Czernobog
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #61
And, you are just making matters worse. First, you are confirming that, far from being the "Word of God", The Bible is just another work of Man. Further, you are admitting that it isn't even a reliable work of man. Rather it is just the propaganda (news account) of events, written by the victors to justify their actions. And, lastly, you are saying that the Bible is just a work that is meant to be "interpreted" ("Most of us do not take it literally").Soooo...basically, even though the Bible claims of itself, that every word is the word of God, this might have been the word of God...or it might have been a bunch of evil bastards just trying to justify their own blood-thirsty behaviour? This is the Bible that we are expected to take seriously, and view as a reliable source of morality?!?!? REALLY??????
Problems occur between those who take every word of the Bible literally and those who fight against the very concept of God.
Most of us do not take every word literally. Many of us understand the difference between a story account and a factual news account. In those days, no newspapers; it was stories that survived. Stories written by man, that we believe were inspired by God and mankind's various experiences with God and understanding of God. These stories, which some now ridicule, were told and written to tell of God's goodness, His justice and His protection of the oppressed.
If we could go back in time would return to those ill and dying in the desert and tell them that their oppressors--those who were killing their husbands, wives, and children--should be admired, should be supported, and should have monuments built to them to honor them for the cruel deaths and treatment they visited upon those struggling to survive in the desert. We can tell them that's the modern view of justice. We can tell them of how corruption should be allowed to reign, that standing up and beating back corruption is now the ultimate evil.
Before modern day people condemn, criticize, and accuse what is in the Bible, it might be best if they first take time to understand the original story as presented by those who lived through it.
Now, my responses would probably be very different if you, at least, pretended to maintain that the Bible is, in fact, the "Word of God". However, since it is just a work of man, I ask, yet again, why should anyone take it any more seriously than The Q'uran, or the Etta, or the Bhagavad Gita...or Grimm's Fairy Tales? Why should anyone not just accept it as a book of fairy tales, with some nice suggestions on how to live one's life, take from it what they like, incorporate that into their lives, and just leave the rest to the dust?
Why should anyone believe you Christians about Jesus, God, Heaven, Hell, or any of it, is the Bible is just a collection of stories put together by men? And yes, I ignored the obvious attempt to make this discussion political.