Is gay marriage the most important issue in the USA?

[Skylar]

Same sex sibling marriage utilizes the exact same arguments presented in the SSM case.

Now tell me it can't become law.

Again with your obsession with incest. If you want to wax eloquent on all your thoughts on sibling sex......feel free to start a thread on the topic. This one is about same sex marriage.

It shows they really do not have any valid reasons (save its icky) to deny gays access to marriage. It is why they have to change the topic to incest, polygamy, PA laws, marrying children and/or animals.

Wrong. It shows why all the arguments in support of gay marriage are absurd. Those arguments also justify incest and polygamy.

If the arguments justifying gay marriage are so absurd.....why have 44 of 46 federal courts ruled in favor of gay marriage and against the bans?

The record of failure of your 'reasoning' is very nearly perfect.

Those judges ruled in favor of gay marriage because they are packed with liberal judges who don't give a fuck what the law says or what logic says, just like you.

44 of 46 times? A judge or two might rule match your description. But you're describing virtually the whole of the judiciary. And they almost all contradict you. Including many Reagan appointees.

Laughing.......only our resident gay marriage opponents would be so desperate as to try and argue that the FAILURE of their argument in virtually every federal court is evidence that they must be right.

Here's a much simpler explanation: your reasoning sucks. The anti-gay marriage argument is a self contradictory mess that doesn't hold up.

 

[bripat9643]

I think your in the wrong thread to be deflecting.

Same sex sibling marriage utilizes the exact same arguments presented in the SSM case.

Now tell me it can't become law.

Again with your obsession with incest. If you want to wax eloquent on all your thoughts on sibling sex......feel free to start a thread on the topic. This one is about same sex marriage.

It shows they really do not have any valid reasons (save its icky) to deny gays access to marriage. It is why they have to change the topic to incest, polygamy, PA laws, marrying children and/or animals.

Wrong. It shows why all the arguments in support of gay marriage are absurd. Those arguments also justify incest and polygamy.

Incest but not polygamy. Marriage is still two adults here, so far. But hey, let's be Biblical and then you can marry a flock and have another on the side. Good times...

Who says marriage is between two adults? The GAYstapo just makes stuff up.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The queers claim marriage has nothing to do with children.

And it doesn't.

 

[bripat9643]

How come people can't fuck consenting animals? I vote that we have a big gay public orgy with animals. That's what the liberals want.

It sounds like that's what YOU want.

Here is a clue for you so you don't get into trouble...

Animals, children and dead people can't consent. Hope that keeps you out of jail.

Animals don't have to consent to being slaughtered for food, so why should they have to consent to being married?

Your argument works if you want to fuck a goat, not marry one. Getting married requires that both parties can consent to a legally binding contract.

Really? Why should that be?

While it doesn't necessarily have to be, it follows tradition, legal traditions.

Having two sexes also follows tradition, numskull. You and the GAYstapo are throwing tradition out the window, so anything goes now.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Who says marriage is between two adults? The GAYstapo just makes stuff up.

Who says? Your society.

 

[Seawytch]

We should just view homosexuality as a mental illness and send them to the psych ward.

You, as an anti gay bigot, are free to "think" whatever you like. Science disagrees...but that has never deterred bigots.

I don't care that much if you want to go have gay butt sex. I'm just saying what it really is.

I don't want to have any anal sex...lots of straight people do though.

 

[bripat9643]

The queers claim marriage has nothing to do with children.

And it doesn't.

Then why should incest be an issue for marriage?

 

[Skylar]

It shows they really do not have any valid reasons (save its icky) to deny gays access to marriage. It is why they have to change the topic to incest, polygamy, PA laws, marrying children and/or animals.

Wrong. It shows why all the arguments in support of gay marriage are absurd. Those arguments also justify incest and polygamy.

If the arguments justifying gay marriage are so absurd.....why have 44 of 46 federal courts ruled in favor of gay marriage and against the bans?

The record of failure of your 'reasoning' is very nearly perfect.

Those judges ruled in favor of gay marriage because they are packed with liberal judges who don't give a fuck what the law says or what logic says, just like you.

Many, probably most, weren't Liberal, just much smarter than you, and therefore able to follow the spirit of the law.

More than half of them are liberal, moron. Obama has been in office for 8 years. How many do you suppose he has put on the court?

Says who? Remmeber, Brit.....you can't actually back up a thing you say. You merely make shit up and then insist we accept your imagination as unimpeachable fact.

Laughing....um, no.

And no, dip....Obama's been in office for 6 years. Even math is beyond you.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

It sounds like that's what YOU want.

Here is a clue for you so you don't get into trouble...

Animals, children and dead people can't consent. Hope that keeps you out of jail.

Animals don't have to consent to being slaughtered for food, so why should they have to consent to being married?

Your argument works if you want to fuck a goat, not marry one. Getting married requires that both parties can consent to a legally binding contract.

Really? Why should that be?

While it doesn't necessarily have to be, it follows tradition, legal traditions.

Having two sexes also follows tradition, numskull. You and the GAYstapo are throwing tradition out the window, so anything goes now.

Requiring that they be opposite sex is traditional, but it goes against an American value, equality before the law. Bye bye tradition, in this case.

 

[bripat9643]

Again the federal tyrannical courts is about to strip more state rights away and for what? So progressives have a spring board to attack churches and force them to perform these sinful ceremonies

Not a single church has been forced to marry any couple, gay or otherwise, against their wishes. Not one.

yet

Gays have been getting married in MA for over a decade now. Not one church has been forced to marry a gay couple. Fear mongering is pretty what ya'll have left.

Far longer than that. Gays were never prohibited from marriage.

Why do you guys bother with these junks argument the courts have already tossed? Gay marriage would be a non-issue, if you homophobic children would just let it fucking go...

Yeah, and the First Amendment would be a non-issue if no one complained when the government tried to censor us.

What a moron.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

The queers claim marriage has nothing to do with children.

And it doesn't.

Then why should incest be an issue for marriage?

It isn't as far as I'm concerned, any two adults can marry. I suspect society will take an alternate view as it already does, of incestuous sexual relations, which is real problem.

 

[bripat9643]

Animals don't have to consent to being slaughtered for food, so why should they have to consent to being married?

Your argument works if you want to fuck a goat, not marry one. Getting married requires that both parties can consent to a legally binding contract.

Really? Why should that be?

While it doesn't necessarily have to be, it follows tradition, legal traditions.

Having two sexes also follows tradition, numskull. You and the GAYstapo are throwing tradition out the window, so anything goes now.

Requiring that they be opposite sex is traditional, but it goes against an American value, equality before the law. Bye bye tradition, in this case.

Wrong. There's nothing unequal about recognizing the facts of biology.

 

[bripat9643]

The queers claim marriage has nothing to do with children.

And it doesn't.

Then why should incest be an issue for marriage?

It isn't as far as I'm concerned, any two adults can marry. I suspect society will take an alternate view as it already does, of incestuous sexual relations.

ROFL! Im other words, you don't really believe your own arguments. Otherwise you would be defending incestuous marriages.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Not a single church has been forced to marry any couple, gay or otherwise, against their wishes. Not one.

yet

Gays have been getting married in MA for over a decade now. Not one church has been forced to marry a gay couple. Fear mongering is pretty what ya'll have left.

Far longer than that. Gays were never prohibited from marriage.

Why do you guys bother with these junks argument the courts have already tossed? Gay marriage would be a non-issue, if you homophobic children would just let it fucking go...

Yeah, and the First Amendment would be a non-issue if no one complained when the government tried to censor us.

What a moron.

Gay marriage is a done deal. It's none of your fucking business in the first place.

 

[SUPERMAN1929]

All these fags butt holes are getting wet with the idea of getting to have anal sex after being legally married. It's sickening.

 

[bripat9643]

Wrong. It shows why all the arguments in support of gay marriage are absurd. Those arguments also justify incest and polygamy.

If the arguments justifying gay marriage are so absurd.....why have 44 of 46 federal courts ruled in favor of gay marriage and against the bans?

The record of failure of your 'reasoning' is very nearly perfect.

Those judges ruled in favor of gay marriage because they are packed with liberal judges who don't give a fuck what the law says or what logic says, just like you.

Many, probably most, weren't Liberal, just much smarter than you, and therefore able to follow the spirit of the law.

More than half of them are liberal, moron. Obama has been in office for 8 years. How many do you suppose he has put on the court?

Says who? Remmeber, Brit.....you can't actually back up a thing you say. You merely make shit up and then insist we accept your imagination as unimpeachable fact.

Laughing....um, no.

And no, dip....Obama's been in office for 6 years. Even math is beyond you.

Remember, you're an idiot.

 

[bripat9643]

yet

Gays have been getting married in MA for over a decade now. Not one church has been forced to marry a gay couple. Fear mongering is pretty what ya'll have left.

Far longer than that. Gays were never prohibited from marriage.

Why do you guys bother with these junks argument the courts have already tossed? Gay marriage would be a non-issue, if you homophobic children would just let it fucking go...

Yeah, and the First Amendment would be a non-issue if no one complained when the government tried to censor us.

What a moron.

Gay marriage is a done deal. It's none of your fucking business in the first place.

"It's done deal?" Is that supposed to be an argument of some kind? How is it not my business? All laws are my business, numskull.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

Your argument works if you want to fuck a goat, not marry one. Getting married requires that both parties can consent to a legally binding contract.

Really? Why should that be?

While it doesn't necessarily have to be, it follows tradition, legal traditions.

Having two sexes also follows tradition, numskull. You and the GAYstapo are throwing tradition out the window, so anything goes now.

Requiring that they be opposite sex is traditional, but it goes against an American value, equality before the law. Bye bye tradition, in this case.

Wrong. There's nothing unequal about recognizing the facts of biology.

This isn't biology, this is the law, and the concept of equality. We don't require that married people will, or even can, produce children. Marriage is not about them, obviously.

 

[PaintMyHouse]

All these fags butt holes are getting wet with the idea of getting to have anal sex after being legally married. It's sickening.

Do grow up, please. That's a bathhouse, not a wedding reception.

 

[Pop23]

How come people can't fuck consenting animals? I vote that we have a big gay public orgy with animals. That's what the liberals want.

It sounds like that's what YOU want.

Here is a clue for you so you don't get into trouble...

Animals, children and dead people can't consent. Hope that keeps you out of jail.

Animals don't have to consent to being slaughtered for food, so why should they have to consent to being married?

See, Seawytch.....they have no interest in discussing gay marriage. These are red herrings for the sole purpose of changing the topic. For fuck's sake, his best argument against gay marriage is hamburgers.

They've conceded the gay marriage debate, running from it and refusing to discuss it.

Gay marriage is not the issue, now is it.