Norman
Diamond Member
- Sep 24, 2010
- 31,254
- 15,182
- 1,590
WE aren't talking about how things were in your grandmother's time. We're talking about now.We are full. This country doesn't need more people.We aren't "full," but what we do need is time to absorb the people who are here......to make sure they support our culture, our Constitution and the Bill of Rights....if they do that, then they are as American as anyone born here........
We are nowhere near “full,” but we certainly don’t need ignorant trash like the OP and worthless squatters like you who hate America.for good, real Americans?
Who benefits from population expansion?
For over 50 years, those identifying as "conservatives" have been against population control and have actively thwarted every attempt to prevent overpopulation and to maintain the world's population at sustainable levels, both in the U.S. and in other countries, despite the desires of people around the world to limit their fertility. The entire birth-control movement began in the U.S. with people who had had enough babies and wanted to find away to stop them from coming.
This attempt to tie the Democratic Party to increasing population is a sick joke.
Scalia had eight children. He never got "fixed." Duggar? How many is that now? He needs to close up his zipper and close up shop. I'm seeing at least 26 to 28 people out of just two men, both of "conservative political views) and their offspring must occupy housing, create sewage, contribute to the crowding on our roadways, consume plastics, metals, and glass that get shipped off to foreign lands (that are now shipping it back to the western nations that sent it) and generally have the same impact on the environment that everybody else does. Each of them and their partners having two children together would have provided replacements for these four.
Conservatives are having babies.
Leftists are having immigrants.
And immigrants (and whomever "leftists" are) are having babies. If my ancestors had not immigrated to the U.S., I wouldn't be here, which holds true for all of us who are not descendants of native peoples. My mother's parents were fresh off the boat (came separately), found each other, got married, got pregnant, and then there was my mother, and then came me after she married an American whose ancestors settled in the U.S. in the 1800's. What are you fighting about? How much do you know of your own background?
Lyistrata response is exactly the type of response I was talking about earlier. It is even more irrelevant than the example I gave, should just let these idiots open their mouths instead of making the point.
"Immigration is always everywhere good, because my parent's parent's parent's parent was an immigrant. And even though I didn't know him, he was a good guy."
Just brilliant. And now as a result we have his anti-American grand grand daughter, so not exactly the best ending.
Last edited: