Is Flynn's resignation enough?

Without partisan rancor and as American citizens, we should all ask ourselves a couple of crucial questions that a mere resignation by Flynn do NOT settle the matter.

The first question regards whether there exists a cabal within the Trump WH that plots strategy unbeknownst by Trump......or a group that simply keeps information FROM Trump....
Of course we have all heard that the DOJ had warned the incoming administration that Flynn could be subject to Russian blackmail...........which then leads to the second question...

Flynn has had the MOST secret of intelligence on our nation's tactics in protecting all of us.......The fear of Flynn being blackmailed into sharing those secrets with our enemies, however, DOES NOT STOP with his resignation.......he is still a walking and breathing LIABILITY to our security and Flynn should be carefully watched or some of our security measure be quickly changed.

Finally, as most conservative pundits are spewing, further investigations are necessary and crucial.....BUT, who are there to facilitate such investigations, mindful that the republican leadership in congress may NOT want investigations that could reveal their own internal flaws.

The FBI cleared Flynn of any wrongdoing, sploogy.

Try again, Herr Goebbels.
 
sure, as long as its true. We have a right to know the truth. But when you libs and the corrupt media put out lies and propaganda, that is another story.

But we all understand why you do it. When the truth is known, liberalism always loses because it is based on a lie.

Trump's ranting about illegal leaking and your response is to tell him he's full of shit and there's no such thing as illegal leaking.

Very interesting.


I did not say that illegal leaking should be permitted or tolerated. Leaking the hidden corruption of the DNC, the Hillary campaign, and the corrupt media was not illegal. If you think what wikileaks did was illegal, give me the statutes that it violated.

Leaking illegal wiretaps is what brought Flynn down.

You're an idiot. What's the difference between leaking a wiretap and leaking a hacked email account?


one is illegal, one is legal. Quite a difference, asshole. There is no law against tapping an unsecure email account and publishing the contents. The DNC brought this on themselves by allowing Hillary to have an unsecure server and not having adequate safeguards on theirs.

Hacking is indeed a crime.
publishing hacked documents isn't a crime unless they are classified. Also, the leak wasn't the result of a "hack." It was the result of some government employee divulging classified information to journalists. That's a felony that can land you in prison for a long time.
 

Forum List

Back
Top