeli implementation of it clearly is about (1) acquisition of land by force, (2) economic exploitation of the occupied communities (both violations of international law), (3) through unwarranted self-serving alterations of local law (also a violation of international law), and (4) in violation of human rights through the practice of collective punishment and (5) the creation of "de facto" annexation also benefitting Israel and at the expense of the local population .

 

[Two Thumbs]

Since they are not violating any international laws, since it was an international decision to put them there, the bases of your is moot.

Just how much does it suck to prove yourself wrong?

You just get dumb and dumber, doncha?

Israeli Violations of International Law - (6) The current Israeli occupation of Palestinian territories is illegal. Military actions and occupations are considered legal only if they are based on self-defense (as Israel claims), but it is now clear that Israel's occupation is illegal because Israeli implementation of it clearly is about (1) acquisition of land by force, (2) economic exploitation of the occupied communities (both violations of international law), (3) through unwarranted self-serving alterations of local law (also a violation of international law), and (4) in violation of human rights through the practice of collective punishment and (5) the creation of "de facto" annexation also benefitting Israel and at the expense of the local population .

good god

Israel was attacked, so guess what

You proved yourself wrong again.

 

[Billo_Really]

good god

Israel was attacked, so guess what

You proved yourself wrong again.

An occupational force is considered the aggressor. Therefore, it cannot claim self-defense.

The Palestinian's are the population under occupation and have every legal right in the world to resist. They're not attacking Israel, they're resisting Israel.

Israel needs to end the occupation and get their fuckin' ass back to their own country.

 

[ima]

Israel occupying London? Man, you're going to piss off half the world's pakis.

 

[Two Thumbs]

good god

Israel was attacked, so guess what

You proved yourself wrong again.

An occupational force is considered the aggressor. Therefore, it cannot claim self-defense.

The Palestinian's are the population under occupation and have every legal right in the world to resist. They're not attacking Israel, they're resisting Israel.

Israel needs to end the occupation and get their fuckin' ass back to their own country.

Wrong again.

NATO made a little country for them, the pals could have lived in peace with them but chose misery instead.

Damn bro, this subject isn't even my cup of tea.

 

[ima]

Damn bro, this subject isn't even my cup of tea.

That's obvious.

 

[Roudy]

Where LOGIC is the "principles of correct reasoning",
ROUDY LOGIC is..........well............not that!

The best way to describe ROUDY LOGIC,
is with a demonstration...​

Loinboy: You take their land.
Roudy: the land wasn't the Muslims,

Loinboy: You take their identity.
Roudy: there were no Palestinian people,

Loinboy: You take their history.
Roudy: nor was there a history.

Roudy: Nice try at deflecting the fact
Loinboy: Huh?

Bipolar disease hit your brain again? We were talking about Musim inability to coexist. which is what is happening all over Europe.

Do you:

A- deny
B - agree
C- change subject!

And none of those statements are false. I repeat, the land did not belong to the Palestinians, it was owned and run by the British and before that for 600 years it was the Ottoman Turks. The Arabs did not call themselves Palestinians up until 1967, there has never been an Arab Palestinian nation, with rulers, capitals, currencies, etc. the Palestinians are invading Arab squatters from neighboring countries.

I understand these are inconvenient facts for terrorist ass kissers like yourself. Deal with it, MOHOMMOD!

Mandates did not own anything. Their job was to assist other countries.

You mean they took over land that the Turks owned for 600 years? Heh heh heh. Still no evidence of this Arab Palestinian nation then.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Bipolar disease hit your brain again? We were talking about Musim inability to coexist. which is what is happening all over Europe.

Do you:

A- deny
B - agree
C- change subject!

And none of those statements are false. I repeat, the land did not belong to the Palestinians, it was owned and run by the British and before that for 600 years it was the Ottoman Turks. The Arabs did not call themselves Palestinians up until 1967, there has never been an Arab Palestinian nation, with rulers, capitals, currencies, etc. the Palestinians are invading Arab squatters from neighboring countries.

I understand these are inconvenient facts for terrorist ass kissers like yourself. Deal with it, MOHOMMOD!

Mandates did not own anything. Their job was to assist other countries.

You mean they took over land that the Turks owned for 600 years? Heh heh heh. Still no evidence of this Arab Palestinian nation then.

What was the name of that mandate again?

 

[eflatminor]

...the "occupation" of Palestinian land by Israel for the last 45 years...

I would argue, as others here have, that there never was "Palestinian land" to take. It was British land, previously part of the Ottoman empire. Of course, there were people when the Jews began arriving, squatters really, many of whom decided they could not live side-by-side with Jews. It took literally days for Muslims to attack Israel in 1948, which continue to this day. Certainly they have a right to defend themselves, no?

But this is just history. What I'm really interested in from you is what would you do about it all now? Shall we exterminate Israelis? Should we make them live elsewhere? Where? Should we create a new country for "Palestinians"? If so, from whose country should the land be taken? Who will be displaced in this new land and where shall they go?

Stated differently, what are you suggesting we do?

 

[Roudy]

Mandates did not own anything. Their job was to assist other countries.

You mean they took over land that the Turks owned for 600 years? Heh heh heh. Still no evidence of this Arab Palestinian nation then.

What was the name of that mandate again?

Those pesky facts seem to keep annoying you. Good.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/British_Mandate_for_Palestine_(legal_instrument)

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine, was a legal commission for the administration of the territory that had formerly constituted the Ottoman Sanjaks of Nablus, Acre, the Southern portion of the Beirut Vilayet, and the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, prior to the Armistice of Mudros. The draft of the Mandate was formally confirmed by the Council of the League of Nations on 24 July 1922, amended via the 16 September 1922 Transjordan memorandum[1][2] and which came into effect on 29 September 1923[1] following the ratification of the Treaty of Lausanne.[3][4] The mandate ended at midnight on 14 May 1948.

The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[5] The mandate document formalised the creation of two distinct British protectorates - Palestine, as a national home for the Jewish people under direct British rule, and Transjordan, an Emirate governed semi-autonomously from Britain under the rule of the Hashemite family.[1]

 

[Roudy]

...the "occupation" of Palestinian land by Israel for the last 45 years...

I would argue, as others here have, that there never was "Palestinian land" to take. It was British land, previously part of the Ottoman empire. Of course, there were people when the Jews began arriving, squatters really, many of whom decided they could not live side-by-side with Jews. It took literally days for Muslims to attack Israel in 1948, which continue to this day. Certainly they have a right to defend themselves, no?

But this is just history. What I'm really interested in from you is what would you do about it all now? Shall we exterminate Israelis? Should we make them live elsewhere? Where? Should we create a new country for "Palestinians"? If so, from whose country should the land be taken? Who will be displaced in this new land and where shall they go?

Stated differently, what are you suggesting we do?

He's a Hamas propogandist, he's rooting for the destruction of Israel.

 

[Swagger]

It's easier to imagine if London was occupied or taken over by middle eastern immigrants, because it is.

A fast google will explain a lot.
London's population is at about 7.5 million.
There seem to be around 88,000 people from Bangladesh and 67,000 from Pakistan.

So, with 150,000 middle eastern people (Wide acceptance of the middle east) out of 7.5 million - How exactly does than make an occupation?

Not really acceptance. There are areas in and around London that nobody steps in, because the Muslims have turned it into a little copy of the shithole they come from. They're even imposing their own barbaric Islamic Shariah laws. It's like that all over Europe. Comes from Muslim inability to co exist, assimilate, and respect and accept the culture and traditions of the countries they have invaded. Even the extremely progressive and liberal Europeans are fed up with them.

As much as I've locked horns with the Jews on USMB, what I've quoted Roudy on encompasses the main reasons I joined the EDL. We get huge support from our friends in the American Tea Party. Look us up: English Defense League.

 

[P F Tinmore]

You mean they took over land that the Turks owned for 600 years? Heh heh heh. Still no evidence of this Arab Palestinian nation then.

What was the name of that mandate again?

Those pesky facts seem to keep annoying you. Good.

British Mandate for Palestine (legal instrument) - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine, was a legal commission for the administration of the territory that had formerly constituted the Ottoman Sanjaks of Nablus, Acre, the Southern portion of the Beirut Vilayet, and the Mutasarrifate of Jerusalem, prior to the Armistice of Mudros. The draft of the Mandate was formally confirmed by the Council of the League of Nations on 24 July 1922, amended via the 16 September 1922 Transjordan memorandum[1][2] and which came into effect on 29 September 1923[1] following the ratification of the Treaty of Lausanne.[3][4] The mandate ended at midnight on 14 May 1948.

The formal objective of the League of Nations Mandate system was to administer parts of the defunct Ottoman Empire, which had been in control of the Middle East since the 16th century, "until such time as they are able to stand alone."[5] The mandate document formalised the creation of two distinct British protectorates - Palestine, as a national home for the Jewish people under direct British rule, and Transjordan, an Emirate governed semi-autonomously from Britain under the rule of the Hashemite family.[1]

The British Mandate for Palestine, or simply the Mandate for Palestine,

Indeed.