Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I also thought I answered I answered my question.I know Hillary can tell lies, but I find the argument that she is corrupt very subjective. I don't know who exactly she sold out to if she indeed sold sold out.
But never mind that. Some are calling her a criminal. What crime has she been convicted of?
Before you raise Benghazi or emails scandal, note that she has not been charged, let alone convicted, of any crime related to those issues.
As far as I know, Hillary Clinton was never charged nor convicted of a crime. That makes her a would be criminal or soon to be criminal, not a criminal!!
But then, can't we say the same about Trump?
Where was she the night Vince Foster died?
Was it her?
Was it William Jefferson Blythe III?
Was it Quagmire transgender sex doll that got hostile when there were no unisex restrooms around?
This demented mind does not need to know nor does it want to...
As for her being a criminal?
No, she has never been convicted of any crime to my knowledge. Now William Jefferson Blythe III was found guilty of perjury but Hillary is not at fault for what her Husband did... Or was she?
( Can't help the idiotic soap opera writing style when you know the answer to your own question )
Technically, she is not a criminal. Suspicion of her committing a crime does not make her a criminal.
Of course, she is a criminal. All politicians are criminals, with a few minor exceptions.I know Hillary can tell lies, but I find the argument that she is corrupt very subjective. I don't know who exactly she sold out to if she indeed sold sold out.
But never mind that. Some are calling her a criminal. What crime has she been convicted of?
Before you raise Benghazi or emails scandal, note that she has not been charged, let alone convicted, of any crime related to those issues.
As far as I know, Hillary Clinton was never charged nor convicted of a crime. That makes her a would be criminal or soon to be criminal, not a criminal!!
But then, can't we say the same about Trump?
She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy.
Let's change the person to Trump then.You are arguing that she is corrupt. That is an ethical judgement that anyone of us can make. There is a subjective element in this judgement.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.A criminal is someone found guilty of a crime."hasn't been convicted" LMAO
that's a weak argument the fringe use. Just because someone has been convicted, doesn't mean a thing.
She has yet to be charged with a crime.
The email scandal suggest Hillary may have a criminal nature, but she is yet to become a criminal!
Its really semantics and technical! To call her a criminal now is mostly due to expectations
Criminal suggest she has committed crimes. But we can not be exactly sure unless she is convicted. Until then, calling her criminal is a subjective argument in which we do not know the complete
No he was technically a suspect.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.A criminal is someone found guilty of a crime."hasn't been convicted" LMAO
that's a weak argument the fringe use. Just because someone has been convicted, doesn't mean a thing.
She has yet to be charged with a crime.
The email scandal suggest Hillary may have a criminal nature, but she is yet to become a criminal!
Its really semantics and technical! To call her a criminal now is mostly due to expectations
Was Al Capone a criminal before he was convicted of tax evasion?
You're trying to make excuse for the corrupt old bitch. Tiresome
Suspicion of her committing a crime does not make her a criminal. Being convicted of a crime does not make he a crimal. Doing the crime is what makes her a criminal.I also thought I answered I answered my question.I know Hillary can tell lies, but I find the argument that she is corrupt very subjective. I don't know who exactly she sold out to if she indeed sold sold out.
But never mind that. Some are calling her a criminal. What crime has she been convicted of?
Before you raise Benghazi or emails scandal, note that she has not been charged, let alone convicted, of any crime related to those issues.
As far as I know, Hillary Clinton was never charged nor convicted of a crime. That makes her a would be criminal or soon to be criminal, not a criminal!!
But then, can't we say the same about Trump?
Where was she the night Vince Foster died?
Was it her?
Was it William Jefferson Blythe III?
Was it Quagmire transgender sex doll that got hostile when there were no unisex restrooms around?
This demented mind does not need to know nor does it want to...
As for her being a criminal?
No, she has never been convicted of any crime to my knowledge. Now William Jefferson Blythe III was found guilty of perjury but Hillary is not at fault for what her Husband did... Or was she?
( Can't help the idiotic soap opera writing style when you know the answer to your own question )
Technically, she is not a criminal. Suspicion of her committing a crime does not make her a criminal.
You are arguing that she is corrupt. That is an ethical judgement that anyone of us can make. There is a subjective element in this judgement.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.A criminal is someone found guilty of a crime."hasn't been convicted" LMAO
that's a weak argument the fringe use. Just because someone has been convicted, doesn't mean a thing.
She has yet to be charged with a crime.
The email scandal suggest Hillary may have a criminal nature, but she is yet to become a criminal!
Its really semantics and technical! To call her a criminal now is mostly due to expectations
Criminal suggest she has committed crimes. But we can not be exactly sure unless she is convicted. Until then, calling her criminal is a subjective argument in which we do not know the complete
No he was technically a suspect.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.A criminal is someone found guilty of a crime."hasn't been convicted" LMAO
that's a weak argument the fringe use. Just because someone has been convicted, doesn't mean a thing.
She has yet to be charged with a crime.
The email scandal suggest Hillary may have a criminal nature, but she is yet to become a criminal!
Its really semantics and technical! To call her a criminal now is mostly due to expectations
Was Al Capone a criminal before he was convicted of tax evasion?
Let's change the person to Trump then.You are arguing that she is corrupt. That is an ethical judgement that anyone of us can make. There is a subjective element in this judgement.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.A criminal is someone found guilty of a crime."hasn't been convicted" LMAO
that's a weak argument the fringe use. Just because someone has been convicted, doesn't mean a thing.
She has yet to be charged with a crime.
The email scandal suggest Hillary may have a criminal nature, but she is yet to become a criminal!
Its really semantics and technical! To call her a criminal now is mostly due to expectations
Criminal suggest she has committed crimes. But we can not be exactly sure unless she is convicted. Until then, calling her criminal is a subjective argument in which we do not know the complete
No he was technically a suspect.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.A criminal is someone found guilty of a crime.
She has yet to be charged with a crime.
The email scandal suggest Hillary may have a criminal nature, but she is yet to become a criminal!
Its really semantics and technical! To call her a criminal now is mostly due to expectations
Was Al Capone a criminal before he was convicted of tax evasion?
You're trying to make excuse for the corrupt old bitch. Tiresome
Trump is charged with fraud, is Trump a criminal?
I say no. What about you?
Let's change the person to Trump then.You are arguing that she is corrupt. That is an ethical judgement that anyone of us can make. There is a subjective element in this judgement.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.A criminal is someone found guilty of a crime.
She has yet to be charged with a crime.
The email scandal suggest Hillary may have a criminal nature, but she is yet to become a criminal!
Its really semantics and technical! To call her a criminal now is mostly due to expectations
Criminal suggest she has committed crimes. But we can not be exactly sure unless she is convicted. Until then, calling her criminal is a subjective argument in which we do not know the complete
No he was technically a suspect.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.
Was Al Capone a criminal before he was convicted of tax evasion?
You're trying to make excuse for the corrupt old bitch. Tiresome
Trump is charged with fraud, is Trump a criminal?
I say no. What about you?
I couldn't care less....and fraud isn't murder...which I strongly suspect Hillary was involved in with Vince Foster.
Suspicion of her committing a crime does not make her a criminal. Being convicted of a crime does not make he a crimal. Doing the crime is what makes her a criminal.I also thought I answered I answered my question.I know Hillary can tell lies, but I find the argument that she is corrupt very subjective. I don't know who exactly she sold out to if she indeed sold sold out.
But never mind that. Some are calling her a criminal. What crime has she been convicted of?
Before you raise Benghazi or emails scandal, note that she has not been charged, let alone convicted, of any crime related to those issues.
As far as I know, Hillary Clinton was never charged nor convicted of a crime. That makes her a would be criminal or soon to be criminal, not a criminal!!
But then, can't we say the same about Trump?
Where was she the night Vince Foster died?
Was it her?
Was it William Jefferson Blythe III?
Was it Quagmire transgender sex doll that got hostile when there were no unisex restrooms around?
This demented mind does not need to know nor does it want to...
As for her being a criminal?
No, she has never been convicted of any crime to my knowledge. Now William Jefferson Blythe III was found guilty of perjury but Hillary is not at fault for what her Husband did... Or was she?
( Can't help the idiotic soap opera writing style when you know the answer to your own question )
Technically, she is not a criminal. Suspicion of her committing a crime does not make her a criminal.
Let's change the person to Trump then.You are arguing that she is corrupt. That is an ethical judgement that anyone of us can make. There is a subjective element in this judgement.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.
Criminal suggest she has committed crimes. But we can not be exactly sure unless she is convicted. Until then, calling her criminal is a subjective argument in which we do not know the complete
No he was technically a suspect.Was Al Capone a criminal before he was convicted of tax evasion?
You're trying to make excuse for the corrupt old bitch. Tiresome
Trump is charged with fraud, is Trump a criminal?
I say no. What about you?
I couldn't care less....and fraud isn't murder...which I strongly suspect Hillary was involved in with Vince Foster.
You cant really say if Hillary was invoked or not. You only suspect she was. That is a subjective judgement.
IAs far as I know, Hillary Clinton was never charged nor convicted of a crime. That makes her a would be criminal or soon to be criminal, not a criminal!!
yeah, if you include, travel, rent supplies and food.She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy.
Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina says that “so little” of the charitable donations to the Clinton Foundation “actually go to charitable works” — a figure CARLY for America later put at about 6 percent of its annual revenues — but Fiorina is simply wrong.
Fiorina and others are referring only to the amount donated by the Clinton Foundation to outside charities, ignoring the fact that most of the Clinton Foundation’s charitable work is performed in-house. One independent philanthropy watchdog did an analysis of Clinton Foundation funding and concluded that about 89 percent of its funding went to charity.
Simply put, despite its name, the Clinton Foundation is not a private foundation — which typically acts as a pass-through for private donations to other charitable organizations. Rather, it is a public charity. It conducts most of its charitable activities directly.
Where Does Clinton Foundation Money Go?
You are saying he is a criminal only after the fact of his conviction.You are arguing that she is corrupt. That is an ethical judgement that anyone of us can make. There is a subjective element in this judgement.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.A criminal is someone found guilty of a crime."hasn't been convicted" LMAO
that's a weak argument the fringe use. Just because someone has been convicted, doesn't mean a thing.
She has yet to be charged with a crime.
The email scandal suggest Hillary may have a criminal nature, but she is yet to become a criminal!
Its really semantics and technical! To call her a criminal now is mostly due to expectations
Criminal suggest she has committed crimes. But we can not be exactly sure unless she is convicted. Until then, calling her criminal is a subjective argument in which we do not know the complete
No he was technically a suspect.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.A criminal is someone found guilty of a crime."hasn't been convicted" LMAO
that's a weak argument the fringe use. Just because someone has been convicted, doesn't mean a thing.
She has yet to be charged with a crime.
The email scandal suggest Hillary may have a criminal nature, but she is yet to become a criminal!
Its really semantics and technical! To call her a criminal now is mostly due to expectations
Was Al Capone a criminal before he was convicted of tax evasion?
No, he was a criminal. The conviction just confirmed his criminality. You become a criminal upon the commitment of a crime not upon a conviction. It's Semantics. If you murder somebody then you are a criminal. It doesn't matter if you are a suspect or not. To be accurate, Hellary is a criminal IMO, but not a convicted criminal.
still arguing over the definition of a criminal
Well, Webster has defined the term. And I can point out tIAs far as I know, Hillary Clinton was never charged nor convicted of a crime. That makes her a would be criminal or soon to be criminal, not a criminal!!
What a stupid post. It's not for you to define who others consider a criminal. No one is saying she should go to jail based on their opinion, but you can't tell anyone they don't think she has committed crimes unless government tells them they can
Let's change the person to Trump then.You are arguing that she is corrupt. That is an ethical judgement that anyone of us can make. There is a subjective element in this judgement.
Criminal suggest she has committed crimes. But we can not be exactly sure unless she is convicted. Until then, calling her criminal is a subjective argument in which we do not know the complete
No he was technically a suspect.
You're trying to make excuse for the corrupt old bitch. Tiresome
Trump is charged with fraud, is Trump a criminal?
I say no. What about you?
I couldn't care less....and fraud isn't murder...which I strongly suspect Hillary was involved in with Vince Foster.
You cant really say if Hillary was invoked or not. You only suspect she was. That is a subjective judgement.
Look, vote for her that's your choice but stop trying to make excuses for her with stupid shit like this thread. Now go bug someone that gives a flying fuck
You are saying he is a criminal only after the fact of his conviction.You are arguing that she is corrupt. That is an ethical judgement that anyone of us can make. There is a subjective element in this judgement.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.A criminal is someone found guilty of a crime."hasn't been convicted" LMAO
that's a weak argument the fringe use. Just because someone has been convicted, doesn't mean a thing.
She has yet to be charged with a crime.
The email scandal suggest Hillary may have a criminal nature, but she is yet to become a criminal!
Its really semantics and technical! To call her a criminal now is mostly due to expectations
Criminal suggest she has committed crimes. But we can not be exactly sure unless she is convicted. Until then, calling her criminal is a subjective argument in which we do not know the complete
No he was technically a suspect.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.A criminal is someone found guilty of a crime.
She has yet to be charged with a crime.
The email scandal suggest Hillary may have a criminal nature, but she is yet to become a criminal!
Its really semantics and technical! To call her a criminal now is mostly due to expectations
Was Al Capone a criminal before he was convicted of tax evasion?
No, he was a criminal. The conviction just confirmed his criminality. You become a criminal upon the commitment of a crime not upon a conviction. It's Semantics. If you murder somebody then you are a criminal. It doesn't matter if you are a suspect or not. To be accurate, Hellary is a criminal IMO, but not a convicted criminal.
Before his conviction, calling him a criminal beforehand is technically wrong. Think if the prosecutor called him a criminal before the case. He could be held in contempt of court.
The use of the term is more technical. Most people are using their subjective judgement which is not always accurate.
For instance, do I suspect the Clinton's are corrupt? Yes, I find there is something questionable with the Clinton foundation as well as her time in the State department plus her relationship with Wall st firms.
Is Hillary Clinton a criminal. Technically, no. However she is currently under investigation for potential crimes concerning handling of emails during her tenure in the State department.
Booth is technically a suspect in the shooting of Lincoln.You are saying he is a criminal only after the fact of his conviction.You are arguing that she is corrupt. That is an ethical judgement that anyone of us can make. There is a subjective element in this judgement.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.A criminal is someone found guilty of a crime.
She has yet to be charged with a crime.
The email scandal suggest Hillary may have a criminal nature, but she is yet to become a criminal!
Its really semantics and technical! To call her a criminal now is mostly due to expectations
Criminal suggest she has committed crimes. But we can not be exactly sure unless she is convicted. Until then, calling her criminal is a subjective argument in which we do not know the complete
No he was technically a suspect.you don't have to be convicted to be a criminal. A criminal is a person that breaks the law. I will give you that she might not have broke the law. We are still waiting on that.. However, she is a smart ass lawyer. She skirts the law. Her slush fund for an example. Her fuckin charity makes 70M a year and only gives +-15% to the needy. Yet SOMEHOW she can get the US taxpayers to fund her charity employee salaries. That law was made so presidents didn't have to go through hardships after office.. They are NOT hard up. Yet, the are LEGALLY doing it. This is why I usually call her corrupt when referring to her many character flaws.
Was Al Capone a criminal before he was convicted of tax evasion?
No, he was a criminal. The conviction just confirmed his criminality. You become a criminal upon the commitment of a crime not upon a conviction. It's Semantics. If you murder somebody then you are a criminal. It doesn't matter if you are a suspect or not. To be accurate, Hellary is a criminal IMO, but not a convicted criminal.
Before his conviction, calling him a criminal beforehand is technically wrong. Think if the prosecutor called him a criminal before the case. He could be held in contempt of court.
The use of the term is more technical. Most people are using their subjective judgement which is not always accurate.
For instance, do I suspect the Clinton's are corrupt? Yes, I find there is something questionable with the Clinton foundation as well as her time in the State department plus her relationship with Wall st firms.
Is Hillary Clinton a criminal. Technically, no. However she is currently under investigation for potential crimes concerning handling of emails during her tenure in the State department.
Does this forum look anything like a court room to you? Of course when people say she is a criminal it is an opinion, but that is the context of this forum, and in my opinion she is a criminal whether she ever gets convicted or not. Was Nixon a criminal? He was never convicted, but still got a pardon. Was John Wilkes Booth a criminal? He was never convicted. Shall we amend all the history books to say Booth was a suspect in the shooting of Lincoln? Nonsense!
Well, Webster has defined the term. And I can point outIAs far as I know, Hillary Clinton was never charged nor convicted of a crime. That makes her a would be criminal or soon to be criminal, not a criminal!!
What a stupid post. It's not for you to define who others consider a criminal. No one is saying she should go to jail based on their opinion, but you can't tell anyone they don't think she has committed crimes unless government tells them they can
