Is Flynn's resignation enough?

[MarcATL]

Trump has no boundaries. He has appointed a shitload of people who also have no boundaries. The problem is that they assume that they were appointed because they have no boundaries, and will act accordingly. What they do not understand is that Trump will throw them under the bus in a New York second, if they act in a way that is not in his best interest. They don't get that, and even when the heads really start to roll, won't get it, until it is too late for them. Nixon was exactly the same way.

every president in history has fired people who did not do his bidding. There is nothing new here.

what really scares you dems and libs is that Trump is being successful and bringing jobs to America, increasing our security, and improving international relations.

Him doing what he said he was going to do has you fools scared shitless. Because his success means that the dem party will continue to shrink and lose what little power it still has. and you idiots have Obama and Clinton to thank for your party's demise.

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[Redfish]

Nope. We need to find out who leaked to the media.

The leaks are the important thing. Of course you would rather wallow in your Trump hatred.

Let me clearly point out what an IDIOT you are (but you probably already know that you're an idiot.)

What you wrote above is the equivalent of a moron conservative believing that what Wikileaks was pouring out is of NO consequence, the important task is to SILENCE Wikileaks......

Find a grown up to explain the above to you......or go back to bed......LOL

of course what wikileaks put out was of consequence. It was also the truth about corruption, lying, and collusion by the DNC, the Hillary campaign, and the media.

are you saying that the voters are not entitled to know the truth about the candidates?

So that's an endorsement of hacking and leaking anything about Trump and his people to learn the truth about them.

sure, as long as its true. We have a right to know the truth. But when you libs and the corrupt media put out lies and propaganda, that is another story.

But we all understand why you do it. When the truth is known, liberalism always loses because it is based on a lie.

 

[Redfish]

Trump has no boundaries. He has appointed a shitload of people who also have no boundaries. The problem is that they assume that they were appointed because they have no boundaries, and will act accordingly. What they do not understand is that Trump will throw them under the bus in a New York second, if they act in a way that is not in his best interest. They don't get that, and even when the heads really start to roll, won't get it, until it is too late for them. Nixon was exactly the same way.

every president in history has fired people who did not do his bidding. There is nothing new here.

what really scares you dems and libs is that Trump is being successful and bringing jobs to America, increasing our security, and improving international relations.

Him doing what he said he was going to do has you fools scared shitless. Because his success means that the dem party will continue to shrink and lose what little power it still has. and you idiots have Obama and Clinton to thank for your party's demise.

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

glad to have amused you. The party of Kennedy and Truman is dead. Obama and Clinton killed it. The dem party is now the party of Alinsky and Soros and they will complete its demise with the help of idiots like Pelosi, Waters, Franken, and Waren.

 

[Redfish]

Trump has no boundaries. He has appointed a shitload of people who also have no boundaries. The problem is that they assume that they were appointed because they have no boundaries, and will act accordingly. What they do not understand is that Trump will throw them under the bus in a New York second, if they act in a way that is not in his best interest. They don't get that, and even when the heads really start to roll, won't get it, until it is too late for them. Nixon was exactly the same way.

every president in history has fired people who did not do his bidding. There is nothing new here.

what really scares you dems and libs is that Trump is being successful and bringing jobs to America, increasing our security, and improving international relations.

Him doing what he said he was going to do has you fools scared shitless. Because his success means that the dem party will continue to shrink and lose what little power it still has. and you idiots have Obama and Clinton to thank for your party's demise.

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

glad to have amused you. The party of Kennedy and Truman is dead. Obama and Clinton killed it. The dem party is now the party of Alinsky and Soros and they will complete its demise with the help of idiots like Pelosi, Waters, Franken, and Waren.

Wow, gnat knows how to post a smiley face. Brilliant retort, gnat.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The OP is a conspiracy nut. Per usual in DC, Flynn is in trouble not for the underlying deed, but for the subsequent coverup.

Flynn should of resigned because he apparently misled Pence. You do not do this. Flynn should of just admitted that he spoke to the Russians and that the topic of Obama's sanctions came up, then dare the Gov to initiate a silly Logan Act prosecution. But Flynn fucked up. He did the typical political move and lied. It is today's M.O. In DC. Neither the Obama nor Bill Clinton administrations could function without lies serving as the foundations for their respective presidencies.

There is no proof that Flynn did anything inappropriate except to mislead Pence. He is certainly above the petty nonsensical gripes suggested by the leftist scum like the OP notwithstanding his alleged lie.

Flynn should of resigned because he apparently misled Pence. You do not do this.

Trump did as well. Yates informed Trump about Flynn two weeks prior to Pence defending Flynn on national television.
Trump completely threw Pence under the bus.
Why did he do that?
Why did he allow Flynn to remain in his post for nearly three weeks after Yates briefed him?
Why did he continue to deny knowledge of Flynn's actions weeks after being briefed by Yates?


Just some of the questions that need to be addressed.

 

[MarcATL]

Trump has long dropped his denials that this was Russian hacking.

I don't understand why we have to re-litigate the same fucking thing 10 times over around here.

Because of hyper-partisanship.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[MarcATL]

Without partisan rancor and as American citizens, we should all ask ourselves a couple of crucial questions that a mere resignation by Flynn do NOT settle the matter.

The first question regards whether there exists a cabal within the Trump WH that plots strategy unbeknownst by Trump......or a group that simply keeps information FROM Trump....
Of course we have all heard that the DOJ had warned the incoming administration that Flynn could be subject to Russian blackmail...........which then leads to the second question...

Flynn has had the MOST secret of intelligence on our nation's tactics in protecting all of us.......The fear of Flynn being blackmailed into sharing those secrets with our enemies, however, DOES NOT STOP with his resignation.......he is still a walking and breathing LIABILITY to our security and Flynn should be carefully watched or some of our security measure be quickly changed.

Finally, as most conservative pundits are spewing, further investigations are necessary and crucial.....BUT, who are there to facilitate such investigations, mindful that the republican leadership in congress may NOT want investigations that could reveal their own internal flaws.

Nope. We need to find out who leaked to the media.

The leaks are the important thing. Of course you would rather wallow in your Trump hatred.

LoL!

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[Hutch Starskey]

The OP is a conspiracy nut. Per usual in DC, Flynn is in trouble not for the underlying deed, but for the subsequent coverup.

Flynn should of resigned because he apparently misled Pence. You do not do this. Flynn should of just admitted that he spoke to the Russians and that the topic of Obama's sanctions came up, then dare the Gov to initiate a silly Logan Act prosecution. But Flynn fucked up. He did the typical political move and lied. It is today's M.O. In DC. Neither the Obama nor Bill Clinton administrations could function without lies serving as the foundations for their respective presidencies.

There is no proof that Flynn did anything inappropriate except to mislead Pence. He is certainly above the petty nonsensical gripes suggested by the leftist scum like the OP notwithstanding his alleged lie.

Wow way to compartmentalize the bigger picture of constant Russian controversies surrounding Trump.

How many people does Trump have to get rid off due to revelations of ties with the Kremlin, before you start asking yourself why Trump picked all of them?

Don't be a douche. The "constant Russian controversies surrounding Trump" are media constructs.

That's what you dopes said about Flynn.
There is more to come. Way too many unanswered questions. Trump gets that as his manic tweets over leaks become increasingly desperate in an attempt to change the subject.

 

[westwall]

Without partisan rancor and as American citizens, we should all ask ourselves a couple of crucial questions that a mere resignation by Flynn do NOT settle the matter.

The first question regards whether there exists a cabal within the Trump WH that plots strategy unbeknownst by Trump......or a group that simply keeps information FROM Trump....
Of course we have all heard that the DOJ had warned the incoming administration that Flynn could be subject to Russian blackmail...........which then leads to the second question...

Flynn has had the MOST secret of intelligence on our nation's tactics in protecting all of us.......The fear of Flynn being blackmailed into sharing those secrets with our enemies, however, DOES NOT STOP with his resignation.......he is still a walking and breathing LIABILITY to our security and Flynn should be carefully watched or some of our security measure be quickly changed.

Finally, as most conservative pundits are spewing, further investigations are necessary and crucial.....BUT, who are there to facilitate such investigations, mindful that the republican leadership in congress may NOT want investigations that could reveal their own internal flaws.

Nope. Now trump needs to empanel a Grand Jury, send out subpoena's and track down the criminals who released sensitive data while spying on a member of his Admin. Those criminals need to spend the rest of their days in prison.

 

[Claudette]

Without partisan rancor and as American citizens, we should all ask ourselves a couple of crucial questions that a mere resignation by Flynn do NOT settle the matter.

The first question regards whether there exists a cabal within the Trump WH that plots strategy unbeknownst by Trump......or a group that simply keeps information FROM Trump....
Of course we have all heard that the DOJ had warned the incoming administration that Flynn could be subject to Russian blackmail...........which then leads to the second question...

Flynn has had the MOST secret of intelligence on our nation's tactics in protecting all of us.......The fear of Flynn being blackmailed into sharing those secrets with our enemies, however, DOES NOT STOP with his resignation.......he is still a walking and breathing LIABILITY to our security and Flynn should be carefully watched or some of our security measure be quickly changed.

Finally, as most conservative pundits are spewing, further investigations are necessary and crucial.....BUT, who are there to facilitate such investigations, mindful that the republican leadership in congress may NOT want investigations that could reveal their own internal flaws.

Nope. We need to find out who leaked to the media.

The leaks are the important thing. Of course you would rather wallow in your Trump hatred.

LoL!

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Of course its funny to a lefty like you. The prime suspect is Rhodes, an Obama holdover. Leaks are a national security issue and Rhodes, if guilty, will be in deep fucking shit.

 

[Claudette]

Without partisan rancor and as American citizens, we should all ask ourselves a couple of crucial questions that a mere resignation by Flynn do NOT settle the matter.

The first question regards whether there exists a cabal within the Trump WH that plots strategy unbeknownst by Trump......or a group that simply keeps information FROM Trump....
Of course we have all heard that the DOJ had warned the incoming administration that Flynn could be subject to Russian blackmail...........which then leads to the second question...

Flynn has had the MOST secret of intelligence on our nation's tactics in protecting all of us.......The fear of Flynn being blackmailed into sharing those secrets with our enemies, however, DOES NOT STOP with his resignation.......he is still a walking and breathing LIABILITY to our security and Flynn should be carefully watched or some of our security measure be quickly changed.

Finally, as most conservative pundits are spewing, further investigations are necessary and crucial.....BUT, who are there to facilitate such investigations, mindful that the republican leadership in congress may NOT want investigations that could reveal their own internal flaws.

Nope. Now trump needs to empanel a Grand Jury, send out subpoena's and track down the criminals who released sensitive data while spying on a member of his Admin. Those criminals need to spend the rest of their days in prison.

Yup and his AG can send out special prosecutors to investigate the whole thing.

 

[Hutch Starskey]

How refreshing to hear of an administration official actually resigning. Where were the resignations the last eight years?

"nice" spin.....but inane. Flynn did blatantly lie to the American public, placing our intelligence community at risk......Yeah, give Flynn another medal for his efforts..

Why were there no resignations during Big Ears reign of shit?

Why did Cankles, Clapper, Holder, Lynch, and Rice not resign? Just to name a few criminals from one of the most corrupt administrations in our history....no doubt there are many more who should have resigned.

Why were there no resignations during Big Ears reign of shit?

That's a great indicator of the viability of all of the claims made against the Obama admin.
There was nothing to them. Certainly nothing that required such action.

 

[MarcATL]

Nope. We need to find out who leaked to the media.

The leaks are the important thing. Of course you would rather wallow in your Trump hatred.

Let me clearly point out what an IDIOT you are (but you probably already know that you're an idiot.)

What you wrote above is the equivalent of a moron conservative believing that what Wikileaks was pouring out is of NO consequence, the important task is to SILENCE Wikileaks......

Find a grown up to explain the above to you......or go back to bed......LOL

of course what wikileaks put out was of consequence. It was also the truth about corruption, lying, and collusion by the DNC, the Hillary campaign, and the media.

are you saying that the voters are not entitled to know the truth about the candidates?

So that's an endorsement of hacking and leaking anything about Trump and his people to learn the truth about them.

sure, as long as its true. We have a right to know the truth. But when you libs and the corrupt media put out lies and propaganda, that is another story.

But we all understand why you do it. When the truth is known, liberalism always loses because it is based on a lie.

What are the lies as you see it?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[MarcATL]

Without partisan rancor and as American citizens, we should all ask ourselves a couple of crucial questions that a mere resignation by Flynn do NOT settle the matter.

The first question regards whether there exists a cabal within the Trump WH that plots strategy unbeknownst by Trump......or a group that simply keeps information FROM Trump....
Of course we have all heard that the DOJ had warned the incoming administration that Flynn could be subject to Russian blackmail...........which then leads to the second question...

Flynn has had the MOST secret of intelligence on our nation's tactics in protecting all of us.......The fear of Flynn being blackmailed into sharing those secrets with our enemies, however, DOES NOT STOP with his resignation.......he is still a walking and breathing LIABILITY to our security and Flynn should be carefully watched or some of our security measure be quickly changed.

Finally, as most conservative pundits are spewing, further investigations are necessary and crucial.....BUT, who are there to facilitate such investigations, mindful that the republican leadership in congress may NOT want investigations that could reveal their own internal flaws.

Nope. We need to find out who leaked to the media.

The leaks are the important thing. Of course you would rather wallow in your Trump hatred.

LoL!

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

Of course its funny to a lefty like you. The prime suspect is Rhodes, an Obama holdover. Leaks are a national security issue and Rhodes, if guilty, will be in deep fucking shit.

LoLing!

#TooFunny

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

 

[Redfish]

Nope. We need to find out who leaked to the media.

The leaks are the important thing. Of course you would rather wallow in your Trump hatred.

Let me clearly point out what an IDIOT you are (but you probably already know that you're an idiot.)

What you wrote above is the equivalent of a moron conservative believing that what Wikileaks was pouring out is of NO consequence, the important task is to SILENCE Wikileaks......

Find a grown up to explain the above to you......or go back to bed......LOL

of course what wikileaks put out was of consequence. It was also the truth about corruption, lying, and collusion by the DNC, the Hillary campaign, and the media.

are you saying that the voters are not entitled to know the truth about the candidates?

So that's an endorsement of hacking and leaking anything about Trump and his people to learn the truth about them.

sure, as long as its true. We have a right to know the truth. But when you libs and the corrupt media put out lies and propaganda, that is another story.

But we all understand why you do it. When the truth is known, liberalism always loses because it is based on a lie.

What are the lies as you see it?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

That Russia controlled the results of our election
That Trump colluded with Putin
That Hillary won the legal popular vote


Now, the lies about liberalism in general
1. that all are treated equally
2. that government can run your life better than you can
3. that human beings do not desire to improve their station in life
4. that people want to be controlled by a tiny super elite minority
5. that socialism works
6. that all rich people are evil
7. that all corporations are evil
8. that man is changing the climate of planet earth
9. that Marx was right when he said "from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs"
10. that empathy is more important than common sense.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Let me clearly point out what an IDIOT you are (but you probably already know that you're an idiot.)

What you wrote above is the equivalent of a moron conservative believing that what Wikileaks was pouring out is of NO consequence, the important task is to SILENCE Wikileaks......

Find a grown up to explain the above to you......or go back to bed......LOL

of course what wikileaks put out was of consequence. It was also the truth about corruption, lying, and collusion by the DNC, the Hillary campaign, and the media.

are you saying that the voters are not entitled to know the truth about the candidates?

So that's an endorsement of hacking and leaking anything about Trump and his people to learn the truth about them.

sure, as long as its true. We have a right to know the truth. But when you libs and the corrupt media put out lies and propaganda, that is another story.

But we all understand why you do it. When the truth is known, liberalism always loses because it is based on a lie.

What are the lies as you see it?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

That Russia controlled the results of our election
That Trump colluded with Putin
That Hillary won the legal popular vote


Now, the lies about liberalism in general
1. that all are treated equally
2. that government can run your life better than you can
3. that human beings do not desire to improve their station in life
4. that people want to be controlled by a tiny super elite minority
5. that socialism works
6. that all rich people are evil
7. that all corporations are evil
8. that man is changing the climate of planet earth
9. that Marx was right when he said "from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs"
10. that empathy is more important than common sense.

Why lie about liberalism? is that because you can't make an honest case against it?

 

[NYcarbineer]

Nope. We need to find out who leaked to the media.

The leaks are the important thing. Of course you would rather wallow in your Trump hatred.

Let me clearly point out what an IDIOT you are (but you probably already know that you're an idiot.)

What you wrote above is the equivalent of a moron conservative believing that what Wikileaks was pouring out is of NO consequence, the important task is to SILENCE Wikileaks......

Find a grown up to explain the above to you......or go back to bed......LOL

of course what wikileaks put out was of consequence. It was also the truth about corruption, lying, and collusion by the DNC, the Hillary campaign, and the media.

are you saying that the voters are not entitled to know the truth about the candidates?

So that's an endorsement of hacking and leaking anything about Trump and his people to learn the truth about them.

sure, as long as its true. We have a right to know the truth. But when you libs and the corrupt media put out lies and propaganda, that is another story.

But we all understand why you do it. When the truth is known, liberalism always loses because it is based on a lie.

Trump's ranting about illegal leaking and your response is to tell him he's full of shit and there's no such thing as illegal leaking.

Very interesting.

 

[Redfish]

of course what wikileaks put out was of consequence. It was also the truth about corruption, lying, and collusion by the DNC, the Hillary campaign, and the media.

are you saying that the voters are not entitled to know the truth about the candidates?

So that's an endorsement of hacking and leaking anything about Trump and his people to learn the truth about them.

sure, as long as its true. We have a right to know the truth. But when you libs and the corrupt media put out lies and propaganda, that is another story.

But we all understand why you do it. When the truth is known, liberalism always loses because it is based on a lie.

What are the lies as you see it?

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

That Russia controlled the results of our election
That Trump colluded with Putin
That Hillary won the legal popular vote


Now, the lies about liberalism in general
1. that all are treated equally
2. that government can run your life better than you can
3. that human beings do not desire to improve their station in life
4. that people want to be controlled by a tiny super elite minority
5. that socialism works
6. that all rich people are evil
7. that all corporations are evil
8. that man is changing the climate of planet earth
9. that Marx was right when he said "from each according to his abilities, to each according to his needs"
10. that empathy is more important than common sense.

Why lie about liberalism? is that because you can't make an honest case against it?

my points were accurate. The best case against liberalism is that it has failed every place and every time it has ever been tried. It is a failed ideology that has never worked and will never work.

 

[nat4900]

he best case against liberalism is that it has failed every place and every time it has ever been tried. It is a failed ideology that has never worked and will never work.

Try again, Mr. Tuna...................LOL

The 5 Most Liberal Countries In the World

These 5 nations, sorted by their Social Progress Index score for personal freedom and choice, all have a wealth of history, insight and liberty: They are nations where the governments have found a sweet point, with a sphere of influence that appears to encourage economic prosperity while allowing the individual a spacious private sphere with aspects like freedom of expression, opportunity and social equality are the aims of the day.

5. Switzerland 66.4
4. Canada 67.8
3. Australia 68.5
2. Costa Rica 69.4
1. Sweden 72.8

 

[Redfish]

he best case against liberalism is that it has failed every place and every time it has ever been tried. It is a failed ideology that has never worked and will never work.

Try again, Mr. Tuna...................LOL

The 5 Most Liberal Countries In the World

These 5 nations, sorted by their Social Progress Index score for personal freedom and choice, all have a wealth of history, insight and liberty: They are nations where the governments have found a sweet point, with a sphere of influence that appears to encourage economic prosperity while allowing the individual a spacious private sphere with aspects like freedom of expression, opportunity and social equality are the aims of the day.

5. Switzerland 66.4
4. Canada 67.8
3. Australia 68.5
2. Costa Rica 69.4
1. Sweden 72.8

1, 2, 4, and 5 are all small countries with a homogeneous population. More like a big family than a country. It almost works because they all think alike and look alike. They also pay income taxes of 60% or more on all forms of income. Australia is not a liberal country philosophically, Aussies are very conservative socially, financially, and are very nationalistic.

Exactly what does "social equality" mean? That everyone is equally miserable? Remember for socialism (liberalism) to work there has to be a very small group of super elites who control everyone else. Socialism really means dictatorship by minority. Is that really what you want?