In just 72 hours : MSNBC: We Have to Break Through This Idea 'That Kids Belong to Their Parents'

[hazlnut]

As has been noted by this Board's more profound intellects, by this time next year we will be debating the finer points of "Protecting Children's Equal Rights Under The Law", part and parcel of which will; you can rest assured, be the Child's right to sexual consent...

Just three days after the SCOTUS divined a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT FOR DEGENERATES TO MARRY WITHIN A HOMO-GENDER CONSTRUCT, we find the Left priming up the separation of children from their 'rents.

"“We have to break through our private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families,” says the professor of political science at Tulane University, where she is founding director of the Anna Julia Cooper Project on Gender, Race, and Politics in the South. Kids belong to whole communities, she insists, and once we realize this we’ll make “better investments” in government indoctrination of children."

...

Stephan Kinsella argues that the primary social evil today is a lack of respect for the fundamental right of self-ownership. Obama and Harris-Perry represent the other side of this argument. They believe, as do all Marxists and socialists, that the state, what Harris-Perry calls the “community,” owns the individual.

Harris-Perry urges us to “break through” the “private idea” that individuals own themselves. Like Marx, she believes the individual is a “communal being” and all human worth is intractably linked to the community, the collective, and the state is the ultimate manifestation of the collective will. Read more via InfoWars..."

I say it here and it comes out ^ THERE ^.

What she's saying is too complicated for your small head.

Move along little boy.

 

[Skylar]

View attachment 43468

These meltdowns are starting to get embarrassing. I thought they'd be entertaining but that ship has sailed at this point, besides Sil.

Pedophilia to hitler to civil war to gay marriage. Its like some batshit conservative game of Mad Libs.

lol, we've reached that point in a crowd behavior where as long as the crowd supports it, nothing is unacceptable, and at this point, the RW crowd is willing to support anything any crazy RW'er does or says as long as it's politically correct.

That's just it; the right wing echo chamber doesn't question shit. I mean look at the OP. No source cited in it says a thing about child sex. Not a word. Not a peep. Yet Keyes accuses them of it all the same.

And not a single conservative in the thread said a thing. There is literally no accusation that is too batshit, that is too insane for these poor, hapless lemmings to nod mindlessly to while in their echo chamber.

To even *question* an accusation is to lose your conservative credentials.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Hard to believe that Republicans won the mother of all election victories in 2014.

Or at least that was what we were told, repeatedly. You guys enjoying the spoils of your big victory?

 

[1stRambo]

Cool...

Now understand, the argument is that in the first 72 hours, the Ideological Left has already begun, to march their way to the rhetorical sea burning and pillaging everything it can burn and pillage in terms of recognition and respect for Natural Law... toward the goal of Legalizing Adult Sex with Children.

I told you on Day One... as most of you already knew, that the 'divining of the Fundamental Right to Marry' was not a Slippery Slope, but a leap from the Precipice... (That means we jumped off the cliff, Gilligan) that such would come first, through the ruse of providing Children with Equal Protection Under the Law, which requires that the responsibilities of the Parent be transferred to the state, thus providing the state the means to determine that children are 'Rightfully entitled to offer their Consent to sexual relations with Adult Homosexuals'.

SOOooo... in the first 72 hours after the Federal Government Licensed Degeneracy, we now have our first In-house Comrades Publicly Joining the Left's Ramp-up to Providing Children Equal Protection Under the Law.

We add to the list the following proponents:

Swim Expert
TheOldSchool

Anyone else?

Yo, the man above is telling me something? The "DEVIL" is trying to takeover the Country!!!
All HELL will break-loose!!!

"GTP"

Uh yeah... we're looking into the dead eyes of Old Testament Evil here. No question... .

And history tells us that No Nation or culture has ever survived the Licensing of Degeneracy.

Now to find out what nations it was that Licensed Degeneracy and failed to live to tell about it, ask any homosexual to cite for you the cultures throughout history that embraced Homosexuality... They'll spout out a list of the big ten fairly quickly.

It's a good practice to get the list from them, as they will accept themselves as credible source.

Name any ancient cultures that have survived intact up to the present.

Exactly my point. If a society embraces homosexuality....they eventually collapse. If a society doesn't embrace homosexuality....they eventually collapse.

When your 'effect' exists regardless of the presence of your 'cause', your cause isn't.

This is simple causation, but it still confounds and confuses Keyes.

Yo, when you are lost? It`s best to get on board, welcome!

"GTP"

 

[Skylar]

Cool...

Now understand, the argument is that in the first 72 hours, the Ideological Left has already begun, to march their way to the rhetorical sea burning and pillaging everything it can burn and pillage in terms of recognition and respect for Natural Law... toward the goal of Legalizing Adult Sex with Children.

I told you on Day One... as most of you already knew, that the 'divining of the Fundamental Right to Marry' was not a Slippery Slope, but a leap from the Precipice... (That means we jumped off the cliff, Gilligan) that such would come first, through the ruse of providing Children with Equal Protection Under the Law, which requires that the responsibilities of the Parent be transferred to the state, thus providing the state the means to determine that children are 'Rightfully entitled to offer their Consent to sexual relations with Adult Homosexuals'.

SOOooo... in the first 72 hours after the Federal Government Licensed Degeneracy, we now have our first In-house Comrades Publicly Joining the Left's Ramp-up to Providing Children Equal Protection Under the Law.

We add to the list the following proponents:

Swim Expert
TheOldSchool

Anyone else?

Yo, the man above is telling me something? The "DEVIL" is trying to takeover the Country!!!
All HELL will break-loose!!!

"GTP"

Uh yeah... we're looking into the dead eyes of Old Testament Evil here. No question... .

And history tells us that No Nation or culture has ever survived the Licensing of Degeneracy.

Now to find out what nations it was that Licensed Degeneracy and failed to live to tell about it, ask any homosexual to cite for you the cultures throughout history that embraced Homosexuality... They'll spout out a list of the big ten fairly quickly.

It's a good practice to get the list from them, as they will accept themselves as credible source.

Name any ancient cultures that have survived intact up to the present.

Exactly my point. If a society embraces homosexuality....they eventually collapse. If a society doesn't embrace homosexuality....they eventually collapse.

When your 'effect' exists regardless of the presence of your 'cause', your cause isn't.

This is simple causation, but it still confounds and confuses Keyes.

Yo, when you are lost? It`s best to get on board, welcome!

"GTP"

I know all those words individually. But for the life of me I have no idea what you're trying to say.

Are you using Google translate or something?

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

Name any ancient cultures that have survived intact up to the present.

Well, if Ancient covers 5000 years, there's Israel... is that ancient enough for ya?

 

[Skylar]

Name any ancient cultures that have survived intact up to the present.

Well, if Ancient covers 5000 years, there's Israel... is that ancient enough for ya?

Israel didn't survive. It fell. Hard. This is like the third or fourth incarnation.

 

[Lumpy 1]

View attachment 43468

And Snopes already took that one apart:

snopes.com Did Hillary Clinton and Adolf Hitler Express Similar Views on Socialism

But way to fulfill Godwin's law. The right is in full panty shitting hysterics mode.

Snopes.com is a liberal biased site run by 2 people from their home

View attachment 43468

And Snopes already took that one apart:

snopes.com Did Hillary Clinton and Adolf Hitler Express Similar Views on Socialism

But way to fulfill Godwin's law. The right is in full panty shitting hysterics mode.

Snopes is totally unreliable but nice try. Read over this link to get you started on the drivel your willing to accept with no questions asked. It's a good start but also not totally reliable either but it does provide insight.

Snopes Liberal Bias and Trusting the Internet The Skeptical Libertarian Blog

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

The liberal victories this week are the cake;

the unprecedented meltdown on the Right is the icing.

...and we know how much the Right hates making those dang liberal cakes.

Liberal victories?

ROFL!

How weird is it, that when Liberal wins, Evil has been advanced?

And how wild is it that when Evil is advanced... Liberals win... And A COURT has divined a miracle, manifested from the gall common to DELUSION!

For instance, the SAME Judges who in 2013 found that the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), was unconstitutional because Marriage and Standards of Behavior relevant to sexuality was PURELY the domain of the Respective States. Only to find NOW... that THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT must recognize the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO MARRY!

Which, objectively speaking, simply means that the Leftists on the Court lied... deceitfully divining "law", in a fraudulent attempt to influence the Ignorant.

And WHAT DOES IT SAY ABOUT THE "LIBERALS" who claim such to be "A WIN"... ?

 

[Skylar]

View attachment 43468

And Snopes already took that one apart:

snopes.com Did Hillary Clinton and Adolf Hitler Express Similar Views on Socialism

But way to fulfill Godwin's law. The right is in full panty shitting hysterics mode.

Snopes.com is a liberal biased site run by 2 people from their home

View attachment 43468

And Snopes already took that one apart:

snopes.com Did Hillary Clinton and Adolf Hitler Express Similar Views on Socialism

But way to fulfill Godwin's law. The right is in full panty shitting hysterics mode.

Snopes is totally unreliable but nice try. Read over this link to get you started on the drivel your willing to accept with no questions asked. It's a good start but also not totally reliable either but it does provide insight.

Snopes Liberal Bias and Trusting the Internet The Skeptical Libertarian Blog

Then show us a source that affirms the where and when of the quote....with evidence.

 

[Idadunno]

As has been noted by this Board's more profound intellects, by this time next year we will be debating the finer points of "Protecting Children's Equal Rights Under The Law", part and parcel of which will; you can rest assured, be the Child's right to sexual consent...

Just three days after the SCOTUS divined a FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT FOR DEGENERATES TO MARRY WITHIN A HOMO-GENDER CONSTRUCT, we find the Left priming up the separation of children from their 'rents.

"“We have to break through our private idea that kids belong to their parents or kids belong to their families,” says the professor of political science at Tulane University, where she is founding director of the Anna Julia Cooper Project on Gender, Race, and Politics in the South. Kids belong to whole communities, she insists, and once we realize this we’ll make “better investments” in government indoctrination of children."

...

Stephan Kinsella argues that the primary social evil today is a lack of respect for the fundamental right of self-ownership. Obama and Harris-Perry represent the other side of this argument. They believe, as do all Marxists and socialists, that the state, what Harris-Perry calls the “community,” owns the individual.

Harris-Perry urges us to “break through” the “private idea” that individuals own themselves. Like Marx, she believes the individual is a “communal being” and all human worth is intractably linked to the community, the collective, and the state is the ultimate manifestation of the collective will. Read more via InfoWars..."

I say it here and it comes out ^ THERE ^.

I swear... you must be from alabama

 

[Skylar]

How weird is it, that when Liberal wins, Evil has been advanced?

But you consider anything you disagree with as 'evil'. That doesn't define anything objectively. That's just your subjective opinion. And you don't know what you're talking about.

What's particularly 'evil' about marriage or healthcare?

For instance, the SAME Judges who in 2009 found that the Federal Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), was unconstitutional because Marriage and Standards of Behavior relevant to sexuality was PURELY the domain of the Respective States.

Can you show us that 2009 ruling? Because I'm pretty sure you're making that shit up. And if you're referring to the Windsor decision, that wasn't in 2009 and that wasn't thier findings. They found that state marriage laws were subject to constitutional guarantees.

Only to find NOW... that THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT must recognize the FUNDAMENTAL RIGHT TO MARRY!

Actually, the fundamental right to marry has been recognized by the courts since at least the last 60s. Check 'Loving v. Virginia'. You simply don't know what you're talking about.

Which, objectively speaking, simply means that the Leftists on the Court lied... deceitfully divining "law", in a fraudulent attempt to influence the Ignorant.

Or.....that you have no idea what you're talking about, have misquoted the ruling, don't know the year it occured it, don't know what it said, and never bothered to check any of the precedent it cited.

Objectively speaking, you're clueless.

 

[Lumpy 1]

The liberal victories this week are the cake;

the unprecedented meltdown on the Right is the icing.

...and we know how much the Right hates making those dang liberal cakes.

I have no problem with Gays getting married, I preferred the domestic partners route where all Americans have a representative vote. This way, the decision will always be considered a political vote where the justices had to stretch the Constitution to fit their bias in the Supreme Court. The American people and States Rights were completely bypassed. ...and, yup, it happens all the time but it doesn't make it right.

 

[Skylar]

Cool...

Now understand, the argument is that in the first 72 hours, the Ideological Left has already begun, to march their way to the rhetorical sea burning and pillaging everything it can burn and pillage in terms of recognition and respect for Natural Law... toward the goal of Legalizing Adult Sex with Children.

I told you on Day One... as most of you already knew, that the 'divining of the Fundamental Right to Marry' was not a Slippery Slope, but a leap from the Precipice... (That means 'we jumped off the cliff', Gilligan) that such would come first, through the ruse of providing Children with Equal Protection Under the Law, which requires that the natural responsibilities of the Parent be transferred to the state, thus providing the state the means to determine that children are 'Rightfully entitled to offer their Consent to sexual relations with Adult Homosexuals'.

Understand, that ROE has already gone along way toward destroying the notion of parental sanctity; wherein the Government Licensed Degeneracy at the first level... by 'granting the Right' to MURDER YOUR CHILDREN. So... where you can murder your children to avoid your responsibility to them, you've closed the gap necessary to rationalize that your parental responsibilities aren't 'real' anyway, so what's the big deal about giving Government the Responsibility for them... . Odds are that there's going to be some serious 'financial incentive coming, to help the lowest common denominator along.

So recognize that pattern, as it's the 900lb Democrat in the middle of the room.

SOOooo... in the first 72 hours after the Federal Government Licensed Degeneracy, we now have our first In-house Comrades Publicly Joining the Left's Ramp-up to Providing Children Equal Protection Under the Law.

We add to the list the following proponents:

Swim Expert
TheOldSchool
Skylar
Idadunno

Anyone else?

You do realize that no one you've quoted has actually backed any of the nonsense you've made up about child sex. Not one of the sources you cited in the OP, not any of the posters you accuse, no one.

Its....just you. Citing you. Talking to yourself.

 

[Skylar]

The liberal victories this week are the cake;

the unprecedented meltdown on the Right is the icing.

...and we know how much the Right hates making those dang liberal cakes.

I have no problem with Gays getting married, I preferred the domestic partners route where all Americans have a representative vote. This way, the decision will always be considered a political vote where the justices had to stretch the Constitution to fit their bias in the Supreme Court. The American people and States Rights were completely bypassed. ...and, yup, it happens all the time but it doesn't make it right.

But why would someone's rights be subject to a vote? Remember, marriage is a right.

 

[Where_r_my_Keys]

How weird is it, that when Liberal wins, Evil has been advanced?

But you consider anything you disagree with as 'evil'.

Straw Reasoning as an opener?

Interesting approach. Not the way I'd have gone; but then, objectively speaking... fallacious reasoning disqualifies argument from consideration and I prefer my argument be considered.

To each their own, I guess.

Your concession is duly noted and summarily accepted.

 

[Lumpy 1]

The liberal victories this week are the cake;

the unprecedented meltdown on the Right is the icing.

...and we know how much the Right hates making those dang liberal cakes.

So your preference is division of the country over unity of the country much like Obama and the rainbow White House.

 

[Lumpy 1]

The liberal victories this week are the cake;

the unprecedented meltdown on the Right is the icing.

...and we know how much the Right hates making those dang liberal cakes.

I have no problem with Gays getting married, I preferred the domestic partners route where all Americans have a representative vote. This way, the decision will always be considered a political vote where the justices had to stretch the Constitution to fit their bias in the Supreme Court. The American people and States Rights were completely bypassed. ...and, yup, it happens all the time but it doesn't make it right.

But why would someone's rights be subject to a vote? Remember, marriage is a right.

The Justices essentially voted, are you saying their votes are invalid?

 

[Lumpy 1]

View attachment 43468

And Snopes already took that one apart:

snopes.com Did Hillary Clinton and Adolf Hitler Express Similar Views on Socialism

But way to fulfill Godwin's law. The right is in full panty shitting hysterics mode.

Snopes.com is a liberal biased site run by 2 people from their home

View attachment 43468

And Snopes already took that one apart:

snopes.com Did Hillary Clinton and Adolf Hitler Express Similar Views on Socialism

But way to fulfill Godwin's law. The right is in full panty shitting hysterics mode.

Snopes is totally unreliable but nice try. Read over this link to get you started on the drivel your willing to accept with no questions asked. It's a good start but also not totally reliable either but it does provide insight.

Snopes Liberal Bias and Trusting the Internet The Skeptical Libertarian Blog

Then show us a source that affirms the where and when of the quote....with evidence.

You're the one so concerned and providing a faulty link, do your own reliable research, you need the practice obviously.

 

[Skylar]

View attachment 43468

And Snopes already took that one apart:

snopes.com Did Hillary Clinton and Adolf Hitler Express Similar Views on Socialism

But way to fulfill Godwin's law. The right is in full panty shitting hysterics mode.

Snopes.com is a liberal biased site run by 2 people from their home

View attachment 43468

And Snopes already took that one apart:

snopes.com Did Hillary Clinton and Adolf Hitler Express Similar Views on Socialism

But way to fulfill Godwin's law. The right is in full panty shitting hysterics mode.

Snopes is totally unreliable but nice try. Read over this link to get you started on the drivel your willing to accept with no questions asked. It's a good start but also not totally reliable either but it does provide insight.

Snopes Liberal Bias and Trusting the Internet The Skeptical Libertarian Blog

Then show us a source that affirms the where and when of the quote....with evidence.

Your the one so concerned and providing a faulty link, do your own research.

So you have nothing to back your 'quote'. And denounce Snopes because it doesn't have evidence.

If not for double standards you'd have none at all.